Comparison of Two Learning Models on Students' Process Skills in Elementary School
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i3.48681Keywords:
Process Skills, Learning model, Problem Based Learning, Problem SolvingAbstract
The learning model is one of the most important things in the learning and learning process. A good learning model will make students more enthusiastic in learning because the model is interesting and effective. The purpose of this study was to analyze the comparison of learning models of problem based learning and problem solving models with student problem solving on cube and block material on the skill process in elementary schools. The method used in this study is a quantitative method with a comparative type. The population of this study was 72 students from two schools, included 40 women and 32 men as students, were the subjects studied. The instruments used are student process skills observation sheets and learning questionnaire models. Data collection techniques used in this study were questionnaires and observation sheets. The data analysis technique used is purposive sampling. The results of the description can be said that based on the T test it can be said that the problem-solving learning model is superior to the problem-based learning model. From the results of the T test for the learning model of students' science process skills, it can be seen that there are differences in the learning model.
References
Achdiyat, M., & Utomo, R. (2018). Kecerdasan Visual-Spasial, Kemampuan Numerik, dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Formatif: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(3), 234–245. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i3.2234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i3.2234
Alan, U. F., & Afriansyah, E. A. (2017). Kemampuan Pemahaman Matematis Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Auditory Intellectualy Repetition Dan Problem Based Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.11.1.3890.67-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.11.1.3890.67-78
Alsabahi, M. A., Maisurah, K., Bahador, K., & Saat, R. M. (2021). Cogent Business & Management The influence of personal characteristics and workplace learning on information technology competency among external auditors : The role of organisational culture as a moderator The influence of personal characteristics and wo. Cogent Business & Management, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1899625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2021.1899625
Ambussaidi, I., & Yang, Y.-F. (2019). The Impact of Mathematics Teacher Quality on Student Achievement in Oman and Taiwan. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i2.39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v1i2.39
Anif, S., Sutopo, A., & Prayitno, H. J. (2020). Lesson study validation: Model for social and natural sciences teacher development in the implementation of national curriculum in Muhammadiyah schools, Indonesia. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(1), 253–259. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080132
Anisah, A. S., & Suntara, H. (2020). Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Debate Untuk Meningkatkan Kecerdasan Emosional Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 14(1), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.52434/jp.v14i1.907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52434/jp.v14i1.907
Anwar, B., & Asriani. (2017). Penerapan Pembelajaran Problem Solving untuk Meningkatkan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Matematika pada Materi SPLDV. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v4i2.2035.
Anwar, N. T. (2018). Peran Kemampuan Literasi Matematis pada Pembelajaran Matematika Abad-21. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 1, 364–370. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/19603.
Ariandi, Y. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Berdasarkan Aktivitas Belajar pada Model Pembelajaran PBL. PRISMA, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, X(1996), 579–585. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/prisma/article/view/21561.
Astuti, L. I. N. S. (2017). Penguasaan Konsep IPA Ditinjau Dari Konsep Diri. Formatif : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA, 7(1), 40–48. https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/formatif.v7i1.1293
Astuti, S., Subagia, I. W., & Sudiana, I. K. (2018). Student’ satisfaction toward chemistry learning process at SMA laboratorium undiksha. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Denpasar), 6(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i2.11880.
