Increasing Population Knowledge: The Comparation of Problem Solving Learning Methods with Conventional Methods

Nurdin Nurdin

Abstract


This study aims to analyze the effect of teaching methods using problem solving and conventional on population knowledge. The research was conducted experimentally with a 2x2 factorial design on 80 students consisting of 40 students having a high attitude, and 40 students having a low attitude at the Junior High School 2 Tambun Selatan-Bekasi. Data collection regarding population knowledge was carried out using an objective test instrument with the answer choices True (B) with a score of 1 and False (S) with a score of 0. The data were analyzed by means of two-way analysis of variance, and the Tukey test. Research results There are differences in population knowledge learning outcomes between students who are given problem solving teaching methods and students who are given conventional teaching methods; There is an interaction between teaching methods and students' attitudes towards population knowledge; Study groups that have high and low attitudes have higher population knowledge learning outcomes when given problem solving teaching methods compared to students who are given conventional teaching methods. The implication is that teachers in teaching must always build a high attitude in the classroom so that positive interactions occur in the teaching and learning process by using various learning methods.


Keywords


teaching methods; problem solving; conventional; population knowledge

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albay, E. M. (2019). Analyzing the effects of the problem solving approach to the performance and attitude of first year university students. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2019.100006.

Alrassi, J., & Mortensen, M. (2020). Jigsaw Group-Based Learning in Difficult Airway Management: An Alternative Way to Teach Surgical Didactics. Journal of Surgical Education, 63(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2020.02.003.

Amaliah, R. R., & Fadhil, A. (2014). Penerapan Metode Ceramah dan Diskusi Dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar PAI di SMA Negeri 44 Jakarta. Studi Al-Qur’an; Membangun Tradisi Berfikir Qur’an, 10(2), 119–131. http://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/jsq/article/view/4441.

Aziz, Z., & Hossain, M. A. (2010). A comparison of cooperative learning and conventional teaching on student’s achievement in secondary mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.115.

Barak, M., & Mesika, P. (2007). Teaching methods for inventive problem-solving in junior high school. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2006.10.002.

Bloomfield, J., Roberts, J., & While, A. (2010). The effect of computer-assisted learning versus conventional teaching methods on the acquisition and retention of handwashing theory and skills in pre-qualification nursing students: A randomised controlled trial. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(3), 287–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2009.08.003.

Chang, Y.-L., Wu, S.-C., & Wu, H.-H. (2015). They are Learning: Changes through Teacher Professional Development of Inquiry Curriculum Design and Implementation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177, 178–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.375.

Colton, D., & Covert, R. W. (2007). Designing and Social Research and Instruments for Constructing Evaluation. Jossey-Bass. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Favier, T. T., & Van Der Schee, J. A. (2014). The effects of geography lessons with geospatial technologies on the development of high school students’ relational thinking. Computers and Education, 76, 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.004.

Gans, P., Hemmer, I., Hemmer, M., & Miener, K. (2018). The Perception of Geography Among The German Population Findings of A Representative Survey. Erdkunde, 72(1), 23–40. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26411578.

Gulo, W. (2002). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Helmi, S. A., Yusof, K. M., & Phang, F. A. (2012). Enhancement of engineering students’ problem solving skills through cooperative problem-based learning. International Journal of Engineering Education, 56, 737–746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.711.

Heyder, A., Südkamp, A., & Steinmayr, R. (2020). How are teachers’ attitudes toward inclusion related to the social-emotional school experiences of students with and without special educational needs? Learning and Individual Differences, 77(July 2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101776.

Ibrahim, M., & Nur, M. (2000). Pengajaran Berdasarkan Masalah. Unesa Universitas Press.

Ji, H., & Grishman, R. (2011). Knowledge Base Population: Successful approaches and challenges. ACL-HLT 2011 - Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 1148–1158.

Koichu, B. (2020). Problem posing in the context of teaching for advanced problem solving. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(July). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.05.001.

Maftuchah, Y. (2000). Pendidikan Kependudukan dan Etika Lingkungan. Lembaga Studi Inovasi Pendidikan.

Mahdalena, S., & Sain, M. (2020). Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Melalui Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Cooperative Script Pada Mata Pelajaran Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Kelas VA Siswa Sekolah Dasar Negeri 010 Sungai Beringin. Asatiza Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(1), 118–138.

Mangen, A., Hoel, T., Jernes, M., & Moser, T. (2019). Shared, dialogue-based reading with books vs tablets in early childhood education and care: Protocol for a mixed-methods intervention study. International Journal of Educational Research, 97(March), 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.07.002.

Naik, G., Chitre, C., Bhalla, M., & Rajan, J. (2020). Impact of use of technology on student learning outcomes: Evidence from a large-scale experiment in India. World Development, 127, 104736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104736.

Nora, Y. (2018). Learning of Social Studies in Elementary School as a Medium to Strengthen Multicultural Education in The Curriculum Era 2013. SHS Web of Conferences, 42(94), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20184200094.

Nur, M. (2000). Pengantar Teori Tes. P2LPTK.

Okuducu, M. B., & Aral, M. M. (2017). Knowledge based dynamic human population models. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 122(May), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2017.05.008.

