The Implementation of Joyful Learning Strategies Using Experimental and Project Methods in terms of Students’ Creativity and Self-Discipline

Authors

  • Melyana Dyah Anggraeni Magister of Physics Education
  • Widha Sunarno Physics Education in sebelas maret university
  • Suparmi Suparmi department of physics at sebelas maret university

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i2.30110

Keywords:

Creativity, self-discipline, learning outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the difference of students’ study result between the joyful learning strategics using the experimental and project method seen from the creativity and self-discipline. The research method used in this study was the experimental method. The research design used in the study was a quasi-experimental research design. The sample was obtained by using the Cluster Sampling technique which consisted of two classes through scientific-based learning observations using project and experimental methods in different classes. The data collection on the learning outcomes of the knowledge aspect used to test techniques, the attitude aspect used the questionnaire technique, and the skill aspect used the observation sheet. The results of this study shows that project method influencing students’ study and skill result better than the experimental method. The learning outcomes of students’ knowledge and skills with creativity were better than those of students with low creativity. The learning outcomes of students with high self-discipline were better than those of students with low self-discipline.

Author Biographies

Melyana Dyah Anggraeni, Magister of Physics Education

Students in physics education at sebelas maret university

Widha Sunarno, Physics Education in sebelas maret university

lecturer in physics education at sebelas maret university

Suparmi Suparmi, department of physics at sebelas maret university

lecturer in department of physics at sebelas maret university

References

Aithal, P. S., & Aithal, S. (2020). Analysis of the Indian National Education Policy 2020 towards Achieving its Objectives. International Journal of Management, Technology, and Social Sciences, 5(2), 20–41. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3676074.

Akinoglu, O. (2008). Assessment of the Inquiry-Based Project Implementation Process in Science Education Upon Students’ Points of Views. International Journal of Instruction, 1(1), 1–12. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/59811.

Arikunto, S. (2010). Prosedur Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Rineka Cipta.

Budiman, H. (2017). Peran Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi Dalam Pendidikan. Al-Tadzkiyyah: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 8(I), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.24042/atjpi.v8i1.2095.

Cope, A. J., Vasilaki, E., Minors, D., Sabo, C., Marshall, J. A., & Barron, A. B. (2018). Abstract concept learning in a simple neural network inspired by the insect brain. Plos Computational Biology.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for the educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791.

Daryanto, & Rahardjo, M. (2012). Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Gava Media.

Deslauriers, L., McCarty, L. S., Miller, K., Callaghan, K., & Kestin, G. (2019). Measuring actual learning versus feeling of learning in response to being actively engaged in the classroom. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(39), 19251–19257. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1821936116.

Durrani, N., & Nawani, D. (2020). Knowledge and Curriculum Landscapes in South Asia. In P. Sarangapani & R. Pappu (Eds.), Handbook of Education Systems in South Asia (pp. 1–31). Springer.

Dziuban, C., Graham, C. R., Moskal, P. D., Norberg, A., & Sicilia, N. (2018). Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0087-5.

Ellis, V., Souto-Manning, M., & Turvey, K. (2019). Innovation in teacher education: towards a critical re-examination. Journal of Education for Teaching, 45(1), 2–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2019.1550602.

Erikson, M. G., & Erikson, M. (2019). Learning outcomes and critical thinking - good intentions in conflict. Studies in Higher Education, 44(12), 2293–2303. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1486813.

Friedman, J., York, H., Graetz, N., Woyczynski, L., Whisnant, J., Hay, S. I., & Gakidou, E. (2020). Measuring and forecasting progress towards the education-related SDG targets. Nature, 580(7805), 636–639. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2198-8.

González-Zamar, M. D., Ortiz Jiménez, L., Sánchez Ayala, A., & Abad-Segura, E. (2020). The impact of the university classroom on managing the socio-educational well-being: A global study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(3), 931. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17030931.

Hanna, D., Sutarto, S., & Harijanto, A. (2016). Model Pembelajaran Tema Konsep Disertai Media Gambar Pada Pembelajaran Fisika Di Sma. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Universitas Jember, 5(1), 23–29. https://jurnal.unej.ac.id/index.php/JPF/article/view/3558.

Harris, A., Jones, M., Adams, D., & Cheah, K. (2019). Instructional leadership in Malaysia: a review of the contemporary literature*. School Leadership and Management, 39(1), 76–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2018.1453794.

Hartong, S. (2015). Global policy convergence through “distributed governance”? The emergence of “national” education standards in the US and Germany. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy, 31(1), 10–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/21699763.2014.977803.

Henderikx, M., Kreijns, K., Castano Munoz, J., & Kalz, M. (2019). Factors influencing the pursuit of personal learning goals in MOOCs. Distance Education, 40(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600364.

İlçin, N., Tomruk, M., Yeşilyaprak, S. S., Karadibak, D., & Savcı, S. (2018). The relationship between learning styles and academic performance in TURKISH physiotherapy students. BMC Medical Education, 18(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-018-1400-2.

Imants, J., & Van der Wal, M. M. (2020). A model of teacher agency in professional development and school reform. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2019.1604809.

Keiler, L. S. (2018). Teachers’ roles and identities in student-centered classrooms. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0131-6.

