How EtnoEduction is Essential and Linked to the Science Learning in the 21st Century Paradigm?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jeu.v12i1.82441Keywords:
Systematic Literature Review, Science Learning, Elementary SchoolsAbstract
Improving the quality of science education in elementary schools is not only crucial for fostering better understanding of science, but also for building a strong foundation for future scientific thinking and actions. This systematic review aims to explore and analyze various effective methods and strategies of science learning in elementary schools in the 21st century. This systematic review was designed based on relevant criteria from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The data were sourced from the utilization of electronic databases such as PubMed, ERIC, Scopus, and Google Scholar. The search keywords employed included “effective science learning”, “science in elementary schools”, and “21 century”. All papers were reviewed and quality assessment was performed. Fifteen studies were finally selected. Data were extracted, organized and analysed using a narrative synthesis. There are several factors influencing effective science education in the 21st century, including the incorporation of digital technology, cultural elements, contextual learning, adaptive approaches, and competency-based methods. Suitable strategies to support this science education include inquiry-based learning, project-based learning, cooperative learning, experiment-based learning, and game-based learning. Consequently, students greatly benefit from ethno-science education delivered through digital learning applications rooted in local cultural contexts.
References
Afriana, J., Permanasari, A., & Fitriani, A. (2016). Penerapan project based learning terintegrasi STEM untuk meningkatkan literasi sains siswa ditinjau dari gender. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 202. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.8561.
Aksela.M., & HaatainenO. (2019). Project-Based Learning (PBL) in Practise: Active Teachers’ Views of Its’ Advantages and Challenges.
Alkhudiry, R. (2022). The Contribution of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory in Mediating L2 Knowledge Co-Construction. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 12(10), 2117–2123. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1210.19.
Amir, A. (2020). Public Policy Implementation: Study on Educational Budgeting of Palopo. Journal La Sociale, 1(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.37899/journal-la-sociale.v1i1.19.
Arphattananon, T. (2021). Breaking the Mold of Liberal Multicultural Education in Thailand through Social Studies Lessons. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 94(2), 53–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2020.1860873.
Bagon, Š., Gačnik, M., & Starčič, A. I. (2018). Information communication technology use among students in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 13(6), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v13i06.8051.
Barth, V. L., Piwowar, V., Kumschick, I. R., Ophardt, D., & Thiel, F. (2019). The impact of direct instruction in a problem-based learning setting. Effects of a video-based training program to foster preservice teachers’ professional vision of critical incidents in the classroom. International Journal of Educational Research, 95(March 2018), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2019.03.002.
Blumberg, F. C., & Fisch, S. M. (2013). Introduction: Digital games as a context for cognitive development, learning, and developmental research. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 139, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20026.
Bui, Y. N., & Fagan, Y. M. (2013). The Effects of an Integrated Reading Comprehension Strategy: A Culturally Responsive Teaching Approach for Fifth-Grade Students’ Reading Comprehension. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 57(2), 59–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988x.2012.664581.
Dam, M., Ottenhof, K., Van Boxtel, C., & Janssen, F. (2019). Understanding cellular respiration through simulation using lego as a concrete dynamic model. Education Sciences, 9(2), 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci9020072.
Dewanti, P., Supuwiningsih, N. N., & Saridewi, D. P. (2021). Utilizing Educational Technologies to Optimize Student and Teacher Learning at Dharma Laksana Mataram Orphanage. Journal of Innovation and Community Engagement, 2(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.28932/jice.v2i1.3601.
Dewi, C. A., Khery, Y., & Erna, M. (2019). An ethnoscience study in chemistry learning to develop scientific literacy. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(2), 279–287. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i2.19261
Farihah, M. J., Norawi, A. M., & Jahan, A. N. (2021). Game-Based STEM Module Development for KSSM Science Teachers. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 18(2), 249–262. https://doi.org/10.36681/tused.2021.63.
Fearnley, M. R., & Amora, J. T. (2020). Learning Management System Adoption in Higher Education Using the Extended Technology Acceptance Model. IAFOR Journal of Education, 8(2), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.8.2.05.
Gilmanova, A. A. (2018). Digital age and reading fiction: realities and perspectives. Kazan Linguistic Journal, 1(1), 90–95. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/tsifrovaya-epoha-i-chtenie-hudozhestvennoy-literatury-realii-i-perspektivy.
