THE VIOLATION MAXIM OF STUDENT IN FACULTY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES, MAHASARASWATI DENPASAR UNIVERSITY

I Gusti Ayu Vina Widiadnya Putri; Ida Bagus Gede Nova Winarta

doi:10.23887/leju.v4i1.32051

Authors

I Gusti Ayu Vina Widiadnya Putri Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar
Ida Bagus Gede Nova Winarta Universitas Mahasaraswati Denpasar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/leju.v4i1.32051

Keywords:

Violation, maxim, utterance

Abstract

The research is aimed to analyze the maxims violations committed by students of the English study program, Faculty of Foreign Languages, Mahasaraswati Denpasar University. All speakers and interlocutors may not understand well the intent and purpose of utterance. Some utterances may contain different aims and objectives from the statement or question of the other person. To determine the suitability and misunderstanding of speech between listeners and speakers, Grice (1975) has initiated a theory of cooperation principles by classifying them into four types. This research is a qualitative descriptive study by collecting data by observation, note taking and recording. The result of this research is violations of maxims have occurred in students' speech. The four violations of maxims were found here. Students violate the maxim of quantity, maxim of quality, maxim of relevance and maxim of method. The most dominant violation of maxims is a violation of the maxims of quantity.

References

Antika, L., Virginia, V., & Sanulita, H. (n.d.). Pelanggaran Maksim Dalam Film 3 Srikandi. 1–12.

Budiarsa, M. (2015). Ecolinguistic Perspective of Kerapingan Culture. E-Journal of Linguistics, 0(0), 40--53.

Ening Herniti. (2015). Ketaatan dan Pelanggaran Iklan Televisi Terhadap Prinsip Kerja Sama. DIALEKTIKA: Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 2(2), 123–139. https://www.metis2020.com/wp-content/uploads/METIS_D1.4_v3.pdf%0Ahttps://www.metis2020.com/documents/deliverables/index.html%0Ahttps://www.metis2020.com/metis-deliverables-d1-4-d2-4-d3-3-d4-3-d6-5-and-d7-3-were-completed-in-february-2015/index.html%0Ahttp

Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and Conversation” dalam Syntax and Semantics, Speech Act 3. Academic Press.

Grice, P. (1975). Logic and Conversation. In Logic and Conversation. Academic Press.

Havid Ardi (p: 69-78) Hamzah, K. G. D. A. (2013). Comparison of the Maxim Violation Found in Action and Drama Movies. 69–78. http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/ell/article/view/900

Hidayati, I. N. (2019). Twofer: Using CDA in The Classroom for Enhancing Student’s Language Skills and Critical Thinking. Jurnal Bahtera, 18(1), 47–58.

Kanaza, F. U. (2020). a Language Function: the Analysis of Conative Function in Meghan Markle’S Speech. Etnolingual, 4(1), 43. https://doi.org/10.20473/etno.v4i1.20347

Wiyanti, E., Dinihari, Y., & Solihatun, S. (2019). Kesantunan berbahasa para Kader Posyandu dalam pelaksanaan layanan informasi. Bahastra, 39(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.26555/bahastra.v39i1.12031

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford University Press.