Performance and Project Assessment in Science Learning

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.48942

Keywords:

performance assessment, project assessment, science learning

Abstract

There are still many teachers who are less precise in carrying out assessments in learning. The purpose of this research is to develop a performance assessment and project assessment in science learning. This type of research is research development, using the ADDIE development model. The subject test consists of content test experts, design experts, expert judgments, and field tests obtained using a questionnaire/questionnaire. The data obtained were analyzed by qualitative descriptive, quantitative, and inferential statistical analysis. The result of this research is that the quality of project performance appraisal by review experts in performance appraisal is a very good qualification, namely 90.00%. The results of the subject expert test are 96.00%. Instructional test design experts in very good qualifications, namely 92.00%, while for project assessment, the qualifications are very good, namely 92%. Experts in the assessment of learning tests with very good qualifications are 90.00%, project assessments with very good qualifications are 94%, and field trials with very good qualifications are 90.76%. 91.7% for project appraisal. The effectiveness of the development of the performance appraisal obtained shows the significance is t = 4.612 > table = 2,000, while for the assessment of the results of the development of the project effectiveness assessment obtained, the significance is t = 6.93 > table = 2,000. It is concluded that there is a significant difference in student learning outcomes before and after using performance and project assessments in science learning.

Author Biography

I Wayan Widiana, [ID SCOPUS: 57200818126] Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

Dr. I Wayan Widiana, S.Pd., M.Pd. was born in Banjar Sari Tunas Tianyar village, Kubu district, Karangasem regency, Bali Province, on July 5th, 1985. He was received Doctor in Educational Evaluation and Research from Jakarta State University. He worked as Lecturer of Statistics, Methodology of Educational Research and Evaluation in Department of Primary Teacher Education at Ganesha University of Education

Publon URL: https://publons.com/researcher/1365958/i-wayan-widiana/metrics/ 

Scopus URL : https://www.scopus.com/authid/detail.uri?authorId=57200818126

Sinta URL : http://sinta.ristekbrin.go.id/authors/detail?id=79356&view=overview

Google Scholar URL: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=j8xF8oQAAAAJ

References

Abu-Eisheh, S. A., & Ghanim, M. S. (2021). Improving senior-level students’ performance in Traffic Systems Management using multimedia contents. Ain Shams Engineering Journal, xxxx. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2021.05.025.

Afni, N., Agung, M., Fitk, R., Sunan, U., & Yogyakarta, K. (2018). Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Kelas V di MIN Tanuraksan Kebumen. Al-Bidayah : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Islam, 10(1), 47–68. https://doi.org/10.14421/AL-BIDAYAH.V10I1.129.

Agustina, N. (2016). Assessment Of Project-Based Learning In Science Class. Jurnal Siliwangi, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.37058/jspendidikan.v2i2.95.

Aiman, U., Amelia, R., & Ahmad, R. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah (PBL) Terhadap Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Flobamorata, 1(1), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.51494/jpdf.v1i1.195.

Al Fariz, A. B., & Lestari, C. A. (2020). Does Internet Usage Frequency Give Impact To Student’s Academic Performance? Indonesian Journal of Educational Assesment. https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v3i1.57.

Amri, & Tharihk, A. J. (2018). Pengembangan perangkat asesmen pembelajaran proyek pada materi pencemaran dan kerusakan lingkungan. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.32502/dikbio.v2i2.1283.

Anwar, K., & Jurotun, J. (2019). Peningkatan Aktivitas dan Hasil Belajar Siswa SMA Pada Dimensi Tiga Melalui Model Pembelajaran PBL Berbantuan Alat Peraga. Kreano, Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 10(1), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.15294/kreano.v10i1.19366.

Astiwi, K. P. T., Antara, P. A., & Agustiana, I. G. A. T. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa SD pada Mata Pelajaran PPKn. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(2), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i3.

Barrios, M., González-Teruel, A., Cosculluela, A., Fornieles, A., & Turbany. (2014). Structure and performance assessment in traditional face-to-face and blended learning statistics courses. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.05.217.

Chien, S.-Y., Hwang, G.-J., & Jong, M. S.-Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers & Education, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751.

