Authentic Assessment Techniques on Cognitive Aspects in Islamic Religious Education Learning at Elementary School Level
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jisd.v6i1.42636Kata Kunci:
Authentic Assessment, Cognitive, PAI LearningAbstrak
The teacher does not correctly and adequately understand the implementation of a valid assessment, so students do not understand the implementation of a valid assessment. This study aims to analyze how authentic assessment techniques on cognitive aspects are used by Islamic religious education teachers in elementary schools. The type of research used is qualitative research with a descriptive approach. This research uses a case study design because the researcher will reveal in-depth or analyze the research problem to obtain more specific results. The subjects in the study were one teacher of Islamic religious education and two students. The data collection used is primary and secondary sources. The primary sources used were observation, interviews, and documentation, while the secondary sources were reputable books and journals that matched the themes discussed. The data analysis using descriptive-analytic is divided into three stages, namely the critical analysis stage, critical interpretation, and concluding. The results of this study are several authentic assessment techniques on cognitive aspects used by Islamic religious education teachers, including written tests, oral tests, and assignments. This assessment technique is used to get a complete picture of student competencies in the realm of knowledge and can be used as a measuring tool for learning success so that assessment has an essential role in education.
Referensi
Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and Challenges of Using e-Assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.1.1008
Arif, M. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Mapel Sains melalui Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses Sains SD/MI. Ta’allum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2016.4.1.123-148. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21274/taalum.2016.4.1.123-148
Astuti, S. I., & Darsinah, D. (2018). Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Kurikulum 2013 di SD Negeri Mangkubumen Kidul No. 16 Surakarta. Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(2), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v13i2.7484. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jmp.v13i2.7484
Barnard, M., Whitt, E., & McDonald, S. (2021). Learning objectives and their effects on learning and assessment preparation: insights from an undergraduate psychology course. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 673–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1822281. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1822281
Damanik, M. R., & Setiawan, D. (2016). Pengembangan Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Karakter Pada Ranah Keterampilan Di Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Medan. Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v8i2.5150. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/jupiis.v8i2.5150
Danniels, E., Pyle, A., & DeLuca, C. (2020). The role of technology in supporting classroom assessment in play-based kindergarten. Teaching and Teacher Education, 88(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102966. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102966
Darmaji, Astalini, Kurniawan, D. A., Sari, N., Wiza, O. H., & Putri, Y. E. (2020). Investigation of students’ psychology: The relationship among students’ attitudes, persistence, creativity, and tolerance toward natural science subjects. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1155–1166. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080405. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080405
Dedy Rosyidi. (2020). Teknik dan Instrumen Asesmen Ranah Kognitif. Tasyri’, 27(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.52166/tasyri.v27i1.79
Fadilah, N., & Efendi, N. (2020). Student Pleasure Attitude and Interest in Spending Time Learning Science Against Student Cognitive Learning Outcomes. Academia Open, 3, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.3.2020.497. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.3.2020.497
Fazal, M. A. ul, Ferguson, S., & Saeed, Z. (2022). Investigating cognitive workload in concurrent speech-based information communication. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102728. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102728
Friantary, H., & Martina, F. (2018). Evaluasi Implementasi Penilaian Hasil Belajar Berdasarkan Kurikulum 2013 oleh Guru Bahasa Inggris dan Bahasa Indonesia di MTS Ja-Alhaq Kota Bengkulu. Silampari Bisa: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, Daerah, Dan Asing, 1(2), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i2.202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31540/silamparibisa.v1i2.202
Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
Gunawan, I., & Paluti, A. R. (2017). Taksonomi Bloom - Revisi Ranah Kognitif : Kerangka Landasan Untuk Pembelajaran,Pengajaran, Dan Penilaian. Jurnal Pendidkan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v2i02.50. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v2i02.50
Hamzah, A. (2020). Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan Library Research. Literasi Nusantara.
