Positive Factors of Student Learning Orientation in Improving Student Understanding and Learning Outcomes

Authors

  • Pikir Wisnu Wijayanto Universitas Telkom, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Ertati Suarni Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Loso Judijanto Indonesia Palm Oil Strategic Studies, Jakarta, Indonesia
  • Putri Zalika LM Kesuma Universitas Muhammadiyah Palembang, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Nuril Huda Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i2.73050

Keywords:

Attitude, doubt, habit, Learning Process

Abstract

The low results of learning mathematics from year to year give rise to students' perception that mathematics is a difficult subject. This needs to be researched to analyze the relationship between mathematics learning attitudes, anxiety, and habits, and evaluate additional mathematics learning outcomes. Quantitative research method with a survey approach. The research subjects were 253 people using random sampling. The data collection technique uses an instrument adapted from Learning Orientation which includes attitudes, attention, and study habits totaling 52 items. The analysis technique uses correlation and regression with SPSS version 26.0 software. The research results show that attitudes, habits, and anxiety are positively and significantly related to learning. Learning anxiety has a moderate relationship, while attitudes and study habits have a weak relationship with increasing learning achievement. Another finding is that learning anxiety is the main predictor of additional material, compared to attitudes and study habits. In conclusion, learning orientation is one of the factors that plays a very important role in determining the level of student learning achievement. This contribution provides information that students who have a positive attitude in learning show good study habits, therefore the teacher's role is needed to build a positive attitude.

References

Álvarez, J. A. M., Arnold, E. G., Burroughs, E. A., Fulton, E. W., & Kercher, A. (2020). The design of tasks that address applications to teaching secondary mathematics for use in undergraduate mathematics courses. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 60(August 2020), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2020.100814.

Avanesian, G. A., Borovskaya, M. A., Ryzhova, V. S., Kirik, V. A., Egorova, V. A., & Bermous, A. G. (2022). Can We Improve Learning Outcomes of Schoolchildren from the Poorest Families by Investing into Their Non-Cognitive Skills? Causal Analysis Using Propensity Score Matching. Voprosy Obrazovaniya / Educational Studies Moscow, 2022(1), 13–53. https://doi.org/10.17323/1814-9545-2022-1-13-53.

Ayanwale, M. A., Sanusi, I. T., Adelana, O. P., Aruleba, K. D., & Oyelere, S. S. (2022). Teachers’ readiness and intention to teach artificial intelligence in schools. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3(June), 100099.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100099.

Baas, J., Schotten, M., Plume, A., Côté, G., & Karimi, R. (2020). Scopus as a curated, high-quality bibliometric data source for academic research in quantitative science studies. Quantitative Science Studies, 1(1), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1162/qss_a_00019.

Behnamnia, N., Kamsin, A., Ismail, M. A. B., & Hayati, A. (2020). The effective components of creativity in digital game-based learning among young children: A case study. Children and Youth Services Review, 116(March 2020), 105227.1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105227.

Blaabæk, E. H. (2020). Reading when the sun does not shine: The effect of reading on children’s academic performance. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 67(December 2019), 100485.1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100485.

Büchele, S. (2020). Bridging the gap – How effective are remedial math courses in Germany? Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64(October 2019), 100832.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.100832.

Burić, I., & Kim, L. E. (2020). Teacher self-efficacy, instructional quality, and student motivational beliefs: An analysis using multilevel structural equation modeling. Learning and Instruction, 66(December 2019), 101302.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2019.101302.

Ching, B. H. H., Kong, K. H. C., Wu, H. X., & Chen, T. T. (2020). Examining the reciprocal relations of mathematics anxiety to quantitative reasoning and number knowledge in Chinese children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 63(September), 101919.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101919.

Datzberger, S. (2018). Why education is not helping the poor. Findings from Uganda. World Development, 110(2018), 124–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.05.022.

Elfadil, N., & Ibrahim, I. (2022). Embedded System Design Student’s Learning Readiness Instruments: Systematic Literature Review. Frontiers in Education, 7(February), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.799683.

Habók, A., Magyar, A., Németh, M. B., & Csapó, B. (2020). Motivation and self-related beliefs as predictors of academic achievement in reading and mathematics: Structural equation models of longitudinal data. International Journal of Educational Research, 103(June 2020), 101634.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101634.

Hidayati, Y. M., Ngalim, A., Sutama, Arifin, Z., Abidin, Z., & Rahmawati, E. (2020). Level of combinatorial thinking in solving mathematical problems. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1231–1243. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.751038.

Hill, R. M., Boto, E., Rea, M., Holmes, N., Leggett, J., Coles, L. A., Papastavrou, M., Everton, S. K., Hunt, B. A. E., Sims, D., Osborne, J., Shah, V., Bowtell, R., & Brookes, M. J. (2020). Multi-channel whole-head OPM-MEG: Helmet design and a comparison with a conventional system. NeuroImage, 219(May), 116995.1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116995.

Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S. I., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers and Education, 153(April), 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897.

Hwang, G. J., Sung, H. Y., Chang, S. C., & Huang, X. C. (2020). A fuzzy expert system-based adaptive learning approach to improving students’ learning performances by considering affective and cognitive factors. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 1(August 2020), 100003.1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2020.100003.

Hwang, G. J., Wang, S. Y., & Lai, C. L. (2021). Effects of a social regulation-based online learning framework on students’ learning achievements and behaviors in mathematics. Computers and Education, 160(1), 104031.1-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104031.

Ibáñez, M. B., Uriarte Portillo, A., Zatarain Cabada, R., & Barrón, M. L. (2020). Impact of augmented reality technology on academic achievement and motivation of students from public and private Mexican schools. A case study in a middle-school geometry course. Computers and Education, 145(February 2020), 103734.1-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103734.

Ivorra, B., Ferrández, M. R., Vela-Pérez, M., & Ramos, A. M. (2020). Mathematical modeling of the spread of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) taking into account the undetected infections. The case of China. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation, 88(September 2020), 105303.1-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnsns.2020.105303.

Jowsey, T., Foster, G., Cooper-Ioelu, P., & Jacobs, S. (2020). Blended learning via distance in pre-registration nursing education: A scoping review. Nurse Education in Practice, 44(January 2020), 102775.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2020.102775.

Kanat-Maymon, Y., Elimelech, M., & Roth, G. (2020). Work motivations as antecedents and outcomes of leadership: Integrating self-determination theory and the full range leadership theory. European Management Journal, 38(4), 555–564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.01.003.

Kaskens, J., Segers, E., Goei, S. L., van Luit, J. E. H., & Verhoeven, L. (2020). Impact of children’s math self-concept, math self-efficacy, math anxiety, and teacher competencies on math development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 94, 103096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103096.

Kudinov, S. I., Kudinov, S. S., Mikhailova, O., Kudinov, V. S., & Imomberdieva, N. M. (2020). Different self-attitude indicators in students and their self-realization in a university. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 8(3), 47–59. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2020-8-3-47-59.

Lindsay, E., & Evans, T. (2022). The use of lecture capture in university mathematics education: a systematic review of the research literature. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 34(4), 911–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-021-00369-8.

Lumbantoruan, J. H., & Manalu, R. U. (2024). Effectiveness of learning mathematics derivative materials using modules equipped with cooperative models in high schools. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(1), 523–533. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25354.

Maamin, M., Maat, S. M., & Ikhsan, Z. (2020). A systematic review of teacher factors and mathematics achievement. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(3), 998–1006. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2020.080334.

Maamin, M., Maat, S. M., & Iksan, Z. H. (2021). Analysis of the factors that influence mathematics achievement in the ASEAN countries. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 16(1), 371–389. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i1.5535.

MacCann, C., Jiang, Y., Brown, L. E. R., Double, K. S., Bucich, M., & Minbashian, A. (2019). Emotional Intelligence Predicts Academic Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 0000219(2), 1–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000219.

Maloney, E. A., & Retanal, F. (2020). Higher math anxious people have a lower need for cognition and are less reflective in their thinking. Acta Psychologica, 202(August 2019), 102939.1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.102939.

Mishra, S. (2020). Social networks, social capital, social support and academic success in higher education: A systematic review with a special focus on ‘underrepresented’ students. Educational Research Review, 29, 100307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100307.

Mohamed, R., Ghazali, M., & Samsudin, M. A. (2020). A Systematic Review on Mathematical Language Learning Using PRISMA in Scopus Database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(8), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/8300.

Namoun, A., & Alshanqiti, A. (2021). Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analytics techniques: A systematic literature review. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 11(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11010237.

Okagbue, H. I., Oguntunde, P. E., Obasi, E. C. M., & Akhmetshin, E. M. (2021). Trends and usage pattern of SPSS and Minitab Software in Scientific research. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1734(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1734/1/012017.

Ömeroğulları, M., Guill, K., & Köller, O. (2020). Effectiveness of private tutoring during secondary schooling in Germany: Do the duration of private tutoring and tutor qualification affect school achievement? Learning and Instruction, 66(January 2020), 101306.1-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101306.

Papadopoulos, D. (2020). Psychological framework for gifted children’s cognitive and socio-emotional development: A review of the research literature and implications. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(1), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.666308.

Patricia Aguilera-Hermida, A. (2020). College students’ use and acceptance of emergency online learning due to COVID-19. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 1(July), 100011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100011.

Primi, C., Bacherini, A., Beccari, C., & Donati, M. A. (2020). Assessing math attitude through the Attitude Toward Mathematics Inventory – Short form in introductory statistics course students. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 64(January 2020), 100838.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100838.

Radianti, J., Majchrzak, T. A., Fromm, J., & Wohlgenannt, I. (2020). A systematic review of immersive virtual reality applications for higher education: Design elements, lessons learned, and research agenda. Computers and Education, 147(December 2019), 103778.1-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103778.