Cifrian, E., Andrés, A., Galán, B., & Viguri, J. R. (2020). Integration of different assessment approaches: application to a project-based learning engineering course. Education for Chemical Engineers, 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2020.04.006.

D’Elia, F. (2019). The training of physical education teacher in primary school. Journal of Human Sport and Exercise - Autumn Conferences of Sports Science, 14, S100–S104. https://doi.org/10.14198/jhse.2019.14.Proc1.12.

Dewi, M. S. A., & Lestari, N. A. P. (2020). E-Modul Interaktif Berbasis Proyek terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(3), 433–441. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v4i3.28035.

Fan, J., & Smith, A. P. (2017). Mental Workload: Assessment, Prediction and Consequences. Communications in Computer and Information Science, 726, 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61061-0.

Fardhila, R. R., & Istiyono, E. (2019). An assessment instrument of mind map product to assess students’ creative thinking skill. Research and Evaluation in Education, 5(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.21831/reid.v5i1.22525.

Febriyanti, A. L., Harsiati, T., & Dermawan, T. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Menulis Kreatif Cerita Fantasi Untuk Siswa Kelas VII SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan: Teori, Penelitian, Dan Pengembangan, 2(10). https://doi.org/10.17977/jptpp.v2i10.10105.

Floryantini, K. N., Sudana, D. N., & Sumantri, M. (2019). Pengaruh Model Sfae Berbasis Penilaian Kinerja Terhadap Keterampilan Berbicara Bahasa Indonesia Siswa Kelas V. Mimbar Ilmu, 24(1), 114–123. https://doi.org/10.23887/mi.v24i1.17468.

Gupta, S. D., Abdullah, F. A., & Xueshuang, Y. (2019). Peer assessment in writing: A critical review of previous study. Journal of Advances in Linguistics, 10, 1478–1487. https://doi.org/10.24297/jal.v10i0.7992.

Hairida, & Junanto, T. (2018). The Effectiveness of Performance Assessment in Project-Based Learning by Utilizing Local Potential to Increase the Science Literacy. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education (IJPTE), 2. https://doi.org/10.20961/ijpte.v2i0.25722.

Imania, K. A., & Bariah, S. K. (2019). Rancangan Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Pembelajaran Berbasis Daring. Jurnal Petik, 5(1), 31–47. https://doi.org/10.31980/jpetik.v5i1.445.

Jehanus, C. R., Ayu, H. D., & Sundaygara, C. (2019). Pengaruh Problem Based Learning Berbasis Asesmen Kinerja Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Ditinjau Dari Kerja Ilmiah. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika JPF, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v7i1.1359.

Kartowagiran, B., & Jaedun, A. (2016). Model Asesmen Autentik Untuk Menilai Hasil Belajar Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama (Smp): Implementasi Asesmen Autentik Di Smp. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 20(2), 131. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v20i2.10063.

Kharismawati, S. A. (2022). Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Asesmen Nasional Berbasis Komputer di Sekolah Dasar Terpencil. Ideguru : Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Guru, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.51169/ideguru.v7i2.372.

Koyuncu, İ., & Fırat, T. (2020). Investigating reading literacy in PISA 2018 assessment. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(2), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2021.189.

Krismony, N. P. A., Parmiti, D. P., & Japa, I. G. N. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Motivasi Belajar Siswa SD. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Profesi Guru, 3(2), 249. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v3i2.28264.

Kyrgiridis, P., Derri, V., Emmanouilidou, K., Chlapoutaki, E., & Kioumourtzoglou, E. (2014). Development of a questionnaire for self-evaluation of teacher effectiveness in physical education (SETEQ-PE). Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 18(2), 73–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/1091367X.2013.866557.

Lestari, N. F., & Harjono, N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter PPK Aspek Kemandirian Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Siswa SD Kelas 4. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 9(1), 19–29. https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v9i1.33379.

Lestari, N., Gito Hadiprayitno, & Muhlis, M. Yamin, M. L. A. (2020). Pelatihan Teknik-Teknik Analisis Instrumen Penilaian Ranah SMPN 21 Mataram. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sains Indonesia, 2(1), 36–39. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpmsi.v2i1.8.