Ginzburg, T., & Barak, M. (2023). Technology-Enhanced Learning and Its Association with Motivation to Learn Science from a Cross-Cultural Perspective. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(4), 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10048-x.
Granić, A., & Marangunić, N. (2019). Technology acceptance model in educational context: A systematic literature review. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(5), 2572–2593. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12864.
Gray, K. (2017). Assessing gains in science teaching self-efficacy after completing an inquiry-based earth science course. Journal of Geoscience Education, 65(1), 60–71. https://doi.org/10.5408/14-022.1.
Hanif, S., Wijaya, A. F. C., & Winarno, N. (2019). Enhancing Students’ Creativity through STEM Project-Based Learning. Journal of Science Learning, 2(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.17509/jsl.v2i2.13271.
Hau, N. H., Cuong, T. V., & Tinh, T. T. (2020). Students and Teachers’ Perspective Of The Importance Of Arts In STEAM Education In Vietnam. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 666–671. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.11.121.
Hikmawati, Suastra, I. W., & Pujani, N. M. (2021). Local wisdom in Lombok island with the potential of ethnoscience for the development of learning models in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1816(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1816/1/012105.
Hong, J. C., Hsiao, H. S., Chen, P. H., Lu, C. C., Tai, K. H., & Tsai, C. R. (2021). Critical attitude and ability associated with students’ self-confidence and attitude toward “predict-observe-explain” online science inquiry learning. Computers and Education, 166(February), 104172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104172.
Hwang, G. J., Chang, C. C., & Chien, S. Y. (2022). A motivational model‐based virtual reality approach to prompting learners’ sense of presence, learning achievements, and higher‐order thinking in professional safety training. British Journal of Educational Technology. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13196.
Imran, M. E., Sopandi, W., Mustafa, B., & Riyana, C. (2011). Improving Primary School Teachers’ Competence in Teaching Multiliteracy Through RADEC-Based Training Programs. Cypriot Journal of Education, 2(6), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.18844/cjes.v16i6.6494.
Jalinus, N., Syahril, & Nabawi, R. A. (2019). A comparison of the problem-solving skills of students in pjBL versus CPjBL model: An experimental study. Journal of Technical Education and Training, 11(1), 36–43. https://doi.org/10.30880/jtet.2019.11.01.005.
Kartimi, Shidiq, A. S., & Nasrudin, D. (2021). The elementary teacher readiness toward stem-based contextual learning in 21st century era. Elementary Education Online, 20(1), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.17051/ilkonline.2021.01.019.
Labouta, H. I., Kenny, N. A., Li, R., Anikovskiy, M., Reid, L., & Cramb, D. T. (2018). Learning science by doing science: an authentic science process-learning model in postsecondary education. International Journal of Science Education, 40(12), 1476–1492. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1484966.
Lai, K., & Hong, K. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12161.
Made, I., Dharma, A., Ayu, N., & Lestari, P. (2022). The Impact of Problem-based Learning Models on Social Studies Learning Outcomes and Critical Thinking Skills for Fifth Grade Elementary School Students. Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar, 6(2), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.23887/JISD.V6I2.46140.
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., & Brennan, S. E. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery, 88, 105906. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Djuhartono, T., Ramdayana, I. P., & Desnaranti, L. (2021). Improvement of teacher’s professional competency in strengthening learning methods to maximize curriculum implementation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21010.
Puspasari, A., Susilowati, I., Kurniawati, L., Utami, R. R., Gunawan, I., & Sayekti, I. C. (2019). Implementasi Etnosains dalam Pembelajaran IPA di SD Muhammadiyah Alam Surya Mentari Surakarta. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 3(1), 25–31. https://sej.umsida.ac.id/index.php/sej/article/download/1599/1801.
Ratheeswari, K. (2018). Information communication technology in education. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 3(1), 45–47. https://doi.org/10.21839/jaar.2018.v3S1.169.
Rukiyati Sugiyo, & L. Andriani Purwastuti. (2017). Local Wisdom-Based Character Education Model in Elementary School in Bantul Yogyakarta Indonesia. Sino-US English Teaching, 14(5), 299–308. https://doi.org/10.17265/1539-8072/2017.05.003.
Sari, R. T., & Angreni, S. (2018). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Project Based Learning (PjBL) Upaya Peningkatan Kreativitas Mahasiswa. Jurnal VARIDIKA, 30(1), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.23917/varidika.v30i1.6548.
