Implementation of Outcome-Based Education from the Perception of Lecturers and Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v8i3.76621Keywords:
engineering, education, outcome-based education, case studyAbstract
Outcome-based education (OBE) means clearly focusing and organizing everything in an educational system around what is essential for all students to be able to do successfully at the end of their learning experiences. This means starting with a clear picture of what is important for students to be able to do, then organizing curriculum, instruction, and assessment to make sure this learning ultimately happens. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the perceptions of lecturers and students regarding the implementation of OBE in the Faculty of Engineering. There are six variables used in this study, i.e., statement of student’s achievement, relevance of student’s achievements, subject’s preparation, teaching and learning process, supporting facilities, and evaluation. The indicators are generated according to the literature review and interview with experts, resulting 51 indicators. There are 103 students and 79 lecturers to be selected as the respondents. The respondents are asked about their opinions regarding the OBE implementation according to those indicators. Results show that from the perspective of lecturers, OBE is very well implemented regarding the variables of statement of student’s achievement, relevance of student’s achievements, and teaching and learning process; while the others are well implemented. However, from the perspective of students, OBE is fairly implemented regarding the variable of supporting facilities; while the others are well implemented.
References
Abdullah, F., Ward, R., & Ahmed, E. (2016). Investigating the influence of the most commonly used external variables of TAM on students’ Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU) and Perceived Usefulness (PU) of e-portfolios. Computers in Human Behavior, 63, 75–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.014
Afandi, M. A., Enriko, I. K. A., & Baihaqy, M. A. (2023). Improvement of Student Attendance System for Recording Student Surface Body Temperature Based on Internet of Things. Elinvo (Electronics, Informatics, and Vocational Education), 7(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.21831/elinvo.v7i2.53944
Aminuddin, A., Salambue, R., Andriyani, Y., & Mahdiyah, E. (2021). Aplikasi E-OBE untuk Integrasi Komponen Kurikulum OBE.
Arlinwibowo, J., Retnawati, H., & Kartowagiran, B. (2022). The impact of ICT utilization to improve the learning outcome: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 11(2), 522. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i2.22112
Carlos, J. C. G., & Dacoco, J. P. E. G. (2021). Knowledge and implementation of outcome-based education in the Mathematics Department of Mapua University. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 9(4), 353–374. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/95aa/83b944b0bdc1d329f4337b3f0ae55309d272.pdf
Crawley, E. F., Hosoi, A., Long, G. L., Kassis, T., Dickson, W., & Mitra, A. B. (2019). Moving Forward with the New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) program at MIT - Building community, developing projects, and connecting with industry. In ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--33124
Custodio, P. C., Espita, G. N., & Siy, L. C. (2019). The implementation of outcome-based education at a Philippine University. Asia Pasific Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 7(4), 37–49. https://www.academia.edu/download/62457333/APJMR-2019-7.4.03.0520200323-106500-ik5378.pdf
Dam, M., Ottenhof, K., Van Boxtel, C., & Janssen, F. (2019). Understanding cellular respiration through simulation using lego as a concrete dynamic model. Education Sciences, 9(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020072
Damyanov, I., & Tsankov, N. (2018). The role of infographics for the development of skills for cognitive modeling in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i01.7541
Dewi, W. S., Febryan, H., Murtiani, & Sari, S. Y. (2022). Need analysis of project-based learning model and portfolio assessment in physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2309(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2309/1/012086
Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students’ Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 182–188. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1176157
Fatimah, A. S., & Santiana, S. (2017). Teaching in 21St Century: Students-Teachers’ Perceptions of Technology Use in the Classroom. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching, 2(2), 125. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.132
Goeltz, J. C., & Cuevas, L. A. (2021). Guided inquiry activity for teaching titration through total titratable Acidity in a general chemistry laboratory course. Journal of Chemical Education, 98(3), 882–887. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c01198
Goyal, M., Gupta, C., & Gupta, V. (2022). A Meta-Analysis Approach to Measure the Impact of Project-based Learning Outcome with Program Attainment on Student Learning Using Fuzzy Inference Systems. Heliyon, 8(8), e10248. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HELIYON.2022.E10248
Haryanto, P. C., & Arty, I. S. (2019). The Application of Contextual Teaching and Learning in Natural Science to Improve Student’s HOTS and Self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1233(1), 0–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1233/1/012106
Hasanah, V., & Supriansyah, S. (2022). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Auditory, Intellectualy, Repetition (AIR) Berbantu Media Audio Visual Terhadap Rasa Percaya Diri Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(4), 6893–6899. https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i4.3411
Heri Suryaman, Kusnan, & Husni Mubarok. (2020). Profile of Online Learning in Building Engineering Education Study Program During the COVID-19 Pandemic. IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research, 1(2), 63–77. https://doi.org/10.46245/ijorer.v1i2.42
Hoang, L. P., & Arch-Int, N. (2013). Assessment of open-ended questions using a multidimensional approach for the interaction and collaboration of learners in e-learning environments. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 19(7), 932–949.
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Loc-Hoang-Phuoc/publication/286190008.
