PEMBELAJARAN IDEAL PROBLEM SOLVING DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI BERPENGARUH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA SISWA KELAS V
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v2i1.3003Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) mengetahui perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar IPA antara kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dengan kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI); (2) mengetahui perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar IPA antara kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dengan kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI) pada kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi berprestasi tinggi; (3) mengetahui perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar IPA antara kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dengan kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI) pada kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi berprestasi rendah; serta (4) mengetahui pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dan motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar IPA. Rancangan penelitian ini adalah Nonequivalent Control Group Design, dengan menggunakan desain faktorial 2x2. Populasi dalam penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas V SDN Gugus Kolonel I Gusti Ngurah Rai Denpasar Utara tahun pelajaran 2013/2014. Data yang dikumpulkan adalah data motivasi berprestasi siswa dan hasil belajar IPA. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan: (1) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar IPA antara kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dengan kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI) (FA hitung = 4,428 > F tabel (α = 0,05; 1,82) = 3,96); (2) terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar IPA antara kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dengan kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI) pada kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi berprestasi tinggi (F (A1B1 – A2B1) hitung = 12,16 > F’(4-1)(2,72) (α=0,05) = 8,16); (3) tidak terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan hasil belajar IPA antara kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dengan kelompok siswa yang dibelajarkan melalui model pembelajaran Direct Instruction (DI) pada kelompok siswa yang memiliki motivasi berprestasi rendah (F (A1B2 – A2B2) hitung = 0,12 < F’(4-1)(2,72) (α=0,05) = 8,16); serta (4) terdapat pengaruh interaksi antara model pembelajaran IDEAL Problem Solving dan motivasi berprestasi terhadap hasil belajar IPA pada siswa kelas V SDN Gugus Kolonel I Gusti Ngurah Rai Denpasar Utara Tahun Pelajaran 2013/2014 (FAB hitung = 7,778 > F tabel (α = 0,05; 1,82) = 3,96).Kata Kunci : IDEAL Problem Solving, motivasi berprestasi, hasil belajar IPA
This study aims: (1) to determine the significant differences of science learning outcome between students that learned used IDEAL Problem Solving learning model with students that learned used Direct Instruction (DI) learning model; (2) to determine the significant differences of science learning outcome between students that learned used IDEAL Problem Solving learning model with students that learned used Direct Instruction (DI) learning model in students that own high achievement of motivation; (3) to determine the significant differences of science learning outcome between students that learned used IDEAL Problem Solving learning model with students that learned used Direct Instruction (DI) learning model in students that own low achievement of motivation; and (4) to determine influence interaction between IDEAL Problem Solving learning model and achievement motivation to science learning outcome. This research design is Nonequivalent Control Group Design, by using factorial 2x2 design. Population in this research were all students of fifth grade SDN in Gugus Kolonel I Gusti Ngurah Rai North Denpasar academic year 2013/2014. Data collected are data achievement motivation and science learning outcome. Result research showed that: (1) there are significant differences of science learning outcome between students that learned used IDEAL Problem Solving learning model with students that learned used Direct Instruction (DI) learning model (FA calculates = 4,428 > F table (α = 0,05; 1,82) = 3,96); (2) there are significant differences of science learning outcome between student group that learned used IDEAL Problem Solving learning model with students that learned used Direct Instruction (DI) learning model in students that own high achievement of motivation (F (A1B1 – A2B1) calculates = > F' (4-1)(2,72) (α=0,05) = 8,16); (3) there are not significant differences of science learning outcome between students that learned used IDEAL Problem Solving learning model with students that learned used Direct Instruction (DI) learning model in students that own low achievement of motivation (F (A1B2 – A2B2) calculates = 0,12 < F'(4-1)(2,72) (α=0,05) = 8,16); and (4) there are influence interaction between IDEAL Problem Solving learning model and achievement motivation to science learning outcome students of fifth grade SDN in Gugus Kolonel I Gusti Ngurah Rai North Denpasar academic year 2013 / 2014 (FAB calculates = 7,778 > F table (α = 0,05; 1,82) = 3,96).
keyword : IDEAL Problem Solving, achievement motivation, science learning outcomes
Published
2014-06-20
How to Cite
., N. K. D. W., ., D. I. B. S. M. M., & ., D. I. W. S. M. (2014). PEMBELAJARAN IDEAL PROBLEM SOLVING DAN MOTIVASI BERPRESTASI BERPENGARUH TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA SISWA KELAS V. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v2i1.3003
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Mimbar PGSD Undiksha agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)