Sefriani, R., & Sepriana, R. (2022). Technology Acceptance Model : the use of E-Study Aplications in. Journal of Education Technology, 6(4), 704–710. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i4.45457.
Shaalan, K. (2018). Investigating students’ acceptance of E-learning system in Higher Educational Environments in the UAE: Applying the Extended Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) حول دراسة اإللكتروني التعلم لنظام الطلبة قبول في العالي التعليم بيئات ضمن. The British University in Dubai, September.
Slough, S. W., & Milam, J. O. (2013). Theoretical framework for the design of STEM project-based learning. STEM Project-Based Learning an Integrated Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) Approach, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-143-6_3.
Sulasmi, E. (2022). Primary School Teachers’ Digital Literacy: An Analysis On Teachers’ Skills In Using Technological Devices. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(2), 140–145. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i2.81.
Surtikanti, H. K., Syulasmi, A., & Ramdhani, N. (2017). Traditional Knowledge of Local Wisdom of Ammatoa Kajang Tribe (South Sulawesi) about Environmental Conservation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 895(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012122.
Tabroni, I., Irpani, A., Ahmadiah, D., R., A. A., Sulaiman, G., & Ichsan. (2021). Implementation and Strengthening of The Schools Pasca The Covid-19 Pancemic. Multicultural Education, 8(1), 16–31. https://doi.org/https://www.mccaddogap.com/ojs/index.php/me/article/view/15.
Taufiq, M., Ghani, A., Hamzah, M., Ramli, S., Ab, W., Daud, A. W., Rijal, T., Romli, M., Najihah, N., & Mokhtar, M. (2019). a Questionnaire-Based Approach on Technology Acceptance Model for Mobile Digital Game-Based Learning. Journal of Global Business and Social Entrepreneurship (GBSE), 5(14), 24621714. http://www.gbse.my/V5 NO.14 (MARCH 2019)/Paper-199-.pdf.
Tise, J. C., Hernandez, P. R., & Wesley Schultz, P. (2023). Mentoring underrepresented students for success: Self-regulated learning strategies as a critical link between mentor support and educational attainment. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 75(October), 102233.1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102233.
Tytler, R., & Prain, V. (2022). Interdisciplinary mathematics and science - a guided inquiry approach to enhance student learning. Teaching Science, 68(1), 31–43. https://doi.org/10.3316/informit.362070229925660.
Vaportzis, E., Giatsi Clausen, M., & Gow, A. J. (2017). Older adults perceptions of technology and barriers to interacting with tablet computers: a focus group study. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1687. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01687.
Vartiainen, H., Pöllänen, S., & Liljeström, A. (2016). Designing Connected Learning: Emerging learning systems in a craft teacher education course. Design And, 21(2), 32–40. https://ojs.lboro.ac.uk/DATE/article/download/2115/2281.
Wahyuni, S., Indrawati, I., Sudarti, S., & Suana, W. (2017). Developing science process skills and problem-solving abilities based on outdoor learning in junior high school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 6(1), 165–169. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v6i1.6849.
Wanchana, Y., Inprom, P., Rawang, W., & Ayudhya, A. J. N. (2020). Environmental Education Competency: Enhancing the Work of Teachers. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(2), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0021.
Wijayanti, D., & Pratomo, W. (2019). Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Model Pembelajaran Kreatif Bagi Siswa Sekolah Dasar (Studi Di Sdn Mendungan 2 Yogyakarta). Taman Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Ke-SD-An, 3(1), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.30738/tc.v3i1.4291.
Wu, J., & Chen, D. T. V. (2020). A systematic review of educational digital storytelling. Computers and Education, 147(December 2019), 103786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103786.
Xu, Z., & Shi, Y. (2018). Application of Constructivist Theory in Flipped Classroom — Take College English Teaching as a Case Study. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 8(7), 880. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0807.21.
Yamin, Y., Permanasari, A., Redjeki, S., & Sopandi, W. (2020). Implementing project-based learning to enhance creative thinking skills on water pollution topic. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 6(2), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v6i2.12202.
Zen, Z., Reflianto, Syamsuar, & Ariani, F. (2022). Academic Achievement: The Effect of Project-based Online Learning Method and Student Engagement. Heliyon, 8(11), e11509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11509.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 I Made Citra Wibawa, I Wayan Widiana, Nyoman Jampel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with the Jurnal EDUTECH Undiksha agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
