Evaluating the Impact of the DECIDE Model on Decision-Making Skills in Elementary Teacher Education Students in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v7i3.84231Keywords:
Decision-Making Skills, Elementary Teacher, Case StudyAbstract
The low level of decision-making skills among students poses a significant challenge in elementary teacher education programs. This study aims to evaluate decision-making skills using the DECIDE model among elementary teacher education students in Indonesia. The research employed a qualitative method with a case study design. The participants consisted of 70 students selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected using open-ended essay tests and non-test techniques, including participant observation and in-depth interviews. The results indicated that students' decision-making skills could be evaluated through the six stages of the DECIDE model: Define the Problem, demonstrated by the ability to define the problem and identify the main aspects requiring resolution; Establish the Criteria, reflected in the ability to establish relevant and objective criteria for evaluating potential solutions; Consider all the Alternatives, shown by the ability to assess all alternatives along with their advantages and disadvantages; Identify the Best Alternative, characterized by the ability to identify the best alternative based on the established criteria; Develop and Implement a Plan of Action, shown through the development of a structured action plan; and Evaluate and Monitor the Solution, demonstrated by continuous evaluation of the implemented solution. This study concluded that elementary teacher education students in Indonesia exhibit good decision-making skills based on the DECIDE model.
References
Ahmad, S., Hussain, A., Batool, A., Sittar, K., & Malik, M. (2016). Play and Cognitive Development: Formal Operational Perspective of Piaget’s Theory. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(28), 72–79.
Ajayi, O. B., Moosa, M., & Aloka, P. J. O. (2023). Relationship Between Career Interest and Career Decision-Making of Grade 12 Learners in Township Secondary Schools in South Africa. Athens Journal of Education, 10(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.30958/aje.10-2-7.
Alred, A. R., & Dauer, J. M. (2020). Understanding factors related to undergraduate student decision-making about a complex socio-scientific issue: Mountain lion management. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/113757.
Al-Tarawneh, H. A. (2011). The Main Factors beyond Decision Making. Journal of Management Research, 4(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.5296/jmr.v4i1.1184.
Aspers, P., & Corte, U. (2019). What is Qualitative in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Sociology, 42(2), 546–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133-019-9413-7.
Aydın Gürler, S., & Kaplan, O. (2023). Attitudes Towards STEAM, Critical Thinking Disposition and Decision-Making Skills: Mediation and Gender Moderation. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 10(1), 210–223. https://doi.org/10.33200/ijcer.1272051.
Badarudin. (2017). Peningkatan Keterampilan Pengambilan Keputusan Dan Penguasaan Konsep IPA Melalui Model Pembelajaran Advance Organizer Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 4(1), 8–21.
Berthet, V., & de Gardelle, V. (2023). The heuristics-and-biases inventory: An open-source tool to explore individual differences in rationality. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1145246), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1145246.
Campbell, S., Greenwood, M., Prior, S., Shearer, T., Walkem, K., Young, S., Bywaters, D., & Walker, K. (2020). Purposive sampling: complex or simple? Research case examples. Journal of Research in Nursing, 25(8), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987120927206.
Chandio, M. T., Pandhiani, S. M., & Iqbal, S. (2016). Bloom’s Taxonomy: Improving Assessment and Teaching-Learning Process. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 3(2), 203–231. https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v3i2.1034.
Colakkadioglu, O., & Celik, D. B. (2016). The Effect of Decision-Making Skill Training Programs on Self-Esteem and Decision-Making Styles. Egitim Arastirmalari - Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 2016(65), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.65.15.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods. In Approaches: Fourth edition. Sage Publication.
Duru, H. (2022). Analysis of Relationships between High School Students’ Career Maturity, Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy, and Career Decision-Making Difficulties. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(1), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.1.479.
Genisa, M. U., Subali, B., Djukri, & Habibi, H. (2021). Decision-making style profiles of pre-service biology teachers in socio-scientific issues. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(3), 760–767. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i3.21376.
Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.’s Taxonomy of the Cognitive Domain. Valdosta State University. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cogsys/bloom.html.
Khristina, O. :, & Prihatin, S. (2018). Penerapan Decision Making Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Pada Mata Pelajaran Akuntansi. Jurnal Pendidikan, Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 1(1), 52–65.
Kotorov, I., Krasylnykova, Y., Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Mansilla, F., & Broisin, J. (2024). Supporting Decision-Making for Promoting Teaching and Learning Innovation: A Multiple Case Study. Journal of Learning Analytics, 11(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.18608/jla.2024.8131.
Le, H. T. T., Phan, L. T., & Vu, H. T. T. (2022). Student Decision-Making Processes as Evaluated by Students, Administrators, And Lecturers. International Journal of Education and Practice, 10(4), 371–380. https://doi.org/10.18488/61.v10i4.3221.
Mahrinasari MS, Safraz, H., Siksha, L. M. Y., Esquivel-Infantes, S. M., Untari, D. T., Yusriadi, & Diah, A. (2021). The Impact of Decision-Making Models and Knowledge Management Practices on Performances. Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 1–13.