Liao, S., Hong, J.-C., Wen, M.-H., Pan, Y.-C., & Wu, Y.-. (2018). Applying Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to explore Users’ Behavioral Intention to Adopt a Performance Assessment System for E-book Production. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(10). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/93575.

Nisa, A., Sudarmin, & Samini. (2015). Efektivitas Penggunaan Modul Terintegrasi Etnosains Dalam Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Untuk Meningkatkan Literasi Sains Siswa. USEJ - Unnes Science Education Journal, 4(3), 1049–1056. https://doi.org/10.15294/usej.v4i3.8860.

Novrianti, N. (2014). Pengembangan Computer Based Testing (CBT) Sebagai Alternatif Teknik Penilaian Hasil Belajar. Lentera Pendidikan : Jurnal Ilmu Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.24252/lp.2014v17n1a3.

Parmiti, D. P., Rediani, N. N., Antara, I. G. W. S., & Jayadiningrat, M. G. (2021). The Effectiveness of Local Culture-Integrated Science Learning through Project-Based Assessment on Scientific Attitudes and Science Process Skills of Elementary School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.31301.

Pramesti, U. D., Pramesti, U. D., & Effendi, E. E. (2018). Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Menulis Paragraf Pada Mku Bahasa Indonesia Di Universitas Negeri Padang Melalui Model Stad (Student Team-Achievement Divisions) Metode Menulis Berantai. KREDO : Jurnal Ilmiah Bahasa Dan Sastra. https://doi.org/10.24176/kredo.v2i1.2565.

Pratiwiningtyas, B. N., Susilaningsih, E., & Sudana, I. M. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Kognitif untuk Mengukur Literasi Membaca Bahasa Indonesia Berbasis Model Pirls pada Siswa Kelas IV SD. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 6(1), 01–09. https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16199.

Purnomo, H, & Wilujeng, I. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Instrumen Penilaian IPA Tema Indahnya Negeriku Penyempurnaan Buku Guru dan Siswa Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v4i1.7697.

Purnomo, Heru, & Wilujeng, I. (2016). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar dan Instrumen Penilaian IPA Tema Indahnya Negeriku Penyempurnaan Buku Guru dan Siswa Kurikulum 2013. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4(1), 67–68. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v4i1.7697.

Raharjo, M. W. C., Suryati, S., & Khery, Y. (2017). Pengembangan E-Modul Interaktif Menggunakan Adobe Flash Pada Materi Ikatan Kimia Untuk Mendorong Literasi Sains Siswa. Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 5(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.33394/hjkk.v5i1.102.

Rahayu, W. P., Hidayatin, & Madziatul. (2020). Development of a Project-Based Learning Assessment System to Improve Students’ Competence. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi & Bisnis, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.008.2.1.

Río, T. G., & Rodríguez, J. (2022). Design and assessment of a project-based learning in a laboratory for integrating knowledge and improving engineering design skills. Education for Chemical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2022.04.002.

Rokhim, D. A., Rahayu, B. N., Alfiah, L. N., Peni, R., Wahyudi, B., Wahyudi, A., Sutomo, S., & Widarti, H. R. (2021). Analisis Kesiapan Peserta Didik Dan Guru Pada Asesmen Nasional (Asesmen Kompetensi Minimum, Survey Karakter, Dan Survey Lingkungan Belajar. Jurnal Administrasi Dan Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.17977/um027v4i12021p61.

Safitri, K., & Harjono, N. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Sikap Sosial Aspek Tanggung Jawab Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu Siswa Kelas 4 SD. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 4(1), 111–121. https://doi.org/10.23887/jp2.v4i1.33352.

Sholikhah, Z., Kartana, T. J., & Utami, W. B. (2018). Efektifitas Model Pembelajaran Open-Ended Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Siswa. JES-MAT (Jurnal Edukasi Dan Sains Matematika), 4(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.25134/jes-mat.v4i1.908.

Siswono, H. (2017). Analisis Pengaruh Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Penguasaan Konsep Fisika Siswa. Momentum: Physics Education Journal. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v1i2.1967.

