The Influence of Survey, Question, Read, Recite, Review Method Toward Reading Comprehension Ability Mediated by Working Memory

Nani Restati Siregar, Muhammad Ilham, Mansyur M.

Abstract


Reading comprehension plays a vital role in students' academic achievement. This empirical study aims to determine the influence of survey, question, read, recite, and review (SQ3R) method on reading comprehension ability. The impact of mediation on semantic and phonological working memory toward reading comprehension ability after being given the SQ3R method. The empirical study was Quasi-experimental with untreated control group design with dependent pretest and posttest samples. The total participants are 57 students in elementary school. Thirty of the subjects were selected based on colored progressive matrices and reading comprehension measurement in equal. In this case, 15 students as treatment groups and 15 students as a control group. Backward digit span task was used to measure phonological working memory, sentence completion, responsibility for semantic working memory, and reading comprehension test for reading comprehension ability. Causal analysis technique by SPSS MACRO PROCESS was used to examine the hypothesis of the research. The results revealed that there was an influence SQ3R method toward reading comprehension ability. Semantic working memory and phonological working memory are mediate between SQ3R and reading comprehension, but the mediating effect of semantic working memory is more reliable than phonological working memory. This research indicated that the effectivity of the SQ3R method to improve reading comprehension was mediated by working memory capacity in Bajo’s children.


Keywords


Metacognition; Reading Comprehension; Working Memory; SQ3R

Full Text:

PDF

References


Baddeley, A. (2012). Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol, 63:1–29, doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.

Banerjee, P. A., & Lamb, S. (2016). A systematic review of factors linked to poor academic performance of disadvantaged students in science and maths in school. Congent Education, 3(1). doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1178441.

Botsas, G. (2017). Differences in strategy use in the reading comprehension of narrative and science text among students with and without learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities : A contemporary Journal, 15(1), 139-162.

Chevaller, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K., & Deacon, H. (2015). The Role of Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Metacognitive Study and Learning Strategies, and Behavioral Study and Learning Strategies in Predicting Academic Success in Students with and Without a History of Reading Difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(1): 34-48.

Concannon-Gibney, T., & McCarthy, M. J. (2012). The explicit teaching of reading comprehension in science class: A pilot professional development program. Improving Schools, 15(1) 73–88. DOI: 10.1177/1365480211433726

de Carvalho, C. A. F., de Kida, A. S. B., Capellini, S. A., & de Avila, C. R. B. (2014). Phonological working memory and reading in students with dyslexia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5: 746. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00746

Derakhshanrad, S. A., & Piven, E. A. (2018). Cognitive neurodynamic approach to prediction of students’ adaptation to college: An ex-post facto study. BCN, 9(3): 217-226, doi: 10.29252/nirp.bcn-9.3.217

Fellman, D., Jykka, J., Waris, O., Soveri, A., Ritakallo, L., Haga, S. & Laine, M. (2020). The role of strategy uses in working memory training outcomes. Journal of Working Memory and Language, 110, 104064.

Ferrara, A., & Panlililo, C.C. (2020). The role of metacognition in explaining the relationship between early adversity and reading comprehension. Children and Youth Service Review, 112: 104884.

Follmer, J., & Sperling, R. A. (2018). Interaction between reader and text: Contributions on cognitive processes, strategy use, and text cohesion to comprehension expository science text. Learning and Individual Differences, 67: 177-187.

Fuchs, L.S., Gilbert, J. K., Fuchs, D., Seethaler, P. M., & Martin, B. L. N. (2018). Text Comprehension and Oral Language as Predictors of Word- Problem Solving: Insights into Word-Problem Solving as a Form of Text Comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 22(2): 152-166

Furnes, B., & Norman, E. (2015). Metacognition and Reading: Comparing Three Forms of Metacognition in Normally Developing Readers and Readers with Dyslexia. Dyslexia (Chichester, England), 21(3), 273–284. doi:10.1002/dys.1501

Gajria, M., & Jitendra, K. (2016). Effective strategies for developing reading comprehension. Dalam R. Schiff dan R. M. Doshi. Intervention in Learning Disabilities. A Handbook on Systematic Training Programs for Individual with Learning Disabilities. Hal. 119-138. Springer, doi:10.1007/978-3-319-3123-4

Gallego, C., Martin –Aragoneses, M. T., López-Higes, R., & PisÖn, G. (2016). Semantic and syntactic reading comprehension strategies used by deaf children with early and late cochlear implantation. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 49–50:153-170.

