PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SIKLUS PRATYAKSA PRAMANA, ANUMANA PRAMANA, UPAMANA PRAMANA, DAN SABDA PRAMANA (PAUS) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA SISWA KELAS IV DI GUGUS V KECAMATAN SUKASADA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v4i1.7125Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui perbedaan hasil belajar IPA antara siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model pembelajaran siklus PAUS dan siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran dengan model konvensional pada siswa kelas IV semester II di Kecamatan Sukasada Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian quasi eksperimen dengan menggunakan desain non-equivalent post-test only control group design. Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh siswa kelas IV SD Semester II di Gugus Kecamatan Sukasada Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016 yang berjumlah 227 orang. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan teknik simple random sampling. Data hasil belajar dikumpulkan dengan tes hasil belajar berbentuk pilihan ganda. Data yang dikumpulkan dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif dan statistik inferensial. Berdasarkan hasil analisis data, diperoleh thitung = 5,26 dan ttabel (pada taraf signifikansi 5%) =1,684. Hal ini berarti bahwa thitung > ttabel, sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan yang signifikan antara siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran menggunakan model pembelajaran siklus PAUS dengan siswa yang mengikuti pembelajaran menggunakan model konvensional. Hal ini berarti, penerapan model belajar siklus PAUS berpengaruh positif terhadap hasil belajar IPA siswa kelas IV di gugus V Kecamatan Sukasada.Kata Kunci : siklus belajar PAUS, hasil belajar IPA
This research aims to knowing the difference of science learning results between two groups which learned with PAUS learning cycle model and conventional learning model towards fourth grade students in Sukasada District on academic year 2015/2016. The type of this research is quasi experiment with non-equivalent post-test only control group design. The population of this research is all of fourth grade students of 5th cluster in Sukasada District on academic year 2015/2016 which consists of 227 students in amount. To get samples, this research is applied random sampling technique. Data were collected by using test in optional test form. The collected data were analyzed using descriptive statistic analysis and inferential statistic (t-test for independent sample) method. Based on analyzed data, it was discovered that thitung was 5,26 and ttabel was 1,684 with 5% of signification degree. It describes that the value of thitung is higher than ttabel. So, it can be concluded that there is a significant difference of science learning result between two groups that learn using PAUS and conventional learning model. In other words, it concluded that PAUS learning model has a positive influence on science learning results.
keyword : PAUS learning model, science learning result
Published
2016-06-22
How to Cite
., G. A. S. H., ., D. D. N. S., & ., D. G. N. J. (2016). PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN SIKLUS PRATYAKSA PRAMANA, ANUMANA PRAMANA, UPAMANA PRAMANA, DAN SABDA PRAMANA (PAUS) TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR IPA SISWA KELAS IV DI GUGUS V KECAMATAN SUKASADA. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v4i1.7125
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Mimbar PGSD Undiksha agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)