The Effectiveness of the Indonesian Forest Honeybee Conservation E-Module on Students' Environmental Literacy Ability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v10i2.30896Keywords:
e-module, environmental literacy, conservation of forest honeybeesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the Indonesian forest honeybee conservation e-module on students' environmental literacy skills in natural resource management courses. This study uses a one-group pretest and posttest design. The sample in this study was 22 students of natural resource management class who were selected using the purposive sampling technique. The learning was carried out 5 times, starting with the pretest and ending with the posttest. The data collection instrument used a multiple-choice test of as many as 29 questions which were conducted online using google form. Data analysis using N-Gain Score. The results showed that the gain-score was 0.8. So, can be concluded that the effectiveness of the Indonesian forest honeybee conservation e-module is quite high in improving students' environmental literacy skills, especially in the aspects of ecological knowledge, conservation knowledge, the attitude in presenting data and information, scientific behavior (having curiosity and caring for the environment), and wise behavior and responsible.
References
Arnon, S., Orion, N., & Carmi, N. (2015). Environmental literacy components and their promotion by institutions of higher education: an Israeli case study. Environmental Education Research, 21(7), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.966656.
Arthur, R., Rouf, F. A., Rahmayanti, H., & Maulana, A. (2019). Plumbing work competence instrument in the field of civil engineering. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1402(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/2/022019.
Asrial, Syahrial, Kurniawan, D. A., Chan, F., Septianingsih, R., & Perdana, R. (2019). Multimedia innovation 4.0 in education: E-modul ethnoconstructivism. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 2098–2107. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2019.071007.
Asrial, Syahrial, Maison, Kurniawan, D. A., & Piyana, S. O. (2020). Ethnoconstructivism E-Module to Improve Perception, Interest, and Motivation of Students in Class V Elementary School. JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 9(1), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpi-undiksha.v9i1.19222.
Genc, M., & Akilli, M. (2016). Modeling the relationships between subdimensions of environmental literacy. 0389(March). https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2016.1141724.
Hake, R. R. (1999). Analyzing Change/Gain Scores. AERA-D - American Educational Research Association’s Division D, Measurement and Research Methodology, 1(1), 1–4.
Halimi, F., AlShammari, I., & Navarro, C. (2020). Emotional intelligence and academic achievement in higher education. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, June. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-11-2019-0286.
Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2020). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers and Education, 160, 104031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031.
Imaningtyas, C. D., Karyanto, P., Nurmiyati, N., & Asriani, L. (2015). Applying E-Module Based on Problem Based Learning to Increase Scientific Literacy and Decrease Student’s Misconception in Ecology at Grade X MIA 6 of SMA N 1 Karanganom Academic Year 2014/2015. Proceeding Biology Education Conference, 185. https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/prosbi/article/view/6726.
Khasanah, A. N., Sajidan, S., & Widoretno, S. (2017). Effectiveness of critical thinking indicator-based module in empowering student’s learning outcome in respiratory system study material. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 187–195. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.8490.
Krnel, D., & Naglic, S. (2009). Environmental literacy comparison between eco-schools and ordinary schools in Slovenia. Science Education International, 20(1), 5–24. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ890652.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormord, J. E. (2013). Practical Research: Planning and Design (10th ed.). Pearson, Merril Prentice Hall.
Littledyke, M. (2008). Science education for environmental awareness: approaches to integrating cognitive and affective domains. In Environmental Education Research (Vol. 14, Issue 1). https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620701843301.
Lloyd‐Strovas, J., Moseley, C., & Arsuffi, T. (2018). Environmental literacy of undergraduate college students : Development of the environmental literacy instrument ( ELI ). School Science and Mathematics, 118(3–4), 84–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12266.
Locke, S., Russo, R., & Montoya, C. (2013). Environmental education and eco-literacy as tools of education for sustainable development. Journal of Sustainability Education, 4(January), 10. http://www.jsedimensions.org/wordpress/content/environmental-education-and-eco-literacy-as-tools-of-education-for-sustainable-development_2013_02/.
Logan, R. M., Johnson, C. E., & Worsham, J. W. (2021). Development of an E-learning Module to Facilitate Student Learning and Outcomes. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 16(2), 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2020.10.007.
Malamassam, D. (2020). Development of model for honey bee management in hasanuddin university educational forest. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 486(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/486/1/012027.
Mansir, F., & Karim, A. (2020). Islamic Education Learning Approaches in Shaping Students’ Emotional Intelligence in the Digital Age. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Islamic Studies, 4(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/004.01.04.