Kromydas, T. (2017). Rethinking higher education and its relationship with social inequalities: past knowledge, present state and future potential. Palgrave Communications, 3(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-017-0001-8.

Mastuhu. (2003). Menata Ulang Pemikiran Sistem Pendidikan Nasional dalam Abad 21. Safiria Insania Press.

Muqarramah. (2016). Pendekatan Student Centered Learning ; Design Pembelajaran Aqidah Akhlak. Jurnal Tarbiyah (Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan), 5(2), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.18592/tarbiyah.v5i2.982.

Mutlu, G., & Yıldırım, A. (2019). Learning environment perceptions and student background variables as determinants of persistence in EFL learning. SAGE Open, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244019898805.

Naz, F., & Murad, H. S. (2017). Innovative Teaching Has a Positive Impact on the Performance of Diverse Students. SAGE Open, 7(4). https://doi.org/10.1177%2F2158244017734022.

Naziev, A. (2017). What is and education? International Conference. Future of Education.

O’Flaherty, J., & Liddy, M. (2018). The impact of development education and education for sustainable development interventions: a synthesis of the research. Environmental Education Research, 24(7), 1031–1049. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2017.1392484.

Osueke, B., Mekonnen, B., & Stanton, J. D. (2018). How undergraduate science students use learning objectives to study. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v19i2.1510.

Prameswari, S. J., & Budiyanto, C. (2017). The development of the effective learning environment by creating an effective teaching in the classroom. IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education), 1(1). https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v1i1.11960.

Purwanto, M. N. (2017). Psikologi Pendidikan. Remaja Rosda Karya.

Rati, N. W., Kusmaryatni, N., & Rediani, N. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek, Kreativitas Dan Hasil Belajar Mahasiswa. JPI : Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 6(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v6i1.9059.

Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in education: what works, what deosn’t, and what to do about it? Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007.

Shrestha, E., Mehta, R. S., Mandal, G., Chaudhary, K., & Pradhan, N. (2019). Perception of the learning environment among the students in a nursing college in Eastern Nepal. BMC Medical Education, 19(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-019-1835-0.

Silaban, B. (2014). Hubungan Antara Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Dan Kreativitas Dengan Kemampuan Memecahkan Masalah Pada Materi Pokok Listrik Statis. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Pendidikan, 20(1), 65 – 75. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24114/jpbp.v20i1.3072.

Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhinya. Rineka Cipta.

Sugiyarti, H., Sunarno, W., & Aminah, N. S. (2015). Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Pendekatan Saintifik Menggunakan Metode Proyek dan Eksperimen ditinjau dari Kreativitas dan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Inkuiri, 4(4), 34–42. https://jurnal.fkip.uns.ac.id/index.php/inkuiri/article/view/7829.

Susianah, & Hidayat, M. Y. (2015). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar dan Kedisiplinan terhadap Hasil belajar Fisika pada Siswa Kelas MIA SMAN 1 Marioriwawo Kabupaten Soppeng. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 157–161. https://doi.org/10.24252/jpf.v3i1.4095.

Syam, I., Subaer, & Aslim. (2011). Hubungan antara Kreativitas Belajar dengan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Sinjau Utara. JSPF, 31, 1–19.

Tetep, & Suparman, A. (2019). Students’ digital media literacy: Effects on social character. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2 Special Issue 9), 394–399. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.B1091.0982S919.

Tharayil, S., Borrego, M., Prince, M., Nguyen, K. A., Shekhar, P., Finelli, C. J., & Waters, C. (2018). Strategies to mitigate student resistance to active learning. International Journal of STEM Education, 5(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0102-y.

Vadakedath, S., Sudhakar, T., & Kandi, V. (2018). Assessment of Conventional Teaching Technique in the Era of Medical Education Technology: A Study of Biochemistry Learning Process among First Year Medical Students Using Traditional Chalk and Board Teaching. American Journal of Educational Research, 6(8), 1137–1140. http://article.scieducationalresearch.com/pdf/education-6-8-11.pdf.

Vasconcellos, A. G., Foncesa e Foncesa, B. d., & Morel, C. M. (2018). Revisiting the concept of Innovatice Developing Countries (IDCs) for its relevance to health innovation and neglected tropical diseases and for the prevention and control of epidemics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis, 12(7). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0006469.

Wena, M. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Kontemporer, Suatu Tinjauan Konseptual Operasional. PT. Bumi Aksara.

Widyaningtyas, A., Sukarmin, & Radiyono, Y. (2013). Peran Lingkungan Belajar Dan Kesiapan Belajar Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas X Sekolah Menengah Atas Negeri 1 Pati. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1), 136–143. https://digilib.uns.ac.id/dokumen/detail/30353.

Winarsih, W., Asriati, N., & Rustiyarso. (2013). Pengaruh Disiplin terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Kelas XI IPS di SMA. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi FKIP Untan.

Zeithamova, D., Mack, M. L., Braunlich, K., Davis, T., Seger, C. A., van Kesteren, M. T., & Wutz, A. (2019). Brain mechanisms of concept learning. Journal of Neuroscience, 39(42), 8259–8266. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1166-19.2019.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-16

Issue

Vol. 10 No. 2 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)