Hidayat, W., & Andriani, A. (2020). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Guru Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i2.24922. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i2.24922
Huang, W.-B., Liu, J., Bai, H., & Zhang, P. (2020). Value assessment of companies by using an enterprise value assessment system based on their public transfer specification. Information Processing & Management, 57(5). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102254. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102254
Ismet Basuki & Hariyanto. (2016). Asesmen Pembelajaran. PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset.
Jalali, L. C., Hasanzadeh, S., Davaee, M., & Afrooz, G. (2016). Development and assessment of effects of de-stress training program on stress of mothers with mentally disabled children. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal, 14(4), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.18869/nrip.irj.14.4.223. DOI: https://doi.org/10.18869/nrip.irj.14.4.223
Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model Asesmen Autentik Untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Smp): Implementasi Asesmen Autentik Di Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063
Krismony, N. P. A., Parmiti, D. P., & Japa, I. G. N. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Motivasi Belajar Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i2.28264. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i2.28264
Kuboja, J. M., & Ngussa, B. M. (2015). Affective Learning and Cognitive Skills Improvement: Experience of Selected Schools in Arusha, Tanzania. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 4(2), 38–53. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v4-i2/1727. DOI: https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v4-i2/1727
Kuntoro, B. T., & Wardani, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas III SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan, 6(3), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3737983.
Lestari, N. D. (2018). Analisis Penerapan Kurikulum 2013 Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Ekonomi Di Sma Negeri Se-Kota Palembang. Jurnal Neraca: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Ekonomi Akuntansi, 2(1), 68–79. https://doi.org/10.31851/neraca.v2i1.2190. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31851/neraca.v2i1.2190
Lilis Suwandari & Euis Nani Mulyati. (2021). Asesmen Kemampuan Kognitif Dasar (Klasifikasi) Yang Dilakukan Guru Bagi Anak Tunagrahita Sedang Kelas Iii Di Slb Madina Serang. Inclusive: Journal of Special Education, 7(1), 64–79.
M. Ngalim Purwanto. (2012). Prinsip-Prinsip dan Teknik Evaluasi Pengajaran. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Maharani, Y. S. (2015). Efektivitas Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif Berbasis Kurikulum 2013. Indonesian Journal of Curriculum and Educational Technology Studies, 3(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcets.v3i1.8683.
Mahmud Mahdi Yahya. (2021). Wawancara.
Marfuah, A. (2019). Penilaian Autentik Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) Di Sekolah Dan Perguruan Tinggi. Fondatia : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v3i2.301. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v3i2.301
Maryani, I., & Martaningsih, S. T. (2017). Persepsi Guru Sekolah Dasar Terhadap Sistem Penilaian Pada Kurikulum 2013. Scholaria : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2017.v7.i2.p153-164. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24246/j.scholaria.2017.v7.i2.p153-164
McGarr, O., & Gallchóir, C. Ó. (2021). Examining supervising field instructors’ reporting and assessment of technology use by pre-service teachers on school placement. Computers & Education, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103753. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103753
Momang, H. D. (2021). Pengembangan model buku ajar digital keterampilan menyimak berdasarkan pendekatan autentik. Kembara: Jurnal Keilmuan Bahasa, Sastra, Dan Pengajarannya, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v7i1.16202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22219/kembara.v7i1.16202
Muhammad Tamrin, D. (2021). Penilaian Autentik Pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam Di Smp Negeri 4 Pematangsiantar. Al-Fikru: Jurnal Ilmiah, 15(2), 129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.51672/alfikru.v15i2.57
Muzlikhatun Umami. (2018). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jiurnal Kependidikan, 6(2), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259.
