STEM-Based Everyone is a Teacher Here Strategy on Metacognitive Abilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i3.47404Kata Kunci:
Teacher Here Strategy, STEM, Metacognitive abilityAbstrak
The low quality of education have an effect quality of the nation. One of efforts to improve quality of education in Indonesia involve metacognitive abilities. The component of cognitive regulation in metacognitive will make the students mind systematic. This study aims to analyze the STEM-based learning strategy everyone is a teacher here on metacognitive abilities. The type of this research was a quasi experimental design with a pre-test and post-test control group design. The amount of data sample of this research is 103 students of fifth grade and the research sample amount is 55 students. The research instrument used has been through validity and reliability tests. Data analysis used in this study were normality test (Kolmogorov-Smirnov) and hypothesis testing (Wilcoxon test and Mann Whitney test).The result showed an increase in metocnitive abilities outcome that can be seen based on the result of pre-test and post-test, experiment class and control class. It was proven in testing the hypothesis, which states that value Asymp. Sig (2-tailed) 0,047 < 0,05 which means Ho is accepted and Ha is rejected. So it can be conclude that learning using the STEM-based learning strategy of everyone is a teacher here is effective in incrase the metacognitive abilities of students. Through STEM-based learning strategy everyone is a teacher here, metacognitive abilities can be enhanced based on soft skill, hard skill and creativity in building knowledge in the science learning process throught the water cycle and impact on living beings.
Referensi
Ainun Fauziah, H., Putri Setyowati, A., Dewantari, R., Dwi Wulandari, A., & Adi Prayitno, B. (2019). Profil Kesadaran Metakognisi Siswa di salah satu SMA Swasta di Sragen. BIOSFER : Jurnal Biologi Dan Pendidikan Biologi, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v3i2.975. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23969/biosfer.v3i2.975
Aisyah, S., & Astuti, R. (2021). Analisis Mengenai Telaah Kurikulum K-13 pada Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(6), 6120–6125. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i6.1770
Anggraini, L. A., Arif, S., Muna, I. A., & Aristiawan, A. (2021). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Numbered Head Together (NHT) Berbasis STEM dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Metakognisi. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(2), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i2.199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i2.199
Antony, A. (2021). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar IPA Menggunakan Strategi Pembelajaran Everyone Is Teacher Here Siswa Sekolah Dasar. JEMS (Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains), 9(1), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v9i1.8420.
Davidi, E. I. N., Sennen, E., & Supardi, K. (2021). Integrasi Pendekatan STEM (Science, Technology, Enggeenering and Mathematic) Untuk Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Scholaria: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 11(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2021.v11.i1.p11-22. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.js.2021.v11.i1.p11-22
Dirkes, M. A. (1988). Self‐directed thinking in the curriculum. Roeper Review, 11(2), 92–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198809553174. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02783198809553174
Ejiwale, J. A. (2012). Facilitating Teaching and Learning Across STEM Fields. Journal of STEM Education: Innovations and Research, 13(3), 87–94. https://www.jstem.org/jstem/index.php/JSTEM/article/view/1711.
Elvianasti, M., Lufri, L., Asrizal, A., & Rikizaputra, R. (2021). Implementasi Pendekatan Saintifik dalam Pembelajaran IPA di Indonesia : Suatu Meta-Analisis. EDUKATIF : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 390–398. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.1819
Erlin, E., Rahmat, A., Redjeki, S., & Purwianingsih, W. (2021). Analisis Berbagai Strategi Dan Model Pembelajaran Yang Dapat Memberdayakan Kemampuan Metakognitif Pada Pembelajaran Biologi. Bioed : Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 9(2), 30. https://doi.org/10.25157/jpb.v9i2.6383. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25157/jpb.v9i2.6383
Garza, A. de la, & Travis, C. (2019). The STEAM Revolution. In The STEAM Revolution. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6
Gyasi, J. F., Zheng, L., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Perusing the Past to Propel the Future: A Systematic Review of STEM Learning Activity Based on Activity Theory. Sustainability, 13(16), 8828. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168828. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13168828
Haryati, S. (2020). Everyone is a Teacher Here Method towards Student Learning Outcomes on Kingdom Animalia Topic. Report of Biological Education, 1(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.37150/rebion.v1i1.818. DOI: https://doi.org/10.37150/rebion.v1i1.818
Impianti, G., & Jamila, J. (2018). Pengaruh Strategi Everyone Is A Teacher Here terhadap Motivasi Belajar Siswa. Biblio Couns: Jurnal Kajian Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 1(1), 12–16. https://doi.org/10.30596/bibliocouns.v1i1.1943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30596/bibliocouns.v1i1.1943
Kodri, K., & Anisah, A. (2020). Analisis Keterampilan Metakognitif Siswa Sekolah Menengah Atas dalam Pembelajaran Ekonomi Abad 21 di Indonesia. Edunomic Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.33603/ejpe.v8i1.2815. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33603/ejpe.v8i1.2815
Kusumaningrum, D. (2018). Literasi lingkungan dalam kurikulum 2013 dan pembelajaran IPA di SD. Indonesian Journal of Natural Science Education (IJNSE), 1(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v1i2.255. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31002/nse.v1i2.255
Livingston, J. a. (1997). Metacognition: an overview. Psychology, 13, 259–266. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED474273.
