The Management Of The Education Operational Grant And Its Effects On School Development

Rismita Rismita

Abstract


The problem that has occurred in schools is in managing education operational aid funds in the current year is not in accordance with the recording of recapitulation of data for students who receive funds resulting in each area in use there is a difference or the remaining funds and less effective in managing expenditure per student by comparing school districts which is based on the previous year's budget that has already happened. This study aims to analyze the management of school fund management towards school development. The research method used is descriptive qualitative research by explaining the function of management. Data collection techniques in this study were interviews with the principal, deputy headmaster of the curriculum, the head of school administration, observation, and documents relating to the accountability of funds. The results of the study are grouping funds according to school programs, there is no waste of funds based on the percentage of funding funding per quarter. The Principal builds a system of monitoring the use of funds in an accountable and accurate manner in achieving the vision and mission of the school


Keywords


Fund Management; Education Operational Grant; School Development

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arnold, M. C., & Gillenkirch, R. M. (2015). Using negotiated budgets for planning and performance evaluation: An experimental study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 43, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2015.02.002

Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making Schools Work: New Evidence on Accountability Reforms. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-0-8213-8679-8

Bush, T. (2007). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391–406.

Bush, T. (2008). Leadership and management development. SAGE.

Bush, T. (2019). School leaders and accountability: Performance or performativity? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 47(2), 167–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218817949

Carlson, D., & Lavertu, S. (2018). School Improvement Grants in Ohio: Effects on Student Achievement and School Administration. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 40(3), 287–315. https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373718760218

Dinham, S. (2013). The quality teaching movement in Australia encounters difficult terrain: A personal perspective. Australian Journal of Education, 57(2), 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0004944113485840

Elliot, A., Murayama, K., Kobeisy, A., & Lichtenfeld, S. (2015). Potential-based achievement goals. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12051

Fatah, A. A. (2016). The Impact of Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) Program: School Operational Assistance to the Household Expenditures in Education: A Case Study of Indonesia. Martin School of Public Policy and Administration University of Kentucky, 29.

Fitri, A. (2014). Pengelolaan dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) SD Negeri Kecamatan Mandiangin Koto Selayan Kota Bukittinggi. Jurnal Bahana Manajemen Pendidikan, 2, 33–39. https://doi.org/10.23036/bmp.v2i1.3753

Gibbs, M., & Poisat, P. (2019). Educator Engagement: Key to High Performance of School Operational teams in South African Secondary Schools. Africa Education Review, 16(4), 37–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2017.1394166

Haynes, N. M., Arafeh, S., & McDaniels, C. (Eds.). (2015). Educational leadership: Perspectives on preparation and practice. University Press of America.

Howieson, B. (2003). Accounting practice in the new millennium: Is accounting education ready to meet the challenge? The British Accounting Review, 35(2), 69–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0890-8389(03)00004-0

Hsieh, J. Y., & Liou, K. T. (2016). Collaborative Leadership and Organizational Performance: Assessing the Structural Relation in a Public Service Agency. Review of Public Personnel Administration, 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734371X15623619

Huang, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020). Research on Management Accounting Practice: A Network Teaching Model Guided by Practical Simulation. Modern Economy, 11(01), 89–95. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2020.111009

INDONESIA, P. R. (2005). PERATURAN PEMERINTAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 19 TAHUN 2005 TENTANG STANDAR NASIONAL PENDIDIKAN. http://www.academia.edu/download/42688161/pengumuman_46.pdf

Ishak, N. Mohd., Iskandar, I. P., & Ramli, R. (2010). Emotional intelligence of Malaysian teachers: A comparative study on teachers in daily and residential schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 604–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.205

Kappes, H. B., Stephens, E. J., & Oettingen, G. (2011). Implicit theories moderate the relation of positive future fantasies to academic outcomes. Journal of Research in Personality, 45(3), 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2011.02.006

Kretchmar, K., & Zeichner, K. (2016). Teacher prep 3.0: A vision for teacher education to impact social transformation. Journal of Education for Teaching, 42(4), 417–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2016.1215550

Kumashiro, K. K. (2010). Seeing the Bigger Picture: Troubling Movements to End Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 56–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347318

Lee, K.-G., & Polachek, S. W. (2018). Do school budgets matter? The effect of budget referenda on student dropout rates. Education Economics, 26(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2017.1404966

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2002). Building a practically useful theory of goal setting and task motivation: A 35-year odyssey. American Psychologist, 57(9), 705–717. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066X.57.9.705

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2006). New Directions in Goal-Setting Theory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 15(5), 265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8721.2006.00449.x

Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (2013). New Developments in Goal Setting and Task Performance. Routledge.

