The Effectiveness of Blended Learning Combined the Team Game Tournament on the Learning Outcomes of Electrical Engineering Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i2.41572Keywords:
Flipped Classroom, Team Game Tournament, Blended LearningAbstract
The pandemic condition forced schools to carry out online learning.As a result, learning becomes ineffective. This study aims to determine the effectiveness of the learning model and the differences in learning outcomes in the subject of Basic Electromechanical Work using the blended learning model of the flipped classroom combined with the team game tournament with the lecture learning model. This study uses a quasi-experiment approach. The research subjects were 68 students of class X Electrical Engineering. The research design used a non-equivalent control group design. Data analysis used description analysis, prerequisite test, and hypothesis. Hypothesis testing using the Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests. The results showed that the flipped classroom learning model was more effective than the lecture model, indicated by an increase in the pretest-posttest score of 3.74 and the control class of 2.24. The flipped classroom model has a significant difference in learning outcomes compared to the lecture model. For students, the use of flipped classroom learning makes it easier and increases interest in learning so that they become more creative and critical which has an impact on increasing students' cognitive, affective and psychomotor abilities. The application of the team game tournament as a learning medium is able to attract students' interest in the learning process.
References
Al-Alwani, A. (2014). Evaluation Criterion for Quality Assessment of E-Learning Content. E-Learning and Digital Media, 11(6), 532–542. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2014.11.6.532.
Albahuoth, H. (2020). Effectiveness of flipped classroom in developing 11th graders’ grammatical competences in Arabic. Interactive Learning Environments, 28(6), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1821714.
Bahtiar, B. (2021). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning Model to Promote Physics Students’ Critical Thinking Skill. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(3), 441–452. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.29619.
Berić-Stojšić, B., Patel, N., Blake, J., & Johnson, D. (2020). Flipped Classroom Teaching and Learning Pedagogy in the Program Planning, Implementation, and Evaluation Graduate Course: Students’ Experiences. Pedagogy in Health Promotion, 6(3), 222–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/2373379919839073.
Bhat, S., Raju, R., Bhat, S., & D’Souza, R. (2020). Redefining Quality in Engineering Education through the Flipped Classroom Model. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 906–914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.131.
Broadbent, J., Sharman, S., Panadero, E., & Fuller-Tyszkiewicz, M. (2021). How does self-regulated learning influence formative assessment and summative grade? Comparing online and blended learners. The Internet and Higher Education, 50, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100805.
Chen, C.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2021). In-service teachers’ conceptions of mobile technology-integrated instruction: Tendency towards student-centered learning. Computers & Education, 170, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104224.
Coetzer, A., Susomrith, P., & Ampofo, E. T. (2020). Opportunities to participate in formal and informal vocational learning activities and work-related outcomes in small professional services businesses. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 72(1), 88–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2019.1584637.
Daryono, R. W., Hariyanto, V. L., Usman, H., & Sutarto. (2020). Factor analysis: Competency framework for measuring student achievements of architectural engineering education in Indonesia. REiD (Research and Evaluation in Education), 6(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v6i2.32743.
Daryono, R. W., Rochmadi, S., & Hidayat, N. (2021). Development and validation of video-based learning media to increase competency achievement in civil engineering education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012022.
Elyakim, N., Reychav, I., Offir, B., & McHaney, R. (2019). Perceptions of Transactional Distance in Blended Learning Using Location-Based Mobile Devices. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(1), 131–169. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735633117746169.
Emzir. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kuantitatif & Kualitatif. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fidan, M., Debbag, M., & Cukurbasi, B. (2021). Metaphoric perceptions of pre-service teachers about ‘LEGO Robotic Instructional Practices,’ ‘Augmented Reality’ and ‘Flipped Classroom’ concepts. Research in Comparative and International Education, 16(1), 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499920982761.
