Ecoliteracy Competence Assessment to Improve Innovation Capability in a Rural Community
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i1.54103Keywords:
ekoliterasi, penilaian, kapasitas, inovasi, masyarakat pedesaan, ecoliteracy, assesment, capability, innovation, rural communitiesAbstract
Efforts to improve people's life skills are part of empowerment; however, many empowerment programs have not been fully utilized because they have failed to adapt to community needs. This phenomenon serves as the foundation for this study, which aims to analyze of community competencies centered on the ability to recognize potential and utilize the environment (ecoliteracy). A qualitative approach was used in this study, with an exploratory descriptive design. Interviews, observation, study documentation and focus group discussions were used to collect research data. 12 family representatives and 14 family facilitators provided data. Data analysis was carried out by each researcher by reading transcripts in an open coding process, looking for concepts, categories, characteristics, and dimensions that characterize each aspect found. The finding reveals that potential of the surrounding nature have awareness and knowledge of how to use ecological resources to sustain life, and are uneasy due to economic problems. Second, on an emotional level, they are satisfied when they see results from using the environment, realize the value of ecoliteracy for survival, and use the land for daily personal consumption. Third, in terms of land use and assistance programs as a source of income support the cost of living, taking into account economic aspects in meeting life's necessities. To sum up, he research results which are differentiated into three aspects, it shows that there is still a lot of potential that can be used as a basis for efforts to develop ecoliteracy learning models for the community
References
Biasutti, M., Concina, E., & Frate, S. (2019). Social Sustainability and Professional Development: Assessing a Training Course on Intercultural Education for In-Service Teachers. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(5), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11051238.
Capra, F. (2007). Sustainable Living, Ecological Literacy, and the Breath of Life. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 12(1). https://openjournal.lakeheadu.ca/index.php/cjee/article/view/624/0.
Cheah, I., & Phau, I. (2011). Attitudes towards environmentally friendly products: The influence of ecoliteracy, interpersonal influence and value orientation. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 29(5), 452–472. https://doi.org/10.1108/02634501111153674.
Code, J. M. (2019). Ecoliteracy and the trouble with reading : ecoliteracy considered in terms of Goethe ’ s ‘ delicate empiricism ’ and the potential for reading in the book of nature. Environmental Education Research, 25(8), 1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1558438.
Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Smith, R. (2003). Ecological literacy: The ‘missing paradigm’ in environmental education (part one). Environmental Education Research, 9(4), 497–524. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350462032000126131.
Desfandi, M., & Maryani, E. (2017). Building ecoliteracy through adiwiyata program (study at adiwiyata school in Banda Aceh). The Indonesian Journal of Geography, 49(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.11230.
Emel, O. B. (2018). Development of an Ecoliteracy Scale Intended for Adults and Testing an Alternative Model by Structural Equation Modelling. International Electronic Journal of Environmental Education, 8(1), 15–34. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1181007.
Gatti, L., Ulrich, M., & Seele, P. (2019). Education for sustainable development through business simulation games: An exploratory study of sustainability gamification and its effects on students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 667–678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.130.
Gayatri, M., & Irawaty, D. K. (2021). Family resilience during COVID-19 pandemic: A literature review. The Family Journal. https://doi.org/10664807211023875.
Gentles, S. J., Charles, C., Ploeg, J., & McKibbon, K. A. (2015). Sampling in qualitative research: Insights from an overview of the methods literature. The Qualitative Report, 20(11), 1772–1789. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3bd0/66b5d7ea4e3a933699576689a855d09f08b6.pdf.
Goleman, D., Bennett, L., & Barlow, Z. (2012). Ecoliterate: How educators are cultivating emotional, social, and ecological intelligence. Jossey Bass.
Hart, J. L., Turnbull, A. E., Oppenheim, I. M., & Courtright, K. R. (2020). Family-centered care during the COVID-19 era. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 60(2), e93–e97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.017.
Hilmi, M. I., Lutfiansyach, D. Y., Hufad, A., Kamil, M., & Wahyudin, U. (2021). Eco-Literacy. First Transnational Webinar on Adult and Continuing Education (TRACED 2020), 118–121. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210508.022.
Ihsan, A. F., & Hanami, Z. A. (2021). Implementasi Ekoliterasi di Era Pascaliterasi. Seminar Nasional Adiwidya, 8, 42–47. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aditya-Ihsan/publication/348522744.
Johns, R. A., & Pontes, R. (2019). Parks, rhetoric and environmental education: challenges and opportunities for enhancing ecoliteracy. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 22(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-019-0029-x.
Kartika, P. C., Daesusi, R., & Farichah, H. (2020). Ekoliterasi Masyarakat Stren Kali Kelurahan Karangpilang Kota Surabaya Menuju New Reality Era Pandemi Covid-19. Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 1(3), 401–409. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/cdj.v1i3.1097.
Kim, G., Vaswani, R. T., Kang, W., Nam, M., & Lee, D. (2017). Enhancing Ecoliteracy through Traditional Ecological Knowledge in Proverbs. Sustainability, 9(7), 1182. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071182.
Martínez-Rodríguez, F. M., de los Ángeles Vilches Norat, M., & Fernández-Herrería, A. (2018). Challenging the neoliberal view of education: the Center for Ecoliteracy as a transformative educational practice. Globalizations, 15(3), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2018.1446601.
