Technology Acceptance Model: the use of E-Study Aplications in E-Learning

Rini Sefriani; Zefriyenni; Rina Sepriana

doi:10.23887/jet.v6i4.45457

Authors

Rini Sefriani Universitas Putra Indonesia Yptk, Padang, Indonesia
Zefriyenni Universitas Putra Indonesia Yptk, Padang, Indonesia
Rina Sepriana Universitas Putra Indonesia Yptk, Padang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i4.45457

Keywords:

Technology Acceptance Model, E-Learning, The Use of E-study Applications

Abstract

The use of the Estudy application in e-learning by students of the Faculty of Engineering must be carried out due to the demands of circumstances that require studying from home due to the Covid-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to analyze how the acceptance of e-study application technology by Engineering faculty students during online learning is carried out. This type of research is quantitative by surveying students. The model used for analyzing technology acceptance is that proposed by Davis. The instrument in this study was a questionnaire that was distributed to students via the Google form link which was distributed online. The sample in this study amounted to 128 people. The data analysis technique used is a correlation. The study results showed that engineering faculty students showed positive attitudes and behaviors in using the Estudy application as an educational platform in e-learning during the Covid-19 pandemic. Thus the use of the e-study application during the Covid-19 pandemic by utilizing the Estudy application by engineering faculty students had a positive effect on learning from home in the form of e-learning. Future e-study applications can be used as e-learning media by students in lectures.

References

Agbenyegah, A. T., & Dlamini, B. I. (2019). Investigating the challenges of E-learning in a developing institution of higher learning: A hypothetical approach. Journal of Applied Business Research, 35(3), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.19030/jabr.v35i3.10303.

Alagoz, S. M., & Hekimoglu, H. (2012). A Study on Tam: Analysis of Customer Attitudes in Online Food Ordering System. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1138–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.195.

Alfadda, H. A., & Mahdi, H. S. (2021). Measuring Students’ Use of Zoom Application in Language Course Based on the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 50(4), 883–900. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-020-09752-1.

Alsharida, R. A., Hammood, M. M., & Al-Emran, M. (2021). Mobile Learning Adoption: A Systematic Review of the Technology Acceptance Model from 2017 to 2020. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(5), 147–162. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i05.18093.

Anitha Kumari, T., Hemalatha, C. H., Subhani Ali, M., & Naresh, R. (2020). Survey on impact and learning’s of the online courses on the present era. Procedia Computer Science, 172, 82–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.05.167.

Arianto, F., Susarno, L. H., Dewi, U., & Safitri, A. F. (2020). Model Penerimaan Dan Pemanfaatan Teknologi: E-Learning Di Perguruan Tinggi. Kwangsan: Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v8n1.p110--121.

Bailey, D. R., Almusharraf, N., & Almusharraf, A. (2022). Video conferencing in the e-learning context: explaining learning outcome with the technology acceptance model. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10949-1.

Bervell, B., Nyagorme, P., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-Enabled Blended Learning Use Intentions among Distance Education Tutors: Examining the Mediation Role of Attitude Based on Technology-Related Stimulus-Response Theoretical Framework. Educational Technology, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/8317.

Binali, T., Tsai, C.-C., & Chang, H.-Y. (2021). University students’ profiles of online learning and their relation to online metacognitive regulation and internet-specific epistemic justification. Computers & Education, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104315.

Cabero-Almenara, J., Romero-Tena, R., Llorente-Cejudo, C., & Palacios-Rodríguez, A. (2021). Academic Performance and Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Through a Flipped Classroom Experience: Training of Future Teachers of Primary Education. Contemporary Educational Technology, 13(3), ep305. https://doi.org/10.30935/cedtech/10874.

Clausen, J. M., Borthwick, A. C., & Rutledge, D. (2021). Collaborative research and use of Q methodology to understand technology infusion in teacher preparation. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(3), 1617–1639. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10018-3.

Downer, T., Gray, M., & Capper, T. (2021). Online learning and teaching approaches used in midwifery programs: A scoping review. In Nurse Education Today (Vol 103, bl 104980). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2021.104980.

Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, and N. R. (n.d.). “Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?” Phys. Rev., 47, 777-780.

Faisal, A., Handayanna, F., & Purnamasari, I. (2021). Implementation Technology Acceptance Model (Tam) on Acceptance of the Zoom Application in Online Learning. Jurnal Riset Informatika, 3(2), 85–92. https://doi.org/10.34288/jri.v3i2.195.

Fathema, N., Shannon, D., & Ross, M. (2015). Expanding The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to Examine Faculty Use of Learning Management Systems (LMSs) In Higher Education Institutions. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching , 11(2), 210–233.

Fecira, D., & Abdullah, T. M. K. (2020). Analisis Penerimaan E-Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (Tam). Intelektiva : Jurnal Ekonomi, Sosial & Humaniora, 02(04), 35–50.

