Context-Based Thematic Teaching Materials to Improve Elementary Students’ Learning Achievements

Nur Fitriana Kusuma Wardani, Sunardi Sunardi, Suharno Suharno


Contextual learning connects the content of subject matters in the classroom with the context of students’ daily lives. Elementary school learning is conducted using a thematic approach that integrates various learning contents into a theme. Thematic teaching materials in elementary schools depend on textbooks provided by the government and are limited in number. Therefore, this study aims to develop context-based thematic teaching materials to improve the learning achievements of elementary school students. In this study, the research and development method was used with the 4D model (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate). The product of development was validated by experts. Testing of the product was conducted twice, namely a small-group test with 8 elementary school students grade IV in SD 2 Guwo and a large-group t to determine the effectiveness of the teaching material developed. The large-group test involved 32 students of grade IV in SD Negeri 2 Kadipaten as the experimental class and 30 students of grade IV in SD Negeri 2 Guwo as the control class. The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences in learning achievements between the experimental class and the control class. The experimental class using context-based thematic teaching materials has better performance than the control class using thematic textbooks. The context-based thematic teaching material that has been developed has been proven to be able to improve student achievement. The results of this study are expected to be a reference for teachers and policymakers to develop context-based thematic teaching materials.


Contextual Teaching and Learning; Thematic Learning; Development of Teaching Materials

Full Text:



Aggelakos, C. (2007). The Cross-Thematic Approach and the ‘New’ Curricula of Greek Compulsory Education: Review of an Incompatible Relationship. Policy Futures in Education, 5(4), 460–467.

Ain, N., & Rahutami, R. (2018). Theme network in thematic learning in elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1013(1).

Aqib, Z. (2013). Model-model, media, dan strategi pembelajaran kontekstual (inovatif). Bandung: Yrama Widya.

Bitchener, J., & Turner, E. (2011). Assessing the effectiveness of one approach to the teaching of thematic unit construction of literature reviews. Assessing Writing, 16(2), 123–136.

Ekowati, C. K., & Nenohai, J. M. H. (2016). The Development of Thematic Mathematics Book Based on Environment with a Realistic Approach to Implant the Attitude of Caring about Environment at Students of Elementary School Grade One in Kupang. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(1), 112.

Gardner, J. E., Wissick, C. A., Schweder, W., & Canter, L. S. (2003). Enhancing interdisciplinary instruction in general and special education: Thematic units and technology. Remidial and Special Education, 24(3), 161–172.

Gayatri, T., Soegiyanto, H., & Rintayati, P. (2018). Development of Contextual Teaching Learning-Based Audio Visual Adobe Flash Media to Improve Critical Thinking Ability of Geography Learning at Senior High School. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 145(1).

Glynn, S. N., & Winter, L. K. (2004). Contextual Teaching and Learning of Science in Elementary Schools. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 16(2), 51–63.

Hobri, Septiawati, I., & Cahya Prihandoko, A. (2018). High-order thinking skill in contextual teaching and learning of mathematics based on lesson study for learning community. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, 7(3), 1576.

Johar, R., Agussalim, Ikhsan, M., & Zaura, B. (2018). The development of learning materials using contextual teaching learning (CTL) approach oriented on the character education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 0–6.

Khatri, R., Henderson, C., Cole, R., Froyd, J. E., Friedrichsen, D., & Stanford, C. (2017). Characteristics of well-propagated teaching innovations in undergraduate STEM. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1).

Kurniasari, H., Sukarmin, & Sarwanto. (2018). Development of contextual teaching and learning based science module for junior high school for increasing creativity of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1).

Lipson, M. Y., Valencia, S. W., Wixson, K. K., & Peters, C. W. (1993). Integration and Thematic Teaching: Integration to Improve Teaching and Learning. Language Arts, 70(4), 252–263.

Lung, M. (2012). A Thematic Approach: Making a Biology Course Relevant & Process-Oriented. The American Biology Teacher, 61(1), 18–22.

Mauliana, Ikhsan, M., & Subianto, M. (2018). Development of Learning Tool with Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL) Approach to Improve Student Mathematical Connection Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1088, 4–9.

McCarthy, C. B. (2005). Effects of thematic-based, hands-on science teaching versus a textbook approach for students with disabilities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(3), 245–263.

McCauley, M. J. (1966). A thematic approach to physics. Science Education, 50(4), 301–308.

Michaelidou, E., Nakos, B., & Filippakopoulou, V. (2007). The Ability of Elementary School Children to Analyse General Reference and Thematic Maps. Cartographica: The International Journal for Geographic Information and Geovisualization, 39(4), 65–88.