Sorensen, E. (2013). Implementation and student perceptions of e-assessment in a Chemical Engineering module. European Journal of Engineering Education, 38(2), 172–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2012.760533.

Srirahayu, R. R. Y., & Arty, I. S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran Fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.20270.

Sugihartini, N., & Agustini, K. (2017). Asesmen Otentik sebagai Pendukung Desain Instruksional Jaringan Komputer Berstrategi Blended-Learning dengan Pendekatan Konstruktivistik. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.10072.

Sukmasari, V. P., & Rosana, D. (2017). Pengembangan Penilaian Proyek Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Discovery Learning untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i1.10468.

Sukmawa, O., Rosidin, U., & Sesunan, F. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Kinerja (Performance Assessment) Praktikum Pada Mata Pelajaran Fisika Di Sma. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.24127/jpf.v7i1.1397.

Sun, B., & Fan, T. (2022). The effects of an AWE-aided assessment approach on business English writing performance and writing anxiety: A contextual consideration. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101123.

Sutarto, S., Sari, D. P., & Fathurrochman, I. (2020). Teacher Strategies in Online Learning to Increase Students ’ Interest in Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Konseling Dan Pendidikan, 8(147800), 129–137. https://doi.org/10.29210/147800.

Tania, & Murni. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Learning Cycle 5e Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.30870/gravity.v3i1.2413. 31.

Taqiyyah, S. A., Subali, B., & Handayani, L. (2017). Implementasi Bahan Ajar Sains Berbahasa Inggris Berbasis Metakognitif Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa SMP. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 224–234. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.14859.

Tomoliyus, Margono, & Sujarwo. (2013). Kemampuan guru tentang pendidikan jasmani dan penilaian berbasis kinerja. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 32(2), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v0i2.1481.

Trisniawati, Rahayu, A., & Rhosyida, N. (2018). Implementasi Pembelajaran Origamasains Matematika Dan Sains Sejak Dini the Implementation of Origamasains Learning To Emerge Fondness To Mathematics and Science. Jurnal Ilmiah VISI PGTK PAUD Dan Dikmas, 13(2), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.21009/JIV.1302.3.

Wahyuni, S., Reswita, & Afidah, M. (2020). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Sains , Technology , Art , Engineering And Mathemathic Pada Kurikulum PAUD. Jurnal Golden Age, Universitas Hamzanwadi, 04(2), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.29408/goldenage.v4i02.2441.

Wardana, I. W., Sudatha, S., & Wawan, I. G. (2013). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation Berbantuan Asesmen Proyek Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Ipa Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar Gugus Iii Tampaksiring. Mimbar PGSD Undiksha, 1. https://doi.org//10.23887/jjpgsd.v1i1.1196.

Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education, 163, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097.

Wiana, P. J. A. E., Gading, I. K., & Kusmariyatni, N. (2017). The Application of Authentic Assessment to Improve the Learning Outcomes of Science in the fourth-grade students of SD Negeri 2 Pupuan. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 1(2), 106. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v1i2.9841.

Winata, A., Widiyanti, I. S. R., & Cacik, S. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Numerasi dalam Pengembangan Soal Asesmen Kemampuan Minimal pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA untuk Menyelesaikan Permasalahan Science. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i2.1090.

Wulandari, I. G. A. A. M., Sudatha, I. G. W., & Simamora, A. H. (2020). Pengembangan Pembelajaran Blended Pada Mata Kuliah Ahara Yoga Semester II di IHDN Denpasar. Jurnal Edutech Undiksha, 8(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v8i1.26459.

Xiao, Y., & Yang, M. (2019). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: How formative assessment supports students’ self-regulation in English language learning. System, 81, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.01.004.

Yuliati, Y. (2017). Literasi Sains Dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendas, 3(2), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.31949/jcp.v3i2.592.

Zhao, H. (2014). Investigating teacher-supported peer assessment for EFL writing. ELT Journal, 68(2), 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cct068.

Downloads

Published

2022-07-08

How to Cite

Widiana, I. W. (2022). Performance and Project Assessment in Science Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran, 55(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v55i2.48942

Issue

Vol. 55 No. 2 (2022): JULY

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:
  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)