Irhandayaningsih, A. (2020). Pengukuran Literasi Digital Pada Peserta Pembelajaran Daring Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Anuva, 4(2), 231–240. https://demo.dspacedirect.org/bitstream/handle/10673/1975/8073-25123-1-SM.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
Ivanović, M., Putnik, Z., Komlenov, Ž., Welzer, T., Hölbl, M., & Schweighofer, T. (2013). Usability and privacy aspects of moodle: Students’ and teachers’ perspective. Informatica (Slovenia), 37(3), 221–230. https://www.informatica.si/index.php/informatica/article/download/451/455
Kennedy et al. (2012). Literacy in Early Childhood and Primary Education. In Literacy in Early Childhood and Primary Education (Issue 15). National Council for Curriculum and Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139519397
Kilgour, P., Northcote, M., Williams, A., & Kilgour, A. (2020). A plan for the co-construction and collaborative use of rubrics for student learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(1), 140–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1614523
Liando, N. V., Pelenkahu, N., & Mongkaren, S. (2021). Students and Parents’ Perceptions toward English Online Learning during Corona Virus Pandemic. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha, 9(1), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v9i1.35049
Liu, C. L., Chung, M. L., Hui, B. P. H., & Li, H. C. (2023). The Effect of Social Capital on Outcomes of Global Citizenship Among Taiwanese Young Adults: The Mediating Role of Political Self-efficacy. Sage Open, 13(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221137862
Lukum, A. (2015). Evaluasi Program Pembelajaran Ipa Smp Menggunakan Model Countenance Stake. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 19(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v19i1.4552
Mee Mee, R. W., Shahdan, T. S. T., Ismail, M. R., Abd Ghani, K., Pek, L. S., Von, W. Y., Woo, A., & Rao, Y. S. (2020). Role of gamification in classroom teaching: Pre-service teachers’ view. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 684–690. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v9i3.20622
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (3th ed.). Sage.
Mulawarman, W. G., Hudiyono, Y., & Mulawarman, U. (2020). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Interaktif ‘POST’ dalam Pembelajaran Apresiasi Puisi untuk Siswa Kelas X SMA. Development of POST Interactive Teaching Materials in Learning of Poetry, 3(1), 14–23. https://doi.org/10.30872/diglosia.v3i1.28
Musso, M. F., Boekaerts, M., Segers, M., & Cascallar, E. C. (2019). Individual differences in basic cognitive processes and self-regulated learning: Their interaction effects on math performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 71(March), 58–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2019.03.003
Park, J. P., Kim, J. H., Park, M. K., & Yun, J. W. (2011). Potential Agents for Cancer and Obesity Treatment with Herbal Medicines from the Green Garden. Biotechnology and Bioprocess Engineering, 16(6), 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12257-011-0215-3
Robinson, Z. (2009). Linking employability and sustainability skills through a module on ‘Greening Business. Planet, 22(1), 10–13. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2009.00220010
Saadah, I. N., Hadi, S., Agus, M., Budiyanto, K., Rahardjan-To, A., & Miftachul Hudha, A. (2022). Development of articulate storyline learning media to improve biology learning outcomes for junior high school students. Research and Development in Education (RaDEn), 2(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/raden.v2i2.232
Seixas, B. V., Smith, N., & Mitton, C. (2018). The qualitative descriptive approach in international comparative studies: Using online qualitative surveys. International Journal of Health Policy and Management, 7(9), 778–781. https://doi.org/10.15171/ijhpm.2017.142
Smieskova, E. (2017). Communication Students’ Skills as a Tool of Development Creativity and Motivation in Geometry. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 5(1), 31–35. https://doi.org/10.13189/ujer.2017.050104
Su, C.-Y., Li, Y.-H., & Chen, C.-H. (2021). Understanding the Behavioural Patterns of University Teachers Toward Using a Learning Management System. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET, 16(14), 129–145. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v16i14.22685
Supeni, S., Hakim, L., & Jumintono. (2019). Strengthening Character Education of Early Childhood through Javanese Traditional Game Dakon. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 7(6S2), 243–249. https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/ijcah-20/125947406
Trilling, B., & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our Times. In Journal of Sustainable Development Education and Research (Vol. 2, Issue 1).
Wei, X., Saab, N., & Admiraal, W. (2021). Assessment of cognitive, behavioral, and affective learning outcomes in massive open online courses: A systematic literature review. Computers and Education, 163, 104097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104097
Weller, J. M., Naik, V. N., & San Diego, R. J. (2020). Systematic review and narrative synthesis of competency-based medical education in anaesthesia. British Journal of Anaesthesia, 124(6), 748–760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2019.10.025
Wibowo, T., & Veronica, J. (2022). IT Curriculum for Boot Camp : An Iterative Development In Applying OBE In Computer Science Education for Non-Formal. Journal of Education Technology, 6(4), 598–606. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JET/article/download/51343/24581/155984
Yamazaki, K. (2018). Computer-assisted learning of communication (CALC): A case study of Japanese learning in a 3D virtual world. ReCALL, 30(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344017000350
Yazar Soyadı, B. B. (2015). Creative and Critical Thinking Skills in Problem-based Learning Environments. Journal of Gifted Education and Creativity, 2(2), 71–71. https://doi.org/10.18200/jgedc.2015214253
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mujiya Ulkhaq, Naniek Utami Handayani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Journal of Education Technology agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