McBride, B. B., Brewer, C. A., Berkowitz, A. R., & Borrie, W. T. (2013). Environmental literacy, ecological literacy, ecoliteracy: What do we mean and how did we get here? Ecosphere, 4(5). https://doi.org/10.1890/ES13-00075.1.
Momeni, M., Nielsen, S. B., & Kafash, M. H. (2015). Determination of innovation capability of organizations: qualitative meta synthesis and delphi method. In 25th Annual RESER Conference. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/43251846.pdf.
Nadiroh, N., Hasanah, U., & Zulfa, V. (2019). Behavioral geography: An ecoliteracy perspective and critical thinking skills in men and women. Indonesian Journal of Geography, 51(2), 115–122. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijg.36784.
Nainggolan, T. (2019). Aspek Gender Dalam Program Keluarga Harapan. Sosio Informa, 5(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33007/inf.v5i1.1593.
Oktapyanto, R. R. (2017). Ecoliteracy: Literasi Dasar yang Terlupakan. Lontar Digital Asia.
Putri, S. S., Japar, M., & Bagaskorowati, R. (2019). Increasing ecoliteracy and student creativity in waste utilization. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18901.
Risna Resnawaty, S. A. S. (2017). Program Keluarga Harapan ( Pkh ): Antara Perlindungan Sosial. Prosiding Ks: Riset & Pkm, 4(1), 1–140. https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v4i1.14213.
Sapanca, P. L. Y. (2012). Efektivitas Ekoliterasi Dalam Meningkatkan Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Perilaku Masyarakat Mengenai Education for Sustainable Development Berbasis Tanaman Pangan Lokal (Studi Kasus Di Kecamatan Bangli). Jurnal Agrimeta, 20(3), 1–13. https://scholar.archive.org/work/wfkbvo2gn5ddzaxsq2dffdzf7i.
Schimek, M. J. (2016). How an experience in nature affects ecoliteracy of high school students. School of Education Student Capstone Theses and Dissertations., 4133, 1–88. https://digitalcommons.hamline.edu/hse_all/4133/.
Segara, N. B. (2015). Education for Sustainable Development (ESD) Sebuah Upaya Mewujudkan Kelestarian Lingkungan. Social Science Education Journal, 2(1), 22–30. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=2593748.
Seyfang, G., & Haxeltine, A. (2012). Growing Grassroots Innovations: Exploring the Role of Community-Based Initiatives in Governing Sustainable Energy Transitions. Journal of Enviromental and Palning C: Government and Policy, 30, 381–400. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10222.
Seyfang, S. and. (2013). Grassroots Innovation movement: Challenges and Contributions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.025
Sivek, D. J., & Hungerford, H. (1990). Predictors of responsible behavior in members of three wisconsin conservation organizations. Journal of Environmental Education, 21(2), 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1990.9941929.
Smith, C. (2007). Education and society: The case for ecoliteracy. Education and Society, 25(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.7459/es/25.1.03.
Snow, T. (2020). Ecosystem metabolisms and functions: an eco-literacy framework and model for designers. Form Akademisk, 13(4), 4. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.3370.
Spínola, H. (2015). Environmental Literacy Comparison between Students Taught in Eco-schools and Ordinary Schools in the Madeira Island Region of Portugal. Science Education International, 26(3), 392–413. https://digituma.uma.pt/handle/10400.13/1361.
Sujana, I. W. C. (2019). Fungsi Dan Tujuan Pendidikan Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.25078/aw.v4i1.927.
Suyitno, Kamil, I., Sunoto, M., & Suherjanto, I. (2016). Teknik pembelajaran observasi lingkungan berbasis kearifan lokal. Jurnal Kependidikan, 46(1), 14–28. https://doi.org/10.21831/jk.v46i1.6826.
Thiagarajan, Sivasailam, D. (1974). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children. National Center for Improvement Educational System.
Tumanggor, R. (2010). Tinjauan Konseptual Tentang Keluarga. Informasi, 15(2). https://ocs.unmul.ac.id/index.php/JParadigma/article/view/348.
Turner, R., & Donnelly, R. (2013). Case Studies in Critical Ecoliteracy : A Curriculum for Analyzing the Social Foundations of Environmental Problems. Educational Studies, 49(5), 387–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2013.825262.
Vargas-Madrazo, E. N. R. I. Q. U. E. (2018). Contemplative dialogue as the basis for a transdisciplinary attitude : Ecoliteracy toward an education for human sustainability. World Futures, 74(4), 224-245. https://doi.org/10.1080/02604027.2018.1444833.
Yang, B., Feldman, M. W., & Li, S. (2021). The status of family resilience: effects of sustainable livelihoods in Rural China. Social Indicators Research, 153(3), 1041–1064. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02518-1.
Yuliani, S., Scorviana, N., & Istiqomah, N. (2021). Pencegahan Covid-19 melalui Pelatihan Ekoliterasi dan Perilaku Hidup Bersih dan Sehat ( PHBS ). KRA-ITH ABDIMAS, 4(3), 108–116. https://journals.upi-yai.ac.id/index.php/IKRAITH-ABDIMAS/article/view/1532.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Erma Kusumawardani, Yuli Nurmalasari, Akhmad Rofiq
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (JERE) agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)