The paradigms of heutagogy and cybergogy in the transdisciplinary perspective

Authors

  • Sumarsono Sumarsono Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v52i3.22882

Keywords:

heutagogy, cybergogy, transdisciplinary, literature review

Abstract

Now we are entering an era where learning and teaching strategies are determined by learners. The interconnection of heutagogy independent learning strategies with internet cybergogy network learning in a transdisciplinary perspective is intended to provide a climate of learning communication between learners and instructors more broadly without being insulated by space and time. Heutagogy models provide opportunities for learners to explore knowledge and experience through more varied learning strategies so that they become more literate and relevant in the present context. This research uses the literature review method from national and international reputable journals, Elsevier, google scholar, Scopus journal, IEEE journal in searching relevant research data through the stages of review, study, structured evaluation, classification and categorization of evidence-based that has been there. In this paper, we look at the prospects and challenges of heutagogy independent learning integrated with online learning cybergogy. Several learning paradigms are proposed as a result of a literature review on the strategy of implementing heutagogy and cybergogy in a transdisciplinary perspective in Higher Education in Islamic Religious Affairs.

Author Biography

Sumarsono Sumarsono, Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta

Informatic, Education Technology

References

Ahmad Nasir Mohd Yusoff. 2017. TitasMOOC & Wixsite Web 2.0 Application In Teaching 21century Collaborative Courses. Proceeding of the international carnival on E-learning (IUCEL) 2017 Publication Center for Global Open Access Learning-Immersive Technology & Quality Assurance (GOAL-ITQAN). USIM. Value, Negeri Sembilan. Malaysia. H 134-135.

Ashutosh Muduli. 2018. Pedagogy or andragogy? Views of Indian postgraduate business students. IIMB Management Review (2018) 30. 168–178.

Barry Chametzky.2014. Andragogy and Engagement in Online Learning: Tenets and Solutions. DOI: 10.4236 / ce.2014.510095

Blaschke Lisa Marie.2012. Heutagogy and Lifelong Learning: A Review of Heutagogical Practice and Self-Determined Learning. Athabasca University.

Blaschke Lisa Marie & Stewart Hase. 2015. Heutagogy, Technology, and Lifelong Learning for Professionals and Part-Time Learners. Springer International Publishing Switzerland.

Daud, W. A. A. W., Teck, W. K., Ghani, M. T. A., & Ramli, S. 2019. The Needs Analysis of Developing Mobile Learning Application for Cybergogical Teaching and Learning of Arabic Language Proficiency. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(8), 33–46.

Dena Fam & Linda Neuhauser & Paul Gibbs. 2018. Transdisciplinary Theory Practice and Education The Art of Collaborative Research and Collective Learning. Springer ISBN 978-3-319-93742-7 ISBN 978-3-319-93743-4. https: // doi .org / 10.1007 / 978-3-319-93743-4..

Erfan Gazali. 2019. Assessing the Challenges and Potential of the Arabic Language and Literature Department (BSA) IAIN Sheikh Nurjati Cirebon in the Educational Era 4.0. Arabiyatana Arabic Journal. Vol. 3. No. 2, November 2019, 229-250 P-ISSN: 2580-5045, E-ISSN: 2580-5053 DOI: 10.29240 / jba.v3i2.857

Gogus A. 2012. Active Learning In: Seel NM (eds) Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer. Boston MA.

Gustavo García Botero, Frederik Questier & Chang Zhu.2018. Self-directed language learning in a mobile-assisted, out-of-class context: do students walk the talk. Computer Assisted Language Learning, DOI: 10.1080 / 09588221.2018.1485707

Hasan, SH. 2007. Transdisipliner dalam Pendidikan dengan Referensi khusus pada Kurikulum. Pasca Sarjana. UPI Bandung Indonesia.

Hase S. & Kenyon C. 2000. From Andragogy to Heutagogy. Ultibase Articles, 5, 1-10.

