Using the Reaction Rate Learning Module with a STEM Approach to Student’s Creative Thinking Ability

Authors

  • Afadil Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Sitti Rahmawati Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Wahda Nur Alisa Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia
  • Kasmudin Mustapa Universitas Tadulako, Palu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v7i1.55637

Keywords:

STEM module, creative thinking, reaction rate, google classroom

Abstract

Creativity is one of the competitiveness in the 21st century. The problems faced by many students are that they do not understand the material in the handbook which causes low creative thinking skills, one of the alternatives in learning this century is the STEM approach. This study aims to determine students' creative thinking skills using the reaction rate learning module with the STEM approach through Google Classroom. The type of research used was pre-experimental with one group pretest-posttest design. Data on the results of students' creative thinking abilities were taken using a creative thinking test given before and after learning. The results showed that students' creative thinking abilities After implementing the reaction rate learning module with the STEM approach through Google Classroom, students' creative thinking abilities in aspects of fluent and original thinking were in the very high category, while the flexible and detailed thinking category was in the high category with an average presentation of the four aspects are in the high category, namely 67.1% and the average N-Gain value of 0.59 is in the medium category. It can be concluded that there is an increase in students' creative thinking skills.

References

Alep, B. (2014). Penerapan metode pembelajaran SQ3R berbantuan internet terhadap hasil belajar siswa kelas X pada materi sistem periodik unsur di SMA Labscool Palu. Jurnal Akademika Kimia, 4(1), 44-49.

Al-Hafidh, H.M (2020). Effect of Using Scientific Stations Strategy in Developing Deductive Thinking of Intermediate School Students in General Sciences. International Journal of Early Childhood Special Education. 12(2). https://doi.org/10.9756/intjecse/v12i2.201054. DOI: https://doi.org/10.9756/INT-JECSE/V12I2.201054

Almuharomah, F. A., Mayasari, T., & Kurniadi, E. (2019). Pengembangan modul fisika STEM terintegrasi kearifan lokal “beduk” untuk meningkatkan kemampuan berpikir kreatif siswa SMP. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1). 1-10. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i1.5630. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v7i1.5630

Almujab, L., Yogaswara, M., Maryani, L., & Ramafrizal, Y. (2020). Analisis efektivitas pembelajaran dengan media belajar google classroom pada masa pandemi. Webinar Nasional Pusat Penelitian FKIP UNPAS. 1(1). 191-202.

Astiti, N. L. A. I., Pudjawan, K & Wirya, I. N. (2014). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran matematika di SMP Negeri 1 Banjar untuk siswa kelas VIII semester genap. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha. 2(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v2i1.3882.

Baker, C. K. & Galanti, T (2017). Integrating STEM in elementary classrooms using model-eliciting activities: responsive professional development for mathematics coaches and teachers. International Journal of STEM Education. 4(1), pp. 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0066-3

Bayyinah, R., An’nur, S., & Suriasa, S. (2014). Perbedaan keterampilan berpikir kreatif siswa terhadap strategi pembelajaran multiple intelligences dan contextual teaching learning. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 2(3). 234-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v2i3.874. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v2i3.874

Bintarawati, D. & Citriandin, Y. (2020). Implementasi kelas virtual dengan google classsroom untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kimia di SMAN Bekasi. Jurnal Kimia dan Pendidikan kimia, 2(2). 177-190. https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v2i2.2573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20414/spin.v2i2.2573

Creswell, J. (2014). Research Design. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dewi, W. A. F. (2020). Dampak Covid-19 terhadap implementasi pembelajaran daring di sekolah dasar. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan. 2(1), 55-61 DOI: https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i1.89

Diana, M., Netriwati, & Suri, F. I. (2018). Modul pembelajaran matematika bernuansa Islami dengan pendekatan inkuiri. Desimal, 1(1). 7–13. https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i1.1906. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/djm.v1i1.1906

Diana, N., Turmudi., & Yohannes. (2021). Analysis of teachers’ difficulties in implementing STEM approach in learning: a study literature. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. pp 1-12. https://10.1088/17426596/1806/1/012219. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012219

Elyani, E., Sumpono, & Amir H. (2019). Perbandingan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Structured Numbered Heads (SNH) Dan Numbered Head Together (NHT) Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa Kelas X MIPA SMAN 6 Kota Bengkulu, Alotrop. 3(1): 82-90. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v3i1.9046. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v3i1.9046

English, L. D., & King, D. T. (2015). STEM Learning Through Engineering Design: Fourth-Grade Students’ Investigations in Aerospace. International Journal of STEM Education. 2(14), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0027-7

Fadzilah,et al (2016). Fostering students’ 21st century skills through Project Oriented Problem Based Learning (POPBL) in integrated STEM education program. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching. 17(1). pp 1-19

Fuad NM, Zubaidah S, Mahanal S, & Suarsini E (2017). Improving Junior High Schools' Critical Thinking Skills Based on Test Three Different Models of Learning. International Journal of Instruction. 101-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.1017a

Gustiani, I., Widodo, A., & Suwarma, I. R. (2017). Development and validation of science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) based instructional material. In AIP Conference Proceedings (pp. 1–7). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983969. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4983969

Insyasiska, D., Zubaidah, S., & Susilo, H. (2015). Pengaruh project based learning terhadap motivasi belajar, kreativitas, kemampuan berpikir kritis, dan kemampuan kognitif siswa pada pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 7(1). 9-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um052v7i1p9-21.