Lowenhaupt, R., Spillane, J. P., & Hallett, T. (2016). Education Policy in Leadership Practice: “Accountability Talk” in Schools. Journal of School Leadership, 26(5), 783–810. https://doi.org/10.1177/105268461602600503

Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Goal-Setting Theory of Motivation. International Journal Of Management, Business, And Administration, 15, 6.

Manu, B. D., Zhang, H., Oduro, D., Krampah-Nkoom, A., Mensah, I. A., Anaba, O. A., & Isaac, A. (2019). School Board Efficiency in Financial Management and Human Resource in Public Senior High Schools: An Evidence from Ashanti Region, Ghana. International Journal of Social Science Studies, 8(1), 79. https://doi.org/10.11114/ijsss.v8i1.4556

Martin, A. J., & Elliot, A. J. (2016). The role of personal best (PB) goal setting in students’ academic achievement gains. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 222–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2015.12.014

Mercer, J. (2010). Human Resource Management in Education: Contexts, Themes and Impact (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203850817

Mestry, R. (2016). The management of user fees and other fundraising initiatives in self-managing public schools. South African Journal of Education, 36(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v36n2a1246

Mohamad, M., & Jais, J. (2016). Emotional Intelligence and Job Performance: A Study among Malaysian Teachers. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35, 674–682. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(16)00083-6

Othoo, H. A., A. Olel, M., & Gogo, J. (2019). Finanacial Resources as Determinants of Academic Performance in Public Secondary Schools in Kuria East and Kuria West Sub-Counties, Kenya. American Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 4(2), 392–406. https://doi.org/10.20448/801.42.392.406

Pontoh, J., Ilat, V., & Manossoh, H. (2017). Analisis Pengelolaan Dana Bantuan Operasional Sekolah (BOS) pada Satuan Pendidikan Dasar di Kota Kotamobagu. Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Auditing “GOODWILL,” 8(2). https://doi.org/10.35800/jjs.v8i2.18266

Rismita, -. (2018, February 4). The Implementation of Tuition-Free School Policy Using Stake’s Countenance Evaluation Model. First Indonesian Communication Forum of Teacher Training and Education Faculty Leaders International Conference on Education 2017 (ICE 2017). https://doi.org/10.2991/ice-17.2018.110

Sampaio, M., & Leite, C. (2017). From curricular justice to educational improvement: What is the role of schools’ self-evaluation? Improving Schools, 20(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216688553

Scharf, J., Hadjar, A., & Grecu, A. (2019). Applying social production function theory to benefits of schooling: The concept of values of education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 40(7), 847–867. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2019.1604207

Tamir, E. (2019). High school managements resources allocation in an era of reforms. International Journal of Educational Management Vol. 33 No. 5, 2019 Pp. 828-847 © Emerald Publishing Limited 0951-354X DOI 10.1108/IJEM-08-2017-0204, Vol.33 No. 5, 2019, 20.

Tesfaye, G. (2018). Addis Ababa University College of Education and Behavioral Studies Department of Educational Planning and Management. 109.

Thieme, C., Prior, D., Tortosa-Ausina, E., & Gempp, R. (2016). Value added, educational accountability approaches and their effects on schools’ rankings: Evidence from Chile. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(2), 456–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2016.01.023

Uljens, M., & Ylimaki, R. M. (Eds.). (2017). Bridging Educational Leadership, Curriculum Theory and Didaktik (Vol. 5). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-58650-2

Van der Sluis, M. E., Reezigt, G. J., & Borghans, L. (2017). Implementing New Public Management in Educational Policy. Educational Policy, 31(3), 303–329. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904815598393

Weltbank (Ed.). (2003). Sustainable development in a dynamic world: Transforming institutions, growth, and quality of life. Oxford Univ. Press.

World Bank. (2004). World Development Report 2005: A Better Investment Climate for Everyone. The World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/0-8213-5682-8

Zeichner, K., Payne, K. A., & Brayko, K. (2014). Democratizing Teacher Education. Journal of Teacher Education, 14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114560908




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.21218

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 853 times
PDF file view : 335 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:

LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT (LPPM)

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN GANESHA

Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928
Homepage: https://lppm.undiksha.ac.id
Email: jpi_journal@undiksha.ac.id


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.