Fisher, R., Perényi, Á., & Birdthistle, N. (2021). The positive relationship between flipped and blended learning and student engagement, performance and satisfaction. Active Learning in Higher Education, 22(2), 97–113. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787418801702.
Gough, E., DeJong, D., Grundmeyer, T., & Baron, M. (2017). K-12 Teacher Perceptions Regarding the Flipped Classroom Model for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 45(3), 390–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239516658444.
Grønlien, H. K., Christoffersen, T. E., Ringstad, Ø., Andreassen, M., & Lugo, R. G. (2021). A blended learning teaching strategy strengthens the nursing students’ performance and self-reported learning outcome achievement in an anatomy, physiology and biochemistry course – A quasi-experimental study. Nurse Education in Practice, 52, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2021.103046.
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586.
Heng Ngee Mok. (2014). The Flipped Classroom. Journal of Information Systems Education, 25(1), 7-11. https://jise.org/Volume25/n1/JISEv25n1p7.pdf.
Huang, F., Teo, T., & Zhou, M. (2020). Chinese students’ intentions to use the Internet-based technology for learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(1), 575–591. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09695-y.
Ismaeel, D., & Al Mulhim, E. (2021). The influence of interactive and static infographics on the academic achievement of reflective and impulsive students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(1), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6138.
Kalfa, M., Tufan, D., & Karaman, M. (2016). Job Satisfaction Level Of Government Employees: The General Directorate Of Sport And Sports Federations Sample. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(2), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n2p32.
Kusuma, W. M., Sudira, P., Hasibuan, M. A., & Daryono, R. W. (2021). The Perceptions of Vocational School Students of Video Animation-Based Learning Media to Operate Lathes in Distance Learning. Journal of Education Technology, 5(2), 200-206. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.33139.
Lai, H.-M., Hsieh, P.-J., Uden, L., & Yang, C.-H. (2021). A multilevel investigation of factors influencing university students’ behavioral engagement in flipped classrooms. Computers & Education, 175, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104318.
Lapitan, L. DS., Tiangco, C. E., Sumalinog, D. A. G., Sabarillo, N. S., & Diaz, J. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2021.01.012.
Lombardini, C., Lakkala, M., & Muukkonen, H. (2018). The impact of the flipped classroom in a principles of microeconomics course: Evidence from a quasi-experiment with two flipped classroom designs. International Review of Economics Education, 29, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iree.2018.01.003.
Luthfi, M. B., Rochmadi, S., Daryono, R. W., & Saputra, R. P. S. (2021). The Development of Interactive Media Based on Video Animation in the Use of a Total Station for Measurement Stake out the Building. Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 4(1), 597–605. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v4i1.1767.
Munir, M. T., Baroutian, S., Young, B. R., & Carter, S. (2018). Flipped classroom with cooperative learning as a cornerstone. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.05.001.
Nurdiansah, N., Bundu, P., & Saman, A. (2018). The Development of Learning Tools Using Software in Informatics Engineering Department. TEM Journal, 7(4), 944–951. https://dx.doi.org/10.18421/TEM74-36.
Ölmefors, O., & Scheffel, J. (2021). High school student perspectives on flipped classroom learning. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 29(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1948444.
Perusso, A., & Baaken, T. (2020). Assessing the authenticity of cases, internships and problem-based learning as managerial learning experiences: Concepts, methods and lessons for practice. The International Journal of Management Education, 18(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijme.2020.100425.
Prescott, J. E., Bundschuh, K., Kazakoff, E. R., & Macaruso, P. (2018). Elementary school–wide implementation of a blended learning program for reading intervention. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 497–506. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2017.1302914.
Ranellucci, J., Robinson, K. A., Rosenberg, J. M., Lee, Y., Roseth, C. J., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2021). Comparing the roles and correlates of emotions in class and during online video lectures in a flipped anatomy classroom. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 65, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.101966.
Reynolds, A. J., & Candee, A. J. (2019). Dimensionality and Predictive validity of the Classroom Learning Activities Checklist in Prekindergarten. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 31(4), 381–407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-019-09306-7.
