AN ANALYSIS OF SPEECH ACTS IN THE STUDENT’S TEXTBOOK AT THE SENIOR VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL

Authors

  • Ni Made Ika Sukmayanthi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Dewa Komang Tantra Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
  • Made Hery Santosa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i2.27657

Keywords:

speech acts, social function, linguistic features, language elements

Abstract

The current research objectives were to analyse the eleventh grade students’ textbook in the Senior Vocational High School publishes by the Indonesian Ministry of National Education based on the 2013 Curriculum. The research problems were focused on the speech acts’ social functions, linguistic features, and language elements. The research was designed in a qualitative approach. Data were collected through document analysis method. Data were analysed descriptively by classifying the speech acts’ social functions, linguistic features, and language elements. The research was delimited on the verbal acts or speech acts, focusing on their social functions, linguistic structures, and language features as outlined in the 2013 Curriculum (Kemdikbud 2016). The three verbal learning focus assisted students in improving their communicative competence in English. The research findings are, firstly, there were four speech act types found, namely directive, assertive, expressive, and commissive acts. The speech acts’ social functions were ordering, asking, telling, advising, praying, stating, explaining, welcoming, thanking, apologizing, offering and refusing. Secondly, the speech acts’ linguistic features designed were imperative, interrogative, and declarative sentences. Thirdly, the speech acts’ language elements specifically grammatical rules used were simple present tense, simple past tense, present continuous tense, present perfect tense, and past continuous tense.

References

Austin, J. (1962). How to do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. Mouton & Co. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783112316009

Cutting, J. (2002). Pragmatics and Discourse. London and New York: Routledge.

Gilbert A. Valverde, L. J. (2002). According to the Book: Using TIMSS to investigate the translation of policy into practice through the world of textbooks. London: Kluwer Academic Publisher. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0844-0_8

Huang, J. (2005). A Diary Study of Difficulties and Constraints in EFL Learning. Elsevier. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2005.04.001

Leech, G. (1989). Principles of Pragmatics. London : Longman.

Lichtman, M. (2010). Qualitative Research in Education: A User’s Guide. 2nd Edition. California: Sage.

Lunenburg, F. C. (2010). Communication: The Process, Barriers, And Improving Effectiveness. Schooling, 1.

Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing Discourse Analysis. London: Penguin.

Priestley, J. (2008). The Rudiments of English Grammar, 1761. Michigan: Scolar P., 1969.

Searle, J. (1979). Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts. London: Cmbridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511609213

Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-Cultural Pragmatic Failure. Applied Lingustics. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/4.2.91

Downloads

Published

2021-07-12

How to Cite

Sukmayanthi, N. M. I., Tantra, D. K., & Santosa, M. H. (2021). AN ANALYSIS OF SPEECH ACTS IN THE STUDENT’S TEXTBOOK AT THE SENIOR VOCATIONAL HIGH SCHOOL. International Journal of Language and Literature, 5(2), 72–78. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijll.v5i2.27657

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)