Education Based on A Collaborative Approach with The Pottery Community for Students’ Art Learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v6i1.41117Keywords:
collaboration, art, potteryAbstract
This study discusses about collaborative education in MBKM program entrepreneurship activities in art learning for Elementary School Teacher Study Program students. The purpose of the study is to analyze the process and results of art learning with the pottery community. The research approach uses action research with an exploratory design. The participants were ten PGSD students. Data collection methods are interviews, observation of the process followed by an understanding questionnaire and a test of artistic practice. Data analysis through description and interpretation of social situation processes and explaining interventions in research. The planning stage is carried out with discussions and input from potters as practitioners. The learning outcomes of appreciation aspects from various cycles have increased from high to very high category by 10%, the medium for high category has increased by 89%. The achievement of the creative aspects of the pretest and posttest results showed a significance level of 0 < 0.05. The impact of influence can be accepted with a collaborative approach. Creative ideas tend to create traditional children's toys and household products from clay. The art learning results have increased in understanding the concept of procedures and characteristics of working materials. The students’ ability have increased their skills in making works of art with clay media. The findings from the research can contribute to the theoretical concept of local culture-based art learning and can practically add to students' artistic experience in preserving the local culture of the surrounding community.
References
Alma, H. (2020). Art and religion as invitation. An exploration based on John Dewey's theory of experience and imagination. Perichoresis, 18(3), 33–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/perc-2020-0015.
Altınay, Z. (2017). Evaluating peer learning and assessment in online collaborative learning environments. Behaviour and Information Technology, 36(3), 312–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2016.1232752.
Asi, Y. E. (2019). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Problem Solving Pada Pendidikan Seni Drama Di Prodi PGSD Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya. Pedagogik Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 12–17. https://doi.org/10.33084/pedagogik.v13i2.863.
Baharuddin, M. R. (2021). Adaptasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (Fokus: Model MBKM Program Studi). Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 4(1), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.30605/jsgp.4.1.2021.591.
Barnes, M. E., & Smagorinsky, P. (2016). What English/Language Arts Teacher Candidates Learn During Coursework and Practica: A Study of Three Teacher Education Programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(4), 338–355. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116653661.
Boddez, Y., Descheemaeker, M., Mertens, G., Truyts, A., & Van de Cruys, S. (2019). Like what you see: Generalization of social learning determines art appreciation. Acta Psychologica, 196(June 2018), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.04.001.
Borsboom, D. (2006). Educational Measurement (4th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510903206097.
Cárdenas Pérez, R. E., Lagos Herrera, I. H., & Figueroa Gutiérrez, E. E. (2016). El profesorado de educación básica y su contribución a la enseñanza de las artes visuales en la escuela. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 28(3), 475-493. Estado del arte, 28(3), 475–493.
Carson, P., & Sorin, R. (2016). Clay’s the Thing: Clay Work for Mastering Spelling. the International Journal of Interdisciplinary Educational Studies, 7(April). http://doi.org/10.18848/2327-011X/CGP.
Cornish, S. (2017). Social work and the two cultures: The art and science of practice. Journal of Social Work, 17(5), 544–559. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017316649355.
Cresswell, J. W. (2014). RESEARCH DESIGN: Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif dan Campuran (4 ed.; Achmad Fawaid dan Rianayati Kusmini Pancasari, ed.). Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Daly, S. R., Mosyjowski, E. A., & Seifert, C. M. (2019). Teaching Creative Process across Disciplines. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.158.
Dorland, S. G. H., & Ionico, D. (2021). Learning from Each Other: a Communities of Practice Approach to Decorative Traditions of Northern Iroquoian Communities in the Late Woodland. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 28(2), 671–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10816-020-09487-2.
Effrisanti, Y. (2015). Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek Melalui Program Magang Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Soft Skills Mahasiswa. Jurnal Eksis, X(1), 28–41.
Ford, C., McNally, D., & Ford, K. (2017). Using design-based research in higher education innovation. Online Learning Journal, 21(3), 50–67. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v%vi%i.1232.
Gericke, T. I. (2017). Aprendizaje, experiencias previas y criterios de evaluación en la formación musical superior. Revista Musical Chilena, 71(227), 79–107. https://doi.org/10.4067/s0716-27902017000100079.
Hali, A. U., Zhang, B., Al-Qadri, A. H., & Aslam, S. (2021). A collaborative teacher training approach in different cultures in the era of technology. International Journal of Instruction, 14(4), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.1442a.
Harun, H., Abdul Rahman, A. W., Noorazman, A. S., Mohd Noor, S. N. F., & Md Sahak, A. A. (2018). The Effectiveness of Cognitive and Psychomotor Domain of Culinary Art Students’ Performance after Internship in Private Colleges. MATEC Web of Conferences, 150, 0–3. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005021.
Indriani, F. (2016). Kompetensi Pedagogik Mahasiswa dalam Mengelola Pembelajaran Tematik Integratif Kurikulum 2013 pada Pengajaran Micro Di PGSD UAD Yogyakarta. Elementary School, 3(1), 1–12.
Kherid, Z. Y. . (2020). Model Pembelajaran Magang Kognitif dan Gender Terhadap Hasil Karya Lukis. Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif, 3(1), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.21009/jpi.031.09.
Kokko, S. (2021). Approaches to craft studies at higher education. FormAkademisk, 14(2), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.7577/FORMAKADEMISK.4197.
Laal, M., & Ghodsi, S. M. (2012). Benefits of Collaborative Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(2011), 486–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.091.
Larrain, A., & Haye, A. (2019). Self as an aesthetic effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 10(JUN). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01433.