Rodríguez, G., Díez, J., Pérez, N., Baños, J. E., & Carrió, M. (2019). Flipped classroom: Fostering creative skills in undergraduate students of health sciences. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100575.
Saifurrahman, M., Sudira, P., & Daryono, R. W. (2021). The Determinant Factor of the Principal Leadership Solutions in Facing the 21st-Century Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 54(2), 14. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i2.34102.
Setyadi, M. R. A., Triyono, M. B., & Daryono, R. W. (2021). The influence of industrial work practices and workshop infrastructure facilities on work readiness of students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1833(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1833/1/012029.
Shi, Y., Tong, M., & Long, T. (2021). Investigating relationships among blended synchronous learning environments, students’ motivation, and cognitive engagement: A mixed methods study. Computers & Education, 168(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104193.
Staker, H. & Horn, M. B., (2012). Classifying K-12 Blended Learning. San Mateo: Innosight Institute.
Steen-Utheim, A. T., & Foldnes, N. (2018). A qualitative investigation of student engagement in a flipped classroom. Teaching in Higher Education, 23(3), 307–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2017.1379481.
Syed Hassan, S. S. (2018). Measuring attitude towards learning science in Malaysian secondary school context: Implications for teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 40(16), 2044–2059. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1518614.
Syukriah, S., Nurmaliah, C., & Abdullah, A. (2020). The implementation of project-based learning model to improve students’ learning outcomes. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1460, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1460/1/012064.
Tayibnapis, A. Z., Wuryaningsih, L. E., & Gora, R. (2018). Indonesia’s Efforts to Achieve Globally Competitive Human Resources. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention (IJHSSI), 7(8), 1–6. https://www.ijhssi.org/papers/vol7(8)/Version-3/A0708030106.pdf.
Tebbs, O., Hutchinson, A., Lau, R., & Botti, M. (2021). Evaluation of a blended learning approach to developing specialty-nursing practice. An exploratory descriptive qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 98(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104663.
Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2020). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5–6), 590–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117.
Veryaeva, K., & Solovyeva, O. (2021). The Influence of Gamification and Platform Affordances on User Engagement in Online Learning: International Journal of Distance Education Technologies, 19(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.4018/IJDET.2021010101.
Wagner, M., & Urhahne, D. (2021). Disentangling the effects of flipped classroom instruction in EFL secondary education: When is it effective and for whom? Learning and Instruction, 75, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2021.101490.
Warsono & Hariyanto. (2012). Pembelajaran Aktif Teori dan Asesmen. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Wozny, N., Balser, C., & Ives, D. (2018). Evaluating the flipped classroom: A randomized controlled trial. The Journal of Economic Education, 49(2), 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220485.2018.1438860.
Yan, T., & Deng, M. (2019). Regular education teachers’ concerns on inclusive education in China from the perspective of concerns-based adoption model. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 23(4), 384–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2018.1435741.
Zainuddin, Z., & Perera, C. J. (2017). Exploring students’ competence, autonomy and relatedness in the flipped classroom pedagogical model. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(4), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1356916.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Ebrahimi, A. (2019). Increasing peer collaborative dialogue using a flipped classroom strategy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(3), 267–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1455688.
Zgraggen, M. (2021). Blended learning model in a vocational educational training hospitality setting: From teachers’ perspectives. International Journal of Training Research, 19(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/14480220.2021.1933568.
Zhou, Y., Zhao, J., & Zhang, J. (2020). Prediction of learners’ dropout in E-learning based on the unusual behaviors. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1857788.
Zimba, Z. F., Khosa, P., & Pillay, R. (2021). Using blended learning in South African social work education to facilitate student engagement. Social Work Education, 40(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2020.1746261.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hardhika Nur Arga, Ariadie Chandra Nugraha, Putu Sudira, Rihab Wit Daryono
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