Hiryanto. 2017. Pedagogy, Andragogy and Heutagogy and Their Implications in Empowering the Education Community of FIP UNY. UNY World Journal of Education.

Imam Mawardi.2013. Pendidikan Islam Transdisipliner dan Sumber Daya Manusia Indonesia. www.neliti.com. Vol. XXVIII No. 2 2013/1434. Universitas Muhammadiyah Magelang.

J. Bhoyrub et al. 2010. Heutagogy: An alternative practice based learning approach, Nurse Education in Practice 10. 322e326, doi: 10.1016 / j.nepr.2010.05.001

Jalaluddin Abdul Malek. 2018. Telecenters in the Development of the Smart Village (SV): Cybergogy for Multicultural Transformation. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322914999

Johannes L. van der Walt. 2019. The Term "Self-Directed Learning" —Back to Knowles, or Another Way to Forge Ahead. Journal of Research on Christian Education. 28: 1, 1-20. DOI: 10.1080 / 10656219.2019 .15323265

Khairul Bahri Bin Abdul Samad. 2018. Enriching Learning Experience of German as Foreign Language. Proceedings: http://www.iium.edu.my/iucel2018/

Mihaela Muresan. 2013. A Blended Learning System within the Cybergogy Dedy Syamsuar, 2010, Utilization of Learning Management System (Lms) in Software Quality Assurance. Journal of Information Systems (JSI). VOL. 2 NO. 2. October 2010.

Mihaela Muresan. 2013. E-learning Chalenges and Provisions, Procedia social and behavioral sciences 92 (2013) 600-605.

Munira binti Abdul Razak. 2018. From Classroom to Global Community: iE.RAT DIVo. NAVi ADAM. Prociding: http://www.iium.edu.my/iucel2018/

Musarat Yasmina & Farhat Naseemb & Isamar C. Massoc. 2019. Teacher-directed learning to self-directed learning transition barriers in Pakistan : www.elsevier.com/locate/stueduc

Narayan, V. & Herrington, J. 2014. Towards a theoretical mobile heutagogy framework. In: ASCILITE 2014: Rhetoric and Reality, 23 - 26 November 2014, Dunedin, New Zealand

Nikoletta Agonács & João Filipe Matos. 2019. Heutagogy and self-determined learning: a review of published literature on the application and implementation of the theory, Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, DOI: 10.1080 / 02680513.2018. 1562329

Nugroho & Wirawan Arief Santosa & Paulus Insap & Fauziati, Silmi. 2019. Pemanfaatan Gamifikasi pada Massive Open Online Course (MOOC). Seminar Nasional Teknologi Komputer & Sains (SAINTEKS). ISBN: 978-602-52720-1-1

Paradigm. 2013. The 2nd Cyprus International Conference on Educational Research. (CY-ICER)

Purniadi Putra. 2017. Transdisiplinaritas Dalam Pendidikan Islam. Jurnal Studi Keislaman, Volume 17, No. 2 Tahun 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/ajsk.v17i2.1951

Scott Chase 1 & Lesley Scopes. 2010. Cybergogy As A Framework for Teaching Design Students in Virtual Worlds. Aalborg University Denmark and Universities of Southampton United Kingdom. CAAD curriculum - Volume 1 – eCAADe.

Wang M., Kang M. (2006) Cybergogy for Engaged Learning: A Framework for Creating Learner Engagement through Information and Communication Technology. In: Hung D., Khine M.S. (eds) Engaged Learning with Emerging Technologies. Springer, Dordrecht

Wang, M. J. 2008. Cybergogy for engaged learning. Journal of Open and Distance Education in China, 14-22

Wissema, Johan G, dan Jan Verloop. 2009. Towards The Third Generation University. Cheltenham (G.B.): E. Elgar.

Downloads

Published

2020-01-07

How to Cite

Sumarsono, S. (2020). The paradigms of heutagogy and cybergogy in the transdisciplinary perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 52(3), 172–182. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v52i3.22882