Bibliometric Analysis of The Term ‘Cooperative Learning Chemistry’

Rusly Hidayah, I Wayan Dasna, Endang Budiasih


Bibliometric analysis related to cooperative learning methods is a new theme and has never been studied. The research pattern related to cooperative learning methods is still uncharted and it is not known how effective it is when analyzed from several previous studies. Cooperative learning chemistry concepts provide suitable solutions for improving activity of students and chemistry learning outcomes. This study aims to demonstrate an all-compassing bibliometric analysis in the terms and concepts of ‘cooperative learning’. The articles evaluated were identified through Google Scholar database as well as the perish or publish software. Furthermore, (Q1, Q2, Q3, and Q4) was adopted during scanning, and a total of 19 articles were analyzed from 7 reliable journals. This research using literature review method. The type of research used a bibliometric review in five measures method pioneered. These five steps describe the keyword of the search as cooperative learning chemistry, initial search results, improvement of these results, collection of initial data statistics and data analysis, as explained below. The results showed the practice of cooperative learning in chemistry is being widely accepted. However, there is a need for further research and Collaborations on inter-regional studies involving Asian scholars and developed nations in particular regions. The results showed that more than 75% of cooperative learning has a significant effect on learning outcomes. The learning model is an external factor that affects learning outcomes.


cooperative learning chemistry; bibliometric analysis; Zotero; publish or perish; Google Scholar; VOSviewer

Full Text:



Artawan, G. (2020). Narrating in Cooperative Learning Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC) Learning in Elementary School to Improve Reading Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI), 9(2).

Bishop, A. (1985). The social construction of amending-a significant development for mathematical education? For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 24–28.

Bodner, G. M., & McMillen, T. L. B. (1986). Cognitive restructuring as an early stage in problem solving. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Brown, A. L., & Campione, J. C. (1986). Psychological Theory and the Study of Learning Disabilities. American Psychologist.

Canelas, D. A., Hill, J. L., & Novicki, A. (2017). Cooperative learning in organic chemistry increases student assessment of learning gains in key transferable skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

Casey, A., & Goodyear, V. A. (2015). Can Cooperative Learning Achieve the Four Learning Outcomes of Physical Education? A Review of Literature. Quest.

Clement, J. (1991). Constructivism inthe classroom--a review of L. P. Steffe & T. Wood (Eds.), Transforming children’s mathematical education. Internasional Perspectives. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 22(422–428).

Deutsch, M. (2002). Cooperation and trust: Some theoretical notes, In M. R. Jones (Ed.). Nebraska symposium on motivation. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press, 275–319.

Fahimnia, B., Tang, C. S., Davarzani, H., & Sarkis, J. (2015). Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A review. In European Journal of Operational Research.

Fauzi, M. ., Usodo, B., & Subanti, S. (2017). The Effect Cooperative Model Type Of SFE Toward Students Social Skills Viewed From The Thinking Styles Characteristics. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Undiksha, 6(2).

Gillies, R. M. (2003a). Structuring cooperative group work in classrooms. International Journal of Educational Research.

Gillies, R. M. (2003b). The behaviors, interactions, and perceptions of junior high school students during small-group learning. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Gillies, R. M. (2004). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students during small group learning. Learning and Instruction.

Gillies, R. M. (2006). Teachers’ and students’ verbal behaviours during cooperative and small-group learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology.

Gillies, R. M. (2008). The effects of cooperative learning on junior high school students’ behaviours, discourse and learning during a science-based learning activity. School Psychology International.

Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1996). Teaching collaborative skills to primary school children in classroom-based work groups. Learning and Instruction.

Gillies, R. M., & Ashman, A. F. (1998). Behavior and Interactions of Children in Cooperative Groups in Lower and Middle Elementary Grades. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Heersmink, R., van den Hoven, J., van Eck, N. J., & van Berg, J. den. (2011). Bibliometric mapping of computer and information ethics. Ethics and Information Technology.

Hinojo-Lucena, F. J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, M. P., & Romero-Rodríguez, J. M. (2019). Artificial intelligence in higher education: A bibliometric study on its impact in the scientific literature. Education Sciences.

Jalilifar, A. (2010). The effect of cooperative learning techniques on college students’ reading comprehension. System.

