Pengaruh Penggunaan Socrative dalam Penilaian Diagnostik terhadap Efektivitas Pengajaran: Perspektif Guru
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/iji.v5i3.85958Keywords:
Perspektif Guru, Penilaian Diagnostik, SocrativeAbstract
Pendidik menghadapi tantangan yang semakin besar dalam menerapkan alat penilaian yang efisien dan efektif untuk mendukung pembelajaran siswa di era digital. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengeksplorasi perspektif guru terkait penggunaan Socrative dalam penilaian diagnostik serta mengevaluasi efektivitas dan kemudahan penggunaannya dalam konteks pendidikan. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif, data dikumpulkan melalui kuesioner dan wawancara semi-terstruktur dari 34 guru yang telah menggunakan Socrative. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Socrative sangat efektif dalam mengumpulkan data diagnostik secara cepat dan akurat, memberikan manfaat signifikan dalam efisiensi, kemudahan penggunaan, dan peningkatan partisipasi siswa. Fitur umpan balik real-time memungkinkan guru memberikan penilaian yang dipersonalisasi, yang berdampak positif pada motivasi belajar siswa. Meskipun persepsi keseluruhan sangat positif, beberapa guru mengakui adanya tantangan awal dalam mengadopsi teknologi ini. Penelitian ini menyarankan bahwa integrasi Socrative dapat memperkuat proses pengajaran melalui penilaian diagnostik yang lebih responsif serta menekankan pentingnya pelatihan lanjutan bagi guru dalam memanfaatkan teknologi pendidikan secara maksimal.
References
Alfageh, D. H., York, C. S., Hodge-Zickerman, A., & Xie, Y. (2024). Elementary teachers’ use of adaptive diagnostic assessment to improve mathematics teaching and learning: A case study. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 19(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/14190.
Ardi Nugraha, C., Kuswandi, D., & Praherdhiono, H. (2022). Teacher Professional Development to Train Digital Skills with Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). JTP - Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 24(3), 330–340. https://doi.org/10.21009/jtp.v24i3.31019.
Batubara, D. S. (2017). Kompetensi Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Guru SD/MI (Potret, Faktor-faktor, dan Upaya Meningkatkannya). Muallimuna Jurnal Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 3(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.31602/muallimuna.v3i1.954.
Chang, W. L., & Yeh, Y. chu. (2021). A blended design of game-based learning for motivation, knowledge sharing and critical thinking enhancement. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 30(2), 271–285. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2021.1885482.
CHIN, H., & CHEW, C. M. (2023). Validation of cognitive models for subtraction of time involving years and centuries. International Journal of Assessment Tools in Education, 10(2), 175–196. https://doi.org/10.21449/ijate.1160120.
Citrawathi, D. M., Adnyana, P. B., & Santiasa, M. P. A. (2016). Analisis Kebutuhan Untuk Pengembangan Modul Inkuiri Berbasis Pertanyaan (Mibp) Di Smp. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v5i1.8289.
Defianty, M., Hidayat, D. N., Kultsum, U., & Sufyan, A. (2020). Reframing Formative Assessment Practices in Emergency Remote Teaching Context of English Language Teaching in Higher Education institutions Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.20-10-2020.2305143.
Devos, N. J. (2023). Reading for the Technical Workplace : Developing a Diagnostic Reading Assessment for Understanding Instructional Texts. TESL Canada Journal, 40(2), 41–61. https://teslcanadajournal.ca/index.php/tesl/article/view/1583.
Dirgayasa, I. W., Lubis, S., & Sari, A. (2023). Developing Worksheet through Socrative to Improve Students’ English Writing Skill. World Journal of English Language, 13(1), 405–409. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v13n1p405.
Firmansyah, M. A. (2017). Analisis Hambatan Belajar Mahasiswa Pada Mata Kuliah Statistika. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.30870/jppm.v10i2.2036.
Fraile, J., Ruiz-Bravo, P., Zamorano-Sande, D., & Orgaz-Rincón, D. (2021). Formative assessment, self-regulation, feedback and digital tools: Use of Socrative in higher education. Retos, 42, 724–734. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87067.
Gaspersz, M., AW, S., & Gaspersz, N. (2023). Model Evaluasi Formatif-Sumatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Pembelajaran Berdiferensiasi Pada Peserta Didik Sma. Jurnal Magister Pendidikan Matematika (JUMADIKA), 5(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.30598/jumadikavol5iss1year2023page1-7.
