Trigger factors of using Moodle or e-learning by faculty of Medicine and health Sciences College and Education College

Saida Affouneh; Eman Alshawish

doi:10.23887/jet.v6i3.51248

Authors

Saida Affouneh Faculty of Educational Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine
Eman Alshawish Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i3.51248

Keywords:

Moodle, e-Learning, Blended Learning, Content Pot, Face Book, Faculty of Medicine, Faculty of Education, Quality of Education

Abstract

There are several obstacles to implementing e-learning. This study aims to identify barriers and facilitators in using Moodle or e-learning by the Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, the College of Health Sciences, and the College of Education. This type of research is qualitative research. This research report is based on the SRQR guidelines. The sample used in this study amounted to seven Faculties of Medicine and Health Sciences, Colleges, and Schools of Education. The method used in collecting data interviews. The instrument used in data collection is an interview sheet. The technique used in analyzing the data is descriptive qualitative analysis. The result of this research is that the study reveals three key factors that represent barriers to using Moodle or e-learning from the participants' perceptions. First, individual barriers (educators & students). Second, institutional barriers or workplace barriers. Third, the participants considered the use of social media (Facebook) in the teaching process unprofessional at the academic level. The English competence of Medical and Health Science students is considered the central supporting factor in using e-learning compared to education students. Participants considered the use of Facebook as unprofessional in academic level communication.

References

Agustini, D., Lian, B., & Sari, A. P. (2020). School’S Strategy for Teacher’S Professionalism Through Digital Literacy in the Industrial Revolution 4.0. International Journal of Educational Review, 2(2), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.33369/ijer.v2i2.10967.

Ahdan, S., Putri, A. R., & Sucipto, A. (2020). Aplikasi M-Learning Sebagai Media Pembelajaran Conversation Pada Homey English. Sistemasi, 9(3), 493. https://doi.org/10.32520/stmsi.v9i3.884.

Alqahtani, A. Y., & Rajkhan, A. A. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the covid-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10090216.

Alshammari, M. T. (2020). Evaluation of gamification in e-learning systems for elementary school students. TEM Journal, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM92-51.

Ariesta, F. W. (2019). Effectiveness of E-Learning Media to Improve Learning Outcomes Natural Science in Primary Schools. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 3(2), 88. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v3i2.17203.

Awidi, I. T., Paynter, M., & Vujosevic, T. (2019). Facebook group in the learning design of a higher education course: An analysis of factors influencing positive learning experience for students. Computers & Education, 129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.018.

Bervell, B., & Arkorful, V. (2020). LMS-enabled blended learning utilization in distance tertiary education: establishing the relationships among facilitating conditions, voluntariness of use and use behaviour. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-0183-9.

Bowling, A., & Ebrahim, S. (2005). Handbook of health research methods: investigation, measurement and analysis. Open University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Brockfeld, T., Müller, B., & de Laffolie, J. (2018). Video versus live lecture courses: a comparative evaluation of lecture types and results. Medical Education Online, 23(1), 1555434. https://doi.org/10.1080/10872981.2018.1555434.

Chen, J. L., & Mensah, F. M. (2018). Teaching Contexts That Influence Elementary Preservice Teachers’ Teacher and Science Teacher Identity Development. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 29(5), 420–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2018.1469187.

Cloonan, M. R., Cloonan, D. J., Schlitzkus, L. L., & Fingeret, A. L. (2020). Learners with Experience in Surgical Scrub Benefit from Additional Education with an Interactive E-Learning Module. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.521.

Derrington, M. L., & Campbell, J. W. (2018). High-stakes teacher evaluation policy: US principals’ perspectives and variations in practice. Teachers and Teaching, 24(3), 246–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2017.1421164.

Dobre, I. (2015). Learning Management Systems for Higher Education - An Overview of Available Options for Higher Education Organizations. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 313–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.02.122.

Ellianawati, E., Subali, B., Khotimah, S. N., Cholila, M., & Darmahastuti, H. (2021). Face to Face Mode vs. Online Mode: A Discrepancy in Analogy-Based Learning During COVID-19 Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(3), 368–377. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i3.30037.

Elyas, A. H. (2018). Penggunaan model pembelajaran e-learning dalam meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran. Jurnal Warta, 56(04), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46576/wdw.v0i56.4.

Erawati, G. A. P. S. A., Widiana, I. W., & Japa, I. G. N. (2021). Elementary School Teachers’ Problems in Online Learning during the Pandemic. International Journal of Elementary Education, 5(4), 562. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v5i4.39233.

Febliza, A., & Okatariani, O. (2020). The development of online learning media by using moodle for general chemistry subject. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 6(1). https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i1.12339.

Ferreira, J., Behrens, M., Torres, P., & Marriott, R. (2018). The necessary knowledge for online education: Teaching and learning to produce knowledge. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/86463.

George, P. P., Papachristou, N., Belisario, J. M., Wang, W., Wark, P. A., Cotic, Z., Rasmussen, K., Sluiter, R., Riboli-Sasco, E., Tudor Car, L., Musulanov, E. M., Molina, J. A., Heng, B. H., Zhang, Y., Wheeler, E. L., A., Shorbaji, N., Majeed, A., & Car, J. (2014). Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction. Journal of global health, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.7189/jogh.04.010406.

Haddad, D. (2018). The Degree of Practicing the Principles of Active Learning in Teaching of English Language from the Perspective of Its Teachers in the Schools of Education Directorate of ‘Bani Obaid’ District in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(36).

Herayanti, L., Habibi, H., & Fuaddunazmi, M. (2017). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Berbasis Moodle pada Matakuliah Fisika Dasar. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 36(2), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v36i2.13077.