Grainger, C., Williams, D. M., & Lind, S. E. (2016). Metacognitive monitoring and control processes in children with autism spectrum disorder: Diminished judgement of confidence accuracy. Consciousness and Cognition, 42: 65-74.

Gropper, R. J., & Tannock, R. (2009). A Pilot Study of Working Memory and Academic Achievement in College Students With ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 12(6): 574-581

Ilter, I. (2017). Improving the reading comprehension of primary-school students at frustration- level reading through the paraphrasing strategy training: A multiple-probe design study. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10 (1): 147-161.

Jian, Y. C. (2018). Reading instruction influence cognitive processes of illustrated text reading not subjected perception: An eye-tracking study. Frontiers Psychology, 9, 2263. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02263

Jung, J. (2018). Effect of task complexity and working memory capacity on L2 reading comprehension. System, 74: 21-37.

Jones, J. S., Milton, F., Mostazir, M., & Adlam, A. R. (2019). The academic outcomes of working memory and metacognitive strategy training in children: A double blind randomized controlled trial. Developmental Science, 00: e12870, doi:10.1111/desc.12870.

Katz, B., & Shah, P. (2017). The role of child socioeconomic status in cognitive training outcomes. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 53: 139-150.

Kim, G. Y. S., & Phillips, B. (2016). Five minutes a day to improve comprehension monitoring in oral language context. An exploratory intervention study with prekindergartners from low-income families. Top Lang Disorder, 36(4), 356-367. doi: 10.1097/TLD.0000000000000103.

Kush, D., Johnson, C. L., & Dyke, J. A. V. (2015). Identifying the role of phonology in sentence- level reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 79-80: 18-29.

Lonigan, C. J. & Burgess, S. R. (2017) Dimensionality of Reading Skills with Elementary-School-Age Children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21:3, 239-253, DOI: 10.1080/10888438.2017.1285918

MacKinnon, D. P. (2011). Integrating mediators and moderators in research design. Res. Soc. Work. Pract, 21(6):675-681, doi:10.1177/1049731511414148.

McArthur, G., Castles, A., Kohnen, S., & Banales, E. (2016). Low self-concept in poor readers: prevalence, heterogeneity, and risk. PeerJ, 4, e2669. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2669

McElvany, M., & Artlet, C. (2009). Systematic reading training in the family: Development, implementation, and initial evaluation of the Berlin Parent–Child Reading Program. Learning and Instruction, 19(1): 79-95.

Mehrdat, A. G., & Ahghar, M. R., & Ahghar, M. (2012). The effect of teaching cognitive and metacognitive strategies on EFL students’ reading comprehension across proficiency levels. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46: 3757-3763

Meyer, M. L., Salimpoor, V. N., Wu, S. S., Geary, D. C., & Menon, V. (2010). Differential contribution of specific working memory components to mathematics achievement in 2nd and 3rd graders. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2): 101–109. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2009.08.004.

Mirandola, C., Ciriello, A., Gigli, M., & Cornoldi, C. (2018). Metacognitive Monitoring of Text Comprehension: An Investigation on Postdictive Judgments in Typically Developing Children and Children with Reading Comprehension Difficulties. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2253. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02253

Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. (2018). The effect of a strategy training on reading comprehension in fourth-grade students, The Journal of Educational Research, 111:6, 690-703, DOI: 10.1080/00220671.2017.1396439

Nicolileo-Carriho, A. P., Crenitte, P. A. P., Lopes-Herrera, S. A., & Hage, S. R., de V. (2018). Relationship between phonological working memory, metacognitive skills and reading comprehension in children with learning disabilities. Journal of Applied Oral Science: revista FOB, 26, e20170414. doi: 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0414

Nishiyama R (2018) Separability of active semantic and phonological maintenance in verbal working memory. PLoS ONE 13(3), e0193808.

