Misconceptions about Science Learning Materials of Class V in Elementary Schools using A Diagnostic Instrument of Four-Tier Multiple Choice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v57i3.73841Kata Kunci:
Misconceptions, Natural Science Materials, Heat and Its TransferAbstrak
Sistem pendidikan Indonesia saat ini memerlukan penilaian terhadap peserta didik secara menyeluruh yang terangkum dalam tiga aspek besar, yaitu kognitif, psikomotorik, dan efektif. Penilaian dilakukan dalam rangka mengukur ketercapaian indikator pembelajaran yang diharapkan dan mengetahui kesulitan belajar. Kesulitan belajar dan miskonsepsi siswa harus diketahui oleh guru agar dapat diambil langkah yang tepat untuk mengatasinya], salah satunya dengan melakukan tes diagnostik. Penelitian bertujuan untuk menganalisis miskonsepsi materi IPA pada tema VI panas dan perpindahannya kelas V sekolah dasar. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Metode pengumpulan data berupa tes diagnostik four-tier dan wawancara. Teknik pengambilan sampel menggunakan purposive sampling yaitu seluruh peserta didik kelas V SDN 1 Krasak Boyolali. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa miskonsepsi yang terjadi pada peserta didik memiliki rata-rata sebesar 29,33% dengan kategori rendah. Miskonsepsi terendah dengan persentase 23,32% terdapat pada subkonsep konduktor dan isolator. Miskonsepsi tertinggi terletak pada subkonsep perbedaan suhu dan panas dengan persentase 36,65%. Faktor penyebab miskonsepsi pada peserta didik berasal dari prakonsepsi yang salah, minat belajar rendah dan reasoning tidak sesuai.
Referensi
Annisa, R., Astuti, B., & Mindyarto, B. N. (2019). Tes Diagnostik Four Tier untuk identifikasi pemahaman dan miskonsepsi peserta didik pada materi gerak melingkar beraturan. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Keilmuan (JPFK), 5(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.25273/jpfk.v5i1.3546.
Apriadi, N. N. S., & Redhana, I. W. (2019). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Kelas X Pada Topik Reaksi Redoks. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia Indonesia, 2(2), 70. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpk.v2i2.16617.
Bekkink, M. O., Donders, A. R. T. R., Kooloos, J. G., De Waal, R. M. W., & Ruiter, D. J. (2016). (2016). Uncovering students’ misconceptions by assessment of their written questions. BMC (Medical Education). 16(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-016-0739-5.
Dewi, S. Z., & Ibrahim, T. (2019). Pentingnya pemahaman konsep untuk mengatasi miskonsepsi dalam materi belajar IPA di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan UNIGA, 13(1), 130–136. https://doi.org/10.52434/jp.v13i1.823.
Diani, R., Alfin, J., Anggraeni, Y. M., Mustari, M., & Fujiani, D. (2019). Four-tier diagnostic test with certainty of response index on the concepts of fluid. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1155(1), 012078. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1155/1/012078.
Duda, H. J., Wahyuni, F. R. E., & Setyawan, A. E. (2020). Student Misconseption Analysis In The Biotechnology Concept With Certainty Of Response Index. International Journal of Education Humanities and Social Science, 3(1), 111–121.
Eshach, H., Lin, T. C., & Tsai, C. C. (2018). Misconception of sound and conceptual change: A cross‐sectional study on students’ materialistic thinking of sound. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 664–684. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21435.
Etobro, A. B., & Fabinu, O. E. (2017). Students’ perceptions of difficult concepts in biology in senior secondary schools in Lagos state. Global Journal of Educational Research, 16(2), 139. https://doi.org/10.4314/gjedr.v16i2.8.
Fadllan, A., Prawira, W. Y., Arsini, & Hartono. (2019). Analysis of students’ misconceptions on mechanics using three-tier diagnostic test and clinical interview. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1170(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1170/1/012027.
Firdaus, N. R., KirAna, T., & Susantini, E. (2021). A four-tier test to identify students’ conceptions in inheritance concepts. . . IJORER: International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 2(4), 402–451. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v2i4.128.
Gurel, D. K., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2015). A review and comparison of diagnostic instruments to identify students’ misconceptions in science. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 989–1008. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1369a.
Halim, A. S., Finkenstaedt-Quinn, S. A., Olsen, L. J., Gere, A. R., & Shultz, G. V. (2018). Identifying and remediating student misconceptions in introductory biology via writing-to-learn assignments and peer review. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-10-0212.
Ichsan, I. Z., & Mulyani, S. W. W. (2018). Improving students’ motoric skills through demonstration method in recycling plastic waste. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 4(2), 189–194. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v4i2.5890.
Ilhami, A., Riandi, R., & Sriyati, S. (2019). Implementation of science learning with local wisdom approach toward environmental literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157(2), 022030. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/2/022030.
Istiyani, R., Muchyidin, A., & Rahardjo, H. (2018). Analisis miskonsepsi siswa pada konsep geometri menggunakan three-tier diagnostic test. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 37(2), 223–236. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v37i2.14493.
Iswana, L. F., Setyarsih, W., & Kholiq, A. (2016). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Siswa Materi Fluida Dinamis Melalui Instrumen Three-Tier Diagnostic Test. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan, 5(3), 170–173. https://doi.org/10.36709/jipfi.v9i3.131.
