Online Learning at Early Pandemic Situation: Grassroots Voices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i3.29561Keywords:
pandemic, online learning, Google classroomAbstract
The advent of the COVID-19 pandemic reconfigured several aspects of life, one of which is education. A study on grassroots voices on online learning is a dearth of. Therefore, a present study was addressed to uncover teachers’ and students’ voices in online learning. Questionnaires and interviews were employed to garner data. 233 students and 30 teachers’ responses from questionnaires were obtained. The interviews were conducted to obtain in-depth data. The data were interpreted descriptively. The results showcased that students’ voices on the ease of GC and GC performance were positive, yet institution support was not maximally implemented. Simultaneously, the teachers’ voices on the ease of GC, the performance of GC, and the supports of institution were positive. In a nutshell, teachers and students have a positive impression of online learning. Their positive impression comes from the ease of the online platform operation, the online platform’s good performance, but student views that the institutional support is not maximally implemented. The ease of using online platforms should be considered in choosing one of the various online platforms available. The online platform features are not complicated for students and teachers to easily operationalize the online platform and support teaching and learning activities such as delivering materials, assigning tasks, submitting a task, and assessing tasks.
References
Amin, F. M., & Sundari, H. (2020). EFL students’ preferences on digital platforms during emergency remote teaching: Video conference, lms, or messenger application? Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 362–378. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v7i2.16929.
Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL Classes Must Go Online! Teaching Activities and Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76.
Fauzi, I., & Sastra Khusuma, I. H. (2020). Teachers’ Elementary School in Online Learning of COVID-19 Pandemic Conditions. Jurnal Iqra’ : Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(1), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.25217/ji.v5i1.914.
Ferdiansyah, S., Ridho, M. A., Sembilan, F. D., Sembilan, F. D., & Zahro, S. F. (2020). Online literature circles during the COVID-19 pandemic: Engaging undergraduate students in Indonesia. TESOL Journal, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.544.
Giatman, M., Siswati, S., & Basri, I. Y. (2020). Online learning quality control in the pandemic Covid-19 era in Indonesia. Journal of Nonformal Education, 6(2), 168–175. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/index.php/jne/article/view/25594.
Heggart, K. R., & Yoo, J. (2018). Getting the most from google classroom: A pedagogical framework for tertiary educators. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 43(3), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2018v43n3.9.
Hernández-Sellés, N., Pablo-César Muñoz-Carril, & González-Sanmamed, M. (2019). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An analysis of the relationship between interaction, emotional support and online collaborative tools. Computers and Education, 138, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.04.012.
Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2020). Far Apart , Yet Close Together : Cooperative Learning in Online Education. Studies in English Language and Education, 7(2), 271–289.
Ke, F. (2013). Online interaction arrangements on quality of online interactions performed by diverse learners across disciplines. Internet and Higher Education, 16(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.07.003.
Limbu, L., & Markauskaite, L. (2015). How do learners experience joint writing: University students’ conceptions of online collaborative writing tasks and environments. Computers and Education, 82, 393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.11.024.
Mabuan, R. A. (2018). Using Blogs in Teaching Tertiary Esl Writing. English Review: Journal of English Education, 6(2), 1. https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v6i2.1238.
Mardiana, H. (2020). Lecturers’ Adaptability To Technological Change And Its Impact On The Teaching Process. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(2), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i2.24595.
Milošević, I., Živković, D., Arsić, S., & Manasijević, D. (2015). Facebook as virtual classroom - Social networking in learning and teaching among Serbian students. Telematics and Informatics, 32(4), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.02.003.
Morice, A., Jablon, E., Delevaque, C., Hossein Khonsari, R., Picard, A., & Kadlub, N. (2020). Virtual versus traditional classroom on facial traumatology learning: Evaluation of medical student’s knowledge acquisition and satisfaction. Journal of Stomatology, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jormas.2020.03.001.
Neumann, K. L., & Kopcha, T. J. (2019). Using Google Docs for Peer-then-Teacher Review on Middle School Students’ Writing. Computers and Composition, 54, 102524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2019.102524.
Nugroho, A. ., & Atmojo, A. E. P. (2020). Digital Learning Of English Beyond Classroom: Efl Learners’ Perception And Teaching Activities. JEELS, 7(2), 219–243.
