Knowledge and Thinking Skills in Li-Pro-GP Model of Instruction
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v11i4.48367Keywords:
Character Education, Knowledge, Literacy, Science, ThinkingAbstract
Surveys from some research on Indonesian student’s literacy skills showed irregularity with Indonesia's literacy rate. Therefore, it can be said that most of Indonesians have already been literate, in terms of education. Nonetheless, their literacy skills in common still remains weak. Moreover, student’s low literacy skills are deemed as the result of low interest at reading. A number of problems in reading skill is closely associated with limited reading experiences and practices. The current research aims to describe student’s knowledge and thinking skills in a Li-Pro-GP model of instruction. The syntax of this learning model is project-based learning that is integrated with the School Literacy Movement (SLM) and Character Education Reinforcement (CER) programs. The research fell into a descriptive research model. Research subjects, seventh graders attending IPA instructions. Data of the research were analyzed descriptively, which indicated improvement in terms of knowledge and thinking skills amidst students. In addition, the highest level of language use was found at the test for Aspect C2, C4, C5, and C6, whilst the highest level of conceptual truth was indicated at Aspect C3. On the other hand, the lowest level of giving argumentation appeared at all aspects. In sum, the highest level of skills was indicated by the language use, while the lowest at the student’s confidence in giving argumentation.
References
Agustin, S., & Cahyono, B. E. H. (2017). Gerakan literasi sekolah untuk meningkatkan budaya baca di SMA Negeri 1 Geger. Linguista: Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pembelajarannya, 1(2), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.25273/linguista.v1i2.1973.
Barus, M. D. B., & Hakim, A. (2020). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematika melalui metode practice rehearsal pairs pada siswa SMA Al-Hidayah Medan. Biormatika : Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(1), 74–78. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35569/biormatika.v6i1.687
Batubara, H. H., & Ariani, D. N. (2018). Implementasi Program Gerakan Literasi Sekolah Di Sekolah Dasar Negeri Gugus Sungai MIAI Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 4(1), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.30870/jpsd.v4i1.2965.
Chamisah. (2017). TIMSS and PISA-How They Help The Improvement of Education Assessment in Indonesia. Conference Proceedings ARICIS I, 42–56. https://doi.org/10.22373/aricis.v1i0.935.
Dalyono, B., & Lestariningsih, E. D. (2020). Implementasi penguatan pendidikan karakter di sekolah [Implementation of strengthening character education in schools]. Bangun Rekaprima, 3(2), 33–42. https://doi.org/10.26858/pir.v3i2.14971.
Effendi, R. (2017). Konsep revisi taksonomi bloom dan implementasinya pada pelajaran matematika SMP. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 2(1), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.26877/jipmat.v2i1.1483.
Erfan, M., Nurwahidah, Anar, A. P., & Maulyda, M. A. (2020). Identifikasi level kognitif pada soal ujian akhir semester gasal kelas IV sekolah dasar. Jurnal Kiprah, 8(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.31629/kiprah.v8i1.1954.
Faisal, A. J. (2008). Penggunaan bahasa indonesia baku dalam tesis mahasiswa S-2 Universitas Hasanudin. Linguistik Indonesia, 98–108.
Fajar, A. P., Kodirun, K., Suhar, S., & Arapu, L. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 17 Kendari. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 229. https://doi.org/10.36709/jpm.v9i2.5872.
Fatmah, H. (2021). Kreativitas peserta didik dalam pembelajaran bioteknologi dengan pjbl berbasis STEAM. Pedagonal: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 05(01), 07–14. https://doi.org/10.33751/pedagonal.v5i1.
Fatmawati, D. R., Harlita, & Ramli, M. (2018). Meningkatkan kemampuan argumentasi siswa melalui action research dengan fokus tindakan think pair share. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 15(1), 253–259. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/download/31790/21270.
Giani, Zulkardi, & Hiltrimartin, C. (2015). Analisis tingkat kognitif soal-soal buku teks matematika kelas VII berdasarkan taksonomi bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.22342/jpm.9.2.2125.78%20-%2098.
Hartini, T., Misri, M. A., & Nursuprianah, I. (2018). Pemetaan hots siswa berdasarkan standar PISA dan TIMSS untuk meningkatkan mutu pendidikan. EduMa, 7(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.24235/eduma.v7i.
