SKENARIO OPEN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (OPBL) PADA ANIMASI TEKS 2D MENGGUNAKAN PENDEKATAN POLYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/janapati.v9i3.28018Keywords:
Kata kunci, Model pembelajaran, skenario, OPBL, kemampuan pemecahan masalah, mahasiswaAbstract
Abstrak: Animasi dengan berbagai peranan menjadikannya sebagai ilmu pengetahuan teknologi yang sangat penting. Peran OPBL memberikan kesempatan kepada siswa untuk berpikir kreatif, mengemukakan ide kritisnya, keterampilan kolaboratif, dan penggunaan teknologi yang akan bermakna dalam dunia kerja dan di kehidupan nyata. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membandingkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa sebelum diberi perlakuan OPBL dan sesudah diberi perlakuan OPBL. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode eksperimen semu. Uji paired sample t-test digunakan untuk menganalisis data. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa ada perbedaan yang signifikan dalam kemampuan pemecahan masalah mahasiswa sebelum diberi perlakuan OPBL dan sesudah diberi perlakuan OPBL, dan perbedaan ini sangat dipengaruhi oleh sintaksis atau skenario model pembelajaran. Pembelajaran kooperatif membuat pembelajaran kelompok siswa lebih terstruktur sesuai dengan topik pembelajaran yang ditugaskan.
References
Albanese, M.A. & Mitchell S. (2010). Problem-based learning: a review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Acad. Med.; 68: 52–81.
Ana & Nurlela, L. (2012). Development model of Patisserie Project-based Learning. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 4 (2), 30–44.
Arcidiacono, G. et al. (2016). Application of axiomatic design for project based learning methodology. Procedia CIRP, 53, 166–172.
Arends, & Richard I. (2014). Belajar Untuk Mengajar, Learning to Teach. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Baser, et al. (2017). Collaborative project-based learning: an integrative science and technological education project. Research in Science & Technological Education.
Bilgin, I., E. Senocak. & M. Sozbilir. (2009). The Effects of Problem Based Learning Instruction on University Students’ Performance of Conceptual and Quantitative Problem in Gas Concepts. Eurasia Jurnal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, Vol 5(2): 153-164.
Chu, K.C.&Lai, P. (2002). How can Engineering Students Problem Solving Skills be Improved?. Journal of World Transactions on Engineering and Technology Education, 1(1).
Cresswell, J.W. (2016). Research Design, Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran Edisi 4. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Dolman, D.H.J.M. & Schmidt, H.G. (2010). What do we know about cognitive and motivational effects of a small group tutorials in problem based learning?. Health Sci Educ, 11: 321-336.
Donald T. Campbell &Julian C. Stanley. (1966). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Designs for Research. Rand Menally & Company. Chicago.
Doppelt, Y. (2003). Implementation and Assesment of Project Based Learning (PBL) on the Education, 13: 255-272.
Douglas, E.P., Koro, L.M., McNeill, N.J., Malcolm, Z.T & Therriault, D.J. (2012). Moving Beyond Formulans and Fixations: Solving Open Ended Engineering Problems. European Journal of Engineering Education, Volume 37: 6.
Hmelo-Silver, C.E & Barrows, H.S. (2008). Goals and Strategiesof Problem Based Learning Model and Project Based Learning Model. International Conference on Engineering Education.
Holmes, David. (2005). Communication Theory: Media, Technology, and Society. Sage Publications: London.
Huang, Y. M., Liao, Y. W., Huang, S. H., & Chen, H. C. (2014). A jigsaw-based cooperative learning approach to improve learning outcomes for mobile situated learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 128-140.
Jonassen, D.H. (2011). Design Problems for Secondary Students. National Center for Engineering and Technology Education.
Khamdi, Waras. (2010). Implementasi Project-Based Learning di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 17 (1), 98-110.
King, F.J., Goodson, L.&Rohani, F. (2013). Higher Order Thinking Skills. Publication of the Learning and Assessment.
Nizwardi J, Syahril, & Rahmat A.N. (2019). A Comparison of the Problem-solving Skills of Students in PjBL Versus CPjBL Model: An Experimental Study. Journal Of Technical Education And Training, 11: 036-043.
Pablos, V., B., G. &Pozo, M., M., d. (2017). Project-based learning (PBL) through the incorporation of digital technologies: An evaluation based on the experience of serving teachers. Computer in Human Behaviour, 68, 501 – 512.
Perez, E., Pearrocha, I., Perez, A., Serrano, J., Belenguer, E., &Sanchis, R. (2009). Cooperative project-based learning for machine design in the Industrial Engineering Program: Methodologies and experiences. In A. Lazinica and C. Calafate (Eds.), Technology, Education and Development (pp. 395 – 414). Vukovar: In-Teh.
Polya, George. (1973). How To Solve It. Princeton, New jersey: Princeton University Press.
Richmond, R & Striley, J. 1996. Making Meaning in Classroom: Social Processes in Small Group Discourse and Scientific Knowledge Building. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 33(8): 839-858.
Saripudin, A., Haryani, S., &Wardani, S. (2015). Characterized project based learning to improve critical thingking skill. ICMSE 2015 Proceedings (pp. 6 – 11).
Saverin, Werner J. James W. Tankard, Jr. 2011. Teori Komunikasi Sejarah, Metode, dan Terapan di Dalam Media Massa. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Shiue, Y. M., & Hsu, Y. C. (2017). Understanding factors that affecting continuance usage intention of game-based learning in the context of collaborative learning. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(10), 6445- 6455. doi:10.12973/ejmste/77949
Slunt, K.M. & Giancarlo, L. C. (2004). Student-centered Learning: A Comparison of Two Different Methods of Instruction. Journal of Chemical Education, 81(7): 985-988.
Tarhan, L., H. A. Kayali., R. O. Urek., & B. Acar. (2008). Problem-Based Learning in 9th Grade Chemistry Class: ‘Intermolecular Force’. ResSci Educ, Vol38: 285-300.
Thomas, Aspinall Edward. (2000). Polotical Opposition and the Transition from Authoritarian Rule: The Case of Indonesia. Sydney: The Australian National.
Trianto. (2013). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif, Progresif, Konsep, Landasan, dan Implementasinya Pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Widodo, S., & Kartikasari. 2017. Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar dengan Model Creative Problem Solving (CPS). Jurnal Prisma Universitas Suryakencana, 6(1), 57- 65.
Windari, F., Dwina, F., & Suherman. 2014. Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Kelas VIII SMPN 8 Padang Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014 dengan Menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran Inkuiri. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 3(2), 25-28.
Yevdokimov, Oleksiy. 2008. Problem Solving Activities in a Constructivist Framework: Exploring how Students Approach Difficult Problems. Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Janapati agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
