Blended Learning Integrated with Project-Based Learning: Its Effect on Learning Outcomes, Perception, and Self-Regulated Learning
Keywords:Blended Learning, Self-Regulated Learning, Learning Outcomes, Project Based Learning
The demands on chemistry learning require hands-on action in the form of practicums to fit understanding of chemical concepts, examine the theories obtained and relate them to everyday scientific phenomena through scientific activities in the laboratory. So that cognitive, affective, and psychomotor learning outcomes are achieved. This research is a type of qualitative descriptive research. This study investigates student perceptions and Self-Regulated Learning (SRL) on integrated blended learning Project Based Learning that affects student learning outcomes. The research subjects were nine people students who were enrolled in basic chemistry courses. This research was conducted for seven meetings where the learning process was carried out with a mixture of online and offline lectures called Blended Learning. Data collection was conducted through interviews to determine student perceptions of Blended Learning and a questionnaire to determine the student's SRL level. Learning Outcomes (LO) tests were in the form of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor. The interview data were analyzed inductively. Meanwhile, the SRL data analysis and the LO test are presented as an integrated and comparative description. Students' interviews revealed positive perceptions about the learning. This study found that the students' SRL were in the high (56%), medium (33%), and low (11%) categories. The LO assessment was obtained from the pre-test and post-test; all students' scores increased. As for the attitude, the measurements showed four categories: very good (67%), good (11%), adequate (11%), and poor (11%). Assessment of instruments designed showed that 67% of the instruments were developed while another 33% were underdeveloped.
Abdullah, M. (2012). Students’ Perception Toward the Use of Learning Management System Moodle in Teaching Translation. Universitas Negeri Makassar.
Agustina, A., & Dian, N. (2012). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Video untuk Melatih Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah pada Materi Larutan Asam Basa. Unesa Journal of Chemistry Education, 1(1), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.26740/ujced.v1n1.p%25p.
Antara, I. G. W. S., Suma, K., & Parmiti, D. P. (2022). E-Scrapbook: Konstruksi Media Pembelajaran Digital Bermuatan Soal-soal Higher Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 10(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v10i1.47559.
Bell, P. A. (2001). Enviromental Psychology. Harcourt College Publisher.
Bi, X., & Shi, X. (2019). On the Effects of Computer-Assisted Teaching on Learning Results Based on Blended Learning Method. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (i-JET), 14(1), 58 – 70. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i01.9458
Broadbent, J. (2017). Comparing online and blended learner’s self-regulated learning strategies and academic performance. Internet and Higher Education, 33, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2017.01.004
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory (3rd ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Darmaji, Kurniawan, Astalini, Winda, Heldalia, & Kartina. (2020). The Correlation Between Student Perceptions of the Use of E-Modules with Students’ Basic Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 9(4), 719 – 729. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.28310. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i4.28310
Densin, & Lincoln. (2009). Qualitative Research. Pustaka Pelajar.
Dewi, A. A. S., Sudarma, I. K., & Tegeh, I. M. (2022). Video Pembelajaran Pada Muatan Pembelajaran IPA untuk Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Indonesian Journal of Instruction, 3(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v3i1.31272. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v3i1.31272
Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., & Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving Students’ Learning with Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions from Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, Supplement, 14(1), 4–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100612453266
Dwiningsih, K., & Mangengke, B. B. (2021). Pembelajaran Kimia Berbasis Kooperatif Think Pair Share (TPS) Dengan Berbantuan Virtual Laboratorium Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 15(1), 2706–2716. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v15i1.21595.
Fraenkel, J., & Wallen, N. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill.
Ginns, P., & Ellis, R. A. (2009). Evaluating the Quality of e-Learning at the Degree Level in the Student Experience of Blended Learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(4), 652–663. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00861.x
Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
Gunbatar, S. A., Celikkiran, A. T., Kutucu, E. S., & Kiran, B. E. (2018). The Influence of a Design-Based Elective STEM Course on Pre-Service Chemistry Teachers’ Content Knowledge, STEM Conceptions, and Engineering Views. Chemical Education Research Practice, 19, 954. https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00128F. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/C8RP00128F
Hammond, L. D., Flook, L., Harvey, C. C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for Educational Practice of The Science of Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Husamah, H. (2015). Thinking Skills for Environmental Sustainability Perspective of New Students of Biology Education Department Through Blended Project Based Learning Model. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(2), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i2.3878.