Nugraha, R., Purnamasari, I., & Baedowi, S. (2017). Evaluasi Penerapan Standar Penilaian Kurikulum 2013 Pada Kelas 4 Sekolah Dasar Di Kecamatan Jambu. Jurnal Sekolah, 2(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.24114/js.v2i1.9925. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24114/js.v2i1.9925
Ozan, C. (2019). The effect of authentic assessment on academic achievement and attitude towards educational measurement and opinions of prospective teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 299–312. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18564. DOI: https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18564
Pantiwati, Y. (2016). Hakekat Asesmen Autentik Dan Penerapannya Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi. Jurnal Edukasi Matematika Dan Sains, 1(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v1i1.773. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25273/jems.v1i1.773
Permendikbud No.23 Tahun 2016. (n.d.). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 23 Tentang standar Penilaian.
Radmehr, F., & Drake, M. (2018). An assessment-based model for exploring the solving of mathematical problems: Utilizing revised bloom’s taxonomy and facets of metacognition. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2018.02.004
Rahayu, N. (2020). Hasil Karya Siswa Sebagai Penilaian Autentik Berbasis Kelas Di Kelompok B Usia 5-6 Tahun Tk An-Nur 1 Yogyakarta. Cakrawala Dini: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i1.17279. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/cd.v11i1.17279
Redifer, J. L., Bae, C. L., & Zhao, Q. (2021). Self-Efficacy and Performance Feedback: Impacts on Cognitive Load During Creative Thinking. Learning and Instruction, 71(June 2020), 101395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101395
Safitri, K., & Harjono, N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial Aspek Tanggung Jawab Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Siswa Kelas 4 SD. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 4(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i1.33352. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i1.33352
Saito, E., Reisch, R., & Davis-Risen, S. (2021). Utilizing a faculty-led student assessment team to evaluate international interprofessional service learning opportunities. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(9). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.037. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.037
Schildkamp, K., Kleij, van der, Heitink, Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Sergeeva, N., & Kortantamer, D. (2021). Enriching the concept of authentic leadership in project-based organisations through the lens of life-stories and self-identities. International Journal of Project Management, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.001
Setiadi, H. (2016). Pelaksanaan penilaian pada Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 166–178. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.7173
Setiawan, D. (2017). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Penilaian Auntentik untuk Meningkatkan Mutu Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam. AL-ASASIYYA: Journal Of Basic Education, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v1i2.683. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24269/ajbe.v1i2.683
Sönmez, V. (2017). Association of Cognitive , Affective , Psychomotor and Intuitive Domains in Education , Sönmez Model. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050307. DOI: https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050307
Soucy, J. N., Owens, V. A. M., Hadjistavropoulos, H. D., Dirkse, D. A., & Dear, B. F. (2016). Educating patients about Internet-delivered cognitive behaviour therapy: Perceptions among treatment seekers and non-treatment seekers before and after viewing an educational video. Internet Interventions, 6, 57–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.09.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.invent.2016.09.003
Ulya, H., Rahayu, R., & Riyono, A. (2019). Integration Of Products Assessment in Mind Mapping Learning to Enhance Mathematical Communication. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1175(012142), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012142. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1175/1/012142
Umami, M. (2018). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam dan Budi Pekerti dalam Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Kependidikan, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24090/jk.v6i2.2259
Utami, D. A. P., & Wardani, N. S. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif dalam Pembelajaran Tematik Kelas 5 SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 20(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.12345/lentera.v12i2.463.
Wajdi, F. (2017). Implementasi Project Based Learning (Pbl) Dan Penilaian Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Drama Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra, 17(1), 86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/bs_jpbsp.v17i1.6960
Wiana, P. J. A. E., Gading, I. K., & Kusmariyatni, N. (2017). The Application of Authentic Assessment to Improve the Learning Outcomes of Science in the fourth-grade students of SD Negeri 2 Pupuan. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.9841. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.9841
Wildan, W. (2017). Pelaksanaan Penilaian Autentik Aspek Pengetahuan, Sikap Dan Keterampilan Di Sekolah Atau Madrasah. Jurnal Tatsqif, 15(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/jtq.v15i2.3
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2022 Ghufran Hasyim Achmad, Andi Prastowo
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
