Generic Science Skills Profile of High School Students in Working on Chemistry Questions Based on Gender
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v6i3.60966Keywords:
Generic Sains Skill, Chemistry, GenderAbstract
The exploration of generic science skills in solving chemistry problems can be influenced by various factors, one of which is gender bias in the learning process. This research aims to measure students' generic skills in solving chemistry problems based on gender. This study is quantitative descriptive research with a pre-experimental method using a One-Shot Case Study design. The sample consists of 20 eleventh-grade students, with 10 male students and 10 female students, selected based on gender and the taught material. Data collection techniques include measurement techniques, observation techniques, and interview techniques. The data analysis technique used is quantitative descriptive analysis. The results of the research show difference in the scores of generic science skills between female and male students. Female students have higher scores in direct observation indicators (80 vs. 79) and logical inference (83 vs. 79). However, there is no significant difference in the cause-and-effect law indicator (74 vs. 74). Meanwhile, male students have a slight advantage in the abstraction indicator (67 vs. 66) and concept building (76 vs. 74). Of the five indicators examined in the form of tests, the abstraction indicator obtains the lowest score, while the highest score is in the logical inference indicator. From these results, there is no significant difference in the generic science skills of male and female students.
References
Ardithayasa, IW, Gading, IK, & Widiana, IW (2022). Project based learning modules to improve scientific literacy and problem-solving skills. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 5(2), 316–325. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i2.52607. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v5i2.52607
Astutik, AR, Putri, DM, Masruroh, M., Alfariza, SA, & Fauzi, I. (2022). Integration of Islam and Science Through the Recitation Learning Method: A Literature Review. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.36667/jppi.v10i1.970. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36667/jppi.v10i1.970
Azizah, M., Sulianto, J., & Cintang, N. (2018). Analysis of Primary School Students' Critical Thinking Skills in Mathematics Learning in the 2013 Curriculum. Journal of Educational Research, 35(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v35i1.13529.
Boelt, A. M., Kolmos, A., & Holgaard, J. E. (2022). Literature review of students' perceptions of generic competence development in problem-based learning in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 47(6), 1399–1420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2074819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2022.2074819
Brotosiswoyo, BS (2001). The nature of learning Mathematics and Natural Science and tips for studying physics in college. PEKERTI-MIPA Open University.
Edwin, LD, Gunayasa, IBK, & Setiawan, H. (2021). The Influence of the Directed Reading Thinking Activity Strategy on the Reading Comprehension Ability of Class V at SD Gugus 3, Gunung Sari District. Journal of Elementary Education, 1(1), 10–18. https://jurnal.educ3.org/index.php/pendagogia/article.
Faradilla, M., Hasan, M., & Sulastri. (2018). The effectiveness of guided inquiry-based student worksheets on students' generic science skills. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088(1), 012106. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1088/1/012106
Haviz, M., Karomah, H., Delfita, R., Umar, MIA, & Maris, IM (2018). Revising generic science skills as 21st century skills on biology learning. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.12438
Hayati, A., Juanengsih, N., & Fadlilah, DR (2021). Laboratory activity-based learning to improve generic science skills on the concept of sensory systems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1836(1), 012077. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1836/1/012077
Herianto, H., & Wilujeng, I. (2020). The correlation between students' curiosity and generic science skills in science learning. Journal of Science Education Innovation, 6(2), 237–246. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.37382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v6i2.37382
Hill, M.A., Overton, T.L., Thompson, C.D., Kitson, R.R., & Coppo, P. (2019). Undergraduate recognition of curriculum-related skill development and the skills employers are seeking. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 20(1), 68–84. https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlehtml/2018/rp/c8rp00105g. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00105G
Hodiyanto, H, Darma, Y., & Putra, SRS (2020). Development of Macromedia Flash-Based Learning Media Containing Problem Posing on Mathematical Problem Solving Ability. Mosharafa: Journal of Mathematics Education, 9(2), 323–334. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i2.652
Hodiyanto, Hodiyanto. (2017). The influence of the problem solving learning model on mathematical communication skills in terms of gender. Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(2), 219. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.15770. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v4i2.15770
Martiningsih, M., Situmorang, RP, & Hastuti, SP (2018). The Relationship Between Generic Science Skills and Scientific Attitudes Through Inquiry Models Viewed from the Cognitive Domain. Journal of Science Education (Jps), 6(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.6.1.2018.24-33. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.6.1.2018.24-33
