Investigating the 5P Model (Presage, Perception, Process, Pedagogy, Product) in Accounting Learning Process at Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.44009Keywords:
gender, student perceptions, learning approach, use e-learning, accounting learning outcomeAbstract
Accounting learning needs to respond to current work needs that prioritize digital skills. But there are still many accounting students who do not fully understand about basic lessons in accounting. It was influenced by several factors. Therefore this study aims to analyse the relationship between gender, student perceptions of accounting learning, learning approaches, use of e-learning, and accounting learning outcome. This study use quantitative research with a correlational approach. The samples were 266 accounting students in the first year. The questionnaires were distributed online using the Google Forms platform. The independent t-test was used to allow researchers to test the hypothesis of comparing male and female students perceptions. Regression analysis is used to determine the relationship between variables. Based on the results, it was found that gender differences did not have a significant effect on student perceptions but showed a relationship between student perceptions, learning approaches, use of e-learning, and accounting learning outcomes. The use of a deep approach in learning will increase the role of e-learning, especially on the complexity of the material provided. In contrast, the ease of using e-learning can affect the understanding of accounting. The findings of this study provide the view that universities in Indonesia need to continue to develop the application of e-learning provided as learning media in pedagogical activities. This research has implications for accounting educators to design and implement educational programs that attract students to study accounting courses and develop their accounting skills.
References
Abayadeera, N., Mihret, D. G., & Hewa Dulige, J. (2018). Teaching effectiveness of non-native English-speaking teachers in business disciplines: intercultural communication apprehension and ethnocentrism. Accounting Education, 27(2), 183–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1414616.
Akcaoglu, M., & Lee, E. (2018). Using Facebook groups to support social presence in online learning. Distance Education, 39(3), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476842.
Alanzi, K. A., & Alfraih, M. M. (2017). Could learning outcomes of the first course in accounting predict overall academic performance? Journal of International Education in Business, 10(1), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-12-2016-0051.
Alfraih, M. M., & Alanezi, F. S. (2016). Accounting students’ perceptions of effective faculty attributes. Journal of International Education in Business, 9(2), 123–142. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-04-2016-0004.
Asif, M., Thomas, G., Awan, M. U., & Muhammad Din, A. (2020). Enhancing student engagement through heterogeneous pedagogical approaches: action research in a university level course in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-10-2019-0375.
Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100750.
Braun, R. L., Boldt, M. N., Mauldin, S., & Viosca, C. (2020). Accounting graduates with both online and traditional coursework: impact on hiring decisions. Accounting Education, 29(4), 340–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1788613.
Cheng, Y. M. (2020). Students’ satisfaction and continuance intention of the cloud-based e-learning system: roles of interactivity and course quality factors. Education and Training, 62(9), 1037–1059. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-10-2019-0245.
Chiu, T. K. F. (2021). Applying the self-determination theory ( SDT ) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 0(0), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998.
Chopra, G., Madan, P., Jaisingh, P., & Bhaskar, P. (2019). Effectiveness of e-learning portal from students’ perspective: A structural equation model (SEM) approach. Interactive Technology and Smart Education, 16(2), 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITSE-05-2018-0027.
Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education : A literature review of Facebook. Educ Inf Technol, 23(June), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-017-9621-2.
Coertjens, L., Vanthournout, G., Lindblom-ylänne, S., & Postareff, L. (2016). Understanding individual differences in approaches to learning across courses : A mixed method approach. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.07.003.
Duff, A., & Mladenovic, R. (2014). Antecedents and consequences of accounting students’ approaches to learning: A cluster analytic approach. The British Accounting Review. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2014.06.003.
Frick, H., Birt, J., & Waters, J. (2020). Enhancing student engagement in large management accounting lectures. Accounting and Finance, 60, 271–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12318.
Gentile, T. A. R., Reina, R., De Nito, E., Bizjak, D., & Canonico, P. (2020). E-learning design and entrepreneurship in three European universities. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 26(7), 1547–1566. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-06-2019-0407.
Gunesekera, A. I., Bao, Y., & Kibelloh, M. (2019). The role of usability on e-learning user interactions and satisfaction: a literature review. Journal of Systems and Information Technology, 21(3), 368–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSIT-02-2019-0024.