Jamali, S. M., Zain, A. N. M., Samsudin, M. A., & Ebrahim, N. A. (2017). Publication trends in physics education: A bibliometric study. In arXiv.

Jaworski, B. (1992). Mathematics teaching: What is it? For the Learning of Mathematics, 12(1), 8–14.

Jiménez, C. R., Prieto, M. S., & García, S. A. (2019). Technology and higher education: A bibliometric analysis. Education Sciences.

Johnson, D., & Johnson, F. (2009). Joining together: Group theory and group skills (10th ed.). Upper Saddle River. New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Johnson, D. W., & et al. (1981). Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2005). New developments in social interdependence theory. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs.

Johnson DW & Johnson, R, T. (1991). Learning Together and Alone. Allin and Bacon. Massa Chussetts.

Jonassen, D. H., Peck, K. L., & Wilson, B. G. (1999). Learning with technology: A constructivist perspective. Special Education.

Karakus, M., Ersozlu, A., & Clark, A. C. (2019). Augmented reality research in education: A bibliometric study. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education.

Kyndt, E., Raes, E., Lismont, B., Timmers, F., Cascallar, E., & Dochy, F. (2013). A meta-analysis of the effects of face-to-face cooperative learning. Do recent studies falsify or verify earlier findings? In Educational Research Review.

Lago, M.R.G., and Nawang, A. . (2007). Influence of Cooperative Learning on Chemistry Students Achievement, Self-efficacy and Attitude. Asian Scientific Journal, 5(1).

Mufarizuddin. (2018). Improving Learning Outcomes by Using Think Pair Share (TPS) Cooperative Learning Model at Primary School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 7(2).

Nam, C. W., & Zellner, R. D. (2011). The relative effects of positive interdependence and group processing on student achievement and attitude in online cooperative learning. Computers and Education.

Oludipe, D., & Awokoy, J. O. (2010). Effect of cooperative learning teaching strategy on the reduction of students’ anxiety for learning chemistry. Journal of Turkish Science Education.

Paulson, D. R. (1999). Active Learning and Cooperative Learning in the Organic Chemistry Lecture Class. Journal of Chemical Education.

Sawyer, J. E., Obeid, R., Bublitz, D., Schwartz, A. M., Brooks, P. J., & Richmond, A. S. (2017). Which forms of active learning are most effective: Cooperative learning, writing-to-learn, multimedia instruction, or some combination? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology.

Shachar, H., & Fischer, S. (2004). Cooperative learning and the achievement of motivation and perceptions of students in 11th grade chemistry classes. Learning and Instruction.

Shen, C. wen, & Ho, J. tsung. (2020). Technology-enhanced learning in higher education: A bibliometric analysis with latent semantic approach. Computers in Human Behavior.

Taştan Kirik, Ö., & Boz, Y. (2012). Cooperative learning instruction for conceptual change in the concepts of chemical kinetics. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.

Tibaná-Herrera, G., Fernández-Bajón, M. T., & De Moya-Anegón, F. (2018). Categorization of E-learning as an emerging discipline in the world publication system: a bibliometric study in SCOPUS. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education.

Towns, M. H. (2013). New guidelines for chemistry education research manuscripts and future directions of the field. In Journal of Chemical Education.

Warfa, A. R. M. (2016). Using Cooperative Learning to Teach Chemistry: A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Chemical Education.

Webb, N. M. (1991). Task-Related Verbal Interaction and Mathematics Learning in Small Groups. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education.

Yager, S., Johnson, R. T., Johnson, D. W., & Snider, B. (1986). The impact of group processing on achievement in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Social Psychology.

Yusof, K. M., Hassan, S. A. H. S., Jamaludin, M. Z., & Harun, N. F. (2012). Cooperative Problem-based Learning (CPBL): Framework for Integrating Cooperative Learning and Problem-based Learning. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences.


Article Metrics

Abstract view : 139 times
PDF file view : 71 times


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 JPI (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia)

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is published by:



Jl. Udayana, Kampus Tengah, Singaraja-Bali
Kode Pos 81116
Telp. 0362-22928

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (JPI) is indexed by:

Akreditasi SINTA 2   Crossref JPI  Index Copernicus JPI JPI Undiksha OneSearch   Microsoft Academic JPI  JPI indexing by Asean Citaion Index 

Creative Commons License

Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.