Nouwens, S., Groen, M. A., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). How working memory relates to children’s reading comprehension: the importance of domain-specificity in storage and processing. Reading and Writting, 30: 105-120. DOI 10.1007/s11145-016-9665-5

Nutley, S. B., & Söderqvist, S. (2017). How Is Working Memory Training Likely to Influence Academic Performance? Current Evidence and Methodological Considerations. Frontiers in Psychology, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00069

Nyarko, K., Kugbey, N., Kofi, C. C., Cole, Y. A., & Adentwi, K. I. (2018). English Reading Proficiency and Academic Performance Among Lower Primary School Children in Ghana. SAGE, 1-10. doi: 10.1177/2158244018797019.

Rode, C., Robson, R., Purviance, A., Geary, D. C., & Mayr, U. (2014). Is Working Memory Training Effective? A Study in a School Setting. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104796.

Sidak, H. M., & Rahim, H. Ab. (2015). The role of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension: A cross-linguistic study. Proceedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197: 50-56, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.046.

Siregar, N. R. (2019). Cool dan hot brain executive functioning dan performansi akademik siswa. Buletin Psikologi, 26(2): 97-110, doi:10.22146/buletinpsikologi.38817

Shivde, G., & Anderson, M. C. (2011). On the existence of semantic working memory: Evidence for direct semantic maintenance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(6), 1342-1370.

Soto, C., de Blume, P. G. A., Jacovina, M., McNamara, D., Benson, N., Riffo, B., &... (2019) Reading comprehension and metacognition: The importance of inferential skills. Cogent Education, 6:1, doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2019.1565067

Sparapani, N., Connor, C. M., McLean, L., Wood, T., Toste, J., & Day, S. (2018). Direct and Reciprocal Effects among Social Skills, Vocabulary, and Reading Comprehension in First Grade. Contemporary educational psychology, 53, 159–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2018.03.003

Swanson, H. L., & Kong, J. E. (2018). Working memory and reading: Is there evidence for an executive processing deficit? In L. Meltzer (Ed.), Executive function in education: From theory to practice (p. 218–239). Guilford Press.

Swanson, H. L., & O’Connor, R. (2009). The Role of Working Memory and Fluency Practice on the Reading Comprehension of Students Who Are Dysfluent Readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(6): 548-575.

Tajalli, P., & Satari, S. (2013). Effectiveness of metacognitive strategies on reading skills of students with hearing disorders. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 84:139-143, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.06.524

Tan, Y., Martin, R. C., & Dyke, J. A. V. (2017). Semantic and syntactic interference in sentence comprehension: A comparison of working memory models. Front. Psychol. 8:198. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00198

van den Bosch, L. J., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2019) The Role of Linguistic Diversity in the Prediction of Early Reading Comprehension: A Quantile Regression Approach. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23:3, 203-219, doi: 10.1080/10888438.2018.1509864.

van Wingerden, E, Segers, E., van Balkom, H., & Verhoeven, L. (2017). Foundations of reading comprehension in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 60: 211-222.

Wassenburg S.I., de Koning B.B, de Vries MH & van der Schoot M (2016) Does the Component Processes Task Assess Text-Based Inferences Important for Reading Comprehension? A Path Analysis in Primary School Children. Front. Psychol. 7:895. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00895

Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspective, 10(3), 190-195. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12184

Xie, W., Richards, J. E., Lei, D., Lee, K., & Gong, Q. (2015). Comparison of the brain development trajectory between Chinese and U.S. children and adolescents. Frontiers in System Neuroscience, doi:10.3389/fnsys.2014.00249

Yang, C., & Bai, L. (2019). The use of metacognitive strategies by Chinese Phd students of social sciences in Australian Universities. International Journal of Educational Research, 97: 43-52.

Yang, J., Peng, J., Zhang, D., Zheng, L., & Mo, L. (2017). Specific effects of working memory training on the reading skills of Chinese children with developmental dyslexia. PLoS ONE, 12(11): e0186114.

Yang, Z. (2016). Study on Factors Affecting Learning Strategies in Reading Comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3): 586-590, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0703.21.

Yeari, M. (2017). The role of working memory in inference generation during reading comprehension: Retention, (re)activation, or suppression of verbal information. Learning and Individual Differences, 56:1-12.

Zhussupova, R., & Kazbekova, M. (2016). Metacognitive strategies as points in teaching reading comprehension. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 228 (2016) 593 – 600




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.23101

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 1814 times
PDF file view : 886 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2020 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:

LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT (LPPM)

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN GANESHA

Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928
Homepage: https://lppm.undiksha.ac.id
Email: jpi_journal@undiksha.ac.id


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.