Portfolio Assessment to Measuring Capabilities Communications and Collaborations of Grade V Students in Elementary School

M. Khairu  Rizal; Dwi  Yulianti; Handoko; Udang  Rosidin

doi:10.23887/jear.v7i4.70112

Authors

M. Khairu Rizal Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Dwi Yulianti Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Handoko Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia
Udang Rosidin Universitas Lampung, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v7i4.70112

Keywords:

Portfolio Assessment, Communications, Collaboration

Abstract

One form of assessment that can assess students' abilities as a whole, process and results, is portfolio assessment. The problem in this study originates from the results of a needs analysis on student learning assessments. This study aims to produce a feasible and effective portfolio assessment to measure the communication and collaboration skills of fifth grade elementary school students. This research is a Research and Development (R&D) type of research, the development was carried out referring to the theory of Borg & Gall. The data collection tool uses a valid and reliable portfolio assessment. The data analysis technique uses a paired t test with a calculated result of 0.000 or less than 0.05, which means that there is a difference between the pretest and post-test results for students. Based on this research, it can be concluded that portfolio assessment is effective in improving students' communication and collaboration skills. Based on the conclusions above, suggestions from researchers regarding students' communication and collaboration skills can be improved by students practicing questions as often as possible and being serious about following the learning process according to the assessment aspects.

References

Akbar, S. (2014). Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran. Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, S. (2016). Dasar-dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Bumi Aksara.

Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (1983). Eucation Research: An Introduction. Longman Inc.

Chodijah, S., Fauzi, A., & Wulan, R. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Guided Inquiryyang Dilengkapi Penilaian Portofolio Pada Materi Gerak Melingkar. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 1, 1–19. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id.

Dewi, N. L. R. A., Lasmawan, I. W., & Gading, I. K. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Keterampilan Belajar dan Berinovasi (4C) pada Pembelajaran IPA Siswa Kelas V SD. PENDASI: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Indones, 6(1), 65–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jurnal_pendas.v6i1.538

Diani, A. A., & Sukartono. (2022). Peran Guru dalam Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Tematik di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(3), 4351–4359. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2831. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2831

Feizi, M., & Zohdijalal, P. (2019). The Effect of Portfolio Assessment on Second Language Writing Self-Regulation of Iranian EFL Students. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 7(4), 48–56.

Gemnafle, M., & Batlolona, J. R. (2021). Manajemen Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Profesi Guru Indonesia (Jppgi), 1(1), 28–42. https://doi.org/10.30598/jppgivol1issue1page28-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30598/jppgivol1issue1page28-42

Hake, R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Score. Indiana University.

Hayati, N., & Yulianto, E. (2021). Efektivitas Pelatihan Dalam Meningkatkan Kompetensi Sumber Daya Manusia. Journal Civics & Social Studies, 5(1), 98–115. https://doi.org/10.31980/civicos.v5i1.958. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/civicos.v5i1.958

Imania, K. A., & Bariah, S. K. (2019). Rancangan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring-Design of Development of Online-Based Learning Assessment Instruments. Jurnal Petik, 5(1), 31–47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v5i1.445

Jakob, O. (2006). Pers Indonesia, Berkomunikasi dalam Masyarakat Tidak Tulus. Kompas.

Jeremy, D., Natalia, S., & Lumbantoruan, J. H. (2021). Faktor Procrastination Penyebab Mahasiswa. 1(1), 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56773/bj.v1i1.5

Kemendikbud. (2015). Undang-undang Nomor 53 Tahun 2015 Tentang Penilaian Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik pada Jenjang Dasar dan Pendidikan Menengah. Permendikbud.

Kusaeri, & Suprananto. (2012). Pengukuran dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Graha Ilmu.

Lestari, D., & Nasution, A. S. (2022). Pengembangan Instrumen Portofolio Asesmen pada Materi Bagian-Bagian Tumbuhan dalam Mata Pelajaran IPA di Kelas IV SD. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Mipa, 6(2), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.32696/jp2mipa.v6i2.1131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32696/jp2mipa.v6i2.1131

Lina listiana. (2011). Pemberdayaan Keterampilan Berpikir Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Melalui Model Kooperatif Tipe Gi (Group Investigation) Dan Ttw (Think, Talk, Write). Seminar Nasional X Pendidikan Biologi FKIP UNS, 2, 1–7.

Mediartika, N., & Aznam, N. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Portofolio Berbasis Multiple Intelligence untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Sikap Ilmiah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.9973. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i1.9973

Mulyati, Y., & Cahyani, I. (2018). Keterampilan Berbahasa Indonesia SD. Universitas Terbuka.

Nabilah, N., Karma, I. N., & Husniati, H. (2021). Identifikasi Kesulitan Guru dalam Melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik pada Kurikulum 2013 di SDN 50 Cakranegara. Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 6(4), 617–622. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i4.298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v6i4.298

Noviana, A., Abdurrahman, A., Rosidin, U., & Herlina, K. (2019). Development and Validation of Collaboration and Communication Skills Assessment Instruments Based on Project-Based Learning 1. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 6(2), 133–146.

Perdana, I., & Misnawati. (2021). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. guepedia.

Permendikbud. (2016). Nomor 23 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Penilaian Pendidikan. Permendikbud.

Purnomo, E. (2016). Dasar-Dasar dan Perancangan Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Media Akademi.

Purwanto. (2010). Evaluasi Hasil belajar. Pustaka Pelajar.

Rahman, A. (2014). Peningkatan disiplin kerja guru di sekolah dasar yayasan mutiara gambut. Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 2(1), 1–9.

Rosidin, U. (2016). Penilaian Otentik. Media Akademi.

Rusilowati, A. (2013). PENGEMBANGAN INSTRUMEN NONTES. Seminar Nasional Evaluasi Pendidikan Tahun 2013, 7–21.

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E., & McDaniel, E. R. (2010). Komunikasi Lintas Budaya: Cummonication Between Cultures. Salemba Humanika.

Septianti, N., & Afiani, R. (2020). Pentingnya Memahami Karakteristik Siswa Sekolah Dasar di SDN Cikokol 2. As-Sabiqun, 2(1), 7–17. https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v2i1.611. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36088/assabiqun.v2i1.611

Sudjana, N. (2017). Penilian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suhady, W., Roza, Y., & Maimunah, M. (2020). Pengembangan Soal untuk Mengukur Higher Order Thinking Skill (HOTS) Siswa. Jurnal Gantang, 5(2), 143–150. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i2.2518. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i2.2518

Sunarti, & Rahmawati, S. (2014). Penilaian dalam Kurikulum 2013 Membantu Guru Mengetahui Langkah-langkah Penilaian Pembelajaran. CV Andi Offset.

Tekege, M. (2017). Pemanfaatan teknologi informasi dan komunikasi dalam pembelajaran SMA YPPGI Nabire. Jurnal Teknologi Dan Rekayasa, 2(1), 40–52. https://uswim.e-journal.id/fateksa/article/view/38.

Wahyuni, & Ibrahim. (2012). Assesmen Pembelajaran Bahasa. Refika Aditama.

Wardani, D. A., Rosidin, U., & Rochmiyanti. (2021). The International Journal of Social Sciences World Development of Assessment Instruments in Project Based Learning to Measure Collaboration Skills and Compassion for Students in Elementary School. The International Journal of Social Sciences World, 3(1), 218–227. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5044958.

Zubaidah, S., Corebima, A. D., Mahanal, S., & Mistianah. (2018). Revealing the relationship between reading interest and critical thinking skills through remap GI and remap jigsaw. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 41–56. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.1124a