Multiple Intelligences in Elementary Science Education: Impact of Guided Discovery Approach on Learning Interest
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpiundiksha.v13i4.82926Keywords:
elementary school teacher education, learning interest, learning process, science learningAbstract
Science education at the elementary school level often ignores the process dimension, emphasizing more on the final product of knowledge. This study aims to analyze the effect of Guided Discovery Learning model on students' interest in developing multiple intelligence-based basic science learning. Using a pre-experimental design, 27 sixth semester students from the Elementary School Teacher Education program participated with purposive sampling. Data collection included observation, questionnaires, tests, and documentation, with data analyzed using descriptive statistics and t-test. The results showed a significant difference before and after the application of Guided Discovery model in the classroom. So it can be concluded that, the Guided Discovery Learning model has a significant impact on student learning interest in the development of multiple intelligence-based basic science learning. This research provides evidence that guided discovery learning and constructive feedback is an effective strategy to improve learning quality and students' interest in learning. This model not only increases students' interest in learning but also promotes critical thinking and problem-solving skills.
References
Akhir, M., Siburian, J., & Effendi, M. H. (2023). A Study Comparison the Application of Discovery Learning and Problem Based Learning Models on the Critical Thinking Ability. Integrated Science Education Journal, 4(2), 84–89. https://doi.org/10.37251/isej.v4i2.390.
Alalwan, N., Cheng, L., Al-Samarraie, H., Yousef, R., Ibrahim Alzahrani, A., & Sarsam, S. M. (2020). Challenges and Prospects of Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Utilization among Primary School Teachers: A Developing Country Perspective. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100876.
Alita, D., Putra, A. D., & Darwis, D. (2021). Analysis of classic assumption test and multiple linear regression coefficient test for employee structural office recommendation. IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems), 15(3), 295. https://doi.org/10.22146/ijccs.65586.
Almoslamani, Y. (2022). The impact of learning strategies on the academic achievement of university students in Saudi Arabia. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives, 18(1), 4–18. https://doi.org/10.1108/LTHE-08-2020-0025.
Amerstorfer, C. M., & Kistner, C. F. von M. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057.
Anan Sutisna, M. P. (2021). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Bidang Pendidikan (1st ed.). UNJ PRESS. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Z_UfEAAAQBAJ.
Astuti, N., Hidayat, N., & Nuraini, S. (2023). The Use of Discovery Learning in Building Students ’ Motivation in Writing Descriptive Text. 3rd English Teaching, Literature, and Linguistics (ETERNAL) Conference, 489–498.
Bond, M. (2020). Facilitating student engagement through the flipped learning approach in K-12: A systematic review. Computers and Education, 151(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.
Cheung, S. K. S., Kwok, L. F., Phusavat, K., & Yang, H. H. (2021). Shaping the future learning environments with smart elements: challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00254-1.
Chu, S. K. W., Reynolds, R. B., Tavares, N. J., Notari, M., & Lee, C. W. Y. (2019). 21st Century Skills Development Through Inquiry-Based Learning. Springer Nature Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1145/3337682.
Cofré, H., Núñez, P., Santibáñez, D., Pavez, J. M., Valencia, M., & Vergara, C. (2019). A Critical Review of Students’ and Teachers’ Understandings of Nature of Science. Science and Education, 28(3–5), 205–248. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-019-00051-3.
Duncan, K. J. (2020). Examining the Effects of Immersive Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and the Development of Collaboration, Communication, Creativity and Critical Thinking. TechTrends, 64(3), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00500-9.
Gunawan, Harjono, A., Hermansyah, & Herayanti, L. (2019). Guided inquiry model through virtual laboratory to enhance students’ science process skills on heat concept. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 38(2), 259–268. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v38i2.23345.
Harefa, D., Sarumaha, M., Telaumbanua, K., Telaumbanua, T., Laia, B., & Hulu, F. (2023). Relationship Student Learning Interest To The Learning Outcomes Of Natural Sciences. International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences, 4(2), 240–246. https://doi.org/10.51601/ijersc.v4i2.614.