Hartono, D. P., & Asiyah, S. (2018). Pjbl untuk meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa : sebuah kajian deskriptif tentang peran model pembelajaran pjbl dalam meningkatkan kreativitas mahasiswa. Jurnal Dosen Universitas PGRI Palembang, 2(1), 1–11. https://jurnal.univpgri-palembang.ac.id/index.php/prosiding/article/view/2694.
Hewi, L., & Shaleh, M. (2020). Refleksi Hasil PISA (The Programme For International Student Assesment): Upaya Perbaikan Bertumpu Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini). Jurnal Golden Age, 4(01), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.29408/jga.v4i01.2018.
Hidayat, D. W., & Pujiastuti, H. (2019). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematis pada materi himpunan. Jurnal Analisa, 5(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.15575/ja.v5i1.4120.
Hidayat, M. H., Basuki, I. A., & Akbar, S. (2018). Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar. Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 3(6), 810–817. https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v3i6.11213.
Himmah, W. I. (2019). Analisis soal penilaian akhir semester mata pelajaran matematika berdasarkan level berpikir. Journal of Medives : Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(1), 55–63. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i1.698.
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The meaning of scientific management. The Contributions of Alexander Hamilton Church to Accounting and Management, 4(3), 275–288. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003056584-3.
Idrus, M. (2009). Kompetensi interpersonal mahasiswa. UNISIA, 37(72), 177–184. https://journal.uii.ac.id/Unisia/article/download/2717/2504.
Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., & Susilo, H. (2015). Pengaruh project based learning terhadap motivasi belajar, kreativitas, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kemampuan kognitif siswa pada pembelajaran biologi [The effect of project based learning on learning motivation, creativity, critical thinking skills, a. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v7i1p9-21.
Ipatenco, S. (2017). How does language development affect cognitive development? How to Adult.
Iskandar, D., & Senam. (2015). Studi kemampuan guru kimia SMA lulusan UNY dalam mengembangkan soal UAS berbasis HOTS. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 1(1), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v1i1.4533.
Jagantara, I. W. M., Adnyana, P. B., & Widiyanti, N. P. (2014). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek (Project Based Learning) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Biologi Ditinjau Dari Gaya Belajar Siswa SMA. E-Journal Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 4(1), 1–13. https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1300.
Junika, N., Izzati, N., & Tambunan, L. R. (2020). Pengembangan soal statistika model PISA untuk melatih kemampuan literasi statistika siswa. Mosharafa: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(3), 499–510. https://doi.org/10.31980/mosharafa.v9i3.615.
Khalamah, N. (2017). Penguatan pendidikan karakter di madrasah [Strengthening character education in madrasas]. Kependidikan, 5(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v5i2.2109.
Komara, E. (2018). Penguatan Pendidikan Karakter dan Pembelajaran Abad 21. SIPATAHOENAN: South-East Asian Journal for Youth, Sports & Health Education, 4(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2121/sip.v4i1.991.
Maunah, B. (2016). Implementasi pendidikan karakter dalam pembentukan kepribadian holistik siswa [Implementation of character education in the formation of students’ holistic personality]. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 1, 90–101. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpk.v0i1.8615.
Megawati, L. A., & Sutarto, H. (2021). Analysis numeracy literacy skills in terms of standardized math problem on a minimum competency assessment. UNNES Journal of Mathematics Education, 10(2), 155–165. https://doi.org/10.15294/ujme.v10i2.49540.
Mevarech, Z. R., & Fan, L. (2018). Cognition, metacognition, and mathematics literacy. In Innovations in Science Education and Technology, vol 24 (pp. 261–278). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66659-4_12.
Minarto. (2020). Pemunculan tingkat kesulitan soal pada tes penjurusan menggunakan Revised Bloom Taxonomi (RBT) di SMAN 1 Bangorejo dengan aplikasi wingen3. Jurnal Incare, 01(01), 17–27. http://ejournal.ijshs.org/index.php/incare/article/view/47.
Munawaroh, R., Rusilowati, A., & Fianti. (2018). Improving Scientific Literacy and Creativity through Project Based Learning. Physics Communication, 2(2), 85–93. https://doi.org/10.15294/physcomm.v2i2.13401.
Mutakinati, L., Anwari, I., & Yoshisuke, K. (2018). Analysis of students’ critical thinking skill of middle school through stem education project-based learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(1), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i1.10495.