Oh, E. G., Huang, W. H. D., Hedayati Mehdiabadi, A., & Ju, B. (2018). Facilitating critical thinking in asynchronous online discussion: comparison between peer- and instructor-redirection. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 489–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-018-9180-6.
Paakkari, A., Rautio, P., & Valasmo, V. (2019). Digital labour in school: Smartphones and their consequences in classrooms. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 21, 161–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.03.004.
Prasetianto, M. (2019). Kinds of Questions Making EFL Students Learn: Students’ Perception. JOALL (Journal of Applied Linguistics & Literature), 4(2), 162–176. https://doi.org/10.33369/joall.v4i2.7607.
Prasetianto, M., & Maharddhika, R. (2020). Online Writing Exchange with Overseas Students: EFL Learners’ Errors and Perceptions. Elite Journal, 7(1), 74–86.
Pratama, A. R., & Scarlatos, L. L. (2020). Ownership and Use of Mobile Devices Among Adolescents in Indonesia. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(3), 356–384. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519886584.
Purwanto, A., Pramono, R., Asbari, M., Santoso, P. B., Wijayanti, L. M., Hyun, C. C., & Putri, R. S. (2020). Exploratory Study of the Impact COVID-19 Pandemic on Online Learning Process in Primary Schools. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan, 2(1), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.20473/jkl.v12i1si.2020.129-136.
Rasmitadila, R., Aliyyah, R. R., Rachmadtullah, R., Samsudin, A., Syaodih, E., Nurtanto, M., & Tambunan, A. R. S. (2020). The Perceptions of Primary School Teachers of Online Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic Period: A Case Study in Indonesia. Journal of Ethnic and Cultural Studies, 7(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejecs/388.
Rozgonjuk, D., Elhai, J. D., Ryan, T., & Scott, G. G. (2019). Fear of missing out is associated with disrupted activities from receiving smartphone notifications and surface learning in college students. Computers and Education, 140(March), 103590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.05.016.
Ruthotto, I., Kreth, Q., Stevens, J., Trively, C., & Melkers, J. (2020). Lurking and participation in the virtual classroom: The effects of gender, race, and age among graduate students in computer science. Computers and Education, 151(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103854.
Shang, H. F. (2017). An exploration of asynchronous and synchronous feedback modes in EFL writing. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 29(3), 496–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9154-0.
Shu, H., & Gu, X. (2018). Determining the differences between online and face-to-face student–group interactions in a blended learning course. Internet and Higher Education, 39(November 2017), 13–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2018.05.003.
Straub, C., & Vasquez, E. (2016). Effects of Synchronous Online Writing Instruction for Students With Learning Disabilities. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(4), 213–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415618929.
Swaggerty, E. A., & Broemmel, A. D. (2017). Authenticity, relevance, and connectedness: Graduate students’ learning preferences and experiences in an online reading education course. Internet and Higher Education, 32, 80–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2016.10.002.
Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2020). The adoption of Facebook as a virtual class whiteboard: Promoting EFL students’ engagement in language tasks. TESOL Journal, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.515.
Valencia-Arias, A., Chalela-Naffah, S., & Bermúdez-Hernández, J. (2019). A proposed model of e-learning tools acceptance among university students in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies, 24(2), 1057–1071. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-018-9815-2.
Wang, C. X. (2020). CAFE: An Instructional Design Model to Assist K-12 Teachers to Teach Remotely during and beyond the Covid-19 Pandemic. TechTrends. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00555-8.
Windiarti, S., Fadilah, N., Dhermawati, E., & Pratolo, B. W. (2019). Teachers’ Perception toward the Obstacles of E-Learning Classes. Ethical Lingua: Journal of Language Teaching and Literature, 6(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.30605/25409190.v6.117-128.
Yi, Y., & Jang, J. (2020). Envisioning possibilities amid the COVID-19 pandemic: Implications from English language teaching in South Korea. TESOL Journal, 11(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.543.
Zheng, B., Niiya, M., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Wikis and collaborative learning in higher education. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 24(3), 357–374. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2014.948041.
Zheng, B., & Warschauer, M. (2015). Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment. Computers and Education, 84, 78–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.01.008.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)