Maisarah, A., Mahmud, M. E., & Saugi, W. (2020). Meningkatkan Kreativitas Anak Melalui Metode Bermain Plastisin Tanah Liat. Journal on Early Childhood Education Research (JOECHER), 1(2), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.37985/joecher.v1i2.7.
March, P. L. (2019). Playing with clay and the uncertainty of agency. A Material Engagement Theory perspective. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 18(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-017-9552-9.
Nurmeta, I. K., & Sutisnawati, A. (2021). Pembelajaran Daring Pendidikan Seni Rupa Mahasiswa PGSD Universitas Muhammadiyah Sukabumi di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Educandum, 3, 1–13.
Omar, A., Amir, Z., & Mohamad, M. (2018). Facilitating online learning: Students’ online discussion strategies for a project work at a technical university in Malaysia. 3L: Language, Linguistics, Literature, 24(4), 102–114. https://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2018-2404-08.
Opačak, T., Krampač Grljušić, A., & Lončarić, M. (2019). Participacija učenika putem primjene i procjene uspješnosti MAPS tehnike osobno usmjerenog planiranja – studija slučaja. Nova prisutnost, XVII(2), 350–350. https://doi.org/10.31192/np.17.2.7.
Pangestu, D. A., & Rochmat, S. (2021). Filosofi Merdeka Belajar Berdasarkan Perspektif Pendiri Bangsa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(1), 78–92. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v6i1.1823.
Pannen, P. (2021). Quality assurance in online learning at scale at the indonesia cyber education institute. In Education in the Asia-Pacific Region (Vol. 58). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0983-1_9.
Patacsil, F. F., & Tablatin, C. L. S. (2017). Exploring the importance of soft and hard skills as perceived by its internship students and industry: A gap analysis. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 7(3), 347–368. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.271.
Plomp, T. (2010). Educational Design Research: an Introduction. In T Plomp & N. Nieveen (Eds.), An Introduction to Educational Design Research (page. 16). Shanghai: Netherland Institute for Curriculum Development.
Pratama, I. G. D. J., Dantes, N., & Yudiana, K. (2020). Thematic Learning Plan With A Nature Of Science Learning Model In The Fourth Grade Of Elementary School. International Journal of Elementary Education, 4(4), 447–453. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v4i4.
Redondo, C. G., & Rico, A. R. (2020). Design of a tool of assesment of apps for arts education. Revista de Humanidades, 39, 61–98. https://doi.org/10.5944/RDH.39.2020.21814.
Reeder, L. K., Ricciardi, L., Zacharia, J., & Harnett, S. (2021). Arts Integration And 21st Century Skills: A Study of Learners and Teachers. International Journal of Education and The Art, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.26209/ijea22n2.
Retnowati, T. H., Mardapi, D., & Prihadi, B. (2017). Dimensi Karakter Dalam Penilaian Proses Berkarya Seni Lukis Peserta Didik Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan. Jutnal Imaji, 15(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.21831/imaji.v15i2.18845.
Salgueiro, F., Quinet de Andrade, S., & Zanelli, M. (2016). Decomposição Estrutural Do Emprego E Da Renda No Brasil : Uma Análise De Insumo-Produto – 1990 a 2007. Nova Economia, 26(3), 909–942.
Salido-López, P. V. (2017). Art education in the key competences context: From the design to the evaluation of didactic workshops in the training of trainers. Arte, Individuo y Sociedad, 29(2), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.5209/ARIS.54655.
Satrio, A. A. (2013). Kriya Keramik: Wujud, Posisi, Dan Perannya Di Masa Kini. Corak, 1(2), 167–176. https://doi.org/10.24821/corak.v1i2.353.
Sauli, F. (2021). The collaboration between Swiss initial vocational education and training partners: perceptions of apprentices, teachers, and in-company trainers. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-021-00114-2.
Shipley, G. (2010). Creating clay models of a human torso as an alternative to dissection. American Biology Teacher, 72(3), 146–147. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2010.72.3.3.
Skjelbred, B. H., & Borgen, J. S. (2019). Ungdomsskolelæreres oppfatninger av tegning sett i lys av den grunnleggende ferdigheten “å skrive” i kunst og håndverk. Acta Didactica Norge, 13(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.5617/adno.6438.
Soetopo, S. (2015). Pembelajaran Seni Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Inovasi Sekolah Dasar, 2(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.36706/jisd.v2i1.8622.
Suhaya. (2016). Pendidikan Seni Sebagai Penunjang Kreatifitas. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kajian Seni, 1(1), 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.30870/jpks.v1i1.
Supriatna, M. A. (2014). Penggunaan Tanah Liat Sebagai Media Pembelajaran. Cakrawala Dini, 5(1), 45–50. https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v5i1.10495.
Thohir, M., Ma’arif, S., Junaedi, Huda, H., & Ahmadi. (2021). From Disruption to Mobilization: Ire Teachers’ Perspectives on Independent Learning Policy. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(2), 359–373. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i2.39540.
Ulger, K. (2018). The effect of problem-based learning on the creative thinking and critical thinking disposition of students in visual arts education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, 12(1), 3–6. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1649.
Vermunt, J. D., & Donche, V. (2017). A Learning Patterns Perspective on Student Learning in Higher Education: State of the Art and Moving Forward. Educational Psychology Review, 29(2), 269–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9414-6.
Zazulak, J., Halgren, C., Tan, M., & Grierson, L. E. M. (2015). The impact of an arts-based programme on the affective and cognitive components of empathic development. Medical Humanities, 41(1), 69–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/medhum-2014-010584.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Nur Fajrie, Mohamed Nor Azhari, Imaniar Purbasari, Dwi Harmanto
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the International Journal of Elementary Education agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