Jolly, E., & Chang, L. J. (2019). The Flatland Fallacy: Moving Beyond Low–Dimensional Thinking. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(2), 433–454. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12404.
Lin, K. Y., Wu, Y. T., Hsu, Y. T., & Williams, P. J. (2021). Effects of infusing the engineering design process into STEM project-based learning to develop preservice technology teachers’ engineering design thinking Kuen-Yi. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1–15.
Maharani, R., Marsigit, M., & Wijaya, A. (2020). Collaborative learning with scientific approach and multiple intelligence: Its impact toward math learning achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 113(4), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2020.1806196.
Mora, H., Signes-Pont, M. T., Fuster-Guilló, A., & Pertegal-Felices, M. L. (2020). A collaborative working model for enhancing the learning process of science & engineering students. Computers in Human Behavior, 103(1), 140–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.008.
Muliati, M., & Syam, U. (2020). Promoting Discovery Learning Method for Efl Students in Reading Comprehension. Exposure : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris, 9(2), 370–382. https://doi.org/10.26618/exposure.v9i2.4083.
Okolie, U. C., Igwe, P. A., Mong, I. K., Nwosu, H. E., Kanu, C., & Ojemuyide, C. C. (2022). Enhancing students’ critical thinking skills through engagement with innovative pedagogical practices in Global South. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(4), 1184–1198. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.
Ouzzine, A., Erguig, R., & Boudlal, A. (2022). Discovery-Based Teaching Methodology: A Framework for Quality Teaching and Learning. Journal of Applied Language and Culture Studies, 5(5), 9–27.
Romanow, D., Napier, N. P., & Cline, M. K. (2020). Using active learning, group formation, and discussion to increase student learning: A business intelligence skills analysis. Journal of Information Systems Education, 31(3), 218–231. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jise/vol31/iss3/6.
Rone, N., Guao, N. A., Jariol, M., & Acedillo, N., Balinton, K., & Francisco, J. (2023). Students’ Lack of Interest, Motivation in Learning, and Classroom Participation: How to Motivate Them? Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 7(8), 636–645. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7749977.
Rusticus, S. A., Pashootan, T., & Mah, A. (2023). What are the key elements of a positive learning environment? Perspectives from students and faculty. Learning Environments Research, 26(1), 161–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09410-4.
Saputri, W., Priyambodo, P., Winarto, W., & Jayawardana, H. B. A. (2022). Penguatan Fungsi dan Peran Sekolah: Solusi Pembelajaran Sains bagi Generasi Y dan Z di Era 4.0. BIOEDUSAINS:Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Dan Sains, 5(1), 54–68. https://doi.org/10.31539/bioedusains.v5i1.3388.
Simamora, R. E., Saragih, S., & Hasratuddin, H. (2019). Improving Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Ability and Self-Efficacy through Guided Discovery Learning in Local Culture Context. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 61–72.
Thambu, N., Prayitno, H. J., & Zakaria, G. A. N. (2021). Incorporating Active Learning into Moral Education to Develop Multiple Intelligences: A Qualitative Approach. Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education, 3(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.23917/ijolae.v3i1.10064.
Yang, J., Peng, M. Y. P., Wong, S. H., & Chong, W. L. (2021). How E-Learning Environmental Stimuli Influence Determinates of Learning Engagement in the Context of COVID-19? SOR Model Perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.584976
Yanti, Y. E. (2019). Studi Awal Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar (Pgsd) Pada Mata Kuliah Konsep Dasar Ipa. Caruban: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar, 2(2), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.33603/cjiipd.v2i2.2200.
Zhampeiis, K., Assanova, G., Toishybaeva, G., Saparbaeva, A., Orazbaeva, A., & Manapova, G. (2022). Academic Lectures: Communicative Approaches To Interactive Lectures In Today’s Classroom. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 2022(6), 7545–7555.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Dela Galuh Thamkaniah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Indnesia agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