Holloway, I. (2005). Qualitative research in health care. University Press.

Hutauruk, A., & Sidabutar, R. (2020). Kendala pembelajaran daring selama masa pandemi di kalangan mahasiswa pendidikan matematika: Kajian kualiatatif deskriptif. Journal of Mathematics Education and Applied, 02(01), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.36655/sepren.v2i1.364.

Ibrahim, D. S., & Suardiman, S. P. (2014). Pengaruh Penggunaan E-Learning Terhadap Motivasi Dan Prestasi Belajar Matematika Siswa SD Negeri Tahunan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 2(1), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.21831/JPE.V2I1.2645.

Karwati, E. (2014). The Influence of E-Learning Based on Information Technology toward Students Quality of Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Komunikasi, 17(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.20422/JPK.V17I1.5.

Khiat, H. (2017). Academic Performance and The Practice of Self-Directed Learning: The Adult Student Perspective. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 41(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2015.1062849.

Kurtz, G., Tsimerman, A., & Steiner, O. (2014). The Flipped Classroom Answer to Future Learning? European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2014-0027.

Lestari, K. B., Dwi Lestari, I. F., & Santoso, I. (2021). The Impact of Health Education Using Online Learning on Adolescent Knowledge of Anaemia. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i3.8541.

Maudiarti, S. (2018). Penerapan E-Learning Di Perguruan Tinggi. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan, 32(1), 51–66. https://doi.org/10.21009/pip.321.7.

Maulana, I. T., & Padang, S. I. (2021). E-Learning effective during the Covid-19 era. İlköğretim Online, 20(2), 179–188. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.02.20.

Moorthy, K., T’ing, L. C., Wei, K. M., Mei, P. T. Z., Yee, C. Y., & Wern, K. L. J. (2019). Is facebook useful for learning? A study in private universities in Malaysia. Computers & Education, 130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.12.002.

Napitupulu, D., Adiyarta, K., Abdullah, D., & Murtiningsih, D. (2019). Proposed ELR Model for E-Learning Readiness Evaluation Based on McKensey 7S Framework. ICASI, 6. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.18-7-2019.2288544.

Noer, R. Z., Wahid, S. M. Al, & Febriyanti, R. (2021). Online lectures : An implementation of full e-learning action research. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 9(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.21831/jpe.v9i1.35030.

Nyatanga, P., & Mukorera, S. (2019). Effects of lecture attendance, aptitude, individual heterogeneity and pedagogic intervention on student performance: A probability model approach. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 56(2), 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2017.1371626.

O’Brien, B. C., Harris, I. B., Beckman, T. J., Reed, D. A., & Cook, D. A. (2014). Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Academic Medicine, 89(9). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388.

Rafiee, M., & Abbasian-Naghneh, S. (2021). E-learning: development of a model to assess the acceptance and readiness of technology among language learners. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 34(5). https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1640255.

Rahayu, W. P., Hidayatin, & Madziatul. (2020). Development of a Project-Based Learning Assessment System to Improve Students’ Competence. Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi & Bisnis, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.21009/JPEB.008.2.1.

Ran, W., & Jinglu, L. (2020). The Design and Development of Digital Books for E-learning. 2020 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Virtual Reality, 51–55. https://doi.org/10.1145/3439133.3439140.

Robertson-Kraft, C., & Zhang, R. S. (2018). Keeping Great Teachers: A Case Study on the Impact and Implementation of a Pilot Teacher Evaluation System. Educational Policy, 32(3), 363–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816637685.

Rubini, B., Permanasari, A., & Yuningsih, W. (2018). Learning Multimedia Based on Science Literacy on the Lightning Theme. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pembelajaran IPA, 4(2), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.30870/jppi.v4i2.3926.

Samba, Odoh, & Egbodo, B. A. (2020). Effects of E-Learning on Students’ Performance, Confidence Level and Science Process Skills Acquisition in Basic Science and Technology. Internationan Journal of Science and Research Methodology, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.21002.29127.

Silverman, D. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical. SAGE Publication Ltd.

Supriyatno, T., Susilawati, S., & Hassan, A. (2020). E-learning development in improving students’ critical thinking ability. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 15(5), 1117–1127. https://doi.org/10.18844/CJES.V15I5.5154.

Tere, T., Bayu Seta, H., Nizar Hidayanto, A., & Abidin, Z. (2020). Variables Affecting E-Learning Services Quality in Indonesian Higher Education: Students’ Perspectives. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 19, 259–286. https://doi.org/10.28945/4489.

Timbi-Sisalima, C., Sánchez-Gordón, M., Hilera-Gonzalez, J. R., & Otón-Tortosa, S. (2022). Quality Assurance in E-Learning: A Proposal from Accessibility to Sustainability. Sustainability, 14(5), 3052. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14053052.

Vonti, L. H., & Rahmah, M. (2019). The use of Hybrid/Blended Learning in Understanding of English Structure Subject to Improve Students’ Achievement and Their Digital Literacy. JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies), 03(02), 99–102. https://doi.org/10.33751/jhss.v3i2.1467.

Yaniawati, R. P. (2013). E-Learning to Improve Higher Order Thinking Skills ( HOTS ) of Students. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v7i2.225.

Yudhiantara, R. A., & Saehu, A. (2017). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning (MALL) in Indonesian Islamic Higher Education. IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 2(1), 21–31. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v2i1.52.

Yulando, S., Sutopo, S., & Franklin Chi, T. (2019). Electronic Module Design and Development: An Interactive Learning. American Journal of Educational Research, 7(10), 694–698. https://doi.org/10.12691/education-7-10-4.