Students’ Mathematical Critical Thinking Using Geogebra Software Based on Adversity Quotient
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i3.47491Keywords:
Adversity Quotient, Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability, GeoGebra SoftwareAbstract
The ability to think critically is not balanced with the optimal learning approach, to the low achievement of mathematical critical thinking ability (MCTA). Quasi-experimental research with a quantitative approach was used to determine the differences in learning using GeoGebra software for the experimental and the control class on MCTA in terms of adversity quotient (AQ). Class XI high school students in one of the schools in Jakarta as the research population, with sample students of 40 from the experimental class and 40 from the control class selected purposively. The instrument is based on an assessment of MCTA and an AQ questionnaire. The Mann-Whitney U Test, Spearman Correlation, and Cohen's d Effect Size were used to analyze the data. The results show the experimental class's MCTA is better than the control class. Based on Wright Maps, the AQ of climber-type students is dominated by the experiment class, while the control class dominates the quitter. The conclusion of this study, there are differences in the MCTA of the experimental class using GeoGebra software and the control class in terms of AQ.
References
Alkhateeb, M. A., & Al-Duwairi, A. M. (2019). The Effect of Using Mobile Applications (GeoGebra and Sketchpad) on the Students’ Achievement. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(3), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/5754
Alyani, F., & Zahra, R. (2020). Penerapan Rasch Model: Analisis Adversity Quotient Siswa dalam Matematika. Math Didactic: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 226–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i2.102. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33654/math.v6i2.1023
Anggraini, T. W., & Mahmudi, A. (2021). Exploring The Students’ Adversity Quotient in Online Mathematics Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 6(3), 221–238. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.13617. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v6i3.13617
Antara, I. G. W. S., Sudarma, I. K., & Dibia, I. K. (2020). The Assessment Instrument of Mathematics Learning Outcomes Based on HOTS Toward Two-Dimensional Geometry Topic. Indonesian Journal Of Educational Research and Review, 3(2), 19–24. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25869. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23887/ijerr.v3i2.25869
Asmar, A., & Delyana, H. (2020). Hubungan Kemandirian Belajar Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Penggunaan Software Geogebra. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2758. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v9i2.2758
Batubara, I. H. (2019). Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Ability Through Guided Discovery Learning Methods Assisted by Geogebra. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1371
Birgin, O., & Acar, H. (2020). The Effect of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Using GeoGebra Software on 11th Grade Students’ Mathematics Achievement in Exponential and Logarithmic Functions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1788186
Brown, N. J. S., Furtak, E. M., Timms, M., Nagashima, S. O., & Wilson, M. (2010). The Evidence-Based Reasoning Framework: Assessing Scientific Reasoning. Educational Assessment, 15(3), 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10627197.2010.530551
Chasanah, A. N. (2019). Cognitive Growth Learning Model to Improve the Students’ Critical Thinking Skills. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 4(2), 112–123. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8127. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v4i2.8127
Delina, D., Afrilianto, M., & Rohaeti, E. E. (2018). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Self Confidence Siswa SMP Melalui Pendekatan Realistic Mathematic Education. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 1(3), 281. https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.p281-288. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/jpmi.v1i3.p281-288
Dhayanti, D., Johar, R., & Zubainur, C. M. (2018). Improving Students’ Critical and Creative Thinking Through Realistic Mathematics Education using Geometer’s Sketchpad. JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education), 3(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5618. DOI: https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v3i1.5618
Dockendorff, M., & Solar, H. (2018). ICT integration in mathematics initial teacher training and its impact on visualization: the case of GeoGebra. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 49(1), 66–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1341060. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2017.1341060
Dolapcioglu, S., & Doğanay, A. (2020). Development of critical thinking in mathematics classes via authentic learning: an action research. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2020.1819573
Faradillah, A., & Febriani, L. (2021). Mathematical Trauma Students’ Junior High School Based on Grade and Gender. Infinity Journal, 10(1), 53. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p53-68. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v10i1.p53-68
Hastuti, T. D., Sari, D. R., & Riyadi. (2018). Student Profile with High Adversity Quotient in Math Learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 983(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/983/1/012131
Hernández, A., Perdomo-Díaz, J., & Camacho-Machín, M. (2020). Mathematical understanding in problem solving with GeoGebra: a case study in initial teacher education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(2), 208–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1587022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1587022
Hidayah, S. R., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Setiawani, S. (2016). Proses Berpikir Kritis Siswa Kelas VII F Mts. Al-Qodiri 1 Jember dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Pokok Bahasan Segitiga dan Segi Empat ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Jurnal Edukasi, 3(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v3i3.3517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v3i3.3517
Hidayat, W., & Sari, V. T. A. (2019). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Adversity Quotient Siswa SMP. Jurnal Elemen, 5(2), 242. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.1454. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v5i2.1454
