Technology Transformation and Its Impact on Lecturer’s Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.24372Keywords:
Technology Transformation, The Impact Of Lecturers' Performance, Learning ProcessAbstract
The interest to do this research is to investigate the impact of technology transformation on the lecturer's performance. The terms technical performance in this research are divided into five (5) indicators: engaging and empowering learning, and teaching with technology, leadership, accommodation (syllabus and lesson scheme), and infrastructure provided by the campus. The findings indicate that many lecturers have a lack of knowledge in technology transformation. However, all lecturers must have it for the teaching and learning process in the 21st-century. The research methods used were descriptive analysis, observations, quantitative and semi-structured qualitative research, and the questionnaires done using Google Form. There were sixty-four (64) respondents in this research. The result shows that the use of technology proves its significant impact on the lecturer's performance.
References
Oblinger, D. (2014, September 15). Designed to Engage. Oakland, San Fransisco, California.
Adams, B. (2016, March 12). Leadership. Retrieved from Office of Education Technology, Department of Education Gov of US: https://tech.ed.gov/netp/leadership/
Ahmadi, F. (2017, 11 7). Koran Sindo. Retrieved from Sarjana Pendidikan Melek TIK: http://koran-sindo.com/page/news/2017-11-07/1/5/Sarjana_Pendidikan_Melek_TIK
Erişti, S. D., & Kurt, A. A. (2012). Teachers’ Views about Effective Use of Technology in Classrooms . Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry, Vol. 3 (2), 30-41.
Granberg, E. M. (2000, October). How Technology Enhances Teaching and Learning. Nashville, TN, US.
Ramey, K. (2017, March 12). THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY – IN EDUCATION AND TEACHING PROCESS . US.
Senge, P. (2010, March 12). Pedagog Infed. Retrieved from Learning Organization: https://api.ag.purdue.edu/api/depotws/File.ashx?t=f&i=11736
Stack, E. (2008). ICT in School: Inspectorat Evaluation Studies. Dublin: Evaluation Support and Research Unit, Inspectorat Department of Education and Science.
Starkings, S. (1996). HOW TECHNOLOGICAL INTRODUCTION CHANGES THE TEACHING OF STATISTICS AND PROBABILITY AT THE COLLEGE LEVEL. Proceedings of the 1996 IASE Round Table Conference (pp. 243-254). Granada, Spain: International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, The Netherlands.
Stielow, F. (2012). Technology Transforming Education: 4 Real-World Models of Success. Arlington, VA: Rosetta Stone of Education.
Trisnantoro, L. (2016). Standar minimal fasilitas infrastruktur untuk pemimpin struktural universitas. Retrieved from Magister Manajemen Pendidikan Tinggi Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Gajah Mada: http://helm-mmpt.pasca.ugm.ac.id/beranda/rubrik2/2-3-5-tema-3-isu-3-standar-minimal-fasilitas-infrastruktur-untuk-pemimpin-struktural-universitas
Womack, A.-M. (2017). Teaching Is Accommodation: Universally Designing Composition Classrooms and Syllabi. New Orleans, LA: National Council of Teachers of English.
Achacoso, M. (2003). Evaluating Technology and Instruction: Literature Review and Recommendations. Austin, TX: he University of Texas at Austin Division of Instructional Innovation and Assessment.
Ali, A. (2015). Performance Lecturer's Competence as the Quality Assurance. The International Journal of Social Sciences Vol. 30 No. 1, 30-45.
Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadeship:Anderson, R., E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School technology leadership: An emprical investigation to prevelance and effect. Educational Administration Quarterly Vo. 41 (1), 49-82.
Banerjee, M., & Brincknerhoff, L. C. (2002). Assessing Student Performance in Distance Education Courses: Implications for Testing Accommodations for Students with Learning Disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention 27 (3), 25-35.
Beatson, A., Coote, L. V., & Rudd, J. M. (2006). Dermining consumer and commitment through self service technology and personal service usage. Journal of Marketing Management Vol. 22 No. 7, 853-882.
Brophy, J. (2001). Generic Aspects of Effective Teaching. In M. C. Wang, & H. J. Walberg (Eds), Tomorrow's Teacher's . McCutchan Publishing Company.
Burn, M. (2016, November ). Deep Learning with Simple Technologies. Tbilisi, , Georgia: Education Development Center.
Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2007). Barriers to Adopting Technology. Educause Quarterly No. 2, 22-28.
Cakir, R. (2012). Technology Integration and Technology Leadership in Schools as Learning Organizations . The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology Vol. 11 Issue 4 , 273-282.