Hao, S., Liu, T., Paszke, W., & Tao, H. (2020). Output feedback based iterative learning control with finite frequency range specifications via a heuristic approach for batch processes with polytopic uncertainties. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 1397–1402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2020.12.1891.
Herrador-Alcaide, T. C., Hernández-Solís, M., & Hontoria, J. F. (2020). Online learning tools in the era of m-learning: Utility and attitudes in accounting college students. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12125171.
Krasodomska, J., & Godawska, J. (2021). E-learning in accounting education: the influence of students’ characteristics on their engagement and performance. Accounting Education, 30(1), 22–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1867874.
Liu, T., & Zainuddin, S. (2021). Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation towards the online component of blended learning in accounting education : evidence from a Malaysian public university. Quality Assurance in Education, 29(2), 293–310. https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-12-2020-0152.
Lynn, S. A. (2016). The Impact of Diversity on Approaches to Learning and Assessment Preferences of Intermediate Accounting Students. Advances in Accounting Education: Teaching and Curriculum Innovations, 2(2), 239–267. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1085-462220160000018013.
Malan, M. (2020). Engaging students in a fully online accounting degree: an action research study. Accounting Education, 0(0), 321–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1787855.
Marzuki, M. M., Nik Abdul Majid, W. Z., Mohd Shukri, R. S., Mohd Zawawi, M. Z., & Abu Bakar, H. (2020). 4P-Model of accounting learning process: The role of mobile apps technology among non-accounting students. Journal of Education for Business, 95(6), 384–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2019.1666787.
Muniasamy, A., & Alasiry, A. (2020). Deep learning: The impact on future eLearning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(1), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.3991/IJET.V15I01.11435.
Opdecam, E., & Everaert, P. (2019). Choice-based learning: lecture-based or team learning? Accounting Education, 28(3), 239–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2019.1570857.
Panigrahi, R., Srivastava, P. R., & Sharma, D. (2018). Online learning: Adoption, continuance, and learning outcome—A review of literature. International Journal of Information Management, 43(May), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.05.005.
Papageorgiou, E., & Callaghan, C. W. (2020). Accountancy learning skills and student performance in accounting education: evidence from the South African context. Accounting Education, 0(0), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1719426.
Peng, J., & Abdullah, I. (2018). Building a market simulation to teach business process analysis: effects of realism on engaged learning. Accounting Education, 27(2), 208–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2017.1407248.
Ross, B., Chase, A., Robbie, D., Oates, G., & Absalom, Y. (2018). Adaptive quizzes to increase motivation , engagement and learning outcomes in a first year accounting unit. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15(30), 1–14.
Sangster, A., Stoner, G., & Flood, B. (2020). Insights into accounting education in a COVID-19 world. Accounting Education, 29(5), 431–562. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1808487.
Sari, D. K., Supahar, & Ralmugiz, U. (2018). The influence of android-based isomorphic physics (Forfis) application on analogical transfer and self-diagnosis skill of students at SMA Negeri 3 Kupang. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(2), 154–161. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i2.14268.
Stainbank, L., & Gurr, K. L. (2016). The use of social media platforms in a first year accounting course An exploratory study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(3), 318–340. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2015-0051.
Sugahara, S., & Dellaportas, S. (2018). Bringing active learning into the accounting classroom. Meditari Accountancy Research, 26(4), 576–597. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-01-2017-0109.
Tarhini, A., Deh, R. M., Al-Busaidi, K. A., Mohammed, A. B., & Maqableh, M. (2017). Factors influencing students’ adoption of e-learning: A structural equation modeling approach. Journal of International Education in Business, 10(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-09-2016-0032.
Ullah, R., Richardson, J. T. E., Malik, R. A., & Farooq, S. (2016). Perceptions of the learning environment, learning preferences, and approaches to studying among medical students in Pakistan. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 50, 62–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2016.07.001.
Van Oordt, T., & Mulder, I. (2016). Implementing basic e-learning tools into an undergraduate taxation curriculum. Meditari Accountancy Research, 24(3), 341–367. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-08-2015-0054.
Watty, K., McKay, J., & Ngo, L. (2016). Innovators or inhibitors? Accounting faculty resistance to new educational technologies in higher education. Journal of Accounting Education, 36(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2016.03.003.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
