GPR Dewi, LDS Adnyani, KS Piscayanti


This study was aimed at investigating students’ perception on the design of asynchronous online discussion using Schoology. This study was a case study research. The data in this study were collected quantitatively and qualitatively by using observation, questionnaire, and interview guide. The observation was conducted toward the design of asynchronous online discussion implemented by 2 lecturers in ICT and Poetry courses. The questionnaire was administered to one hundred students of English Language Education, Ganesha University of Education who were taught using Schoology in academic year 2017/2018. The interviews were done toward six students. The result of this study showed that 1) the design of the asynchronous online discussion in ICT and Poetry courses was different in terms of flexibility of time, flexibility of place, instruction or guidance, and topic, 2) the students had positive perception on the design of asynchronous online discussion.


asynchronous design; perception; Schoology

Full Text:



Ardi, P. (2017). Promoting learner autonomy through schoology m-learning Platform in an EAP Class at an Indonesian university. Teaching English with Technology, 17(2), 55-76.

Beckett, G., Amaro-Jiménez, C., and Beckett, K. (2010). Students’ use of asynchronous discussions for academic discourse socialization, Distance Education, 31(3), 315-33.

Cerniglia, E. G. (2011). Modeling best practice through online learning: Building relationships. YC Young Children, 66(3), 54-56, 58-59.

Ellis, R.K. (2009). Field Guide to Learning Management Systems, ASTD Learning Circuits. Retrieved from 7E597444645D/23395/ LMS fieldguide_20091.pdf

Fedynich, L., Bradley, K.S., Bradley, J. (2015). Graduate students’ perception of online learning. Research in Higher Education Journal, 27.

Fayer, L. Dr. (2014). A multi-case study of student perceptions of online course design elements and success. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 8(1).

Hazari, A. (2014).Learning Curve: student perceptions have a huge impact on understanding. Retrieved from

Hrastinski, S. (2008). Asynchronous and synchronous e-learning. Educause Quarterly, 31(4). 51-55.

Istifci, I. (2017). Perceptions of Turkish EFL students on online language learning platforms and blended language learning. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 113-121.

Johnson, B. (2013). How do we know students are engaged? Edutopia. Retrieved from

Koyan, I. W. (2012). Statistikpendidikanteknikanalisis data kuantitatif. Singaraja: Undiksha Press.

Krasnova, T., Ananjeva, A. (2015). Students’ perception of learning in the online discussion environment. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6. 202-207.

Krause, J., Portolese, L., & Bonner, J. (2017). Student perceptions of the use of multimedia foronline course communication. Online Learning, 21(3), 36-49.

Mellard, D. D. (2006). Feasibility of explicit instruction in adult basic education: Instructor-learner interaction patterns. Adult Basic Education, 16, 21–37.

Miles, M. B., &Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Perdanawati, H. (2010). StudiKomparasiantaraPersepsiSiswaTentangKualitasPembelajaran IPS danIntensitasPenggunaanSumberBelajardenganPrestasiBelajar IPS SiswaKElas VIII di SMP Negeri 2 Surakarta tahunPelajaran 2009/2010 (Doctoral dissertation, UNS).

Rose, R., & Smith, A. (2007). Chapter 9 Online discussions. In C. Cavanaugh &R.Blomeyer (Eds.), What works in k-12 online learning (pp. 143-160). Washington, D.C.: International Society for Technology in Education.

Su, B., Bonk, C.J., Magjuka, R.J., Liu, X & Lee, S.H. (2005). The importance of interaction in web-based education: a program-level case study of online MBA courses. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(1), 1—19.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 993 times
PDF file view : 615 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2018 International Journal of Language and Literature

Currently, International Journal of Language and Literature indexed by:

Crossref IJLL         

Creative Commons License
International Journal of Language and Literature is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.