Bankole, Q. A., & Nasir, Z. (2020). Empirical Analysis of Undergraduate Students ’ Perception in the Use of Electronic Sources in Kwara State University Library. International Information & Library Review, 0(0), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1805274. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10572317.2020.1805274
Century, J., Ferris, K. A., & Zuo, H. (2020). Finding time for computer science in the elementary school day: a quasi-experimental study of a transdisciplinary problem-based learning approach. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00218-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00218-3
Cooper, G., & Berry, A. (2020). Demographic predictors of senior secondary participation in biology, physics, chemistry and earth/space sciences: students’ access to cultural, social and science capital. International Journal of Science Education, 42(1), 151–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1708510. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1708510
Crawley, E. F., Hosoi, A., Long, G. L., Kassis, T., Dickson, W., & Mitra, A. B. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT - Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33124. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33124
Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., Astalini, A., & Dari, R. W. (2021). Description of Students Critical Thinking Ability in Temperature and Calor Material. JIPF (Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika), 6(2), 98. https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i2.1895. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26737/jipf.v6i2.1895
Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Irdianti, I. (2019). Physics education students’ science process skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 293–298. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.28646. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.16401
Emilzoli, M., Ali, M., & Rusman. (2021). Perceptions, attitudes and lifestyles of students of Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Teacher Education Study Program about education for sustainable development. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 739(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012058. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/739/1/012058
Ernawan, T. (2010). Pembelajaran Ipa Melalui Metode Demonstrasi Menggunakan Media Animasi Dan 2d Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Tingkat Berpikir Dan Gaya Belajar Siswa. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/15392.
Fauziyah, L. (2017). Model Problem Based Learning dengan Pendekatan Open-Ended untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 6(1), 59–67. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/17240.
Febriana, R., Yusri, R., & Delyana, H. (2020). Modul Geometri Ruang Berbasis Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kreativitas Pemecahan Masalah. Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 93–100. https://scholar.archive.org/work/bdnwolyvjffebmtxjuh3je7b3a/access/wayback/http://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/download/2591/pdf. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i1.2591
Fitriani, R. S., Astalini, & Kurniawan, D. A. (2021). Pengaruh tanggung jawab terhadap sikap siswa pada mata pelajaran ipa di smp kota jambi. Jurnal Emasains: Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, X. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4724784. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37251/jee.v2i1.184
FLORES-TENA, M. J. (2020). The Educational Inclusion in the Deficit of Attention of Elementary Students. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 265–273. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.747244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.747244
Fromowitz, D. B. (2017). Batch and history sampling for fixed-source monte carlo problems. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 187(2), 142–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1312944. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00295639.2017.1312944
García-Merino, J. D., Urionabarrenetxea, S., & Fernández-Sainz, A. (2020). Does PBL improve student performance in a multidimensional way? A proposal for a moderated mediation model. Higher Education Research and Development, 39(7), 1454–1473. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1732878. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1732878
Harsiwi, U. B., & Arini, L. D. D. (2020). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Menggunakan Media Pembelajaran Interaktif terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 3(2), 524–532. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.505. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v4i4.505
Hendriana, H., Johanto, T., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). The role of problem-based learning to improve students’ mathematical problem-solving ability and self confidence. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 291–299. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5394.291-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5394.291-300
Hidayati, N., Tanah Boleng, D., & Candra, K. P. (2020). Students’ learning motivation and cognitive competencies in the PP and PBL models. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i3.12081. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i3.12081
Hong, L. Y., & Talib, C. A. (2018). Scientific Argumentation in Chemistry Education: Implications and Suggestions. Asian Social Science, 14(11), 16. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n11p16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v14n11p16
Hutauruk, P., & Simbolon, R. (2018). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Dengan Alat Peraga Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa Kelas Iv Sdn Nomor 14 Simbolon Purba. SEJ (School Education Journal), 8(2), 112. https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v8i2.9770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/sejpgsd.v8i2.9770
Ikhsan, M., Munzir, S., & Fitria, L. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Metakognisi Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika melalui Pendekatan Problem Solving. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 234. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v6i2.991. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v6i2.991
