PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA KELAS IV DI SD NO 3 SONGAN
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v3i1.5909Abstract
Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar IPA antara siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif STAD dengan siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran konvensional. Penelitian merupakan jenis quasi experimen dengan rancangan post-test only control group design. Populasi dari penelitian ini adalah siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri 3 Songan semester ganjil tahun pelajaran 2013/2014 yang berjumlah 79 siswa (39 siswa pada kelompok eksperimen dan 40 siswa pada kelompok kontrol). Data penelitian berupa hasil belajar IPA yang diperoleh dengan tes hasil belajar berupa test pilihan ganda sebanyak 25 item soal. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis dengan uji-t. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa secara keseluruhan rata-rata skor hasil belajar IPA siswa pada kelompok eksperimen yaitu sebesar 13,69 lebih tinggi dibandingkan dengan rata-rata skor hasil belajar siswa pada kelompok kontrol yaitu 11,73. Hasil uji-t pada taraf signifikansi 5% diperoleh thitung= 2,1024. Sementara ttabel pada taraf signifikasi 5% dengan db 77 adalah 1,9913. Dengan demikian thitung > ttabel, maka ditarik kesimpulan bahwa terdapat perbedaan hasil belajar IPA yang signifikan antara siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran kooperatif STAD dengan siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran konvensional.Kata Kunci : model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD, model pembelajaran konvensional, hasil belajar IPA
The purposes of this research were to know differences between students result in science who learnt by student teams achievement division cooperative learning model and students who learnt using conventional learning model. The type of this research was a quasi experiment by using post-test only control group design. Population of this research was grade fourth student of SD Negeri 3 Songan in academic year 2013/2014 amounting to 79 students (39 students in the experimental group and 40 students in the control group). Science students learning outcome data were collected using the test method in the form of multiple-choice test of 25 items. Data were analyzed by t-test. The result of this research show overall average score of science learning outcomes of students in the experimental group that is equal to 13.69 higher than the average score of student learning outcomes in the control group 11.73. The results of the t-test at 5% significance level obtained tcount = 2.1024. While ttable at 5% significance level with 77 db is 1.9913. Thus tcount> ttable, then conclude that there are differences in learning outcomes between the significant science students who learnt by student teams achievement division cooperative learning model and students who learnt by with conventional learning model.
keyword : student teams achievement division cooperative learning model, conventional learning model, students result in science
Published
2015-08-07
How to Cite
., I. K. S., ., D. N. T. R., & ., N. W. R. S. M. (2015). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA KELAS IV DI SD NO 3 SONGAN . MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v3i1.5909
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Mimbar PGSD Undiksha agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)