Milner, A. R., Templin, M. A., & Czerniak, C. M. (2011). Elementary Science Students’ Motivation and Learning Strategy Use: Constructivist Classroom Contextual Factors in a Life Science Laboratory and a Traditional Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 22(2), 151–170.

Min, K. C. (2012). Teachers ’ Understanding and Practice towards Thematic Approach in Teaching Integrated Living Skills ( ILS ) in Malaysia. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 2(23), 273–281.

Nurlaela, L., Samani, M., Asto, I. G. P., & Wibawa, S. C. (2018). The effect of thematic learning model, learning style, and reading ability on the students’ learning outcomes. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 296(1).

Piazza, J. A., Scott, M. M., & Carver, E. C. (1994). Thematic Webbing and the Curriculum Standards in The Primary Grades. The Arithmetic Teacher, 41(6), 294–298.

Resor, C., & Gandy, S. K. (2013). Dreaming of a Better Life: Utopia as a Focus for Thematic, Interdisciplinary Instruction. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 87(1), 1–8.

Scantlebury, K., Boone, W., Kahle, J. B., & Fraser, B. J. (2001). Design, validation, and use of an evaluation instrument for monitoring systemic reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(6), 646–662.

Selvianiresa, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2017). Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach of Mathematics in Primary Schools. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1).

Shanahan, T. (1997). Reading-Writing Relationships, Thematic Units, Inquiry Learning In Pursuit of Effective Integrated Literacy Instruction. The Reading Teacher, 51(1), 12–19.

Sheppard, N. (2012). A Thematic Approach to Concerns of the Future. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 10(7), 30–33.

Shidiq, A. S. (2016). Pembelajaran Sains Kimia Berbasis Etnosains Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Dan Prestasi Belajar Siswa. In Seminar Nasional Kimia dan Pendidikan Kimia VIII (pp. 227–236). Surakarta: Program Studi Pendidikan FKIP UNS.

Shidiq, A. S., & Yamtinah, S. (2019). Pre-service chemistry teachers’ attitudes and attributes toward the twenty-first century skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(042014), 1–8.

Suryawati, E., Osman, K., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). The effectiveness of RANGKA contextual teaching and learning on student’s problem solving skills and scientific attitude. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 1717–1721.

Syafutri, R., & Soeharto. (2019). Movable Book Development To Improve Students’ Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(1), 141–150.

Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (1974). Instructional development for training teachers of exceptional children: A sourcebook. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped. Bloomington: Indiana University.

Trifonoff, K. M. (1995). Going beyond location: Thematic maps in the early elementary grades. Journal of Geography, 94(2), 368–374.

Urbani, J. J. M., Truesdell, E., Urbani, J. J. M., Roshandel, S., Michaels, R., Truesdell, E., … Truesdell, E. (2017). Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. Educacion Quimica, 1(1), 1709–1716.

Wahyuningtyas, R. S., & Wuryadi, W. (2018). The influence of contextual teaching and learning (CTL) on critical thinking ability and conceptual understanding of skeletal system materials. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2021.

Wepner, S. B. (1993). Technology Links to Literacy: Technology and Thematic Units: An Elementary Example on Japan. The Reading Teacher, 46(5), 442–445.

White, R. M. (2014). How Thematic Teaching Can Transform History Instruction. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 68(3), 160–162.

Willey, W. (2006). A Thematic Approach to the Teaching of English. The English Journal, 51(9), 643.

Wu, Y. T., & Tsai, C. C. (2005). Effects of constructivist-oriented instruction on elementary school students’ cognitive structures. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 113–119.

Yamtinah, S., Indriyanti, N. Y., Saputro, S., Mulyani, S., Ulfa, M., Mahardiani, L., … Shidiq, A. S. (2019). The identification and analysis of students ’ misconception in chemical equilibrium using computerized two-tier multiple-choice instrument. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157 (2019(042015), 1–7.

Yuh-Tyng Chen. (2012). The effect of thematic video-based instruction on learning and motivation in e-learning. International Journal of the Physical Sciences, 7(6), 957–965.

Yuliana, M., Wiryawan, S. A., & Riyadi. (2018). The development of thematic materials using project based learning for elementary school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1022(1).

Zulfaneti, Rismen, S., & Suryani, M. (2016). Validity analysis of development lesson plan and student worksheet based realistic mathematics education. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1707.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 573 times
PDF file view : 278 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:



Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.