Ismayani, A. (2016). Pengaruh penerapan STEM project-based learning terhadap kreativitas matematis siswa SMK. Indonesian Digital Journal of Mathematics and Education. 3(4), 264-272.

Jawad, L.F & Majeed, B.H (2021). The impact of teaching by using STEM approach in the development of creative thinking and mathematical achievement among the student of the fourth scientific class.. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM). 15(13). 172-188. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v15i13.24185

Khumairah, R., Sundaryono, A., & Handayani, D. (2020). Pengaruh model pembelajaran Flipped Classroom terhadap hasil belajar kimia peserta didik pada materi larutan penyangga di SMAN 5 Kota Bengkulu. Alotrop. 4(2): 92-97. https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v4i2.13832. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33369/atp.v4i2.13832

Kristiani, K.A Mayasari, T. Kurniadi, E. (2017). Pengaruh pembelajaran STEM-PJBL terhadap keterampilan berpikir kreatif. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Fisika III. 266-274.

Lutfi, A., Aini, N. Q., Amalia, N., Umah, P. A., & Rukmana, M. D. (2021). Gamifikasi Untuk Pendidikan: Pembelajaran Kimia Yang Menyenangkan Pada Masa Pandemic Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 5(2). 94. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v5i2.38486. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v5i2.38486

Munandar. (2012). Mengembangakan Kreatifitas Anak berbakat. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta

Nadeak, B., Juwita, C. P., Sormin, E., & Naibaho, L. (2020). Hubungan kemampuan berpikir kritis mahasiswa dengan penggunaan media sosial terhadap capaian pembelajaran pada masa pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 8(2), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.29210/146600. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29210/146600

Nurjanah, & Cahyana, U. (2021). Pengaruh Penerapan Online Project Based Learning Dan Berpikir Kreatif. Jurnal Buana Pendidikan, 17(1), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol17.no1.a3161. DOI: https://doi.org/10.36456/bp.vol17.no1.a3161

Pimthong and J. Williams. (2018). Preservice teachers’ understanding of STEM education. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2018.07.017

Puala’A, A. (2020). Desain dan Validasi Modul Pembelajaran Kimia Kelas XI SMA Berbasis Pendekatan Science, Technology, Engineering And Mathematics (STEM) Pada Materi Laju Reaksi. Skripsi, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Tadulako. Palu

Rahman, S., Azmi, N. H., Surat, S., Yusoff, A. N., & Marzuki, M. A. (2017). Idea generation training: Impact on originality, fluency, flexibility, and elaboration among university students. International Journal of Economic Research, 14(16). 1-10.

Rahmawati, Y., Agustin, M. A., Ridwan, A., Erdawati, E., Darwis, D., & Rafiuddin, R. (2019). The development of chemistry students’ 21 century skills through a STEAM project on electrolyte and non-electrolyte solutions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1402(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1402/5/055049

Riduwan. (2010). Skala pengukuran variabel-variabel penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta

Robert, A & Cantu D. (2012). Applying STEM Instructional Strategies to Design and Technology Curriculum. Linköping Electronic Conference Proceedings. 73(13), 111-118

Saptarani D, Widodo A, Purwianingsih W 2019). Biology teachers and high school students perceptions about STEM learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1157(4) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042007

Sari, F. K., Farida, & Syazali, M. (2016). Pengembangan media pembelajaran (modul) berbantuan geogebra pokok bahasan turunan. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. 7(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.9664. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v7i2.24

Sirajudin, N., Suratno J & Pamuti (2020). Developing creativity through STEM education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 1-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012211

Subramaniam, M. M., Ahn, J., Fleischmann, K. R., & Druin, A. (2012). Reimagining the role of school libraries in STEM education: Creating hybrid spaces for exploration. The Library Quarterly, 82(2), 161-182. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/664578

Stohlmann M, Moore T. J, & Roehrig G.H (2012). Considerations for teaching integrated STEM education. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER). 2(1). pp 1-7. https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5703/1288284314653

Tjiptiany, E. N., As’ari, A. R., & Muksar, M. (2016). Pengembangan modul pembelajaran untuk membantu siswa SMA Kelas X dalam memahami materi peluang. Jurnal Pendidikan, 1(10). 1938–1942. http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/jp.v1i10.6973.

Wrobel, A.E., Cash P, & Lomberg, C. J. (2020). Pro‐active neutrality: The key to understanding creative facilitation, Creativity and Innovation Management. DTU library. 29(3), 424-437, https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12372

Winarni, J., Zubaidah, S., & Koes, S. (2016). STEM: Apa, mengapa, dan bagaimana. Prosiding Semnas Pend IPA Pascasarjana UM

Wulandari, M. W., Liliasari, M., & Supriyanti, M. (2011). Problem Based Learning untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kreatif dan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa pada Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 116-121. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v16i2.36043 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v16i2.239

Downloads

Published

2023-08-01

How to Cite

Afadil, Rahmawati, S., Alisa, W. N. ., & Mustapa, K. (2023). Using the Reaction Rate Learning Module with a STEM Approach to Student’s Creative Thinking Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 7(1), 36–45. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpki.v7i1.55637

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)