Learning Style Preference: Results of Repetitive Cross-Sectional Surveys in an Higher Education Institution

Eliot Simangunsong

Abstract


Using the theoretical framework of the Felder-Silverman Learning Styles Model, this study aims to understand the learning styles of middle school students entering the university to promote teaching innovation and improve the quality of the learning experience. A quantitative research method was applied through repeated cross-sectional surveys for 3 years among 2,325 students. Systematic analysis is applied to investigate respondent learning styles. Data analysis showed a significant difference in terms of the sex of students, while in terms of graduation years, the proportion of sequential students showed a significant increase from 2014 to 2016; this might imply that students from scientific or analytic backgrounds increasingly choose management schools. As expected, management students are active in character, except in accounting programs, where sensing learners are dominant. Innovative, active and visual-based learning is also preferred. Through the findings of this study, we conclude that interest in studies is related to the learning dimensions. The teaching style must follow the characteristics of the learning dimensions to provide an optimal learning experience. Here, it is important to implement an innovation-based learning process in higher education institutions.


Keywords


learning styles; innovation in teaching; quality; management; higher education; teaching-learning methodologies

References


Acharya, C. (2002). Students’ Learning Styles and their implications for Teachers. CDTL Brief, 5(6), 1–8.

Astuti, L. D. P. (2020, May 22). Orang Tua Wajib Tahu, Gaya Belajar Seperti Apa yang Disukai Anak. Orang Tua Wajib Tahu, Gaya Belajar Seperti Apa yang Disukai Anak. https://www.viva.co.id/gaya-hidup/parenting/1217379-orang-tua-wajib-tahu-gaya-belajar-seperti-apa-yang-disukai-anak

Balakrishnan, V., & Gan, C. L. (2016). Students’ learning styles and their effects on the use of social media technology for learning. Telematics and Informatics, 33(3), 808–821. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.12.004

Bayrak, B. K. (2012). A Study on Learning Styles of Secondary School Student’s According to Gender and Class Level. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 843–847. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.210

Bernardes, R. F., Guzzo, R. F., & Madera, J. M. (2019). Millennial Attitudes Toward Online and Traditional Training Methods: The Role of Training Utility and Satisfaction. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 60(4), 320–334. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965519843488

Brown, E., Cristea, A., Stewart, C., & Brailsford, T. (2005). Patterns in authoring of adaptive educational hypermedia: A taxonomy of learning styles. Educational Technology & Society, 8(3), 77–90.

de Souza, G. H. S., de Miranda Coelho, J. A. P., Esteves, G. G. L., & Lima, N. C. (2020). Learning Management: An Analytical Approach for Teaching Methodologies Associated With Cognitive Skills. In Learning Styles and Strategies for Management Students (pp. 111–130). IGI Global.

DiLullo, C., McGee, P., & Kriebel, R. M. (2011). Demystifying the Millennial student: A reassessment in measures of character and engagement in professional education. Anatomical Sciences Education, 4(4), 214–226.

Emerson, T. L., & Taylor, B. A. (2007). Interactions between personality type and the experimental methods. The Journal of Economic Education, 38(1), 18–35.

Felder, R. M., Felder, G. N., & Dietz, E. J. (2002). The effects of personality type on engineering student performance and attitudes. Journal of Engineering Education, 91(1), 3–17.

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.

Graf, S., Viola, S. R., Leo, T., & Kinshuk. (2007). In-depth analysis of the Felder-Silverman learning style dimensions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 40(1), 79–93.

Hammond, C. (2016, November 16). Apakah kita mempunyai pilihan gaya belajar tertentu? BBC News Indonesia. https://www.bbc.com/indonesia/vert-fut-37940972

Honigsfeld, A., & Dunn, R. (2003). High School Male and Female Learning-Style Similarities and Differences in Diverse Nations. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(4), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/27542433

Islam, N. (2019). Learning styles: Diverse avenues to learning. International Journal of Research in Engineering, IT and Social Sciences, 9(1), 73–85.

Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., Schmeck, R. R., & Avdic, A. (2011). The big five personality traits, learning styles, and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(4), 472–477.

Kuntarto, N. M. (2020, May 2). Pendidikan yang Menggugah dan Menggairahkan di Tengah Covid-19 [Blog]. Pendidikan yang Menggugah dan Menggairahkan di Tengah Covid-19. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2020/05/02/120848771/pendidikan-yang-menggugah-dan-menggairahkan-di-tengah-covid-19

Luz Tortorella, G., Miorando, R., Fettermann, D., & Tlapa Mendoza, D. (2020). An empirical investigation on learning and teaching lean manufacturing. Education + Training, 62(3), 339–354. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-11-2018-0232

Moore, G. F., Moore, L., Littlecott, H. J., Ahmed, N., Lewis, S., Sulley, G., Jones, E., & Holliday, J. (2015). Prevalence of smoking restrictions and child exposure to secondhand smoke in cars and homes: A repeated cross-sectional survey of children aged 10–11 years in Wales. BMJ Open, 5(1), e006914. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006914

Ovariyanti, A. S., & Santoso, H. B. (2016). An adaptation of the Index of Learning Style (ILS) to Indonesian version: A contribution to Index of Learning Style (ILS), validity and reliability score. 2016 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACSIS.2016.7872762

Pinintia Kasih, A. (2020). Guru, Ini Panduan Mengajar Jarak Jauh dari Sekolah Lawan Corona. KOMPAS.com. https://edukasi.kompas.com/read/2020/03/23/175105071/guru-ini-panduan-mengajar-jarak-jauh-dari-sekolah-lawan-corona

Sadler-Smith, E. (2001). The relationship between learning style and cognitive style. Personality and Individual Differences, 30(4), 609–616.

Samuel, A. B., & Rahman, M. M. (2018). Innovative Teaching Methods and Entrepreneurship Education: A Review of Literature. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 10(1), 1807–1813.

Shaw, G., & Marlow, N. (1999). The role of student learning styles, gender, attitudes and perceptions on information and communication technology assisted learning. Computers & Education, 33(4), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00020-2

Shih, T., & Huang, Y.-Y. (2017). A case study on technology entrepreneurship education at a Taiwanese research university. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22(4), 202–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2017.07.009

Simangunsong, E. (2014). An Empirical Study of Felder and Silverman’s ILS in Undergraduate Program of ABC University to Increase Quality & Education Processes. Gadjah Mada International Conference on Economics and Business, 1. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/315747463_An_Empirical_Study_of_Felder_and_Silverman%27s_ILS_in_Undergraduate_Program_of_ABC_University_to_Increase_Quality_Education_Processes

Sofiyabadi, J., & Firoozabadi, K. J. (2017). TQM in Higher Education: Fuzzy Ranking based on AQIP Components. http://www.palmajournal.org/articles/2017-16/218226.pdf

Sullivan, P., & Hyun, S.-Y. J. (2016). Clothing Retail Channel Use and Digital Behavior: Generation and Gender Differences. Journal of Business Theory and Practice, 4(1), 125.

Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating learning styles and adaptive e-learning system: Current developments, problems and opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014

Viola, S. R., Graf, S., & Leo, T. (2006). Analysis of Felder-Silverman index of learning styles by a data-driven statistical approach. Multimedia, 2006. ISM’06. Eighth IEEE International Symposium On, 959–964.

Wang, J., & Mendori, T. (2015). The Reliability and Validity of Felder- Silverman Index of Learning Styles in Mandarin Version. Information Engineering Express, 1(3), 1–8.

Zywno, M. (2003). A Contribution to Validation of Score Meaning for Felder Soloman’s Index of Learning Styles. Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition, 119.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.21414

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 68 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:

LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT (LPPM)

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN GANESHA

Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928
Homepage: https://lppm.undiksha.ac.id
Email: jpi_journal@undiksha.ac.id


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.