Microteaching Lesson Study of Biology Prospective Teacher to Develop Lesson Plan Design and Teaching Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.22701Keywords:
Microteaching-Lesson Study, Lesson Plan, Teaching AbilityAbstract
This research aimed to develop the learning tools of the biological subject in high school and the teaching biology ability of the teacher candidates through microteaching-lesson study (MLS). The combination of MLS activities was unfolded in preparing the real learning conditions for prospective teachers who will conduct the field practice in the actual classroom. Data were collected through the observation sheets, interviews, and microteaching scores that represented the students' teaching ability. The data were analyzed descriptively. The results showed that each student capable of designing three learning plans with good and excellent categories. The teaching ability and classroom management of students increase by the three activities that conducted, as can be seen from the mean of first (55,77), the second (71,88), and the third (84,38) practice values. However, the students experienced difficulties in the stages of preparation and implementation concerning the more time needed as well as the more cycle activities. Therefore, the students argued that by the only three cycles of activities they experienced, then the LS would be constrained to introduce in the field practice program at school. The more cycles of MLS and guidance from the lecturer is still needed to make prospective teacher ready to implement LS in their field practice at school.
References
Aida, W., & Antoni, R. (2017). Basic Components of Micro Teaching Skill At Third Year Student FKIP Universitas Pasir Pengaraian. Journal of English Education, 3(2), 100–112. https://journal.upp.ac.id/index.php/JEE/article/view/512.
Asman, H. (2016). The Capacity of Microteaching Lesson Study in Promoting Teaching Practice and Pedagogical Development. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 5(2), 198–213. https://journal.ikippgriptk.ac.id/index.php/bahasa/article/view/325.
Ceylan, S., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Improving a Sample Lesson Plan for Secondary Science Courses within the STEM Education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 177(July 2014), 223–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.395.
Chichibu, T., & Kihara, T. (2013). How Japanese schools build a professional learning community by lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(1), 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311290105.
Chukwunyere, B. B., Chigozie, R., & Chibuike, R. (2017). The Impact of Microteaching in Developing Teaching Skills among Pre-Service Teachers in Alvan Ikoku College of Education Owerri, Nigeria. African Research Review, 11(2), 237–1994. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v11i2.18.
Contreras, K., Arredondo, C., Díaz, C., Inostroza, M. J., & Strickland, B. (2020). Examining differences between pre- and in-service teachers’ cognition when lesson planning. System, 91, 102240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102240.
Damalie, S. N. (2018). Student-teachers’ experiences of microteaching on an economics methods course. African Research Review, 12(2), 101. https://doi.org/10.4314/afrrev.v12i2.10.
Doig, B., & Groves, S. (2011). Japanese Lesson Study: Teacher Professional Development through Communities of Inquiry. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 13(1), 77–93. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ960950.
Fujii, T. (2016). Designing and adapting tasks in lesson planning: a critical process of Lesson Study. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 48(4), 411–423. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-016-0770-3.
Gellert, U. (2008). Routines and collective orientations in mathematics teachers’ professional development. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 67(2), 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-007-9089-x.
Ghanaguru, S., Nair, P., & Yong, C. (2013). Teacher trainers’ beliefs in microteaching and lesson planning in a teacher training institution. English Teacher, 42(2), 216–228.
Gutierez, S. B. (2015). Collaborative professional learning through lesson study: Identifying the challenges of inquiry-based teaching. In Issues in Educational Research (Vol. 25, Issue 2).
Handayani, S. (2018). Microteaching Practices based on Multiple Intelligence : A Research and Development of Students ’ Handbook for English Language. The 2nd International Conference on Technology, Education, and Social Science 2018, 268–275.
Hasan, R., Lukitasari, M., Utami, S., & Anizar, A. (2019). The activeness, critical, and creative thinking skills of students in the Lesson Study-based inquiry and cooperative learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 77–84.
Hj Iksan, Z., Aishah Mohd Nor, S. N., Nordiyana Mahmud, S., & Zakaria, E. (2014). Applying the principle of “Lesson study” in teaching science. Asian Social Science, 10(4), 108–113. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n4p108.
Iksan, Z. H., Zakaria, E., & Daud, M. Y. (2014). Model of lesson study approach during micro teaching. International Education Studies, 7(13), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n13p253.
Kanauan, W., & Inprasitha, N. (2014). Collaboration between Inservice Teachers and Student Intern in Thai Lesson Study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.163.
Kostas, K., Galini, R., & Maria, M. (2014). The Practicum in Pre - Service Teachers’ Education in Greece: The Case of Lesson Study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.09.325.