Fikri, M., Ananda, M. Z., & Faizah, N. (2021). Kendala Dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 : Sebuah Kajian Kritis. Jurnal Education and development, 9(1), 145–148. https://doi.org/10.37081/ed.v9i1.2290.

Han, J. H., & Sa, H. J. (2021). Acceptance of and satisfaction with online educational classes through the technology acceptance model (TAM): the COVID-19 situation in Korea. Asia Pacific Education Review, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09716-7.

Hanifah, N. H., Rofiki, I., Sedayu, A., & Hariyadi, M. A. (2020). Mobile Learning Pada Mata Kuliah Strategi Pembelajaran Mi/Sd: Penelitian Pengembangan. Ta’dib, 23(1), 119. https://doi.org/10.31958/jt.v23i1.1704.

Hutauruk, A., & Sidabutar, R. (2020). Kendala pembelajaran daring selama masa pandemi di kalangan mahasiswa pendidikan matematika: Kajian kualiatatif deskriptif. Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 02(01), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v2i1.364.

Irawan, V. T., & Sutadji, E. (2017). Blended learning based on schoology: Effort of improvement learning outcome and practicum chance in vocational high school. Cogent Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1282031.

Kabir, K. H., Hassan, F., Mukta, M. Z. N., Roy, D., Darr, D., Leggette, H., & Ullah, S. M. A. (2022). Application of the technology acceptance model to assess the use and preferences of ICTs among field-level extension officers in Bangladesh. Digital Geography and Society, 3, 100027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diggeo.2022.100027.

Kartal, T., Kiziltepe, İ. S., & Kartal, B. (2022). Extending Technology Acceptance Model with Scientific Epistemological and Science Teaching Efficacy Beliefs: A Study with Preservice Teachers. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.1055590.

Khafit, A., Sulastri, S., & Fauzan, S. (2020). Technology Acceptance Model (TAM): Measurement Of E- Learning Use by Accounting Students at Malang State University. Asia Pacific Journal of Management and Education, 3(3), 64–72. https://doi.org/10.32535/apjme.v3i3.969.

MacLachlan, M., Banes, D., Bell, D., Borg, J., Donnelly, B., Fembek, M., Ghosh, R., Gowran, R. J., Hannay, E., Hiscock, D., Hoogerwerf, E. J., Howe, T., Kohler, F., Layton, N., Long, S., Mannan, H., Mji, G., Odera Ongolo, T., Perry, K., … Hooks, H. (2018). Assistive technology policy: a position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 13(5), 454–466. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496.

Morze, N., Varchenko-Trotsenko, L., Terletska, T., & Smyrnova-Trybulska, E. (2021). Implementation of adaptive learning at higher education institutions by means of Moodle LMS. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012062.

Mousa, A. H., Aldeen, Z. N., Nasir, I. S., & Hamdi, R. S. (2020). Measuring readiness of higher education institutes towards adopting e-learning using the technology acceptance model. ICIC Express Letters, 14(7), 731–740. https://doi.org/10.24507/icicel.14.07.731.

Muntianah, Tutik S. Astuti, E. S. A. D. F. (2012). Pengaruh Minat Perilaku Terhadap Actual Use Teknologi Informasi dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Profit Universitas Brawijaya Malang, 6(1), 88–113.

Novita, D., & Helena, F. (2021). Analisis Kepuasan Pengguna Aplikasi Traveloka Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Dan End-User Computing Satisfaction (EUCS). Jurnal Teknologi Sistem Informasi, 2(1), 22–37. https://doi.org/10.35957/jtsi.v2i1.846.

Nugroho, F., & Iqbal Arrosyad, M. (2020). Moodle Multimedia Development in Web-based Integrative Thematic Learning for Class IV Elementary Students. Cendekiawan, 2(1), 49–63. https://doi.org/10.35438/cendekiawan.v2i1.177.

Park, E. S., & Park, M. S. (2020). Factors of the technology acceptance model for construction IT. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(22). https://doi.org/10.3390/app10228299.

Piper, B., Zuilkowski, S. S., Kwayumba, D., & Strigel, C. (2016). Does technology improve reading outcomes? Comparing the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of ICT interventions for early grade reading in Kenya. International Journal of Educational Development, 49, 204–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2016.03.006.

Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Gulzhaina K. Kassymova, & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The Trend in Using Online Meeting Applications for Learning During the Period of Pandemic COVID-19 : A Literature Review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58–68. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v1i2.15.

Pratama, R. E., & Mulyati, S. (2020). Pembelajaran Daring dan Luring pada Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.30870/gpi.v1i2.9405.

Primasari, I. F. N. D., & Zulela. (2021). Kendala Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (PJJ) Secara Online Selama Masa Pandemik Covid-19 di Sekolah Dasar. JIKAP PGSD: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Kependidikan, 5(1), 64–73. https://doi.org/10.26858/jkp.v5i1.16820.

Quansah, R. (2021). The Use of Learning Management System (LMS) Moodle in the midst of Covid-19 Pandemic: Students’ perspective. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 4(3). https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.934730.