Courville , K. (2011, November 28-29). The 2011 Louisiana Computer Using Educator’s Conference. Retrieved from Educational Technology: Effective Leadership and Current Initiatives : https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED527339.pdf
Craven, G. (2014, June 19). Campus Infrastructure Development Procedure. Retrieved from Australian Catholic University: file:///C:/Users/Lenovo/Desktop/Journal%20Harisa/Technologies%20Transformation/Campus_Infrastructure_Development_Procedure.pdf
Department Education, U. (2017). Building Technology Infrastructure for Learning. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
DIKTI, K. (2018, January 5). Kementrian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Republik Indonesia. Retrieved from Kemenristek Bedah Kinerja, 2017, Fokus Kinerja 2018 : https://ristekdikti.go.id/kemenristekdikti-bedah-kinerja-2017-fokus-kinerja-2018-2/
Dirksen, D., & Tharp, D. (2000). Goals 2000: Initial Evaluation. Moving Beyond the crossroads: Teachers as Agent for Change. National Computing Conference. Atlanta, GA: ERIC Document Reproduction Service.
Duhaney, D. C. (2000). Technology and Educational Process: Transforming Activities. International of Instructional Media Vol. 27 (1), 67-72.
Fry, H., Ketteridge, S., & Marshall, S. (2009). Understanding Student Learning. In H. Fry, S. Ketteridge, & S. Marshall, Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education; Enhancing Academic Practice; 3rd Edition (pp. 8-25). New York: Routledge.
Gérard, G. (2010). The constellation of being: Reading of heidegger's identity and difference [La constellation de l'être: Lecture d'Identité et. Studia Phaenomenologica Vol. 10, 313-332.
Graham, D. (2016, December 7). Paid With Compliment, Not Cash. Jakarta, DKI, Indonesia.
Jackson, S. (2017, June 31). Cambridge Centre for Sixth-form Studies. Retrieved from Teaching Methods: Traditional VS. Modern: https://www.ccss.co.uk/news/traditional-vs-modern-teachi
Kanter, R. M. (1995). Kekuasaan dalam Handbook of Organization; Kajian & Teori Organisasi. In H. Usmara, Kekuasaan dalam Handbook of Organization: Kajian & Teori Organisasi (pp. 78-119). Yogyakarta: Amara Books.
Kayes, D. C. (2002). Experiential learning and its critics: Preserving the role of experience in management education learning and education. Academy of Management Learning and Education Vo. 1 No. 2, 137-149.
Long , C. S., Ibrahim, Z., & Kowang, T. O. (2014). An Analysis on the Relationship between Lecturers’ Competencies and Students’ Satisfaction. International Education Studies; Vol. 7, No. 1, 37-46.
Mapesela, M. L., & Strydom, F. (2004). Performance Management of Academic Staff in South African Higher Education System. OECD Conference on Trends in Management of Human Resources in Higher Education. Bloemfontein: University of Free State.
Mardiana, H. (2018). Lecturer’s Attitude towards Advance Technology and Its Impact to the Learning Process: Case study in Tangerang City Campuses. Journal of Educational Science and Technology Vol. 4 No. 1, 12-25.
Mardiana, H. (2018). Lecturer's Attitude towards Advanced Technology and Its Impact to the Learning Process: Case Study in Tangerang City Campuses. Journal of Education Science and Technology Vol 4 (1), 11-24.
Molefe, G. N. (2010). Performance measurement dimensions for lecturers at selected universities: An international perspective. SA Journal of Human Resource Management Vol. 8 No. 1, 1-13.
Office of Ed. Tech, U. (2000). Techonology Grant Program. www.ed.gov/technology/edgrants.html.
Rink , T. (2016, January 12). 10 Ways to Empower Your Students in the Classroom. Retrieved from Mimio Educator: http://blog.mimio.com/10-ways-to-empower-your-students-in-the-classroom
Stošić, L. (2015). The Importance of Educational Technology in Teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and EducationVol. 3, No.1, 111-114.
Sukoco, B. M. (2017, 11 6). Koran Jakarta. Retrieved from Revolusi Industri 4.0 dan Universitas: http://www.koran-jakarta.com/revolusi-industri-4-0-dan-universitas/
Sweden, T. (2017, May 26). The Guardian - International Edition. Retrieved from Tech skills are seriously lacking in universities – take it from the IT guy: https://www.theguardian.com/higher-education-network/2017/may/26/tech-skills-are-seriously-lacking-in-universities-take-it-from-the-it-guy
Tomorrow, P. (2011). The New 3 E's of Education: Enable, Engage and Empower. Irvine, CA: National Research Project.
Trucano, M. (2005, May 10). InfoDev- Supporting By World Bank. Retrieved from Teachers, Teaching and ICTs - A Knowledge Map on Information & Communication Technologies in Education: http://www.infodev.org/articles/teachers-teaching-and-icts
Wang , Y., & Sparks, B. (2014). Technology-enabled services: Importance and role of technology readiness. Tourism Analysis, Vol. 19, 19–33.
Yepes-Baraya, M. (2002). Technology Integration. In J. Johnston, & L. Tom Baker, Assessing the Impact of Technology in Teaching and Learning (pp. 139-160). Michigan: Regents of University of Michigan.
Yuliawati, S. (2012). KAJIAN IMPLEMENTASI TRI DHARMA PERGURUAN TINGGI SEBAGAI FENOMENA PENDIDIKAN TINGGI DI INDONESIA. Jakarta: Widya UHAMKA.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
