A Comparison Differences in Students’ Perceptions Toward Using Teacher’s Feedback

Andi Syahputra

Abstract


This study aims to compare their perceptions between gender and their age toward using the teachers’ feedback in their classroom. This study applied a quantitative method with survey method, which allowed the data to be quantified and analyzed using statistical analysis. In collecting the data, the Questionnaire Feedback, Identification, School Trajectories that measure their perceptions about Effective Teachers’ Feedback (EFT) and Ineffective Teachers’ Feedback (IEFT) have been used. The samples are 125 students, who are 53 boys and 72 girls, also 17 and 18 years old. The data are analyzed by descriptive statistics. The findings showed that there were statistically significant differences perceptions among students across their genders (p≤0.001) on EFT perceived. Furthermore, there is a significant difference between 17 years old students and 18 years old students (p≥0.05) on EFT perceived. As the result, the students’ gender and their age have main effect, with girls perceiving are more effective than boys, which leads them to report receiving more feedback from their teachers when compared to boys, and 18 years old students’ percept more than 17 years old students on teachers’ feedback toward their reading achievement.


Keywords


Students’ perceptions; Teacher’s feedback

Full Text:

PDF

References


Akyol, H., & Boyaci-Altinay, Y. (2019). Reading Difficulty and its Remediation: A Case Study. European Journal of Educational Research, 8(4), 1269–1286. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.8.4.1269.

Al-Jarrah, R., & Al-Ahmad, S. (2012). An Optimality-theoretic Account of Corrective Feedback in Process Writing. Asian EFL Journal, 14(3), 10–40. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/an-optimality-theoretic-account-of-corrective-feedback-in-process-writing/.

Andi, S. (2014). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension through Survey, Question, Read, Recite, and Review (SQ3R) Technique. English Education Journal, 5(2), 1–18. http://jurnal.stkipkusumanegara.ac.id/index.php/semnara2020/article/view/808.

Asnawi., Zulfikar., & I. (2017). Students’ Perception of Oral Corrective Feedback in Speaking Classes. English Education Journal (EEJ), 8(3), 275–291. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/8918.

Bailey, R., & Garner, M. (2010). Is the feedback in higher education assessment worth the paper it is written on? Teachers’ reflections on their practices. Teaching in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562511003620019.

Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Preventing Feedback Fizzle. Educational Leadership.

Carless, D. (2007). Conceptualizing Pre-emptive Formative Assessment. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940701478412.

Carvalho, C., Conboy, J., Santos, J., Fonseca, J., Tavares, D., Martins, D., … Gama, A. P. (2015). An Integrated Measure of Student Perceptions of Feedback, Engagement and School Identification. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.01.896.

Carvalho et al. (2014). Teachers’ Feedback: Exploring Differences in Students’ Perceptions. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 159, 169–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.351.

Edmunds, C. E. R., Milton, F., & Wills, A. J. (2015). Feedback can be superior to observational training for both rule-based and information-integration category structures. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470218.2014.978875

Ellis, R. (2009). Corrective Feedback and Teacher development. L2 Journal, 1(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.5070/l2.v1i1.9054.

Else-Quest et al. (2006). Gender Differences in Temperament: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(1), 33–72. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0033-2909.132.1.33.

Esra C., & Sabri, S. (2018). Reading Comprehension Skills in Terms of the Sentiments Given in Reading Texts. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(4), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v7.i4.

Fakhrul A., Sofyan A.G., B. D. (2019). Lecturers’ Feedback in Speaking Class (A Descriptive Study at Ar-Raniry State Islamic). English Education Journal (EEJ), 10(4), 447–472. http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/14983.

Ferris, D. (2006). Does error feedback help student writers? In F. Hyland & K. Hyland (Eds.), Feedback in Second Language Writing: Contexts and Issues (pp. 81–102). Cambridge University Press.

Ferris, Dana. (2015). Written corrective feedback in L2 writing: Connors & Lunsford (1988); Lunsford & Lunsford (2008); Lalande (1982). Language Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000257.

Freedberg, M., Glass, B., Filoteo, J. V., Hazeltine, E., & Maddox, W. T. (2017). Comparing the effects of positive and negative feedback in information-integration category learning. Memory and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-016-0638-3.

Galea, J. M., Mallia, E., Rothwell, J., & Diedrichsen, J. (2015). The dissociable effects of punishment and reward on motor learning. Nature Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.3956.

Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2004). Does your assessment support your students’ learning? Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 1(1). http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.201.2281&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

Hartshorn et al. (2010). Effects of dynamic corrective feedback on ESL writing accuracy. TESOL Quarterly, 44(1), 84–109. https://doi.org/10.5054/tq.2010.213781.

Hattie. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.