Makaborang, Y. (2019). Evaluasi Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Mata Pelajaran Biologi Di SMA Negeri. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i2.p130-145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i2.p130-145
Martinez, M. E. (2006). What is Metacognition? Phi Delta Kappan, 87(9), 696–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700916. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170608700916
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495
Nugrahanto, S., & Zuchdi, D. (2019). Indonesia PISA Result and Impact on The Reading Learning Program in Indonesia. 297(Icille 2018), 373–377. https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2991/icille-18.2019.77
Nugroho, O. F., Permanasari, A., & Firman, H. (2019). Program Belajar berbasis STEM untuk Pembelajaran IPA: Tinjauan Pustaka, dengan Referensi di Indonesia. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (JEP), 3(2), 117. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3-iss2/328. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol3-iss2/328
O’Neil Jr., H. F., & Brown, R. S. (1998). Differential Effects of Question Formats in Math Assessment on Metacognition and Affect. Applied Measurement in Education, 11(4), 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1104_3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame1104_3
Paramita, A., Dasna, I. W., & Yahmin, Y. (2019). Kajian Pustaka: Integrasi Stem Untuk Keterampilan Argumentasi Dalam Pembelajaran Sains. J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 4(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v4i22019p092. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17977/um026v4i22019p092
Pratiwi, I. (2019). Efek Program Pisa Terhadap Kurikulum Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 4(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v4i1.1157
Putri, M. L., & Dafit, F. (2022). Teacher Ability to Apply Questioning Skills in Elementary School. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/https://10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42565. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42565
Rizki Putri Wardani, V. A. (2021). Kajian Literatur: STEM Dalam Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 47(4), 124–134. https://doi.org/10.31857/s013116462104007x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31857/S013116462104007X
Seage, S. J., & Türegün, M. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning on STEM Achievement of Elementary School Students. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 6(1), 133–140. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1231349. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46328/ijres.v6i1.728
Septiyani, E., Ramdhan, B., & Juhanda, A. (2020). Profil Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa Pada Pembelajaran Ipa Kelas Vii Di Smpn 13 Kota Sukabumi. Jurnal Biotek, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v8i1.13356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24252/jb.v8i1.13356
Silberman, M. (2013). 101 Cara Pelatihan Dan Pembelajaran Aktif. Jakarta: Indeks.
Siringo-ringo, S., Boiliu, E. R., & Manullang, J. (2021). Studi Deskriptif Penerapan Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif Tipe Everyone Is a Teacher Here Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pendidikan Agama Kristen Tingkat SMA. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(4), 2020–2035. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i4.1599. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i4.1599
Stohlmann, M. (2022). Review Article Growth mindset in K-8 STEM education : A review of the literature since 2007. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 6(2), 149–163. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213029. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202213029
Struyf, A., De Loof, H., Boeve-de Pauw, J., & Van Petegem, P. (2019). Students’ engagement in different STEM learning environments: integrated STEM education as promising practice? International Journal of Science Education, 41(10), 1387–1407. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1607983
Suryana, S. I., Sopandi, W., & Sujana, A. (2022). The Analyse of Concept Understanding of 5 th Grade Elementary School Student towards Air in Science Subjects by Using Blended Learning. International Conference on Elementary Education, 4(1), 730–740. http://proceedings.upi.edu/index.php/icee/article/view/2048.
Syahmani, S., Hafizah, E., Sauqina, S., Adnan, M. Bin, & Ibrahim, M. H. (2021). STEAM Approach to Improve Environmental Education Innovation and Literacy in Waste Management: Bibliometric Research. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), 3(2), 130–141. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.12782. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i2.12782
Syaiful, S., Aprillya, S., & Anggraeni, E. (2020). Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Everyone is a Teacher Here (ETH) Ditinjau dari Gaya Kognitif Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep Matematika. Jurnal Gantang, 5(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i1.1562. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v5i1.1562
Ting, F. S. T., Shroff, R. H., Lam, W. H., Garcia, R. C. C., Chan, C. L., Tsang, W. K., & Ezeamuzie, N. O. (2022). A Meta-analysis of Studies on the Effects of Active Learning on Asian Students’ Performance in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Subjects. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00661-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-022-00661-6
Toma, R. B., & Greca, I. M. (2018). The effect of integrative STEM instruction on elementary students’ attitudes toward science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(4), 1383–1395. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/83676
W., G. A. (2020). Penyelenggaraan Pembelajaran Ipa Berbasis Pendekatan Stem Dalam Menyongsong Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. LENSA (Lentera Sains): Jurnal Pendidikan IPA, 10(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24929/lensa.v10i1.98
Wahyu Lestari, Fatinatus Selvia, & Rohmatul Layliyyah. (2019). Pendekatan Open-ended Terhadap Kemampuan Metakognitif Siswa. At- Ta’lim : Jurnal Pendidikan, 5(2), 184–197. https://doi.org/10.36835/attalim.v5i2.263. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36835/attalim.v5i2.263
Wicaksono, A. G., & Sayekti, I. C. (2020). Bagaimana perbandingan kurikulum 2013 dengan kurikulum Australia pada mata pelajaran IPA? Natural: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.30738/natural.v7i1.8117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30738/natural.v7i1.8117
Widiani, L. P. S., Sudiatmika, A. A. I. A. R., & Sudiana, I. K. (2021). Dampak Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Everyone is Teacher Here secara Daring Berbantuan Video Presentasi terhadap Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Belajar. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 5(3), 533. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v5i3.39756. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v5i3.39756
Yusuf, M. (2018). Peningkatan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SD dengan Menerapkan Strategi Everyone Is A Teacher Here pada Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i1.13706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v2i1.13706
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Levina Syafaa Averina, Mayarni
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
