Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar PKn Materi Pokok Pancasila sebagai Ideologi Negara melalui Metode Diskusi Kelompok

Authors

  • Surya Mega

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v2i4.16336

Abstract

Based on the results of observations, interviews and evaluation results of the implementation of Civics subject learning stated by the class XII Semester 1 teacher and student of SMK Negeri 60 Jakarta, the 2015/2016 academic year obtained data that the implementation of Civic Education learning in SMK Negeri 60 Jakarta still requires innovation from various aspects in accordance with PKn subject learning material. Pre-cycle results conducted by the researchers at the beginning of this study were low or below the KKM, which was 61.43 with the percentage of success in learning reaching 46.66%. Seeing such conditions Researchers are encouraged to make improvements through Classroom Action Research by applying group discussion learning methods where the application of group discussion learning methods is believed to be able to improve student learning outcomes to a level better. The main objectives in this study are: to find out the improvement of student learning outcomes in PKn subjects through the implementation of group discussion learning methods in students of class XII of the first semester of SMK Negeri 60 Jakarta in the 2015/2016 student year. The results obtained through data collection techniques, namely: observation, documentation tests and interviews, are: Learning outcomes cycle I is 75.6 while the results of Learning cycle II are 79.7. The conclusion of this study is "Through the application of learning methods to group discussions on Civics subjects with the subject matter of Pancasila as State Ideology can improve the learning outcomes of students of class XII of the first semester of SMK Negeri 60 Jakarta in the 2015/2016 school year.

References

Agus Suprijono. 2009. Cooperative Learning: Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar

A.M. Sardiman. 2012. Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. dkk. 2008. Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi. Aksara.

Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. 2003. Undang-Undang nomor 23 tahun 2003 tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: Depdiknas.

Depdikbud. 1995. Pedoman Proses Belajar Mengajar di SD. Jakarta: Proyek Pembinaan Sekolah Dasar.

Depdiknas. 2010. Mutu Pendidikan. Depertemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta

Hosnan, M. 2014. Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual Dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Margono. 2007. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Miles, Matthew dan Huberman, A. Michael. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif: Buku Sumber Tantang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press.

Misbahudin, Iqbal Hasan. 2013. Analisis Data Penelitian Dengan Statistik. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Moejiono, 1994. Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta.

Sugiyono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Kuantitati, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi (Mixed Methods). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suharsimi. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Sumiati, dan Asra. 2008. Metode Pembelajaran. Bandung: Wacana Prima.

Uno, Hamzah. 2012. Model Pembelajaran Menciptakan Proses Belajar Mengajar yang Kreatif dan Efektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Uno, Hamzah. 2009. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: PT. Bumi Aksara.

Wahida, Lestari, M.P. Alibasyah, dan Minarni Rama Jura. 2014. Penerapan Metode Diskusi Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Ipa Kelas IV SDN 4 Kombo Kecamatan Dampal Selatan Kabupaten Tolitoli. Jurnal Kreatif Tadulako Online Vol. 5 No. 10 ISSN 2354-614X 133

Wahyu Nur Hidayat, Muhammad Basri, Suparman Arif. 2017. Pengaruh Metode Diskusi Kelompok Terhadap Motivasi Belajar Sejarah Siswa . Jurnal FKIP Unila Vol 2 No 1

Downloads

Published

2018-12-19

How to Cite

Mega, S. (2018). Upaya Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar PKn Materi Pokok Pancasila sebagai Ideologi Negara melalui Metode Diskusi Kelompok. Journal of Education Action Research, 2(4), 370–376. https://doi.org/10.23887/jear.v2i4.16336