Gina Amalia, Maulida, & Wirdatul Ulfah. (2022). Analisis Pendidikan Karakter Sosial Anak Usia SD di Era Society 5.0 Menurut Imam Al-Ghazali. Al-Furqan : Jurnal Agama, Sosial, Dan Budaya, 1(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.35931/alfurqan.v1i3.2.
Hanum, N. S. (2013). Keefetifan e-learning sebagai media pembelajaran (studi evaluasi model pembelajaran e-learning SMK Telkom Sandhy Putra Purwokerto). Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi, 3(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpv.v3i1.1584.
Hendratno, H., Yermiandhoko, Y., Wiryanto, W., Subrata, H., Istiq’faroh, N., & Kantina, S. (2023). Pelatihan Aplikasi Learning Tools untuk Peningkatan Kualitas Pembelajaran Hybrid di Sekolah Dasar. Nuansa Akademik: Jurnal Pembangunan Masyarakat, 8(2), 237–254. https://doi.org/10.47200/jnajpm.v8i2.1662.
Huang, Y., & Wilson, J. (2021). Using automated feedback to develop writing proficiency. Computers and Composition, 62, 170046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2021.102675.
Jaelani, A., Mansur, A.S, Zaqiyah, Q. . (2020). Implementation of Integrated Quality Management Strengthening Character Education in Realizing Pancasila Student Profile. International Journal Of Graduate Of Islamic Education, 3(2), 361–377. http://journal.iaisambas.ac.id/index.php/IJGIE/article/view/1342.
Jaelani, A. (2020). The Use of Socrative in English Language Teaching Classroom. ITELL (Indonesia Technology Enhanced Language Learning), 2006, 19–24. https://ejournal.ijshs.org/index.php/edu/article/download/338/305.
Kaliappen, N., Ismail, W. N. A., Ghani, A. B. A., & Sulisworo, D. (2021). Wizer.Me and socrative as innovative teaching method tools: Integrating tpack and social learning theory. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 1028–1037. https://doi.org/10.11591/IJERE.V10I3.21744.
Kizi, G. M. G., & Shadjalilovna, S. M. (2022). Developing Diagnostic Assessment, Assessment For Learning And Assessment Of Learning Competence Via Task Based Language Teaching. Academicia Globe: Inderscience Research, 3(8.5.2017).
Kolisnyk, M., Kornytska, Y., Ogurtsova, O., & Sokyrska, O. (2022). Socrative as a Formative Assessment Tool in English for Specific Purposes Course. Arab World English Journal, 2, 377–392. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/covid2.25.
Kumar, P. (2022). Role of ICT in Teacher Training Education. Journal of Teacher Education and Research, 17(01), 29–30. https://doi.org/10.36268/jter/17106.
Lathifaturrohmah AJ, B., & Yunikawati, N. A. (2022). Meningkatkan Keterlibatan Siswa Menggunakan Online Student Response System : Eksperimen. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(1), 89. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v10n1.p89--111.
Mbagho, H. M., & Tupen, S. N. (2020). Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik dalam Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Materi Operasi Bilangan Pecahan. Jurnal Basicedu, 5(1), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v5i1.632.
Mulyawan, I. W. (2021). Maintaining and revitalising Balinese language in public space: A controversial language planning regulation. Indonesia and the Malay World, 49(145), 481–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13639811.2021.1910356.
Nabila, H., Al-Manar, M. A., & Gunawan, Y. I. (2023). the Effectiveness of Socrative Application for Formative Assessment on the Eighth Grade Students in Teaching Vocabulary At Smpn 16 Kota Tangerang Selatan. Globish: An English-Indonesian Journal for English, Education, and Culture, 12(2), 102. https://doi.org/10.31000/globish.v12i2.7846.
Nguyen, N. (2020). Critical reading skills in ESL students: Challenges and pedagogical recommendations. English Australia Journal, 36(2), 34–51. https://search.informit.org/doi/abs/10.3316/informit.467613065322239.
Nurmala, N., & Anggoro, K. J. (2023). Investigating Weekly Vocabulary List Utilization and Vocabulary Quiz Using Socrative in an EFL Context. Mextesol Journal, 47(1), 0–3. https://doi.org/10.61871/mj.v47n1-16.
Nurwidiawati, D., Dhini, D. A., & Patras, Y. E. (2024). An implementation of primary school differentiated learning. Dikoda: Jurnal Pendidikan Sekolah Dasar, 5(01), 24–45. https://doi.org/10.37366/jpgsd.v5i01.4631.