Nabilah, M., Stepanus, S. S., & Hamdani. (2020). Analisis kemampuan kognitif peserta didik dalam menyelesaikan soal momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Inovasi Penilitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 1(2017), 1–7. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v1i1.41876.
Nofiana, M., & Julianto, T. (2017). Profil kemampuan literasi sains siswa SMP di Kota Purwokerto ditinjau dari aspek konten, proses, dan konteks sains. JSSH (Jurnal Sains Sosial Dan Humaniora), 1(2), 77–84. https://doi.org/10.30595/jssh.v1i2.1682.
Pantiwati, Y., Permana, F. H., Kusniarti, T., & Sari, T. N. I. (2020). Model pembelajaran Li-Pro-GP (literasi berbasis proyek terintegrasi GLS dan PPK) [Li-Pro-GP learning model (GLS and KDP Integrated project-based literacy)]. Simposium Nasional Mulitidisiplin, 2, 79–84. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i1.17824.
Pantiwati, Y., Permana, F. H., Kusniarti, T., Sari, T. N. I., & Nurrohman, E. (2022). Application of the Li-Pro-GP learning model to improve students’ conceptual understanding and creativity of environmental pollution. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 15(1), 159–168. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.25800.
Redhana, I. W. (2019). Mengembangkan Keterampilan Abad Ke-21 Dalam Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1). https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/JIPK/article/view/17824.
Regita, N. A., Pramiarsih, E. E., & Sritumini, B. A. (2019). Penerapan model pembelajaran jigsaw untuk meningkatkan kemampuan siswa dalam mengemukakan pendapat. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Ekonomi Akuntansi, 5(2), 95–108. http://jurnal.fkip.unla.ac.id/index.php/jp2ea/article/view/327.
Rohendi, E. (2010). Pendidikan karakter di sekolah [Character education in school]. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Eduhumaniora, 3(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v3i1.2795.
Rosnawati, R. (2009). Enam tahapan aktivitas dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk mendayagunakan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa. Seminar Nasional:Revitalisasi MIPA Dan Pendidikan MIPA Dalam Rangka Penguasaan Apasitas Kelembagaan Dan Profesionalisme Menuju WCU, 1–12. http://staff.uny.ac.id/sites/default/files/penelitian/r. rosnawati, dra. m.si./enam tahapan aktivitas dalam pembelajaran matematika untuk mendayagunakan berpikir tingkat tinggi siswa.pdf.
Rusminiati, N. N., Karyasa, I. W., & Suardana, I. N. (2015). Komparasi peningkatan pemahaman konsep kimia dan keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa antara yang dibelajarkan dengan model pembelajaran project based learning dan discovery learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran IPA, 5(2), 1–11. https://ejournal-pasca.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/jurnal_ipa/article/view/1563.
Samrin. (2016). Pendidikan karakter (sebuah pendekatan nilai) [Character education (a values approach)]. Jurnal Al-Ta’dib, 9(1), 120–143. https://doi.org/10.31332/atdb.v9i1.505.
Sari, L. I., Satrijono, H., & Sihono. (2015). Penerapan model pembelajaran berbasis proyek (project based learning) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar keterampilan berbicara siswa kelas VA SDN Ajung 03. Jurnal Edukasi UNEJ, 2(1), 11–14. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v2i1.3404.
Sari, T. N. I., Pantiwati, Y., Fendy Hardian Permana, & Yanto, A. R. (2021). Penerapan model pembelajaran Li-Pro-GP untuk meningkatkan kemampuan kognitif dan menyampaikan pendapat siswa SMP. Seminar Nasional VI Prodi Pendidikan Biologi, 186–194. http://research-report.umm.ac.id/index.php/psnpb/article/view/4749.
Snow, C. E. (2006). What Counts as Literacy in Early Childhood? In Blackwell Handbook of Early Childhood Development (K. McCartn, pp. 1–20). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757703.ch14.
Srirahayu, D. P., Kusumaningtiyas, T., & Harisanty, D. (2021). The Role of the School Librarian toward the Implementation of the School Literacy Movement (Gerakan Literasi Sekolah) in East Java. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–15. https://search.proquest.com/openview/3867add817b308af06f7b250ab023384/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=54903.