Hidayat, W., Wahyudin, & Prabawanto, S. (2018). The Mathematical Argumentation Ability and Adversity Quotient (AQ) of Pre-service Mathematics Teacher. Journal on Mathematics Education, 9(2), 239–248. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.9.2.5385.239-248
Ishartono, N., Nurcahyo, A., Waluyo, M., Prayitno, H. J., & Hanifah, M. (2022). Integrating GeoGebra into The Flipped Learning Approach to Improve Students’ Self-Regulated Learning During The Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal on Mathematics Education, 13(1), 69–86. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp69-86. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v13i1.pp69-86
Krishnan, P. (2018). A review of the non-equivalent control group post-test-only design. Nurse Reasearcher, 26(2), 37–40. https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1582. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr.2018.e1582
Maulyda, M. A., Hidayanto, E., & Rahardjo, S. (2019). Representation of Trigonometry Graph Function Colage Students Using GeoGebra. International Journal of Trends in Mathematics Education Research, 2(4), 193–196. https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33122/ijtmer.v2i4.100
Muntazhimah, Putri, S., & Khusna, H. (2020). Rasch Model untuk Memvalidasi Instrumen Resiliensi Matematis Mahasiswa Calon Guru Matematika. JKPM (Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika), 6(1), 65. https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.8144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v6i1.8144
Oliveros, J. C. (2014). Adversity Quotient and Problem-solving Skills in Advanced Algebra. JPAIR Multidisciplinary Research, 1(17). https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v17i1.282. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7719/jpair.v17i1.282
Ölmez, İ. B., & Ölmez, S. B. (2019). Validation of The Math Anxiety Scale with The Rasch Measurement Model. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 31(1), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0244-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-018-0244-8
Pangma, R., Tayraukham, S., & Nuangchale, P. (2009). Causal Factors Influencing Adversity Quotient of Twelfth Grade and Third-Year Vocational Students. Journal of Social Sciences, 5(4), 466–470. https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.466.470. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3844/jssp.2009.466.470
Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2019). The Miniature Guide to Critical Thinking Concepts & Tools. Rowman & Littlefield.
Phoolka, S., & Kaur, N. (2012). Adversity Quotient: A New Paradigm to Explore. International Journal of Contemporary Business Studies, 3(4), 227-44.
Purwasih, R. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Climber. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 323–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i2.2118. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v8i2.2118
Puspitasari, I. W., Fauzan, G. A., & Bernard, M. (2016). Software Geogebra Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Matematik Siswa SMP. Journal On Education, 01(04), 679–687.
Rahayu, N., & Alyani, F. (2020). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient. Prima: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 121. https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v4i2.2668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31000/prima.v4i2.2668
Rohaeti, E. E., & Bernard, M. (2018). the Students’ Mathematical Understanding Ability Through Scientific-Assisted Approach of Geogebra Software. Infinity Journal, 7(2), 165. https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p165-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v7i2.p165-172
Sawilowsky, S. S. (2009). Very large and huge effect sizes. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 8(2), 597–599. https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22237/jmasm/1257035100
Soheila, B., & Rosemaliza, K. (2018). The Intention to Use GeoGebra in the Teaching of Mathematics among Malaysian Teachers. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 109–115.
Stoltz, P. G. (2000). Adversity Quotoient, Mengubah Hambatan Menjadi Peluang (T. Hermaya (ed.); I). PT Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Model Rasch untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (Edisi Revisi). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.
Supandi, M., & Senam, S. (2020). Development of Science Learning Media-Based Local Wisdom Batui to Improve Critical Thinking Ability. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 52(3), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v52i3.18149.
Suryaningrum, C. W., Purwanto, Subanji, Susanto, H., Ningtyas, Y. D. W. K., & Irfan, M. (2020). Semiotic Reasoning Emerges in Constructing Properties of a Recyangle : A Study of Adversity Quotient. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(1), 95–110. https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.1.9766.95-110
Syafitri, Q., Mujib, M., Netriwati, N., Anwar, C., & Wawan, W. (2018). The Mathematics Learning Media Uses Geogebra on the Basic Material of Linear Equations. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2160. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2160
Wahyuni, M. (2020). Statistik Deskriptif Untuk Penelitian Olah Data Manual dan SPSS 25. CV. Bintang Surya Madani.
Wechsler, S. M., Saiz, C., Rivas, S. F., Vendramini, C. M. M., Almeida, L. S., Mundim, M. C., & Franco, A. (2018). Creative and Critical Thinking: Independent or Overlapping Components? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 27(November 2017), 114–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2017.12.003
Wulandari, I. P. (2020). Critical Thinking Ability in Terms of Adversity Quotient on DAPIC Problem Solving Learning. UJMER: Unnes Journal of Msthematics Education Research, 9(1), 52–59.
Yanti, A. P., Koestoro, B., & Sutiarso, S. (2018). The Students’ Creative Thinking Process Based On Wallas Theory In Solving Mathematical Problems Viewed From Adversity Quotient/Type Climbers. Al-Jabar : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 9(1), 51. https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2331. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24042/ajpm.v9i1.2331
Yurniwati, & Soleh, D. A. (2020). The effectiveness of computer-based problem solving to improve higher order thinking skills on prospective teachers. International Journal of Instruction, 13(2), 393–406. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13227a. DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13227a
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Fitri Alyani, Natalia Dinda Sartika Putri
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