Ofori, D. A., Anjarwalla, P., Mwaura, L., Jamnadass, R., & Stevenson, P. C. (2020). Pengaruh Gaya Kepemimpinan Guru Dalam Mengajar Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Aqidah Akhlak Di Madrasah Aliyah Muhammadiyah. Molecules, 2(1), 1–12. https://repository.metrouniv.ac.id/id/eprint/1462/.
Pratiwi, D. I., Atmaja, D. S., & Prasetya, H. W. (2021). Multiple E-Learning technologies on practicing TOEFL structure and written expression. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 6(1), 105–115. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v6i1.1194.
Pratiwi, D. I., & Waluyo, B. (2023). Autonomous learning and the use of digital technologies in online English classrooms in higher education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/13094.
Rahmah, C. M., Nasir, M., & Bahri, S. (2020). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI) pada Materi Kinematika Gerak Lurus di MAN 4 Aceh Besar. Jurnal Phi; Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Terapan, 2018(2), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.22373/p-jpft.v2018i2.7457.
Rokhim, D. A., & Widarti, H. R. (2024). Profile of Needs Analysis of Five-Tier Diagnostic Instrument Development for High School Chemistry Courses. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 14(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.14.02.17.
Romero-ramos, O., Fernández-rodríguez, E., López-fernández, I., Merino-marbán, R., & Benítez-porres, J. (2022). Journal of Technology and Science Education THE IMPACT OF THE M-LEARNING METHODOLOGY. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 12(1), 121–131. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=8368396.
Rusandi, & Muhammad Rusli. (2021). Merancang Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar/Deskriptif dan Studi Kasus. Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Studi Islam, 2(1), 48–60. https://doi.org/10.55623/au.v2i1.18.
Saeed Alharbi, A., & Meccawy, Z. (2020). Introducing Socrative as a Tool for Formative Assessment in Saudi EFL Classrooms. Arab World English Journal, 11(3), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol11no3.23.
Sari, D. P., & Safrizal, S. (2021). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Strategi Think, Predict, Read, Connect untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Membaca Pemahaman Siswa Sekolah Dasar. El-Ibtidaiy:Journal of Primary Education, 4(2), 177. https://doi.org/10.24014/ejpe.v4i2.13822.
Squire, N. (2023). Comparative Study of Game-Based Epedagogies in an Online Undergraduate Course. Journal of Educators Online, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2023.20.1.13.
Subandi, S. (2018). Kontribusi Kepemimpinan Kepala Sekolah, Motivasi Kerja,dan Iklim Sekolah terhadap Kinerja Guru. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Sains Dan Humaniora, 1(2), 57–63. https://doi.org/10.23887/jppsh.v1i2.12934.
Sukriadi, S., Kartono, K., & Wiyanto, W. (2015). Analisis Hasil Penilaian Diagnostik Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa Dalam Pembelajaran Pmri Berdasarkan Tingkat Kecerdasan Emosional. Unnes Journal of Mathematics Education Research, 4(2), 139–145. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/ujmer/article/view/9841.
Sumitra, A., & Sumini, N. (2019). Peran Guru Dalam Mengembangkan Kemampuan Minat Baca Anak Usia Dini Melalui Metode Read Aloud. Jurnal Ilmiah Potensia, 4(2), 115–120. https://doi.org/10.33369/jip.4.2.115-120.
Tran, T. N. A., & Nguyen Thanh, P. (2023). Effects of Socrative-Based Online Homework on Learning Outcomes in Vietnam: A Case Study. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 17(05), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v17i05.37513.
Wiwin, D., Utami, U. W., & Taris, T. (2022). Digital Media and Its Implication in Promoting Students’ Autonomous Learning. JET (Journal of English Teaching), 8(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.33541/jet.v8i1.3284.
Yi, Y. S. (2023). Another Reason for CDA in Language Assessment: A Critical Synthesis from a Perspective of Validating Test Constructs. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 37, 248–265. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2023.37.14.
Zahra, I. A. (2019). The Effect of Debate Activity in English Four Skills: The Students’ Perspective. In UHAMKA International Conference on ELT and CALL, 57–67. http://download.garuda.kemdikbud.go.id/article.php?article=1482949&val=11431
Zati, M. R., Rosalina, D., & Lubis, N. K. (2020). Persepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Faktor-Faktor Yang Berpengaruh Terhadap Kompetensi Dosen di Universitas Samudra. Jurnal Manajemen Motivasi, 16(2), 74. https://doi.org/10.29406/jmm.v16i2.2305.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Ni Luh Putu Ary Jhuniati, Ni Wayan Sri Puryanti, Ni Putu Yunita Susandi Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Indonesian Journal of Instruction agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