Jauhariyah, M. N. R., Suprapto, N., Suliyanah, Admoko, S., Setyarsih, W., Harizah, Z., & Zulfa, I. (2018). The students’ misconceptions profile on chapter gas kinetic theory. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012031.
Kaltakci-Gurel, D., Eryilmaz, A., & McDermott, L. C. (2017). Identifying pre-service physics teachers’ misconceptions and conceptual difficulties about geometrical optics. European Journal of Physics, 8(2), 212–220.
Kamilah, D. S., & Suwarna, I. P. (2019). Pengembangan three-tier test digital untuk mengidentifikasi miskonsepsi pada konsep fluida statis. Edusains, 8(2), 212–220. https://doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i2.5192.
Kumandaş, B., Ateskan, A., & Lane, J. (2018). Misconceptions in biology: A meta-synthesis study of research, 2000–2014. Journal of Biological Education, 53(4), 350–364. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2018.1490798.
Ladd, H. F., & Sorensen, L. C. (2017). Returns to teacher experience: Student achievement and motivation in middle school. Education Finance and Policy, 12(2), 241–279.
Laliyo, L. A. ., Hamdi, S., Pikoli, M., Abdullah, R., & Panigoro, C. (2021). Implementation of Four-Tier Multiple-Choice Instruments Based on the Partial Credit Model in Evaluating Students’ Learning Progress. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(2), 825–840. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.2.825.
Maison, M., Kurniawan, D. A., & Widowati, R. S. (2021). The Quality of Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Misconception Instrument for Parabolic Motion. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 54(2), 359–369. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp.v54i2.35261.
Okmarisa, H. (2021). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Materi Larutan Elektrolit dan Nonelektrolit Menggunakan Four Tier Multiple Choice Diagnostic Test. Konfigurasi: Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia dan Terapan, 5(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.24014/konfigurasi.v5i1.8471.
Rukmana, D. (2017). Identifikasi miskonsepsi pada materi prinsip archimedes di smk dengan menggunakan tes diagnostik pilihan ganda tiga tingkat. WaPFi (Wahana Pendidikan Fisika), 13(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.17509/wapfi.v2i2.8276.
Samsudin, S., & M, N. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Sub-Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03208.
Savira, I., Wardani, S., Harjito, & Noorhayati, A. (2019). Desain instrumen tes three tiers multiple choice untuk analisis miskonsepsi siswa terkait larutan penyangga. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 13(1), 2277–2286. https://doi.org/10.15294/jipk.v13i1.15924.
Schultz, M., Lawrie, G. A., Bailey, C. H., Bedford, S. B., Dargaville, T. R., O’Brien, G., Tasker, R., Thompson, C. D., Williams, M., & Wright, A. H. (2017). Evaluation of diagnostic tools that tertiary teachers can apply to profile their students’ conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 565–586. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1296980.
Sholihat, F. N., Samsudin, A., & Nugraha, M. G. (2017). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa Menggunakan Four-Tier Diagnostic Test Pada Sub-Materi Fluida Dinamik: Azas Kontinuitas. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.03208.
Soeharto, S., Csapó, B., Sarimanah, E., Dewi, F. I., & Sabri, T. (2019). A review of students’ common misconceptions in science and their diagnostic assessment tools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 247–266. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.18649.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode penelitian pendidikan pendekatan kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Suliyanah, Putri, H. N. P. A., & Rohmawati, L. (2018). Identification student’s misconception of heat and temperature using three-tier diagnostic test. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 997(1), 012035. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/997/1/012035.
Syamsiar, A. A., & R. (2021). Profile of misconseption on genetic substance topic on student grade xii with four-tier diagnostic test. BioEdu (Berkala Imiah Pendidikan Biologi), 10(3), 523–529.
Tahya, N. P. D., & Kayadoe, V. (2020). Students misconseption indentification of chemical candidates teachers using three tier test method in the basic concept of chemical bond.
Wahyono, P., & Susetyorini, E. (2021). Misconceptions of biology education students in Biochemistry course during the covid-19 pandemic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 7(2), 104–110. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v7i2.17093.
Waluyo, E. M., Muchyidin, A., & Kusmanto, H. (2019). Analysis of students misconception in completing mathematical questions using certainty of response index (CRI). Tadris: Jurnal Keguruan dan Ilmu Tarbiyah, 4(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.24042/tadris.v4i1.2988.
Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., & Mulyani, S. (2017). Undergraduate Students’ Misconception On Acid-Base And Argentometric Titrations: A Challenge To Implement Multiple Representation Learning Model With Cognitive Dissonance Strategy. International Journal of Education, 9(2), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v9i2.5464.
Widodo, R. P. A., Lisdiana, & Nuswowati, M. (2019). Development of teaching materials based on discovery learning on science lessons with addictive and psychotropic themes in middle school. Journal of Innovative, 8(3), 349–357. https://doi.org/10.15294/JISE.V8I1.31079.
Zhao, C., Zhang, S., Cui, H., Hu, W., & Dai, G. (2023). Middle school students’ alternative conceptions about the human blood circulatory system using four-tier multiple-choice tests. Journal of Biological Education, 57(1), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2021.1877777.
Unduhan
Diterbitkan
Cara Mengutip
Terbitan
Bagian
Lisensi
Hak Cipta (c) 2024 Idam Ragil Widianto Atmojo, Dwi Yuniasih Saputri, Alfianita Nur Fadhilah
Artikel ini berlisensiCreative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