Marhaeni, A. A. I. N., Dantes, N., & Paramartha, A. A. G. Y. (2018). Teacher Assessment Literacy: Discrepancies in Authentic Assessment Practice in EFL Context. International Conference on Educational Assessment and Policy, 2, 18–21. https://doi.org/10.26499/iceap.v2i1.90.
Maurer, M., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). Modelling environmental literacy with environmental knowledge, values and (reported) behaviour. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 65(January 2019), 100863. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100863.
Minja, G. S., & Nkumilwa, T. J. (2016). The Role Of Beekeeping On Forest Conservation And Poverty Alleviation In Moshi Rural District,Tanzania. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 12(23), 366. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2016.v12n23p366.
Purwanto, A., Nurjayadi, M., Suluya, R., & Ichsan, I. Z. (2020). EM-SETS: An integrated e-module of environmental education and technology in natural science learning. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(3), 7014–7025.
Ramadan, Z. H., Putra, E. D., & Baskara, A. (2020). Environmental Literacy in Elementary School 111 Pekanbaru (A Naturalistic Inquiry Study at Adiwijaya School National Level). Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education (BirLE) Journal, 3(1), 306–317. https://doi.org/10.33258/birle.v3i1.809.
Requier, F., Garnery, L., Kohl, P. L., Njovu, H. K., Pirk, C. W. W., Crewe, R. M., & Steffan-Dewenter, I. (2019). The Conservation of Native Honey Bees Is Crucial. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 34(9), 789–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2019.04.008.
Sahronih, S., Purwanto, A., & Sumantri, M. S. (2019). The effect of interactive learning media on students’ science learning outcomes. Proceedings of the 2019 7th International Conference on Information and Education Technology, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1145/3323771.3323797.
Schneiderhan-Opel, J., & Bogner, F. X. (2020). FutureForest: Promoting Biodiversity Literacy by Implementing Citizen Science in the Classroom. American Biology Teacher, 82(4), 234–240. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2020.82.4.234.
Serevina, V. (2018). Development of E-Module Based on Problem Based Learning ( PBL ) on Heat and Temperature to Improve Student ’ s Science Process Skill. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 17(3), 26–36. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1184205.
Setiawan, A., Sulaeman, R., & Arlita, T. (2016). The Business Development Strategy of Beekeeping of Setia Jaya Farmer’s Group in The Village Rambah Jaya Sub-District Bangun Purba, District Rokan Hulu. Jom Faperta, 3(1), 1–9.
Shamuganathan, S., & Karpudewan, M. (2015). Modeling environmental literacy of malaysian pre-university students. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 10(5), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijese.2015.264a.
Sugiani, K. A., Degeng, I. N. S., Setyosari, P., & Sulton. (2019). The Effects of Electronic Modules in Constructivist Blended Learning Approaches to Improve Learning Independence. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(10), 82–93.
Sunarsih, S., Rahayuningsih, M., & Setiati, N. (2020). The Development of Biodiversity Module Using Discovery Learning Based on Local Potential of Wonosobo. Journal of Innovative Science Education, 9(1), 1–11. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jise/article/view/31178.
Suryanti, D., Sinaga, P., & Surakusumah, W. (2018). Improvement of Students’ Environmental Literacy by Using Integrated Science Teaching Materials. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 306(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/306/1/012031.
Suwatra, W., Suyatna, A., & Rosidin, U. (2018). Development of Interactive E-Module for Global Warming to Grow of Critical Thinking Skills. International Journal of Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 4(7), 543–549. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.4.7.7.
Taqiyyah, S. A., Subali, B., & Handayani, L. (2017). Implementasi Bahan Ajar Sains Berbahasa Inggris Berbasis Metakognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.14859.
Teksoz, G., Sahin, E., & Tekkaya-Oztekin, C. (2012). Modeling Environmental Literacy of University Students. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9294-3.
Vaninee, H. S., Veisi, H., Gorbani, S., Falsafi, P., & Liaghati, H. (2016). The status of literacy of sustainable agriculture in Iran: A systematic review. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 15(2), 150–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2016.1164097.
Veisi, H., Lacy, M., Mafakheri, S., & Razaghi, F. (2019). Assessing environmental literacy of university students: A case study of Shahid Beheshti University in Iran. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 18(1), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/1533015X.2018.1431163.
Widyastuti, E., & Susiana. (2019). Using the ADDIE model to develop learning material for actuarial mathematics. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012052.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