Rais, M., Fadillah, R., & Rivai, A. A. (2019). The Effectiveness of Blended Learning in Improving Media Literacy on Different Self-Regulated Learning. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 5(3), 277–285. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v5i3.10873.

Ritonga, A. W., Ritonga, M., Nurdianto, T., Kustati, M., Rehani, R., Lahmi, A., Yasmadi, Y., & Pahri, P. (2020). E-Learning Process of Maharah Qira’ah in Higher Education during the Covid-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(6), 227. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v9n6p227.

Saha, A., Dutta, A., & Sifat, R. I. (2021). The mental impact of digital divide due to COVID-19 pandemic induced emergency online learning at undergraduate level: Evidence from undergraduate students from Dhaka City. Journal of Affective Disorders, 294(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2021.07.045.

Sahudra, T. M., Taher, A., & Kemal, I. (2021). E-Learning Development Management With The Schoology Improving Geographic Learning Literation. Journal of Education Technology, 5(1), 70. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i1.33631.

Sarosa, S. (2021). The effect of perceived risks and perceived cost on using online learning by high school students. Procedia Computer Science, 197(2021), 477–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.12.164.

Satyawan, I. M., Wahjoedi, W., & Swadesi, I. K. I. (2021). The Effectiveness of Online Learning Through Undiksha E-Learning During the Covid-19 Pandemic. Journal Education Technology, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i2.32364.

Sefriani, R., Sepriana, R., Wijaya, I., & Radyuli, P. (2021). Blended Learning with Edmodo: The Effectiveness of Statistical Learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10((1), .), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20826.

Sefriani, Rini, & Sepriana, R. (2020). Pengembangan Media E-Learning Berbasis Schoology pada Pembelajaran Kurikulum Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 2(1), 8–14. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v2i1.76.

Sefriani, Rini, Sepriana, R., Wijaya, I., Putra, U., & Yptk, I. (2021). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Online di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Edukatif : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(6), 4731–4737. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v3i6.1430.

Shahin, N., & Arfaj, H. Al. (2022). Learning technologies among academics in the United Arab Emirates: One academic year since COVID-19. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 12(2), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2022.12.2.1597.

Shaikhli, D. Al. (2022). The effect of the tracking technology on students ’ perceptions of their continuing intention to use a learning management system. Education and Information Technologies, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11156-8.

Siti, C., Md, L., Nur, L., Binti, D., Mohd, I., Afiq, D., & Tazilah, K. (2021). Application Of Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) Towards Online Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic: Accounting Students Perspective. International Journal of Business, Economics and Law, 24(1), 13–20.

Sudijono, A. (2011). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R & D. IKAPI.

Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020a). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.

Sukendro, S., Habibi, A., Khaeruddin, K., Indrayana, B., Syahruddin, S., Makadada, F. A., & Hakim, H. (2020b). Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Heliyon, 6(11), e05410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05410.

Sumardi, D., Suryani, N., & Musadad, A. A. (2021). Website-Based Learning Management System (LMS) as a Tool for Learning in the Covid-19 Pandemic Period for Junior High Schools. Journal of Education Technology, 5(3), 346. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i3.38371.

Tahar, A., Riyadh, H. A., Sofyani, H., & Purnomo, W. E. (2020). Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 7(9), 537–547. https://doi.org/10.13106/JAFEB.2020.VOL7.NO9.537.

Utami, V. U., Ardi, Lufri, & Fuadiah, S. (2021). Media Pembelajaran E-Learning Berbasis Edmodo pada Materi Sistem Gerak. Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 4(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.23887/jlls.v4i2.34238.

Veri, J., Sefriani, R., Aulia, L., Keguruan, F., Putra, U., & Yptk, I. (2019). Pengembangan Mobile Learning Berbasis Client Server Pada Mata Pelajaran Simulasi Digital. Jurnal KomTekInfo, 5(3), 61–71. https://doi.org/10.29165/komtekinfo.v5i3.194.

Wang, J., Antonenko, P., & Dawson, K. (2020). Does Visual Attention To The Instructor in Online Video Affect Learning and Learner Perceptions? An Eye-Tracking Analysis. Computers and Education, 146, 103779. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103779.

Yaacob, Z., & Saad, N. H. M. (2020). Acceptance of YouTube as a Learning Platform during the Covid-19 Pandemic: The Moderating Effect of Subscription Status. TEM Journal, 9(4), 1732–1739. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM94-54.

Yu-Fong Chang, J., Wang, L. H., Lin, T. C., Cheng, F. C., & Chiang, C. P. (2021). Comparison of learning effectiveness between physical classroom and online learning for dental education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Dental Sciences, 16(4), 1281–1289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jds.2021.07.016.

Zabolotniaia, M., Cheng, Z., Dorozhkin, E., & Lyzhin, A. (2020). Use of the LMS Moodle for an Effective Implementation of an Innovative Policy in Higher Educational Institutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(13), 172. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v15i13.14945.