Nastiti, D., Rahardjo, SB, VH, ES, & Perdana, R. (2018). The Need Analysis of Module Development Based on Search, Solve, Create, and Share to Increase Generic Science Skills in Chemistry. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 7(4), 428–434. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.12393. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i4.12393
Novellia, M. (2018). Application of the problem based learning (PBL) learning model to improve creative thinking abilities and student learning outcomes in thematic learning. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v1i2.14760. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v1i2.14760
Pujani, NM, Suma, K., Sadia, W., & Wijaya, AFC (2018). Applying collaborative ranking tasks to improve students concept mastery and generic science skills. Indonesian Journal of Science Education, 7(3), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14304. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14304
Ramdhani, EP, Khoirunnisa, F., & Siregar, NAN (2020). Effectiveness of Multiple Representation Integrated Electronic Modules in Chemical Bonding Materials. Journal of Research and Technology, 6(1), 162–167. https://journal.unusida.ac.id/index.php/jrt/article/view/152
Razali, Halim, A., Haji, AG, & Nurfadilla, E. (2020). Effect of inquiry learning methods on generic science skills based on creativity level. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460(1), 012118. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012118
Respati, SMB, Soenoko, R., Irawan, YS, Suprapto, W., Wicaksono, DK, & Purwanto, H. (2018). The effect of palm fibers addition on density, porosity, water discharge and TDS of the natural zeolite ceramic. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1977. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5042927
Rosidah, T., Astuti, AP, & Wulandari, VA (2017). Exploration of students' generic science skills in chemistry subjects at SMA Negeri 9 Semarang. Journal of Science Education (JPS), 5(2), 130–137. https://doi.org/10.26714/jps.5.2.2017.130-137.
Salmia, & Yusri, AM (2021). The Role of Teachers in 21st Century Learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Indonesian Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v5i1.31955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v5i1.31955
Sarkar, M., Overton, T., Thompson, C.D., & Rayner, G. (2020). Academics perspectives of the teaching and development of generic employability skills in science curriculum. Higher Education Research & Development, 39(2), 346–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1664998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2019.1664998
Sele, Y., Nomleni, FT, & Sir, MS (2021). The Gender Equality in CLIS Model and Brain Gym Technique: A Review of Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Unnes Science Education Journal, 10(1), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.15294/USEJ.V10I1.42794. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v10i1.42794
Sholikhati, MA, & Sartika, SB (2022). Profile of analytical thinking skills of junior high school students in solving science questions based on gender. Indonesian Journal of Science Education and Learning (JPPSI), 5(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v5i1.42221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsi.v5i1.42221
Siahaan, AT, Liliasari, & Hernani. (2019). Effectiveness of Argument-Driven Inquiry Model on Students' Generic Science Skills and Concept Mastery. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012020
Sugiyono. (2019). Quantitative, Qualitative, and R&D Research Methods. CV. Alphabet.
Surya, YF (2017). Use of the 21st Century Character Education Learning Model in Early Childhood. Obsession Journal: Journal of Early Childhood Education, 1(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.31004/obsession.v1i1.31.
Suryani, K., Utami, IS, & Rahmadani, AF (2020). Development of STEM-based Digital Modules using the 3D FlipBook Application in the Operating Systems Course. 25(3), 358–367.
Tang, Y.M., Chen, PC, Law, KMY, Wu, CH, Lau, Y. yip, Guan, J., He, D., & Ho, GTS (2021). Comparative analysis of Student's live online learning readiness during the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic in the higher education sector. Computers and Education, 168(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104211
Wegemer, C. M., & Eccles, J. S. (2019). Gendered STEM career choices: Altruistic values, beliefs, and identity. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 110, 28–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.020
Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraala, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097
Widyastuti, AC, Permana, D., & Sari, IP (2018). Analysis of students' mathematical creative thinking abilities in solving mathematical problems on flat-sided geometric material seen from gender. Journal of Innovative Mathematics Learning, 1(2), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i2.p145-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i2.p145-148
Yudha, F., Dafik, D., & Yuliati, N. (2018). The Analysis of Creative and Innovative Thinking Skills of the 21st Century Students in Solving the Problems of "Locating Dominating Set" in Research Based Learning. International Journal of Advanced Engineering Research and Science, 5(3), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.3.21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaers.5.3.21
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Kasmudin Mustapa, Siti Nuryanti, Muhammad Al Gifary
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