Rossiter, J. A., Cassandras, C. G., Hespanha, J., Dormido, S., de la Torre, L., Ranade, G., Visioli, A., Hedengren, J., Murray, R. M., Antsaklis, P., Lamnabhi-Lagarrigue, F., & Parisini, T. (2023). Control education for societal-scale challenges: A community roadmap. Annual Reviews in Control, 55(September 2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arcontrol.2023.03.007.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2020). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation from a self-determination theory perspective: Definitions, theory, practices, and future directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61, 101860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101860.

Sahin, D., & Yilmaz, R. M. (2020). The effect of Augmented Reality Technology on middle school students’ achievements and attitudes towards science education. Computers and Education, 144, 103710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103710.

Staddon, R. V. (2022). A supported flipped learning model for mathematics gives safety nets for online and blended learning. Computers and Education Open, 3(April), 100106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100106.

Sugiman, Rizkianto, I., & Pujiasti, E. (2020). Artistically talented students’ perceptions of mathematics: View, interest, competence, and relevance. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1245–1259. https://doi.org/10.17478/JEGYS.762677.

Thanon, P., Xia, Z., & Xun, Y. (2020). Information technology gifted program under the national curriculum reform of basic education: A case study on a senior high-school in Shanghai, China. Revista de Cercetare Si Interventie Sociala, 71(November), 77–97. https://doi.org/10.33788/rcis.71.5.

Thomson, M. M., Walkowiak, T. A., Whitehead, A. N., & Huggins, E. (2020). Mathematics teaching efficacy and developmental trajectories: A mixed-methods investigation of novice K-5 teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87(January 2020), 102953. 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.102953.

Ulia, N., & Kusmaryono, I. (2021). Mathematical Disposition of Students’, Teachers, and Parents in Distance Learning: A Survey. Premiere Educandum : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 11(1), 147. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v11i1.8869.

Veas, A., Castejón, J.-L., Miñano, P., & Gilar-Corbí, R. (2019). Early Adolescents’ Attitudes and Academic Achievement: The Mediating Role of Academic Self-concept. Revista de Psicodidáctica (English Ed.), 24(1), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psicoe.2018.11.002.

Velazco, D. J. M., Hinostroza, E. M. F., Moreno, J. E. S., Cerda, J. F. P., & Barros, M. V. S. (2022). Attitudes of Ecuadorian Secondary School Teaching Staff towards Online STEM Development in 2022. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(7), 59–81. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.7.4.

Vidergor, H. E., & Ben-Amram, P. (2020). Khan academy effectiveness: The case of math secondary students’ perceptions. Computers and Education, 157(July), 103985.1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103985.

Viera Valencia, L. F., & Garcia Giraldo, D. (2019). Student and Classroom-Level Predictors of Keyboard-Based Writing in Early Primary. In Angewandte Chemie International Edition (Vol. 2). https://research.bond.edu.au/en/publications/student-and-classroom-level-predictors-of-keyboard-based-writing-.

Wang, Z., Oh, W., Malanchini, M., & Borriello, G. A. (2020). The developmental trajectories of mathematics anxiety: Cognitive, personality, and environmental correlates. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 61(May), 101876.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101876.

Xie, C., Cheung, A. C. K., Lau, W. W. F., & Slavin, R. E. (2020). The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Mathematics Achievement in Mainland China: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(July 2019), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101565.

Yin, H., Shi, L., Tam, W. W. Y., & Lu, G. (2020). Linking university mathematics classroom environments to student achievement: The mediation of mathematics beliefs. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 66(December 2019), 100905.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100905.

Zanden, P. J. A. C. Van Der, Meijer, P. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2020). A review study about creativity in adolescence : Where is the social context ? Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38(July), 100702.1-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100702.

Zeineddine, H., Braendle, U., & Farah, A. (2021). Enhancing prediction of student success: Automated machine learning approach. Computers and Electrical Engineering, 89(November), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106903.

Zhang, D., & Wang, C. (2020). The relationship between mathematics interest and mathematics achievement: mediating roles of self-efficacy and mathematics anxiety. International Journal of Educational Research, 104(July 2020), 101648.1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101648.

Zhou, S., Zhou, W., & Traynor, A. (2020). Parent and teacher homework involvement and their associations with students’ homework disaffection and mathematics achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 77(September 2019), 101780.1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101780.

Zynuddin, S. N., Kenayathulla, H. B., & Sumintono, B. (2023). The relationship between school climate and students’ non-cognitive skills: A systematic literature review. Heliyon, 9(4), e14773.1-25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14773.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-28

How to Cite

Wijayanto, P. W. ., Suarni, E. ., Judijanto, L. ., Putri Zalika LM Kesuma, & Huda, N. . (2024). Positive Factors of Student Learning Orientation in Improving Student Understanding and Learning Outcomes . International Journal of Elementary Education, 8(2), 198–206. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v8i2.73050

Issue

Section

Article