AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMATICAL ERRORS COMMITTED BY THE SECOND GRADE STUDENTS OF SMPK 2 HARAPAN IN WRITING DESCRIPTIVE TEXTS IN ACADEMIC YEAR 2017/2018
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v5i2.12112Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menyelidiki jenis-jenis kesalahan tata bahasa yang dilakukan oleh siswa-siswi kelas dua SMPK 2 Harapan dalam menulis teks deskriptif pada tahun akademik 2017/2018. Penelitian ini juga mendeskripsikan sumber-sumber kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh siswa-siswi. Subyek penelitian ini adalah 39 siswa-siswi kelas 8B. Tulisan siswa-siswi dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori Azar dalam mengklasifikasikan jenis-jenis kesalahan tata bahasa yang dilakukan oleh siswa-siswi. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa terdapat 12 jenis kesalahan yang dilakukan oleh siswa-siswi. Kesalahan-kesalahan tersebut meliputi ejaan (3.80%), pemilihan kata (4.60%), kata sambung (2.40%), tunggal-jamak (10.62%), kata kerja subjek (26.25%), susunan kata (4.80%), bentuk kata kerja (7,81% ), kata ganti (22,24%), preposisi (6.41%), artikel (5.61%), penghilangan kata (4.20%), dan tanda baca (2.60%). Jumlah kesalahan tatabahasa dalam teks deskriptif adalah 499 kesalahan. Dari segi sumber-sumber kesalahan, sumber-sumber kesalahan dianalisis dengan menggunakan teori Brown. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa kesalahan yang paling umum berasal dari kesalahan intralingual transfer (26.44%) dan kesalahan yang paling sedikit berasal dari konteks pembelajaran (22.76%). Dari perhitungan kuisioner didapat 949 kesalahan. Oleh karena itu, dapat disimpulkan bahwa siswa kelas dua SMPK 2 Harapan masih banyak melakukan kesalahan dari pengembangan bahasa kedua ke sistem linguistik.Kata Kunci : Teks descriptif, kesalahan tata bahasa, menulis
This study aimed at investigating the kinds of grammatical errors committed by the second grade students of SMPK 2 Harapan in writing descriptive texts in academic year 2017/2018. This study also described the sources of errors committed by the students. The subjects of this study were 39 students of class 8B. The students’ writings were analyzed by using Azar theory in classifying the kinds of grammatical errors committed by the students. The result of this study indicated that there were 12 types of errors committed by the students. Those errors were spelling (3.80%), diction (4.60%), conjunction (2.40%), singular-plural (10.62%), subject-verb agreement (26.25%), word order (4.80%), verb form (7.81%), pronoun (22.24%), preposition (6.41%), article (5.61%), omit a word (4.20%), and punctuation (2.60%). The total number of grammatical errors in descriptive texts was 499 errors. In terms of sources of errors, the sources of errors were analyzed by using Brown theory. The result of this study indicated that the most common errors came from intralingual transfer sources (26.44%) and the least common errors came from context of learning sources (22.76%). From the result of the questionnaire was 949 errors. Therefore, it can be concluded that the second grade students of SMPK 2 Harapan still committed lots of errors from L2 linguistic development.
keyword : Descriptive text, grammatical errors, writing.
Published
2017-10-24
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)
