The Demonstration of Linguistic, Cognitive and Socio-cultural Dimensions of Academic Literacy in Nursing Students’ Written Texts

Asih Nurakhir, Issy Yuliasri, Dwi Anggani Linggar Bharati

Abstract


This study aimed to evaluate the demonstration of linguistic, cognitive, and socio-cultural dimensions of academic literacy in the written texts produced by the students of the nursing program. A descriptive qualitative research design was used to meet the purpose of the study. Data were collected from the students’ written texts, which served as the students’ responses to an English quiz. Fifteen out of fifty-two students’ written texts were randomly selected for the analysis. A modified scale table from the existing literature was used as a guideline during the analysis. This scale describes an assessment of the three dimensions of literacy: linguistic, cognitive, and socio-cultural. The results of the analysis showed that, in general, the students had a fair level of linguistic, cognitive, and socio-cultural dimensions of literacy. They could partially use layouts, punctuations, capitalizations, verb conjugations, and agreement as well as spelling. They also seemed to be familiar with some types of texts and generic structures, as well as linguistic features. However, there was evidence that students provided a less complete response and sometimes irrelevant information as well as an inconsistent interpretation of the subject of the text. This study indicates a high need for nursing students to improve their ability in academic literacy in English. As academic literacy is not a natural phenomenon, instead a learned ability, it should be developed and fostered in the educational institutions. 

Keywords


Academic literacy; Dimensions of Literacy; Evaluation; Nursing Students; Written Texts

References


Adams, R. (2016). Poor handwriting ‘may hinder students’ chances of exam success. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/education/2016/aug/22.

Barton, D. (2007). Literacy: An introduction to ecology of written language. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

Chimbganda, A. B. (2011). Discovering academic literacy skills in English of first year ESL students in humanities at the University of Botswana. International Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 1-21.

Curry, M. J. (2004). UCLA community college review: academic literacy for english language learners. Community College Review, 32(2), 51-68. doi: 10.1177/009155210403200204.

Darus, S., & Ching, K. H. (2009). Common errors in written english essays of form one Chinese students: A case study. European Journal of Social Sciences, 10(2), 242-253.

Defazio, J., Jones, J., Tennant, F., & Hook, S. A. (2010). Academic literacy: The importance and impact of writing across the curriculum – A case study. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 10(2), 34-47.

Faridi, A., Bahri, S., & Nurmasitah, S. (2016). The problems of applying student centered syllabus of English in vocational high schools in Kendal Regency. English Language Teaching, 9(8), 231-240.

Gao, L. H. (2017). Academic literacy acquisition beyond cultural boundaries: Taking academic English writing as a case. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Education and Social Development (ICESD 2017). Retrieved from http://dpi-proceedings.com/index.php/dtssehs/article/download/11583/11125.

Gerot, L. & Wignell, P. (1995). Making sense of functional grammar. Sydney: Stabler.

Girón-García, C. (2015). Literacy and technologies in EFL settings: Fostering reading comprehension on the Internet. Bellaterral Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 8(2), 69-100. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5565/rev/jtl3.616.

Hastuti, D., & Yuliasri, I. (2015). The effectiveness of STAD and TGT to enhance narrative text reading comprehension of the students with high and low achievement. English Education Journal, 5(2), 46-52.

Henderson, R., & Hirst, E. (2007). Reframing academic literacy: Re-examining a short-course for “disadvantaged” tertiary students. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(2), 25-38.

Hyland, K. (2007). Genre pedagogy: Language, literacy and L2 writing instruction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16, 148–164. doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.005.

Kern, R. (2000). Literacy and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Knaflič, L. (2014). Psychological Aspects of Literacy. Libellarium, 7(1), 41-53.

Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (1998). Student writing in higher education: An academic literacies approach. Studies in Higher Education, 23(2), 157-172.

Lea, M. R., & Street, B. V. (2006). The “academic literacies” model: Theory and applications. Theory into Practice, 45(4), 368-377.

Lillis, T., & Scott, M. (2007). Defining academic literacies research: issues of epistemology, ideology and strategy. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), pp. 5–32. doi: 10.1558/japl.v4i1.5.

Manikowati, & Bharati, D. A. L. (2017). The effectiveness of multimedia in teaching writing to students with different learning styles. English Education Journal, 7(2), pp. 85-91.

Marinkovich, J., Velásquez, M., Córdova, A., & Cid, C. (2016). Academic literacy and genres in university learning communities. Ilha do Desterro, 69(3), 95-113.

Mujiyanto, Y. (2013). The significance of academic literacy in analysing texts for translation. Language Circle Journal of Language and Literature, 7(2), 65-73.

Nurakhir, A., & Palupi, F. N. (2018). Exploring ESP needs of undergraduate nursing students in a university in Indonesia. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 5(7), 77-85.

Odell, L. (1995). Basic writing in context: Rethinking academic literacy. Journal of Basic Writing, 14(1), 43-56.

Palmer, L., Levett-Jones, T., Smith, R., & McMillan, M. (2014). Academic literacy diagnostic assessment in the first semester of first year at university. The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 5(1), 67-78.

Papashane, M. & Hlalele, D. (2014). Academic literacy: A critical cognitive catalyst towards the creation of sustainable learning ecologies in higher education. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(10). Doi:10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n10p661.

Piršl, D., Piršl, T., & Kesić, D. (2011). Writing skills at university level. Sportlogia, 7(1), 69-72.

Rajagukguk, T. E. B., Agustien, H. I. R., & Mujiyanto, Y. (2017). The academic literacy of sixteen-seventh graders of an English immersion junior high school in Semarang. Language Circle: Journal of Language and Literature, 11(2), 198-214.

Rahayu, A., & Arrasyid, I. (2016). Exploring writing practices in EFL classroom: A case study at English Department IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon. ELT-Echo, 1(1), 53-64.

Wells, G. (1987). Apprenticeship in Literacy. Interchange, 18, pp. 109-123.

Watcharapunyawong, S., & Usaha, S. (2013). Thai EFL students’ writing errors in different text types: The interference of the first language. English Language Teaching, 6(1), 67-78. doi:10.5539/elt.v6n1p67

Wu, Y., & Dong, H. (2009). Applying SF-based genre approaches to English writing class. International Education Studies, 2(3), 77-81.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i3.17736

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 129 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:

LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT (LPPM)

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN GANESHA

Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928
Homepage: https://lppm.undiksha.ac.id
Email: jpi_journal@undiksha.ac.id


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.