Imaduddin, M., & Khafidin, Z. (2018). Ayo Belajar IPA dari Ulama: Pembelajaran Berbasis Socio-Scientific Issues di Abad ke-21. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 1(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i2.4439. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v1i2.4439
Khaldi, K. (2017). Quantitative, qualitative or mixed research: which research paradigm to use? Journal of Educational and Social Research, 7(2), 15–15. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2017.v7n2p15
Kjeldsen, K. (2019). A study-of-religion(S)-based religion education: Skills, knowledge, and aims. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(4), 11–29. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.678. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.678
Kruit, P. M., Oostdam, R. J., van den Berg, E., & Schuitema, J. A. (2018). Assessing students’ ability in performing scientific inquiry: instruments for measuring science skills in primary education. Research in Science and Technological Education, 36(4), 413–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2017.1421530
Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L., & Cramb, D. T. (2018). Learning science by doing science: an authentic science process-learning model in postsecondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1476–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1484966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1484966
Lin, S., Zhou, Y., & Wijaya, T. T. (2020). Using hawgent dynamic mathematics software in teaching arithmetic operation. International Journal of Education and Learning, 2(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v2i1.97. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31763/ijele.v2i1.97
Llussà, A. S., Guilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2019). Video worked examples to promote elementary students’ science process skills: a fruit decomposition inquiry activity. Journal of Biological Education, 00(00), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2019.1699149
Maison, M., Kurniawan, D. A., & Pratiwi, N. I. S. (2020). Pendidikan sains di sekolah menengah pertama perkotaan: Bagaimana sikap dan keaktifan belajar siswa terhadap sains? Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 6(2), 135–145. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.32425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.32425
Mutiani. (2021). Pembinaan Etika Peserta Didik Melalui Pembelajaran Tematik - Integratif di Sekolah Dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidika, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.397. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i3.397
Mutlu, A. (2020). Evaluation of students’ scientific process skills through reflective worksheets in the inquiry-based learning environments. Reflective Practice, 21(2), 271–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2020.1736999
Nurlaily, V. A., Soegiyanto, H., & Usodo, B. (2019). Elementary school teacher’s obstacles in the implementation of problem-based learning model in mathematics learning. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(2), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5386.229-238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.2.5386.229-238
Nuryanti, L., Zubaidah, S., & Diantoro, M. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(2), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i2.10490.
Putranto, T. D. (2018). Kelas Sosial Dan Perempuan Generasi Z di Surabaya Dalam Membuat Keputusan Setelah Lulus Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Komunikasi Profesional, 2(1), 15–28. https://doi.org/10.25139/jkp.v2i1.841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25139/jkp.v2i1.841
Raharjo, Y. K., . S., & . W. (2019). Need Analysis of Learning Model of History Integrated with Leadership Values of Mangkunegara I through Reflective Pedagogy Paradigm. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(4), 617–623. https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24331/ijere.628436
Rati, N. W., Kusmaryatni, N., & Rediani, N. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek, Kreativitas dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. JPI : Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9059. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9059
Saleh, M., Charitas, R., Prahmana, I., & Isa, M. (2018). Improving the Reasoning Ability of Elementary School Student Through the Indonesian Realistic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5049.41-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.1.5049.41-54
Sanova, R., Aidil Fachrizal, M., Safira, A., Prawitasari Br Hasibuan, S., & Mustina, N. (2019). Sosialisasi Persiapan Pendidikan Di Panti Asuhan Yatim Piatu Di Era New Normal. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat (Kesehatan), 1(2), 38–42. http://www.jurnal.uui.ac.id/index.php/jpkmk/article/viewFile/860/433.
Siagian, M. D. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Circ Dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivisme Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Koneksi Matematik. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 1(2), 58–67. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/648.
Solé-Llussà, A., Aguilar, D., & Ibáñez, M. (2020). Video-worked examples to support the development of elementary students’ science process skills: a case study in an inquiry activity on electrical circuits. Research in Science and Technological Education, 00(00), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02635143.2020.1786361
Stender, A., Schwichow, M., Zimmerman, C., & Härtig, H. (2018). Making inquiry-based science learning visible: the influence of CVS and cognitive skills on content knowledge learning in guided inquiry. International Journal of Science Education, 40(15), 1812–1831. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1504346
Stylinski, C. D., Peterman, K., Phillips, T., Linhart, J., & Becker-Klein, R. (2020). Assessing science inquiry skills of citizen science volunteers: a snapshot of the field. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 10(1), 77–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2020.1719288
Sukamolson, S. (2007). Fundamentals of quantitative research. Language Institute Chulalongkorn University, 1(3), 1–20. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Vihan-Moodi/post/What_are_the_characteristics_of_quantitative_research/attachment/5f3091d0ed60840001c62a27/AS%3A922776944787456%401597018576221/download/SuphatSukamolson.pdf.