Lai, M. Y., & Lo-Fu, Y. W. P. (2013). Incorporating learning study in a teacher education program in Hong Kong: a case study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 2(1), 72–89. https://doi.org/10.1108/20468251311290141.
Ledger, S., & Fischetti, J. (2020). Micro-teaching 2.0: Technology as the classroom. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 36(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.4561.
Marble, S. (2007). Inquiring into Teaching: Lesson Study in Elementary Science Methods. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(6), 935–953. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9071-6.
Marsigit. (2007). Mathematics Teachers Professional Development through Lesson Study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 3(2), 141–144.
Marsigit. (2016). Lesson Study Among the Move of Educational Reformation in Indonesia. Proceeding Of 3rd International Conference On Research, Implementation And Education Of Mathematics And Science, 16–17.
Merdekawati, K. (2018). The implementation of lesson study to improve the teaching skills of chemistry teacher candidates. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1116(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1116/4/042022.
Murata, A. (2011). Conceptual Overview of Lesson Study. In Lesson Study Research and Practice in Mathematics Education (pp. 1–12).
Murtafiah, W. (2016). Peningkatan Kemampuan Mengembangkan Perangkat Pembelajaran Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika Pada Matakuliah Microteaching Melalui Lesson Study. Jurnal Edukasi, 2(1), 1–14.
Murtafiah, W., & Lukitasari, M. (2019). Developing Pedagogical Content Knowledge of Mathematics Pre-Service Teacher through Microteaching Lesson Study. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 13(2), 201–218.
Murtafiah, W., Sa’dijah, C., Chandra, T. D., & Susiswo, S. (2019). Decision making of the Winner of the National Student Creativity Program in Designing ICT-based Learning Media. TEM Journal, 8(3), 1039–1045. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM83-49.
Myers, J. (2012). Lesson Study as a Means for Facilitating Preservice Teacher Reflectivity. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2012.060115.
Natalia, S., & Ditasona, C. (2019). Analysis of the difficulties in determining the right evaluation instrument in teaching practice student teachers of mathematics education study program. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 5(3), 1003–1033.
Norton, S. (2018). Middle School Pre- Service Teachers ’ Mathematics Content Knowledge and Mathematical Pedagogy Content Knowledge : Assessing and Relating. Proceedings of the 41st Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, July, 599–606.
Nugraheni, F. S. A. (2019). Learning difficulties in microteaching class: A case study. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2194 (December). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5139803.
Okobia, E. O., Augustine, O. E., & Osagie, R. . . (2013). An Analysis of the Perceived Challenges Faced by Student-Teachers during Teaching Practice Exercise. Undefined, 4, 7–11.
Ono, Y., & Ferreira, J. G. (2009). (PDF) A case study of continuing teacher professional development through lesson study in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 30, 59–74.
Remesh, A. (2013). Microteaching, an efficient technique for learning effective teaching. In Journal of Research in Medical Sciences (Vol. 18, Issue 2, pp. 158–163).
Saun, S. (2015). Problems Done by The Microteaching Students in Teaching The Grammar For A Communicative Purpose. Poceedings of ISELT-3, 411–418.
Shuilleabhain, A. N. (2016). Developing Mathematics Teachers ’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Lesson Study : Case Study Findings. International Journal of Lesson and Learning Study, 5(3), 212–226.
Sumantri, M. S., Prayuningtyas, A. W., Rachmadtullah, R., & Magdalena, I. (2018). The Roles of Teacher-Training Programs and Student Teachers’ Self-Regulation in Developing Competence in Teaching Science. Advanced Science Letters, 24(10), 7077–7081. https://doi.org/10.1166/asl.2018.12412.
Suryani, F. B. (2014). Developing a Model of Microteaching Lesson Study for English Student Teachers. Proceedings of World Association of Lesson Studies, 6–10.
Utami, I. W. P., Mashuri, & Nafiáh, U. (2017). A Model of Microteaching Lesson Study Implementation in the Prospective History Teacher Education. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(27), 10–14.
Yang, L. (2017). The Problems of and Solutions to Micro-teaching for English Pedagogical Students. 40 (Icelaic 2016), 147–152. https://doi.org/10.2991/icelaic-16.2017.36.
Yigit, N. (2010). Developing presentation skills of student teachers through micro-teaching method. Energy Education Science and Technology Part B: Social and Educational Studies, 2(2), 55–74.
Yoshida, M. (2008). Exploring Ideas for a Mathematics Teacher Educator’s Contribution to Lesson Study (pp. 85–106). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087905460_006.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