Suraya, Setiadi, A. E., & Muldayanti, N. D. (2019). Argumentasi ilmiah dan keterampilan berpikir kritis melalui metode debat. Edusains, 11(2), 233–241. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v11i2.10479.
Suryani, E., Rusilowati, A., & Wardono, W. (2016). Analisis pemahaman konsep IPA siswa SD menggunakan two-tier test melalui pembelajaran konflik kognitif. Journal of Primary Education, 5(1), 56–65. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v4i2.878.
Syarifudin, A., & Sulistyaningrum, S. (2015). Peningkatan kemampuan berpendapat mahasiswa melalui Problem Based Learning (PBL) sebagai pendukung pencapaian Kerangka Kualifikasi Nasional Indonesia (KKNI) pada mata kuliah pragmatik [Improving Students’ Opinion Ability Through Problem Based Learning (PB. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Unnes, 32(2), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpp.v32i2.5055.
Tuan Soh, T. M., Arsada, N. M., & Osman, K. (2010). The relationship of 21st century skills on students’ attitude and perception towards physics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(July 2014), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.10.073.
Ubaque Casallas, D. F., & Pinilla Castellanos, F. S. (2016). Argumentation skills: A peer sssessment spproach to siscussions in the EFL classroom. PROFILE Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 18(2), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.15446/profile.v18n2.53314.
Wahyuni, E. (2021). Implementasi model pembelajaran project based learning ( pjbl ) dalam meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik pada mata pelajaran pendidikan agama islam SMP Negeri 7 Kota Tangerang. Tadarus Tarbawy, 3(1), 320–327. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31000/jkip.v3i1.
Wibayanti, S. H., Lian, B., & Mulyadi. (2020). The Influence of School Literacy Movement and Reading Habit on Student’s Achievement. International Journal of Progressive Sciences and Technologies, 20(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/bdnks.
Widayoko, A., Koes, S., & Muhardjito. (2018). Analisis program implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah (GLS) dengan pendekatan goal-based evaluation [Analysis of the School Literacy Movement (GLS) implementation program with a goal-based evaluation approach]. Jurnal Tatsqif : Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Pendidikan, 16(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v16i1.134.
Wijaya, E. Y., Sudjimat, D. A., & Nyoto, A. (2016). Transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global. Prosding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 1, 263–278. https://repository.unikama.ac.id/840/32/263-278 transformasi pendidikan abad 21 sebagai tuntutan pengembangan sumber daya manusia di era global.pdf.
Wijaya, P. A., Jasruddin, & Arafah, K. (2019). Kemampuan peserta didik kelas X dalam menyelesaikan soal-soal kognitif tipe menganalisis dan mengevaluasi pada mata pelajaran fisika. Jurnal Sains Dan Pendidikan Fisika, 15(1), 75–86. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/23558/.
Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi sains dalam pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v3i2.592.
Yunianika, I. T., & Suratinah. (2019). Implementasi Gerakan Literasi Sekolah di Sekolah Dasar Dharma Karya Universitas Terbuka. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 3(4), 497–503. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v3i4.17331.
Yunita, D., Slamet, A., & Santoso, L. M. (2017). Pengaruh penerapan model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe Student Facilitator And Explaining (SFE) terhadap penguasaan konsep peserta didik kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Talang Kelapa materi sistem ekskresi. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA, 480–492. http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semnasipa/article/view/712.
Yusnaeni, Susilo, H., Corebima, A. D., & Zubaidah, S. (2016). Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kreatif dan hasil belajar kognitif pada pembelajaran search solve create and solve di SMA [The relationship between creative thinking skills and cognitive learning outcomes in search solve create and solve learning in High Scho. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Biologi 2016, January 2018, 443–446. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/siti-zubaidah-7/publication/322315783_hubungan_kemampuan_berpikir_kreatif_dan_hasil_belajar_kognitif_pada_pembelajaran_search_solve_create_and_solve_di_sma/links/5a539db2aca2725638c858d4/hubungan-kemampuan-berpikir-kreatif-dan-hasil-belajar-kognitif-pada-pembelajaran-search-solve-create-and-solve-di-sma.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Yuni Pantiwati, Tuti Kusniarti, Fendy Hardian Permana, Endrik Nurrohman, Astuti Muh. Amin, Tasya Novian Indah Sari, Tasya Novian Indah Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