Oruç, Ş., & Teymuroǧlu, B. (2011). The effects of using cartoon in teaching social sciences on attitudes of students against to social science course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3211–3215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.273.

Panek, R. C., Deloney, L. A., Park, J., Goodwin, W., Klein, S., & Ferris, E. J. (2006). Interdepartmental Problem-Solving as a Method for Teaching and Learning Systems-Based Practice. Academic Radiology, 13(9), 1150–1154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.003.

Pehlivan, H., & Köseoglu, P. (2011). The reflections of certain social factors concerning science high school students into their attitudes towards physics course. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 605–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.148.

Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Widiarto, T., & Sriyono, H. (2018). Character-based Economic Learning Implementation and Teacher’s Reinforcement on Student’s Affective Competence in Minimizing Hoax. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(3), 426–435. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i3.21583.

Prasetyono, Hendro, Abdillah, A., Anita, T., Nurfarkhana, A., & Sefudin, A. (2020). Identification of the Decline in Learning Outcomes in Statistics Courses Using the Chi-Squared Automatic Interaction Detection Method. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1490, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1490/1/012072.

Prasetyono, Hendro, Abdillah, A., Djuhartono, T., Ramdayana, I. P., & Desnaranti, L. (2021). Improvement of teacher’s professional competency in strengthening learning methods to maximize curriculum implementation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21010.

Puspitasari. (2018). Metode Pembelajaran Bermain Peran Pada Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, I(1), 55–64. https://doi.org/https://www.researchgate.net/deref/http%3A%2F%2Fdx.doi.org%2F10.31949%2Fjcp.v1i1.347.

Putri, E. (2018). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Ekonomi Menggunakan Metode Problem Solving (Pemecahan Masalah) dengan Metode Ceramah Pada Siswa Kelas X IPS SMAN 3 Teladan Bukittinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi, 11(2), 99–106. http://journal2.um.ac.id/index.php/jpe/article/view/5174.

Ramdayana, I. P., Prasetyono, H., & Rahman, N. V. T. (2020). Comparative Study Of Discussion And Question-Answer Learning Method To Improve Learning Outcomes Of Vocational High School Students. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran), 4(3), 597–607. https://scholar.archive.org/work/6rqahp2tzzhvlkqt23byyth47y/access/wayback/https://pajar.ejournal.unri.ac.id/index.php/PJR/article/download/7990/pdf.

Rapi, N. K. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Jenis Penilaian Formatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA Siswa SMPN. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 35(1), 69–79. https://repo.iainbatusangkar.ac.id/xmlui/bitstream/handle/123456789/8042/1509096341657_8366-21320-1-PB.pdf?sequence=1.

Rosidah, A. (2016). Penerapan Media Pembelajaran Visual Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ips. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v2i2.499.

Saguni, F. (2013). Efektivitas Metode Problem Based Learning, Cooperative Learning Tipe Jigsaw, dan Ceramah Sebagai Problem Solving dalam Matakuliah Perencanaan Pembelajaran. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(2), 207–219. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v0i2.1478.

Sanaie, N., Vasli, P., Sedighi, L., & Sadeghi, B. (2019). Comparing The Effect of Lecture and Jigsaw Teaching Strategies on The Nursing Students’ Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Motivation: A Quasi-Experimental Study. Nurse Education Today, 79, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.05.022.

Saputra, S., & Prasetyono, H. (2020). The Effect of Science Approach to The Activity of Learning Students In SMPN 25 Tangerang City. Jurnal PAJAR (Pendidikan Dan Pegajaran), 4(1), 20–30. https://doi.org/10.33578/pjr.v4i1.7910.

Şengül, S., & Katranci, Y. (2014). Effects of Jigsaw Technique on Mathematics Self-Efficacy Perceptions of Seventh Grade Primary School Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 333–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.217.

Strulik, H., & Weisdorf, J. (2008). Population, food, and knowledge: A simple unified growth theory. Journal of Economic Growth, 13(3), 195–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-008-9033-7.

Sung, E. (2017). The influence of visualization tendency on problem-solving ability and learning achievement of primary school students in South Korea. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 26, 168–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.10.007.

Suparmo, P. (2001). Teori Pengembangan Kognitif jean Piaget. Kanisius.

Widodo, S., & Kartikasari, K. (2017). Pembelajaran Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dengan Model Creative Problem Solving (Cps). Prisma, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.35194/jp.v6i1.28.

Wilson, J. A., Pegram, A. H., Battise, D. M., & Robinson, A. M. (2017). Traditional Lecture Versus Jigsaw Learning Method For Teaching Medication Therapy Management (MTM) Core Elements. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 9(6), 1151–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2017.07.028.

Woschank, M., & Pacher, C. (2020). Teaching and learning methods in the context of industrial logistics engineering education. Procedia Manufacturing, 51, 1709–1716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.10.238.

Wright, R. T., & Nebel, B. J. (2000). Environmental Science. Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Yearworth, M., Edwards, G., Davis, J., Burger, K., & Terry, A. (2013). Integrating problem solving and research methods teaching for systems practice in engineering. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 1072–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2013.01.113.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i2.35778

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 196 times
PDF file view : 53 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


 

JPP is indexed by:

          Crossref JPI

 

Creative Commons License

JPP is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.