Mati, A., Gatumu, J. C., & Chandi, J. R. (2016). Students’ Involvement in Decision Making and Their Academic Performance in Embu West Sub-County of Kenya. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(10), 2294–2298. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2016.041008.
Meral, M., Altun Yalçın, S., Çakır, Z., & Samur, E. (2024). The Effect of STEM-Based Robotic Coding Education on Primary School Students’ Decision-Making Skills. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim, 17(2), 478–498. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1355818.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook, Edition 3. Sage Publication.
Murtafiah, W., Sa’dijah, C., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo, S. (2019). Decision making of the winner of the national student creativity program in designing ICT-based learning media. TEM Journal, 8(3), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM83-49.
Novianawati, N., & Nahadi. (2015). Analysis of students’ decision making to solve science reasoning test of trends in international mathematics and science study (Timss). Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 4(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v4i1.3491.
Oni, A. A., & Adetoro, J. A. (2015). The effectiveness of student involvement in decisionmaking and university leadership: A comparative analysis of 12 universities in South-west Nigeria. Journal of Student Affairs in Africa, 3(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.14426/jsaa.v3i1.93.
Pakpahan, F. H., & Saragih, M. (2022). Theory Of Cognitive Development By Jean Piaget. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 2(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.52622/joal.v2i2.79.
Panpatte, S., & Takale, V. D. (2019). To Study the Decision-Making Process in an Organization for its Effectiveness. The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, 3(1), 73–78.
Polatlar, D. Y., & Öztabak, M. Ü. (2021). The Analysis of the Relation Between Preschool Teachers’ Decision Making and Attachment Styles. International Education Studies, 14(9), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v14n9p1.
Robert, W. S., & Tomohito, Y. (2023). An analysis of student decision making for educational recommender systems. Educational Research and Reviews, 18(4), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.5897/err2023.4313.
Sadiya Iqbal, H., Muhammad, M., Akhtar, S., & Saleem, M. (2020). A Study of Decision Making Styles of Academic Managers in Public Sector Universities of the Punjab. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(2), 181–196.
Sari, M. P. (2022). Decision-Making and Life Satisfaction: The Role of General Decision-Making Styles and Maximizing Tendency as Predictors. Humaniora, 13(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.21512/humaniora.v13i2.7769.
Sari, P., Kasman, P., & Ali, H. (2022). Literature Review Factors Affecting Decision Making And Career Planning: Environment, Experience And Skill. Dinasti International Journal of Digital Business Management, 3(2), 219–231. https://doi.org/10.31933/dijdbm.v3i2.
Sever, I., & Ersoy, A. (2019). Investigation of decision-making skills of fourth grade students according to student and teacher opinions. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 12(2), 167–182. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2019257664.
Sinnaiah, T., Adam, S., & Mahadi, B. (2023). A strategic management process: the role of decision-making style and organisational performance. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 15(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1108/JWAM-10-2022-0074.
Sola, E. (2018). Decision Making: Sebuah Telaah Awal Ermi Sola. JURNAL IDAARAH, 2(2), 208–215.
Sutiman, Sofyan, H., Soenarto, Mutohhari, F., & Nurtanto, M. (2022). Students’ Career Decision-Making During Online Learning: The Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy in Vocational Education. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 1669–1682. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.3.1669.
Töre, E. (2022). The Effect of School Managers’ Five-Factor Personality Traits on Decision-Making Processes. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 9(3), 730–740. https://doi.org/10.52380/ijpes.2022.9.3.767.
Turda, E. S. (2024). The Relationship Between Personality Factors, Vocational Identity and Career Decision-Making Self-Efficacy. International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training, 11(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.13152/IJRVET.11.1.3.
Unciti, O., & Palau, R. (2023). Teacher Decision Making Tool: Development Of A Prototype To Facilitate Teacher Decision Making In The Classroom. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 13(3), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.1801.
Vaidya, P. R., & Acharya, K. (2023). Students’ Decision-Making at the University Level: A Phenomenological Study. Journal of Business and Management Research, 5(1–2), 20–34. https://doi.org/10.3126/jbmr.v5i1-2.58568.
Wahono, B., Narulita, E., Chang, C. Y., Darmawan, E., & Irwanto, I. (2021). The Role of Students’ Worldview on Decision-Making: An Indonesian Case Study by a Socio-Scientific Issue-Based Instruction Through Integrated STEM Education. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(11), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/11246.
West, S., Stoll, O., Meierhofer, J., & Züst, S. (2021). Digital twin providing new opportunities for value co-creation through supporting decision-making. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(9), 132–150. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11093750.
Yurtseven, R., Üyesi, Ö., Akkaş Baysal, E., Ocak, G., & Baysal, E. A. (2014). Analysis Of The Relationship Between Decision Making Skills And Problem Solving Skills Of Primary School Students. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 8(3), 2148–2225.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Moh Salimi, Ratna Hidayah, Suhartono Suhartono, Tri Saptuti Susiani, Wahyono Wahyono, Achmad Basari Eko Wahyudi, Laksmi Evasufi Widi Fajari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)