Hattie. (2011). Research for Teachers Hattie ’ s concept of visible teaching and learning. Reasearch for Teachers. www.gtce.org.uk.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487.

Havnes et al. (2012). Formative assessment and feedback: Making learning visible. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 38, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2012.04.001.

Hong, L., & Qingying, L. (2007). The Role of Revision and Teacher Feedback in a Chinese College Context. Asian EFL Journal, 9(4), 230–239. https://www.asian-efl-journal.com/main-editions-new/the-role-of-revision-and-teacher-feedback-in-a-chinese-college-context/.

Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006). Feedback on second language students’ writing. Language Teaching, 39, 83–101. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444806003399.

Junqueira, L., & Payant, C. (2015). “I just want to do it right, but it’s so hard”: A novice teacher’s written feedback beliefs and practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 27, 19–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2014.11.001.

Krish, P. (2006). The Power of Feedback in an Online Learning Environment. 3L: Journal of Language Teaching, Linguistics and Literature, 12, 95–106. https://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/download/1086/982.

Lee, I. (2003). How Do Hong Kong English Teachers Correct Errors in Writing? Education Journal, 31(1), 153–169. https://www.academia.edu/download/54436549/How_Do_Hong_Kong_English_Teachers_correct_errors_in_writing.pdf.

Leh, Ling Ying; Bin Ibrahim, Z. H. (2019). The Influence Of Feedback Environment Towards Job Satisfaction In Tvet Education Organization. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI), 8(1), 96–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v8i1.16471.

Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Factors affecting second language learning in C.N Candlin and N. Mercer. In English language teaching in its social context (pp. 28–43).Routledge.

Mack, L. (2009). Issues and Dilemmas: What Conditions are Necessary for Effective Teacher Written Feedback for ESL Learners? Polyglossia, 16, 33–39. https://ritsumei.repo.nii.ac.jp/?action=repository_action_common_download&item_id=11622&item_no=1&attribute_id=22&file_no=1.

Madani., & H. (2016). The Effects of Reading Skills on the Development of Language Proficiency. Abou Bakr Belkaid-Tlemcen.

O’Donnell, M. E. (2014). Peer response with process-oriented, standards-based writing for beginning-level, second language learners of Spanish. Hispania, 97(3), 413–429. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpn.2014.0083.

Patthey-Chavez, G.G., & Ferris, D. . (1997). Writing conferences and the weaving of multivoiced texts in college composition. Research in the Teaching of English, 31(1), 51–90. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40171264.

Phuong, T.T.,& Huan, N. . (2018). Teacher corrective feedback on students’ speaking performance and their uptake in EFL classes. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 3(3), 573–595. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1321246.

Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W., & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students’ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.03.002.

Safak, P, Yilmaz, H. C., Demiryurek, P., & Dogus, M. (2016). The Effect of Performance Feedback Provided to Student-Teachers Working with Multiple Disabilities. European Journal of Educational Research, 5(3), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.5.3.109.

Sen, N. . (2017). The Role of Feedback in Employee Performance Improvement. The University of Liverpool.

Shute, V. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795.

Silver, R., & Lee, S. (2007). What does it take to make a change? Teacher feedback and student revisions. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 6(1), 25–49. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ832137.

Sprouls, K. (2011). Teachers' use of positive and negative feedback with students who are high-risk for emotional behavioral disorders. Arizona State University.

Sumarno, Setyosari, P., & H. (2017). Effect of feedback strategy and motivation of achievement to improving learning results concept in learning civic education in vocational high school. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(4), 441–453. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.4.441.

Valente, M.O., Conboy, J., & Carvalho, C. (2009). Student voices on how engagement is influenced by teacher’s communication of evaluation results. The European Conference on Educational Research, 28–30. Vienna.

Wasding, R. (2013). Feedback expressions used by an English teacher of Tour and Travel Department. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 3(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v3i1.190.

Wood et al. (2011). Audio feedback for student writing in online nursing courses: exploring student and instructor reactions. The Journal of Nursing Education, 50(9), 540–543. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110616-04.

Yoke et al. (2013). The use of online corrective feedback in academic writing by L1 Malay learners. English Language Teaching, 6(12), 175–180. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/elt.v6n12p175.

Zuhana et al. (2014). Critical Reading Ability and its Relation to L2 Proficiency of Malaysian ESL Learners. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 20(2), 43–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.17576/3L-2014-2002-04.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i1.28514

Article Metrics

Abstract view : 301 times
PDF file view : 69 times

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2021 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:

LEMBAGA PENELITIAN DAN PENGABDIAN KEPADA MASYARAKAT (LPPM)

UNIVERSITAS PENDIDIKAN GANESHA

Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928
Homepage: https://lppm.undiksha.ac.id
Email: jpi_journal@undiksha.ac.id


Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 




Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.