A STUDY OF THE REINFORCEMENT USED BY ENGLISH TEACHER IN 6A CLASS AT SD LAB UNDIKSHA SINGARAJA

M. B. A Pratiwi; Sudirman Sudirman; L. D. S Adnyani

doi:10.23887/ijll.v2i3.16317

Penulis

M. B. A Pratiwi
Sudirman Sudirman
L. D. S Adnyani

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v2i3.16317

Abstrak

This study was a descriptive study aimed at describing the components and the implementation of reinforcement used by English teacher in 6A class at SD LAB Undiksha Singaraja. The subjects of this study were an English teacher and 39 students. The data of this study were collected by observation and interview. The result of this study showed that the English teacher in 6A class at SD LAB Undiksha Singaraja used various kinds of reinforcement such as verbal, gestural, contact, and proximity reinforcement. Positive and negative reinforcement were consisted by each of those types. For positive reinforcement, the teacher used “good, very good, well done, good enough, that’s right, nice, smiling, nodding head, thumb up, applause, touching the students, standing next to the students, and sitting close with the students”. For negative reinforcement, the teacher used “sssst, calling students’ name, giving warning, giving explanation, and putting forefinger in front of the lips”. Besides, the teacher used four ways in implementing the reinforcement: given with warmth and enthusiastic, emphasized on meaningfulness, given to both group and individual, and given with various types and purposes.

Key words: elementary school, reinforcement

Referensi

Bhutto, M. I. (2011). Effects of Social Reinforcers on Students'Learning Outcomes at Secondary School Level. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 1(2), 71.

Diedrich, J. L. (2010). Motivating students using positive reinforcement.education and human development master’s theses. State University of New York. Brockport: Digital Commonns.

Djamarah, S. (2005). Guru dan anak didik dalam interaksi anak didik. Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Hoque, R. (2013). Effect of Reinforcement on Teaching–Learning Process. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 7(1), 13-16.

Kinyanjui, M. W., Aloka, P. J., Mutisya, S. K., Ndeke, F. N., & Nyang’ara, N. M. (2015). Classroom Reinforcement Schedules and Their Effectiveness in Selected Kenyan Primary Schools. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(3), 41.

Manzoor, F., Ahmed, M., & Gill, B. R. (2014). Use of motivational expressions as positive reinforcement in learning English at primary level in rural areas of Pakistan. British Journal of English Linguistics, 2(3), 30-42.

Padmadewi, N. N., Artini, L. P., Agustini, D. E. (2017). Micro Teaching.Yograkarta: Raja Gravindo.

Peters, L. C. (2010). Reinforcement in the classroom improves student motivation and performance. Innovations and Perspectives.

Sanjaya, W. (2006). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Usman, H. (2013). Manajemen: Teori, PraktikdanRisetPendidikan –Ed.4, Cet.1-.Jakarta: BumiAksara.

Wahyudi, D. (2013). An AnalysisofReinforcement Implemented by English Teachers at Sman 1 Kecamatan V Koto Kampung Dalam Padang Pariaman Regency. English Language Teaching (ELT), 1(2). (101-107).