The Analysis of Grammatical Errors in University Students’ Essays
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i3.40951Kata Kunci:
essay, grammatical errorAbstrak
This study aims to identify and analyze grammatical errors in student essays. In this case, every student's grammatical error consisting of errors in the use of diction, syntactic structure and meaning were identified and described in detail within the framework of the correct grammatical rules. This research was conducted using a qualitative descriptive method because the data collected was in the form of language use, especially grammatical errors. The subject of this research is English Education Study Program students who joined essay writing courses. Meanwhile, the object of research was grammatical errors in student essays. The data were collected through the collection of student essays obtained from the end-of-semester test and interview guide. The percentage of grammatical errors made by students in their essays in sequence were as follows; fragments: 280 (17.5%), runs on: 235 (14.7%), verb forms and verb tense: 225 (14.1%), passive: 220 (13.8%), linking verb deletion: 160 (10 %), plural disagreement: 120 (7.5%), unclear reference: 115 (7.2%), proposition misuse 89: (5.6%), subject-verb disagreement: 80 (5%), and parallelism: 74 (4.6%). Grammatical errors that needed to be considered more seriously were parallelism and passivity, which, although they look low in percentage terms, for they were rarely used in student essays; but when both forms were present, the grammatical construction tended to be wrong. In addition, both forms were also difficult to understand, compared to other types of errors that could be learned quickly
Referensi
Abushihab, I., El-Omari, A. H., & Tobat, M. (2011). An Analysis of Written Grammatical Errors of Arab Learners of English as a Foreign Language at Alzaytoonah Private University of Jordan. European Journal of Social Sciences, 20(4), 543–552. https://www.iasj.net/iasj/article/96110.
Ahmed, F. E. Y. (2019). Errors of Unity and Coherence in Saudi Arabian EFL University Students’ Written Paragraph: A case Study of College of Science & Arts, Tanumah, King Khalid University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(3), 125–155. https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/2281.
Aidinlou, N. A., & Mehr, H. S. (2012). The Effect of Discourse Markers Instruction on EFL Learners’ Writing. World Journal of Education, 2(2), 10–16. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1158965.
Alghazo, K. M., & Alshraideh, M. K. (2020). Grammatical Errors Found in English Writing: A Study from Al-Hussein Bin Talal University. International Education Studies, 13(9), 1–9. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1266480.
Anh, D. T. N. (2019). EFL student’s writing skills: challenges and remedies. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 9(6), 74–84. https://doi.org/10.9790/7388-0906017484.
Bartram, M., & Walton, R. (1991). Correction: A Positive Approach to Language Mistakes. Cengage Learning.
Corder, S. P. (1976). The Significance of Learner‟s Errors. 1RAL, 5, 161–170.
Corder, S. P. (1982). Error Analysis and Interlanguage. Oxford University Press.
Eng, L. S., Luyue, C., & Lim, C. K. (2020). A Comparison of the English Grammatical Errors of Chinese Undergraduates from China and Malaysia. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 931–950. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1239318.
Fareed, M., & Bilal, M. (2016). ESL Learners ’ Writing Skills : Problems , Factors and Suggestions ESL Learners ’ Writing Skills : Problems , Factors and Suggestions Introduction. Journal of Education and Social Sciences, 4(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.20547/jess0421604201.
Ferris, D. R. (2011). Treatment of Error in Second Language Student Writing. The University of Michigan.
James, C. (2013). Errors in Language Learning and Use: Exploring Error Analysis. Routledge.
Keshavarz, M. H. (2012). Contrastive Analysis and Error Analysis. Rahnama Press.
Llach, M. P. A. (2011). Lexical Errors and Accuracy in Foreign Language Writing. Multilingual Matters.
Manuel, M. P. (2019). Belief System Towards Explicit Corrective Feedback in EFL Classroom: The Case of Foundation Students of OMAN. College Health Sciences, 4(3), 50–59. https://www.oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/2262.
Maulina, U., Hikmah, S., & Pahamzah, J. (2019). Attractive Learning Media to Cope with Students’ Speaking Skills in the Industry 4.0 Using Sparkol Videoscribe. Online Submission, 2(5), 132–140. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED598724.
Mehta, S. R., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2014). Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and writing in an EFL context. RELC Journal, 46(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214555356.
Mindog, E. (2016). Apps and EFL: A case study on the use of smartphone apps to learn English by four Japanese university students. JALT CALL Journal, 12(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v12n1.199.
Nisa, B. (2017). Kesalahan Tata Bahasa (Grammar) pada Makalah Mahasiswa Program Studi Bahasa Inggris ABA BSI Jakarta. Wanastra, 9(1), 17–23. https://ejournal.bsi.ac.id/ejurnal/index.php/wanastra/article/view/1436.
Nurfitriah, Nai’mah, R. J., & Adriyati, R. (2018). Analisa Kesalahan Gramatikal Mahasiswa dalam Membuat Kalimat-Kalimat Sederhana Menggunakan Bahasa Inggris. Prosiding Seminar Nasional ASBIS 2018.
Pawlak, M. (2014). Error Correction in The Foreign Language Classroom: Reconsidering The Issues. Springer_Verlag.
Phoocharoensil, S., Moore, B., Gampper, C., Geerson, E. B., Chaturongakul, P., Sutharoj, S., & Carlon, W. T. (2016). Grammatical and Lexical Errors in Low-Profieciency Thai Graduate Students’ Writing. Language Educatioon and Acquistion Research Network (LEARN) Journal, 9(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1229539.
Putri, M., Ariyani Pedo, V., & Pawestri, N. (2020). Analyzing the Factors Influencing Students’ Fluency in English Speaking Skills: A Case in Bina Nusantara University. ICLLT 2019. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.12-10-2019.2292184.
Radford, A. (1988). Transformational Grammar: A First Course. Cambridge University Press.
Selingker, L. (2014). Interlanguage. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition (pp. 31–54). Taylor and Francis.
Sevy-Biloon, J. (2018). Integrating EFL Skills for Authentically Teaching Specific Grammar and Vocabulary. Studies in English Language and Education, 5(2), 175–184.
Shulze, M. (2003). Grammatical Errors and Feedback: Some Theoretical Insights. CALICO Journal, 20(3), 437–450. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24157523.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Uba, S. Y., & Souidi, N. M. (2020). Students’ writing difficulties in English for business classes in Dhofar University, Oman. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(3), 86–97. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n3p86.
Yusuf, R. (2020). Teaching EFL Students Using Selected Media: Offline Video Taken From YouTube. Utamax : Journal of Ultimate Research and Trends in Education, 2(1), 29–33. https://doi.org/10.31849/UTAMAX.V2I1.2909.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
