The effectiveness of teacher and peer feedback techniques toward the writing achievement of the eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Gianyar
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.23887/jpbi.v5i2.12156Abstract
Feedback guru dan feedback teman sebaya berdasarkan penelitian sebelumnya merupakan teknik yang efektif untuk pembelajaran menulis kepada siswa EFL. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memverifikasi keefektifan dari kedua teknik tersebut terhadap prestasi menulis dari siswa kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Gianyar tahun akademik 2017/2018. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif dan kuantitatif. Sampel ditentukan menggunakan teknik cluster random sampling, dimana dua kelas dipilih sebagai sampel dari penelitian. Melalui lotre, kelas XI MIPA 6 dan kelas XI MIPA 7 sebagai sampel dari penelitian ini. Instrumen yang digunakan untuk mengambil data adalah test siswa (post-test) dan di bantu dengan rubrik penilaian menulis, tulisan siswa selama proses pengambilan data dan dibantu oleh rubric menulis. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa feedback guru berkontribusi presentase lebih besar pada aspek ide, sedangkan feedback teman sebaya pada aspek mekanik. Kedua feedback tersebut juga berkontribusi positif pada grammar dan pilihan kata Data dianalisis secara deskriptif dengan bantuan SPSS 21.00 untuk Windows. Hasil dari analisis deskriptif menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata dari grup eksperimental adalah 85.46 dan nilai rata rata untuk grup control adalah 82.51. Berarti bahwa nilai rata-rata dari grup eksperimental lebih baik daripada grup control. Jadi, dapat disimpulkan bahwa feedback teman sebaya lebih efektif dari feedback guru.Kata Kunci : feedback guru, feedback teman sebaya, prestasi menulis
Teacher and peer feedback based on the previous studies are effective techniques for teaching writing to ELF students. This study aimed to verify the effectiveness of both techniques toward the writing achievement of eleventh grade students of SMA Negeri 1 Gianyar in the academic year 2017/2018. This study was descriptive quantitative and qualitative research. The samples were determined by using cluster random sampling technique, whereby two classes were selected as the samples. Through the lottery, the class of XI MIPA 6 and XI MIPA 7 were chosen as the sample of the study. The instruments used to collect the data were student’s post-test completed with a writing rubric, students writing during the treatment assessed by writing rubric. The result indicated that the teacher feedback contributes higher percentage to the idea aspect, while peer feedback to mechanics aspect. Yet, both feedbacks also contribute positively on organization and diction aspects. Additionally, the data were analyzed descriptively with the help of SPSS 21.00 for Windows The result of descriptive statistical analysis shows that the mean score of the experimental group was 85.46 while the mean score of the control group was 82.51. It means that the experimental group was better than the control group in terms of their writing achievement. So, it can be concluded that peer feedback was more effective than teacher feedback.
keyword : teacher feedback, peer feedback, writing achievement
Published
2017-10-25
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Authors who publish with the Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Undiksha agree to the following terms:- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. (See The Effect of Open Access)