Authenthic Assessment Instrument in Attitude for Fourth Grade Elementary School Students

Authors

  • Zaka Hadikusuma Ramadan Universitas Islam Riau
  • Tity Hastuti Universitas Islam Riau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i1.34157

Keywords:

Authentic Assessment, Attitude

Abstract

Assessment and imprisonment are two things that can not be separated, but currently, teachers still have difficulty in compiling instruments and conduct authentic assessments,  especially in the realm of attitude. It will directly affect the results of learning if not completed. The purpose of the study was to develop an authentic assessment instrument in the realm of attitudes for grade IV elementary students. This type of research is a development with the method used is formative research conducted two stages namely preliminary and formative evaluation stage. the subject of the study was  2  teachers and  20  students. Research instruments use expert evaluation validation sheets, materials, and thematics. Analyze data using descriptive analysis.  Instrumen authentic assessment on the realm of attitude for grade IV students who are attachedn on the theme of "My Hero" in the form of assessment rubrics and assessment formats. The results showed that expert validation results gained an average percentage of  97.50%  in the excellent category. So, the authentic assessment instrument developed deserves to be used to measure students' attitudes in learning.

References

Arifin, Z. (2017). Kriteria Instrumen dalam suatu Penelitian. The Original Research of Mathematics, 2(1). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31949/th.v2i1.571.

Baiduri, B., Utomo, D. P., Rosyadi, A. A. P., & Jamil, A. F. (2019). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Kurikulum 2013 Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika. JINoP (Jurnal Inovasi Pembelajaran), 5(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22219/jinop.v5i1.4973.

Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., & Rumble, M. (2012). Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills. Springer Science+Business Media, 17–66. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2324-5_2.

Bolat, Y., & Karakuş, M. (2017). Design implementation and authentic assessment of a unit according to Concept- Based Interdisciplinary Approach *. 10(1). https://doi.org/10.26822/iejee.2017131885.

Chong, E. J. M., Lim, J. S. W., Liu, Y., Lau, Y. Y. L., & Wu, V. X. (2016). Improvement of learning domains of nursing students with the use of authentic assessment pedagogy in clinical practice. Nurse Education in Practice, 20, 125–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2016.08.002.

Delita, F. (2017). Penerapan Authentic Assesment Pada Mata Kuliah IPS Terpadu Semester Gasal Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017. Jurnal Geografi, 9(2), 133. https://doi.org/10.24114/jg.v9i2.6970.

Fatonah, S., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2013). Developing an Authentic Assessment Model in Elementary School Science Teaching. 4(13), 50–62.

Fityana, I. N., Sarwanto, & Sugiarto. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Pada Pembelajaran IPA Berbasis Proyek Untuk Siswa SMP / MTs Kelas VII. Jurnal Materi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika (JMPF), 7(2), 23–27.

Gaol, P. L., Khumaedi, M., & Masrukan, M. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter Percaya Diri pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16209.

Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955.

Lee, I., & Coniam, D. (2013). Introducing assessment for learning for EFL writing in an assessment of learning examination-driven system in Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 22(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.11.003.

Marfuah, A., & Febriza, F. (2019). Penilaian Autentik pada Pembelajaran Pendidikan Agama Islam (PAI) di Sekolah dan Perguruan Tinggi. Fondatia, 3(2), 35–58. https://doi.org/10.36088/fondatia.v3i2.301.

Msosa, A., Bruce, J., & Crouch, R. (2021). Effect of a formative assessment intervention on nursing skills laboratory learning in a resource-constrained country. Nurse Education Today, 97(October 2019), 104677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104677.

Mulianti, Hala, Y., & Taiyeb, A. M. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Pada Materi Sistem Ekskresi Di Kelas Xi Sma Negeri 1 Tellusiattinge. Jurnal Nalar Pendidikan, 4(2), 97–107.

Nurjananto, N., & Kusumo, E. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Untuk Mengukur Kompetensi Peserta Didik Materi Senyawa Hidrokarbon. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Kimia, 9(2).

Ozan, C. (2019). Authentic assessment increased academic achievement and attitude towards the educational measurement of prospective teachers. 8(2). https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v8i2.18564.

Pasaribu, A., & Saparini. (2017). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Kontekstual untuk Meremidiasi Miskonsepsi pada Materi Gaya dan Hukum Newton. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(2), 36–47.

Pinilih, F. W., Budiharti, R., & Ekawati, E. Y. (2013). Pengembangan Instrument Penilian Produk pada Pembelajaran IPA untuk Siswa SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(2), 23–27.

Purnomo, M. E., Saripudin, A., & Sari, A. (2020). Pengembangan Penilaian Autentik dalam Pembelajaran Sastra : Pendampingan bagi Guru Bahasa Indonesia. Jurnal Pengabdian Pada Masyarakat, 5(3), 681–694. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30653/002.202053.365.

Rahmawati, E., Yuberti, Y., & Irwandani, I. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Otentik dengan Pendekatan Saintifik pada Pokok Bahasan Gerak Melingkar Kelas X SMA/MA. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(1), 12. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v1i1.8047.

Rahmawati, L. E., & Fatimah, N. (2015). Pengembangan Model Penilaian Autentik Kompetensi Berbicara. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 26(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v26i1.727.

Rosayu, W. I. (2020). Pengembangan Penilaian Autentik Keterampilan Berbahasa Tulis Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 1, 41–53.

Setiawan, D. (2017). The Developing Authentic Assessment Instruments Based on Character on Skill Domain in Primary School. 104(Aisteel), 144–149.

Setiawan, D. (2019). The Development of Authentic Assessment Instruments Based on Characters in Measuring Students ’ Competence at Primary School. 208(Icssis 2018), 292–298.

Siswanto, J., Saptaningrum, E., Saefan, J., Patonah, S., & Nuvitalia, D. (2015). Ibm Penyusunan Penilian Utentik Bagi Guru Sekolah Di Ponpes Darul Fikri Bawen. E-Dimas: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 6(2), 25923. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/e-dimas.v6i2.964.

Sya’idah, U., Amaliyah, A., & Ismail, Y. (2016). Kemampuan Guru PAI dalam Merencanakan dan Melaksanakan Penilaian Autentik. Jurnal Online Studi Al-Qur’an, 12(2), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.21009/jsq.012.2.01.

Tridane, M., Belaaouad, S., Benmokhtar, S., Gourja, B., & Radid, M. (2015). The Impact of Formative Assessment on the Learning Process and the Unreliability of the Mark for the Summative Evaluation. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197(February), 680–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.058.

Zhang, X. (2020). Assessment for learning in constrained contexts: How does the teacher’s self-directed development play out? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(November 2019), 100909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100909.

Zuliani, D., Florentinus, T. S., & Ridlo, S. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Karakter pada Siswa Kelas IV Sekolah Dasar. Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation, 6(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15294/jrer.v6i1.16207.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-11

How to Cite

Ramadan, Z. H., & Hastuti, T. (2021). Authenthic Assessment Instrument in Attitude for Fourth Grade Elementary School Students. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(1), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i1.34157

Issue

Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): February

Section

Article

License

Authors who publish with the International Journal of Elementary Education agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal. 
  2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)