Sultan, A. D., & Bancong, H. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Multiple Intelligences Melalui Model Pembelajaran Langsung Terhadap Sikap Dan Hasil Belajar Fisika Peserta Didik Kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 11 Makassar. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Unismuh, 5(1), 120620. https://doi.org/10.26618/jpf.v5i1.341.
Sutarmi, K., & Suarjana, I. M. (2017). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Siswa Menggunakan Metode Problem Solving dalam Pembelajaran. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 1(2), 75. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i2.10141. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v1i2.10141
Tanti, T., Kurniawan, D. A., Syefrinando, B., Daryanto, M., & Fitriani, R. S. (2021). Identification of students attitudes towards natural sciences at Adhyaksa 1 Junior High School, Jambi City. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 15(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.16377. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v15i1.16377
Tao, H., & Ning, J. (2018). Computation Randomized quasi-random sampling / importance resampling. Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation, 0(0), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1547398. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03610918.2018.1547398
Tri Pudji Astuti. (2019). Model Problem Based Learning dengan Mind Mapping dalam Pembelajaran IPA Abad 21. Proceeding of Biology Education, 3(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.21009/pbe.3-1.9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21009/pbe.3-1.9
Utami, R. W., & Wutsqa, D. U. (2017). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika dan self-efficacy siswa SMP negeri di Kabupaten Ciamis. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.14897
Utaminingsih, R., Rahayu, A., & Andini, D. W. (2018). Pengembangan RPP IPA sekolah dasar berbasis problem-based learning untuk siswa learning disabilities Development of primary school natural science lesson plan based on problem-based learning for learning disabilities students. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 4(2), 191–202. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v4i2.21401.
Vansteensel, M. J., Kristo, G., Aarnoutse, E. J., & Ramsey, N. F. (2017). The brain-computer interface researcher’s questionnaire: from research to application. Brain-Computer Interfaces, 4(4), 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2017.1366237. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/2326263X.2017.1366237
Vartiainen, J., & Kumpulainen, K. (2020). Playing with science: manifestation of scientific play in early science inquiry. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 28(4), 490–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1783924. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2020.1783924
Wahyudi, E. E., Aminah, N. S., & Sukarmin. (2017). Pembelajaran Optika Geometri Melalui Problem Based Learning (PBL) Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA Kelas X Tahun 2014/2015. Jurnal Inkuiri, 6(3), 49–60. https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v6i3.17842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/inkuiri.v6i3.17842
Widayat, W., & Hindarto, N. (2017). Pembentukan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Karakter Peduli Lingkungan Berbantuan Scaffolding. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 6(1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.15294/jise.v6i1.17068.
Wulandari, A., Handayani, P., & Prasetyo, D. R. (2019). Pembelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam Berbasis EMC (Education Mini Club) sebagai Solusi Menghadapi Tantangan Pendidikan dI Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, 2(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v2i1.5498. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v2i1.5498
Yamashita, S., Yeo, J., Nakanishi, K., Kojima, K., Igarashi, R., Terasawa, A., Chang, J., Toh, J., Pang, A., Ashardianto, S., & Nomura, J. (2019). Development and Evaluation of Global Positioning System Science Lesson Based on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Model in Singapore. Science Education International, 30(3), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v30.i3.5
Zarić, J., Hasselhorn, M., & Nagler, T. (2021). Orthographic knowledge predicts reading and spelling skills over and above general intelligence and phonological awareness. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 36(1), 21–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00464-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-020-00464-7
Zubaedi, Z., Amin, A., Asiyah, A., Suhirman, S., Alimni, A., Amaliyah, A., & Agus Kurniawan, D. (2021). Learning style and motivation: gifted young students in meaningful learning. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 9(1), 57–66. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.817277. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.817277
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Kamid Kamid, Roseli Theis , Sufri , Sabila Eka Septi , Fhadira Insani Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