Khoiroh, W., Aini, N., & Budhi, H. S. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Kegiatan Praktikum Kimia Dasar Mahasiswa S1 Tadris IPA IAIN Kudus Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Wahana Matematika Dan Sains, 15(2), 107 – 114. https://doi.org/10.23887/wms.v15i2.30678.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-Based Learning: A review of The Literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Krasnova, L., & Shurygin, V. (2019). Blended Learning of Physics in the Context of the Professional Development of Teachers. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (i-JET), 14(23), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i23.11084. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i23.11084
Macdonald, J. (2008). Blended Learning and Online Tutoring. Gower Publishing Company.
Masino, S., & Zarazúa, M. N. (2016). What Works to Improve the of Student Learning in Developing Countries? International Journal of Educational Development, 48, 53–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.11.012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2015.11.012
Mcfarlane, D. A. (2013). Understanding the Challenges of Science Education in the 21st Century: New Opportunities for Scientific Literacy. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 4, 35–44. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.4.35. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.4.35
Moore, J. L., Deane, C. ., & Galyen, K. (2011). E-Learning, Online learning, and Distance Learning Environments: Are They The Same? The Internet and Higher Education, 14(2), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.10.001
Palys, T., & Atchison, C. (2014). Research Decisions: Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (5th ed.). Nelson Education.
Pedaste, M., Maeots, M., Siiman, L. A., Jong, T. D., Riesen, Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of Inquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and the Inquiry Cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003
Phuapan, P., Viriyavejakul, C., & Pimdee, P. (2016). An Analysis of Digital Literacy Skills among Thai University Seniors. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 11(3), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v11i03.5301
Prabha, S. (2016). Laboratory Experiences for Prospective Science Teachers: A Meta-analytic Review of Issues and Concerns. European Scientific Journal, 12(34), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n34p235. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n34p235
Pradita, K. K., Mahadewi, L. P. P., & Sukmana, A. I. W. I. Y. (2022). Konten E-Learning dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Bali pada Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Indonesian Journal of Instruction, 3(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v3i1.31134. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v3i1.31134
Rahardjanto, A., Husamah, & Fauzi, A. (2019). Hybrid-PjBL: Learning Outcomes, Creative Thinking Skills, and Learning Motivation of Preservice Teacher. International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education, 12(2), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032072. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12212a
Romero, C., Espejo, P. G., Zafra, A., Romero, J. R., & Ventura, S. (2013). Web Usage Mining for Predicting Final Marks of Students that Use Moodle Courses. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 21(1), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20456. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/cae.20456
Schunk, D. H. (2012). Learning Theories an Education Perspective (6th ed.). Pustaka Pelajar.
Shidiq, A. S., Yamtinah, S., & Masykuri, M. (2019). Identifying and addressing students’ learning difficulties in hydrolysis using testlet instrument. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194(1), 020117. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139849. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139849
Stoeger, H., & Ziegler, A. (2005). Evaluation of an Elementary Classroom Self-Regulated Learning Program for Gifted Mathematics Underachievers. International Education Journal, 6(2), 261–271. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854979.pdf.
Subekti, H., Taufiq, M., Susilo, H., Ibrohim, I., & Suwono, H. (2018). Mengembangkan Literasi Informasi Melalui Belajar Berbasis Kehidupan Terintegrasi STEM Untuk Menyiapkan Calon Guru Sains Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0: Review Literatur. Education and Human Development Journal, 3(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v3i1.90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v3i1.90
van Alten, D. C. D., Phielix, C., Janssen, J., & Kester, L. (2020). Self-regulated learning support in flipped learning videos enhances learning outcomes. Computers and Education, 158(July), 104000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104000
Yustina, Syafii, W., & Vebrianto, R. (2020). The Effects of Blended Learning and Project-Based Learning on Pre-Service Biology Teachers’ Creative Thinking Through Online Learning In The Covid-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(3), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i3.24706
Zarouk, M. Y. (2020). The Impact of Flipped Project-Based Learning on Self-Regulation in Higher Education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (i-JET), 15(17), 127 – 147. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/218014/. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i17.14135
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909
Zou, J., Liu, Q., & Yang, Z. (2012). Development of a Moodle Course for School Children’s Table Tennis Learning Based on Competence Motivation Theory, Its Effectiveness in Comparison to Traditional Training Method. Computers & Education, 59(2), 294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.008
Zubaidah, S., Fuad, N. M., Mahanal, S., & Suarsini, E. (2017). Improving Creative Thinking Ability of Students Through Differentiated Science Inquiry Integrated with Mind Map. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 14(4), 77–91. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10214a.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2022 Lisa Pohan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)